Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 20 Jan 2021 (v1), last revised 29 Sep 2021 (this version, v2)]
Title:Dictionary-Sparse Recovery From Heavy-Tailed Measurements
View PDFAbstract:The recovery of signals that are sparse not in a basis, but rather sparse with respect to an over-complete dictionary is one of the most flexible settings in the field of compressed sensing with numerous applications. As in the standard compressed sensing setting, it is possible that the signal can be reconstructed efficiently from few, linear measurements, for example by the so-called $\ell_1$-synthesis method.
However, it has been less well-understood which measurement matrices provably work for this setting. Whereas in the standard setting, it has been shown that even certain heavy-tailed measurement matrices can be used in the same sample complexity regime as Gaussian matrices, comparable results are only available for the restrictive class of sub-Gaussian measurement vectors as far as the recovery of dictionary-sparse signals via $\ell_1$-synthesis is concerned.
In this work, we fill this gap and establish optimal guarantees for the recovery of vectors that are (approximately) sparse with respect to a dictionary via the $\ell_1$-synthesis method from linear, potentially noisy measurements for a large class of random measurement matrices. In particular, we show that random measurements that fulfill only a small-ball assumption and a weak moment assumption, such as random vectors with i.i.d. Student-$t$ entries with a logarithmic number of degrees of freedom, lead to comparable guarantees as (sub-)Gaussian measurements.
As a technical tool, we show a bound on the expectation of the sum of squared order statistics under very general assumptions, which might be of independent interest.
As a corollary of our results, we also obtain a slight improvement on the weakest assumption on a measurement matrix with i.i.d. rows sufficient for uniform recovery in standard compressed sensing, improving on results by Lecué and Mendelson and Dirksen, Lecué and Rauhut.
Submission history
From: Christian Kümmerle [view email][v1] Wed, 20 Jan 2021 19:51:00 UTC (43 KB)
[v2] Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:17:13 UTC (34 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.IT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.