[go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Dual-View Single-Shot Multibox Detector at Urban Intersections: Settings and Performance Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Camera- and Viewpoint-Agnostic Evaluation of Axial Postural Abnormalities in People with Parkinson’s Disease through Augmented Human Pose Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Low-Computing-Complexity Touch Signal Detection Method and Analog Front-End Circuits Based on Cross-Correlation Technology for Large-Size Touch Panel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 6
10.3390/s23063194
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Survey on Current-Mode Interfaces for Bio Signals and Sensors

by
Massimo Scarsella
,
Gianluca Barile
*,
Vincenzo Stornelli
,
Leila Safari
and
Giuseppe Ferri
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(6), 3194; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063194
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Circuits and Systems for Smart Sensors)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Second generation current conveyor: (<b>a</b>) circuit symbol, (<b>b</b>) ideal equivalent circuit.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Real second-generation current conveyor.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Second generation voltage conveyor: (<b>a</b>) circuit symbol, (<b>b</b>) equivalent circuit.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Real second-generation voltage conveyor.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Basic CCII applications: (<b>a</b>) voltage amplifier; (<b>b</b>) current amplifier; (<b>c</b>) V-I converter; (<b>d</b>) I-V converter; (<b>e</b>) voltage differentiator; (<b>f</b>) voltage integrator; (<b>g</b>) current differentiator; (<b>h</b>) current integrator; (<b>i</b>) differential voltage amplifier.</p> "> Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Basic CCII applications: (<b>a</b>) voltage amplifier; (<b>b</b>) current amplifier; (<b>c</b>) V-I converter; (<b>d</b>) I-V converter; (<b>e</b>) voltage differentiator; (<b>f</b>) voltage integrator; (<b>g</b>) current differentiator; (<b>h</b>) current integrator; (<b>i</b>) differential voltage amplifier.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Basic VCII applications: (<b>a</b>) voltage amplifier; (<b>b</b>) current amplifier; (<b>c</b>) V-I converter; (<b>d</b>) I-V converter; (<b>e</b>) voltage differentiator; (<b>f</b>) voltage integrator; (<b>g</b>) current differentiator; (<b>h</b>) current integrator; (<b>i</b>) differential voltage amplifier.</p> "> Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Basic VCII applications: (<b>a</b>) voltage amplifier; (<b>b</b>) current amplifier; (<b>c</b>) V-I converter; (<b>d</b>) I-V converter; (<b>e</b>) voltage differentiator; (<b>f</b>) voltage integrator; (<b>g</b>) current differentiator; (<b>h</b>) current integrator; (<b>i</b>) differential voltage amplifier.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Traditional interfaces for resistive sensors. (<b>a</b>) Resistive voltage divider; (<b>b</b>) resistive Wheatstone bridge.</p> "> Figure 8
<p>Traditional interfaces for capacitive sensors. (<b>a</b>) Capacitive voltage divider; (<b>b</b>) capacitive Wheatstone bridge. Here, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> denote AC amplitude values.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>Two different CCII-based proposed interfaces using a square-wave generator for resistive and capacitive sensors: (<b>a</b>) the square-wave generator proposed in [<a href="#B53-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">53</a>]; (<b>b</b>) the square-wave generator proposed in [<a href="#B84-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; (<b>c</b>) the sine-wave oscillator proposed in [<a href="#B34-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p> "> Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Two different CCII-based proposed interfaces using a square-wave generator for resistive and capacitive sensors: (<b>a</b>) the square-wave generator proposed in [<a href="#B53-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">53</a>]; (<b>b</b>) the square-wave generator proposed in [<a href="#B84-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; (<b>c</b>) the sine-wave oscillator proposed in [<a href="#B34-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p> "> Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) The concept of a current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (<b>b</b>) CCII-based current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (<b>c</b>) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a couple of resistive sensors in differential operation; (<b>d</b>) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a single resistive sensor.</p> "> Figure 10 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) The concept of a current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (<b>b</b>) CCII-based current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (<b>c</b>) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a couple of resistive sensors in differential operation; (<b>d</b>) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a single resistive sensor.</p> "> Figure 11
<p>Two different current-mode interfaces for differential capacitive sensors: (<b>a</b>) is the CCII-based circuit proposed in [<a href="#B51-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">51</a>]; (<b>b</b>) is the VCII-based circuit proposed in [<a href="#B52-sensors-23-03194" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p> "> Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of ISFET and MOSFET; (<b>b</b>) standard differential current-mode approach.</p> "> Figure 13
<p>VCII-based interface circuits for (<b>a</b>) a single SiPM and (<b>b</b>) an array of SiPMs.</p> "> Figure 14
<p>Equivalent circuit of a piezoelectric transducer in reception. The current <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>I</mi> </semantics></math> is the derivative of the charge that develops in response to an applied force.</p> "> Figure 15
<p>VCII-based second-order low-pass and bandpass filter.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, a review of second-generation voltage conveyor (VCII) and current conveyor (CCII) circuits for the conditioning of bio signals and sensors is presented. The CCII is the most known current-mode active block, able to overcome some of the limitations of the classical operational amplifier, which provides an output current instead of a voltage. The VCII is nothing more than the dual of the CCII, and for this reason it enjoys almost all the properties of the CCII but also provides an easy-to-read voltage as an output signal. A broad set of solutions for relevant sensors and biosensors employed in biomedical applications is considered. This ranges from the widespread resistive and capacitive electrochemical biosensors now used in glucose and cholesterol meters and in oximetry to more specific sensors such as ISFETs, SiPMs, and ultrasonic sensors, which are finding increasing applications. This paper also discusses the main benefits of this current-mode approach over the classical voltage-mode approach in the realization of readout circuits that can be used as electronic interfaces for different types of biosensors, including higher circuit simplicity, better low-noise and/or high-speed performance, and lower signal distortion and power consumption.

1. Introduction

The great success of electronics in many medical and biology-related fields (and not only those) is due to the need for measuring quantities and parameters of biological interest, which is satisfied by the availability of a broad range of existing biosensors. Just as examples, they are used in glucose, cholesterol, pressure, and oxygen level measurements from blood, saliva, or other sources with cheap and commercially available electronics instrumentation, in the detection of the acidity of an aqueous solution, or in quality control processes for the food industry [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, to fully exploit all the great opportunities offered by modern electronic systems, such as the possibility of integrating biosensors and electronics circuits together in an extremely compact system-on-chip, it is necessary to develop conditioning circuits for the detection of bio-signals that enjoy the best possible performances. These conditioning circuits usually represent the interface of the external world with electronics, and are the first and most critical stage of a more complex signal processing system. For example, it might be desirable to make a sensor “smart” by interfacing it with a digital acquisition system through a suitable analog interface. The performance of this electronic interface also affects the operation and overall characteristics of the sensor system. Typical performance requirements are high sensitivity, low-noise operation, wide dynamic range, high-speed performance, low-voltage and/or low power operation, ease of integration on the chip, simplicity of construction, low distortion levels, input–output linearity, etc. As is easy to imagine, the number of possible characteristics can be so great that it is practically impossible to satisfy all of them. For these reasons, the designer usually must make choices considering suitable trade-offs. The classical approach to the realization of simple and reliable electronic interfaces for sensors concerns the use of well-known voltage-mode analog circuits, namely the operational amplifier, which can be employed together with a few additional components to realize readout circuits for the most commonly used and diffused sensors. In this sense, the literature on such voltage mode interfaces is large and detailed [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Thanks to this approach, which has eventually become the standard due to the large availability of cheap operational amplifiers, the interfacing of most of the existing sensors with electronics has been possible. As examples, voltage-mode solutions for wide-range resistive sensors are reported in [26,27,28]; in [19,20], techniques for the readout of capacitive ones are described; in [18] an interface circuit is applied to an ISFET; and in [22] an interface for pressure sensors is shown. Even if this approach is successful in many cases, the current-mode techniques have shown that there are situations where the operational amplifier is not the best active block to be used because some of its performances are worse than those offered by the most common current-mode active elements. The main current-mode analog blocks are the second-generation current conveyor (CCII) and its dual, the second-generation voltage conveyor (VCII). These blocks have been successfully applied to the realization of a variety of analog signal processing functions [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. For example, in [31] a current-mode full-wave bridge rectifier has been developed; in [32,40,42] the realization of various filter functions using VCII is shown; and in [33,53] current-mode oscillators are described. It has been shown that the current mode approach has advantages in terms of larger gain-bandwidth products, high-speed operation, low-noise performance, a higher dynamic range, and simplicity of implementation. Moreover, several papers show that the current-mode approach usually requires a lower number of additional components to realize the interface. An example is given in [34], which shows that the minimum number of components to realize an RC sinusoidal oscillator is significantly lower if VCII is used as an active block instead of an operational amplifier. On the other hand, a suitable internal design, at transistor level, is mandatory to reduce the effect of parasitic components, as discussed in [37,54]. For these reasons, the presented work aims to give a review of some of the proposed solutions using these active blocks, the CCII and the VCII, providing a comparison between these circuits and the traditional solutions that use the voltage-mode approach so as to highlight the main benefits of the current-mode approach. However, our discussion is general, and we also make some considerations between the CCII and VCII solutions. The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we show the main properties and characteristics of the two main current-mode active blocks used for sensor interfaces; in Section 3 some interfaces that employ these active elements are shown; and in Section 4, comparisons and future prospects are presented. Finally, conclusions are drawn.

2. Current Mode Active Blocks for Signal Processing

In this section, we briefly present the two main current-mode active blocks used for the analog processing of signals, namely the second-generation current and voltage conveyors called, respectively, CCII and VCII, which have been successfully applied to the realization of electronic interfaces for bioelectrical sensors and signals [17,18,45,55,55,56,57]. Other current-mode active circuits exist [33,36,40,45,49,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], but they will not be considered because they are less known and available and/or their application in biomedical sensor conditioning is not efficient.

2.1. Second-Generation Current Conveyor (CCII)

An ideal second-generation current conveyor (CCII) is the 3-port (X, Y, Z) and 4-terminal (including ground) active analog block shown in Figure 1, together with its internal equivalent circuit.
An ideal CCII behaves as a voltage buffer from Y to X and as a current buffer from X to Z, so its ideal current-voltage relationships are:
i Y v X i Z = 0 0 0 α 0 0 0 ± β 0 v Y i X v Z
where α and β are unitary gains. Depending on whether it is i Z = + i X or i Z = − i X , we distinguish between CCII+ and CCII−, respectively. From the above discussion, Y is a high impedance (ideally infinite) voltage input port; X is a low impedance (ideally zero) current input and voltage output port; and Z is a high impedance (ideally infinite) current output port. However, if a practical implementation of a current conveyor must be used rather than an ideal one, the designer must consider real values for the port impedances and non-unitary gains.
Figure 2 shows the typical nature of the port impedances and represents a more complete circuit of a real CCII. Equivalent impedances at Y and Z ports are typically of the parallel RC type, while X impedance is of the RLC type, as shown in Figure 2. In most cases, r Y is sufficiently high to be considered negligible. Moreover, other non-ideal effects not discussed here, such as offsets and nonlinearities, have modest entities in most applications, so they can be neglected.
Practical implementations at the transistor level of real CCIIs are reported in [47,71,72]. In [71], a CCII with a rail-to-rail input/output dynamic range is presented, while in [72] the applicability of the concept of adaptive biasing to the CCII is proved. A study of these implementations should clarify the general form of the port impedances in Figure 2. A commercial IC that can be configured as a CCII is the AD844 (fabricated by Analog Devices), which has been used to realize several discrete-component prototypes of CCII circuits. Moreover, we should mention that many generalizations of the CCII as a circuit block have been proposed in the literature [59,60,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], obtained, for example, when considering differential inputs and outputs or non-unitary or controllable gains, but they have had lower success than the classical CCII illustrated here.

2.2. Second-Generation Voltage Conveyor

An ideal second-generation voltage conveyor is nothing more than the dual active circuit block of the CCII [44]. This block is finding increasing applications as an alternative to the well-known voltage-mode circuit and the CCII itself [32,34,35,36,37,38,39,41,43,52,56]. As for the CCII, the information in a VCII is carried both by currents and voltages, but the VCII is equipped with both an input and an output voltage port. This represents one of the main advantages with respect to the CCII, because voltage measurements are generally easier. Other advantages are larger gain-bandwidth products, high-speed operation, low-noise performance, a higher dynamic range, and the simplicity of implementation [44]. Since a VCII is the dual circuit of a CCII, a dual analysis of that illustrated for the CCII can be applied to the VCII.
Figure 3 depicts the symbol and the equivalent circuit of the VCII and shows that an ideal second-generation voltage conveyor behaves as a current buffer from Y to X and as a voltage buffer from X to Z. Y is a low impedance (ideally zero) current input port; X is a high impedance (ideally infinite) voltage input and current output port; and Z is a low impedance (ideally zero) voltage output port. The ideal voltage–current relationships of a VCII are the following:
i X v Y v Z = 0 ± β 0 0 0 0 α 0 0 v Y i X v Z
where, again, α and β are unitary gains and, depending on whether it is i X = + i Y or i X = − i Y , we distinguish between VCII+ and VCII−, respectively. A simple practical implementation at transistor level of a VCII can be found in [73], while more advanced architectures proposed are a low-voltage, high-drive VCII that permits high current drive capability at the X port [74] and rail-to-rail VCIIs, presented in [54,75]. As for the CCII, all these practical implementations of the VCII suffer from non-ideal values of the port impedances and non-unitary gains. Figure 4 shows the typical nature of the various port impedances and represents a more complete circuit of a real VCII. Taking into consideration the duality between CCII and VCII, Y and Z port impedance are of the RLC type, while X impedance is of the RC type, as shown in Figure 4. As for the CCII, the commercial AD844 from analog devices can also be configured as a VCII and used for the implementation of discrete-component circuits.
Finally, we should note that, as for the CCII, some generalizations of the VCII with differential inputs and outputs or non-unitary controllable gain have been proposed [36,39], albeit to a more limited extent with respect to the CCII. This represents a research topic in current-mode processing.

2.3. Basic CCII and VCII Configurations

Using VCII or CCII, it is possible to realize common analog signal processing circuits. Depending on the specific application, we find that VCII and CCII are very useful blocks in configurations where classical operational amplifiers are limited, notably in those that require operation on current signals such as current differentiation and integration [44]. Moreover, even in those applications where op-amps provide well-established solutions, CCII and VCII can perform the same tasks but with some important advantages such as higher bandwidth, speed, dynamic range, and lower consumption. The bandwidth improvement is due to the fact that, unlike in voltage mode circuits, where the constant gain-bandwidth product (GBW) represents the main trade-off that limits the obtainable bandwidth, in CCII and VCII this limitation is overcome through the concepts of voltage and current conveying. Since current conveying means unitary gains, the bandwidth is maximized to the GBW value for the current buffer and voltage buffer stages of a CCII or VCII, but at the same time, the availability of a current input or output terminal allows for signal amplification, as shown in the following. Moreover, the current terminal provides even more flexibility than that offered by op-amps, since it makes it easier to perform any current-to-voltage conversion or vice versa. As for the dynamic range improvements, this is because, using current as an information-bearing signal, it is possible to allow high signal swings even with low supply voltages. Finally, as discussed in the following sections, there are many situations where sensors provide a current signal, and the current mode approach is, therefore, more suitable. For these reasons, a brief summary of the basic applications of CCII and VCII is reported in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively, which show the most basic circuits commonly used in the conditioning of signals together with standard circuit analysis to explain their operation [44]. In particular, Figure 5a–i show a CCII-based voltage amplifier, current amplifier, transconductance amplifier, transimpedance amplifier, voltage differentiator, voltage integrator, current differentiator, current integrator, and differential voltage amplifier, respectively. Similarly, Figure 6a–i show a VCII-based voltage amplifier, current amplifier, transconductance amplifier, transimpedance amplifier, voltage differentiator, voltage integrator, current differentiator, current integrator, and differential voltage amplifier. A comprehension of such circuits sets the stage for the study of more advanced circuits such as the interfaces presented in the following, and should, hence, prove useful. Other applications not reported here obviously exist and include, for example, oscillators [34], filters [42], and impedance-simulation circuits [36,59].

3. Current-Mode Sensor Interfaces for Bioelectrical Signal Conditioning

A transducer is defined as a physical system able to convert a signal from one physical domain to another. Since signal processing is usually most conveniently performed by electronic systems, the output domain is typically the electrical one and in this case, the transducer is defined as a “sensor”. A biosensor is a biologically sensitive device combined with a physical-chemical transducer. A good overview of different biosensors is reported in [76], where biosensor types are classified into electrochemical, optical, thermal, electronic, and gravimetric biosensors, according to the physical–chemical transducer operating principle. As discussed, electrochemical sensors are the most widely investigated and used because they produce signals in terms of voltages, currents, and impedances that are easy to process and measure using electronics systems. A subset of electrochemical sensors is represented by molecular sensors, which can perform molecular recognition in solutions, blood, air, etc. [77]. At the same time, optical biosensors are finding increasing applications because they provide a non-invasive way to measure the same quantities [76,78,79,80,81] and ease in converting optical signals into electrical form. Common examples of electrochemical and optical biosensors are employed in glucose meters, cholesterol meters, and oximetry, which represent commercial, daily-life applications of biosensors. Since the performances of the biosensor are critically affected by the read-out electronic circuit, particular attention must be paid to the choice of the read-out circuit, and the research in current-mode circuits demonstrates the benefits and advantages of this approach to signal conditioning systems [43,52,55,56,72]. For these reasons, in this section we present a review of different current-mode based interfaces suitable for bioelectrical signal conditioning and processing.

3.1. Current-Mode Interfaces for Capacitive/Resistive Sensors

A subset of the class of electrochemical biosensors is represented by capacitive and resistive sensors, which are particular types of electrochemical sensors and constitute a large part of the most common biosensors [75]. In a resistive or capacitive biosensor, the variations of the biological parameter to be measured are converted into impedance variations, in particular resistance or capacitance variations, respectively. An example of a resistive biosensor is represented by blood, whose electrical impedance varies depending on its glucose level [82], while capacitive biosensors have been successfully applied to the detection of proteins, nucleotides, heavy metals, saccharides, small organic molecules, and microbial cells [83]. To maintain circuit simplicity and, hence, the ease of on-chip integration, the traditional voltage approach for the conditioning of such types of sensors consists of inserting them into a simple voltage divider or a Wheatstone bridge that modifies its behavior depending on the measured values, as in Figure 7 and Figure 8. As shown, the divider or bridge may be resistive DC-excited or capacitive AC-excited depending on the sensor’s nature. Although these circuits have proven their potential in implementing cheap and area-saving readout circuits, they suffer from an important limitation that resides in their steady-state (DC or AC) non-linear input–output characteristics. The main implication of this nonlinear behavior is that such circuits cannot be used for large sensor variation since, in each case, circuit output saturates at a fixed supply voltage if sensor impedance ( R s e n s or 1 / ω C s e n s ) becomes higher than the baseline value ( R or 1 / ω C , respectively). The sensitivity of an interface circuit is the ratio of the output voltage variation to the sensor resistance or capacitance variation with respect to the baseline value. If the sensor resistance or capacitance varies from its baseline, we may write, respectively:
R s e n s = R + Δ R = R 1 + Δ R R = R 1 + δ R
C s e n s = C + Δ C = C 1 + Δ C C = C 1 + δ C
where δ R and δ C denote Δ R / R and Δ C / C , respectively. The output voltage change in response to such sensor variation for Figure 7a,b and Figure 8a,b, is given by, respectively:
V o u t = V D C R 1 + δ R R + R 1 + δ R = V D C 1 + δ R 2 + δ R
V o u t = V D C 1 2 − 1 2 + δ R = V D C 2 δ R 2 + δ R
V o u t = V a c C − 1 1 + δ C − 1 C − 1 1 + δ C − 1 + C − 1 = V a c 1 2 + δ C
V o u t = V a c 1 2 − C − 1 C − 1 + C − 1 1 + δ C − 1 = V a c 1 2 − 1 + δ C 2 + δ C
Hence, the sensitivities are obtained as the following derivatives:
d V o u t d δ R = V D C 1 2 + δ R 2 ≈ V D C 4
d V o u t d δ R = V D C 1 2 + δ R 2 ≈ V D C 4
d V o u t d δ C = − V a c 1 2 + δ C 2 ≈ − V a c 4
d V o u t d δ C = − V a c 1 2 + δ C 2 ≈ − V a c 4
The last approximation in (9)–(12) is justified only in the case of a small sensor impedance change with respect to the baseline value, namely if δ R < < 1 or δ C < < 1 . The above equations clearly show that, in all the circuits of Figure 7 and Figure 8, the absolute value of the sensitivity for a small signal is a quarter of the amplitude of the DC or AC stimulus applied. Moreover, as anticipated before, the equations also show that, for high range variation (i.e., δ R ≫ 1 or δ C ≫ 1 ), the small-signal sensitivities tend to be very small values as the circuit operations enter into a strongly non-linear compression zone. The sensitivity values may be increased by employing, at the output, a single-input, single-output voltage amplifier for cases Figure 7a and Figure 8a, such as those in Figure 5a or Figure 6a. A similar statement applies to the Wheatstone bridge cases Figure 7b and Figure 8b, using a differential voltage amplifier such as the one in Figure 5i or Figure 6i. The increase in the sensitivity value is given by the gain A of the amplifier.
A simple way to overcome this limitation in the detection of high-variation capacitive or resistive signals is to perform an impedance-to-period conversion, for example by inserting the sensor in a square-wave or generator circuit as an astable multivibrator or in a sine-wave oscillator. Some current-mode architectures have been proposed in this sense. Another interface (exclusive to the current-mode approach) will be discussed in the next subsection, namely the current-mode Wheatstone bridge (CMWB) with intrinsic linearity.
Figure 9a,b show two examples of CCII-based interfaces performing an impedance-to-period conversion for their operation with large sensor variation [53,84].
In contrast to previously proposed voltage-mode solutions, these circuits enjoy the advantages of current-mode processing, such as better performance in terms of high-frequency operation. The circuit shown in Figure 9a makes use of just one CCII configured as a Schmitt trigger and capacitor [53]. The period T for an ideal CCII in this case can be approximated by
T = 2 C R 3 1 + R 2 R 1 + 2 R 1 R 1 + R 3
It is shown that the circuit approximately maintains this linear C-T relationship and shows relative errors below 10% for capacitance values from 100 pF to 10 uF. The solution proposed in Figure 9b [84] makes use of a current differentiation instead of voltage integration, allowing the estimation of the resistance or capacitance of the sensor while neglecting the effects of both CCII voltage node saturations and internal parasitic components, as follows:
T = 2 C R 2 + R 3 ln 2 R 2 R 3 R 6 − R 1 R 4 R 2 + R 3 R 1 R 4 R 2 + R 3
According to (13), the period T is linear with respect to C (but not to resistances). For a resistive sensor, typical choices are to replace R 2 or R 3 with the sensor because this allows the optimization of the circuit to obtain good linearity. The results show a good agreement between the theoretical and measured periods for a wide range of capacitive values from 10 pF to 10 nF. In both cases Figure 9a,b, the circuits have been experimentally tested using the commercial AD844 from Analog Device, but in [53] simulation results are obtained with a CCII designed at transistor level using the AMS 0.35 um CMOS technology.
Concerning the VCII, Figure 9c shows a possible solution that performs an impedance-to-period conversion [34]. The circuit is the minimal component configuration for a sine-wave oscillator, provided that the sine-wave oscillation condition given by
R 1 R 2 + C 2 C 1 = 1
is satisfied, and the oscillating frequency in such case is
f 0 = 1 T = 1 2 π R 1 R 2 C 1 C 2   .
Although the oscillating condition cannot be strictly satisfied if the biosensor replaces just one of the resistances or capacitances in Figure 9c, the circuit still proves useful in this application since it can be shown that, when implemented with a real VCII circuit such as an AD844, it continues to oscillate even when the oscillating condition is released to
R 1 R 2 + C 2 C 1 ≤ 1
although this implies higher total harmonic distortion (THD) values of the output waveform that tend to be more “squared”, and a higher frequency estimation error using Equation (16). The condition (17) is required to ensure that the poles of the circuit transfer function remain on the right side of the complex plane.

3.2. Current-Mode Interfaces for Differential Resistive Sensors

To overcome the problems related to oscillator-based interfaces, the recently proposed current-mode Wheatstone bridge in Figure 10a can be used. With respect to the conventional voltage-mode Wheatstone bridge consisting of four resistances, the current-mode Wheatstone bridge [85] has a smaller number of resistors and employs a current instead of a voltage as exciting input, allowing the produced signals to be processed with current-mode active blocks, which enjoy better performances in terms of high-frequency operation. This idea may be applied both to the CCII and VCII cases. For the CCII case [86], the circuit is quite simple and exploits the current inputs of a couple of CCIIs to reduce the complexity of the circuit and take advantage of the high-speed properties of the CCII (Figure 10b). This simple topology may be used to realize a basic interface for a broad range of resistive and differential resistive sensors. As for the VCII, a solution with intrinsic linearity based on the current mode Wheatstone bridge has been developed and applied to resistive sensors [50]. Two topologies are proposed, depending on whether a couple of resistive sensors in differential operation (Figure 10c) or a single resistive sensor (Figure 10d) is used. Both the topologies use VCIIs as active blocks to obtain an easy-to-read voltage output signal that is linearly related to the resistance variations, as given by the following relations (for the cases in Figure 10c,d, respectively).
V o u t ≈ ± Δ R R 0 α 1 R 3 I r e f
V o u t ≈ ± Δ R R 0 α 2 β 2 R 3 I r e f
Equations (18) and (19) also show that the gain can be easily regulated by varying R 3 . The same concept has previously been applied to other current-mode blocks (as the operational floating current conveyors, or OFCC, not discussed here), resulting in circuits that show similar properties in terms of linearity and can be used in situations where a current output instead of a voltage is acceptable. Finally, we should note that even if different circuits have been proposed based on the current-mode Wheatstone bridge, the literature lacks experimental results that show the practical application of such circuits to real sensors.

3.3. Current-Mode Interfaces for Differential Capacitive Sensors

The current-mode Wheatstone bridge has also been applied to differential capacitive sensors, an important subclass of capacitive sensors, for which ad hoc current mode solutions have been designed. A differential capacitive sensor is simply a system of two series capacitances, C 1 and C 2 , that vary with opposite signs with respect to a baseline value as the measurand varies (as the sensor resistances in Figure 10c do). Biosensors modelled by a differential capacitor exist [87]. The relationship between the measurand x and the two capacitors for these sensors is simply given by:
x = C 1 − C 2 C 1 + C 2 .
Although all the previously shown solutions for capacitive sensors may be successfully applied to differential capacitive sensors, there are some well-known important reasons why these ad hoc solutions are generally better, primarily the mitigation of unwanted common-mode signals and parasitic effects, as well as temperature compensation. Moreover, by properly using a differential capacitive sensor, it is possible to obtain a doubled sensitivity for the interface circuit by exploiting the fact that the two capacitances vary with opposite variation. The use of current-mode blocks for these sensors is justified once again by all the already mentioned benefits that current-mode processing carries with it (e.g., low-power operation, high-frequency performance, increased dynamic range with low distortion, greater implementation simplicity, etc.). Two of the circuits are reviewed here (Figure 11), one based on CCIIs (Figure 11a) [51] and one on VCIIs (Figure 11b) [52].
As discussed in [51], the operation of the circuit in Figure 11a is as follows: C 1 and C 2 represent the differential capacitive sensor. The first stage of the interface is just a voltage-to-current converter (added to use the circuit with more common AC voltage inputs), which converts the input voltage V i n into a current I 0 . This current ( I 0 ) is then divided into two parts, I 1 and I 2 , proportionally to the occurred capacitive variation, and then the currents are subtracted with a couple of CCII to obtain I o u t = I 1 − I 2 and, hence, the voltage V o u t . Performing all the necessary calculations yields the following input–output relation for the peak-to-peak values:
V o u t . p p x = R L ′ V i n , p p R 1 ′ C 0 C 0 + C 3 x + C 3 C 0 + C 3  
where R L ′ and R 1 ′ are the resistance values, including the parasitic components of the CCIIs. This equation clearly shows that the simple circuit of Figure 11a has an output peak-to-peak voltage proportional to x , an extremely desirable property that indicates that, in voltage mode processing, more complex circuits are generally required, and shows again the potential of current-mode processing. Equation (21) also clarifies the function of C 3 as an offset term that is required to distinguish between positive and negative x values (if C 3 = 0 , the peak-to-peak output voltage has the same values both for negative and positive values).
The analysis now discussed clearly shows two main limitations of the CCII-based circuit, namely that the output is a current signal that requires a load to be converted into a voltage and, more importantly, that the output signal is affected by the internal parasitic capacitance of the sensor C p located between the internal node of the differential capacitive sensor and ground. To overcome these limitations, the VCII solution of Figure 11b [52] can be used since this employs a feedback loop to make the circuit insensitive to stray parameters and does not require a load resistance since the output is on the Z voltage port of a VCII. Its operation is based on exciting the sensor capacitances with a square-wave current signal that is divided into two parts (proportionally to x ), plus a third part that flows through C p . As discussed in [52], this parasitic capacitance causes a loss of sensitivity in any interface that uses the difference of the two currents through C 1 and C 2 in order to evaluate the measurand x. In particular, this can be drastically reduced for small baseline sensors (tens of pF or fewer). The two currents through C 1 , C 2 are, hence, used to produce an error signal due to this current that is integrated and summed back to the input square-wave current to compensate for the effects of C p . At the same time, these currents are also used to obtain an output proportional to their difference, and hence to x . The calculations provide the following simple equation:
V o u t ≈ R g I r e g x .
Results reported show that the full-scale error always remains below 2.5% for a 200 pF baseline linear differential capacitor with |x| ranging from 0 to about 90%, while without compensation the error increases with |x| until a peak of almost 30%. The corresponding voltage-mode circuit for the conditioning of differential capacitive sensors with parasitic capacitance effect compensation is given in [88]. Comparing the VCII-based solution with the voltage-mode one, we find again that the VCII offers a much simpler solution, so we can say that the results of the interfaces in Figure 11 prove the high potential of CCIIs and VCIIs in implementing low-cost, highly accurate, and fully integrable read-out circuitry for differential capacitive sensors.
Until now, we have discussed electronic interfaces for different types of resistive and capacitive sensors. Starting from the next section, we consider some examples of more specific electronic circuits for the conditioning of biosensors that do not belong to these classes.

3.4. A Current-Mode Interface for ISFET Sensors

The concept of current-mode Wheatstone Bridge has also been applied to the conditioning of ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) sensors. As the name suggests, ISFET sensors are FET-based sensors where the current that flows through the FET varies with the ion concentration in a solution, and are frequently used in biological applications as a pH sensor [89]. The physical structure and operation are easy to understand if we compare the ISFET sensor with the well-known MOSFET. As shown in Figure 12a, an ISFET is nothing more than a MOSFET with a remote gate separated from the chip, for which the threshold voltage is linearly related to the pH. Just like a MOSFET, the ISFET can operate in linear or saturation region depending on the DC voltages at its terminals. By biasing the ISFET in the linear region, the current will be linearly related to the threshold voltage and, hence, to the pH, an extremely desirable property. The proposed current-mode interface for ISFET sensors is shown in Figure 12b and employs just two CCIIs, the ISFET sensor, and another reference transistor REFET that has the same electrical performance as the ISFET but is not sensitive to the ions in the solution. Since this reference transistor is biased in the linear region to the same working point as the ISFET and has the same temperature dependence as the ISFET, the circuit realizes temperature compensation and the output current I O U T = I I S F E T − I R E F E T does not vary as the temperature varies. A comparative analysis of this circuit with other voltage-mode readout circuits [18] for ISFET highlights that the first one is more suitable to apply to micro-sensors, since it requires a lower voltage supply, consumes less power, and has a higher response speed. Moreover, having a current output can be an advantage in those cases in which the output signal has to be converted into digital form, since current is more suitable for A/D conversion.

3.5. A Current-Mode Interface for Silicon Photomultipliers

Silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) are becoming an interesting alternative to other electronic light detectors and classical photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) since they are able to combine an extremely high sensitivity with the advantages of possible integration with other sensors and circuits on a system-on-chip, and they are finding increasing applications as biosensors [90,91]. The design of an appropriate interface circuit for these sensors is not an easy matter since it is required to deal with their relatively high output capacitance, which can reach values up to thousands of pF for an array of SiPMs. This means that the readout circuit must have the lowest possible input impedance to minimize the effects of such parasitic capacitance. Moreover, an appropriate circuit should fulfill, at the same time, other important requirements such as high linearity, fast response time, and low-noise performance, and it is in these requirements that current-mode processing can play an important role. In fact, all the conventional voltage-mode readout circuits [92,93], based mostly on common-gate/common-base amplifiers and operational amplifiers, suffer from limitations in terms of circuit complexity and/or high-frequency and low-noise performances that make these structures unattractive. A recently published work [48] shows that the current-mode technique can be successfully applied to the design of high-speed and low-noise interface circuits. The proposed circuit is shown in Figure 13a for a single photomultiplier and in Figure 13b for an array of SiPMs. The output of the circuit in both cases is given by:
V o u t I i n = α β R g a i n
where α and β are the voltage gain and current gain of the VCII. The extreme simplicity of these circuits, which use just one resistor and a VCII to obtain a transimpedance amplifier, allows the minimization of the cost and the noise of the circuit at the same time. Most importantly, this current-mode solution exhibits, for the first time, the interesting property that the achieved gain is independent of bandwidth because, differently from operational amplifiers, the VCII has a constant bandwidth. If the noise minimization is also carried out at transistor level using an appropriate internal structure for the VCII optimum noise performance can be obtained, and the study carried out in [73] presents the main guidelines that must be considered for an optimum design. Finally, we must note that even though it is reasonable to assume that similar performances can be obtained using CCIIs, a corresponding study on the implementation of a CCII-based interface for SiPMs is missing.

3.6. Current-Mode Interfaces for Ultrasonic Sensors

Another important class of sensors is that which generates and receives sound waves in the ultrasonic band, commonly known as ultrasonic sensors. Although not a biosensor in a strict sense, ultrasonic sensors are finding increasing application in the biomedical field. For example, a noteworthy application is their use in echography for human body imaging [94]. The most popular approach for the task of ultrasonic signal reception and generation is to use a piezoelectric crystal such as PZT or PVDF [95,96]. When a piezoelectric crystal is excited with an AC voltage in the ultrasonic band, it slightly compresses and expands following the AC stimulus signal and transmits such mechanical oscillations to the surrounding medium (whether it is air or something else). Vice versa, a piezoelectric crystal can also be used for signal reception of ultrasonic mechanical waves, as discussed here. When used in reception, the piezoelectrical crystal is an active sensor typically represented by a generator and a filter network composed of resistances and reactive elements, as in Figure 14. Here, C 0 represents the static capacitance of the transducer, while the series RLC branch models high-frequency resonance. However, for use as a sensor, the signal frequencies are typically such that this latter branch can be neglected. The current source is simply the derivative of the charge q that develops at the two ends of the crystal, being thus proportional to applied force:
I = d q d t   .
An alternative representation with a voltage source is clearly possible, but it is preferable to represent the sensor as a current generator in this context because its impedance is typically somewhat higher than the impedance of the Y input port of a VCII, a fact that allows directly interfacing the spiral shaped PVDF sensor to the VCII. This has been exploited in [46], where a circuit similar to that in Figure 13a for a SiPM has been applied to a spiral-shaped omnidirectional PVDF sensor specifically designed to receive ultrasounds in air in a wide frequency range (20–80 kHz) [97]. The designed circuit displays a transimpedance gain of 86 dBΩ and an overall power consumption of about 6 mA. The reported PVDF sensor sensitivity is in the range between −107 and −101 dB, with a beam directivity of 360° on both the vertical and horizontal planes. As well as in the SiPM case, the same advantage, that the achieved gain is independent of bandwidth, remains obviously valid.
In [46], a circuit to perform a noise filtering function in addition to transimpedance amplification was developed to obtain a purified version of the received signal, depicted in Figure 15. This goal was achieved using Z 1 = 1 / s C 1 , Z 2 = R 2 , Z 3 = 1 / s C 3 , Z 4 = R 4 to obtain a second-order band-pass filter, with a transfer function given by
V o u t I i n = s C 1 R 2 R 4 1 + s C 1 R 2 + C 3 R 4 + s 2 C 1 C 3 R 2 R 4
or, alternatively, using Z 1 = R 1 , Z 2 = 1 / s C 2 , Z 3 = R 3 , Z 4 = 1 / s C 4 to obtain a second-order low-pass filter with transfer function
V o u t I i n = R 3 1 + s C 2 R 1 + C 4 R 3 + s 2 C 2 C 4 R 1 R 3
where the sensor impedance has been considered negligible in calculations.

4. Comparison and Future Prospects

In this section, we present a not-exhaustive comparison of the performance of current-mode interfaces with respect to conventional ones. Table 1 shows a comparison between some current-mode oscillator-based interfaces and conventional voltage-mode ones. A quick inspection of this table should clarify the main benefit of the current-mode approach for this category of readout circuits. Using the current-mode approach, it is generally possible to obtain comparable or sometimes even better performances in terms of dynamic range and sensitivity with a simpler circuit. This aspect becomes even more important if the readout circuit is to be integrated on a system-on-chip, since it is advantageous in terms of area occupation of the chip. Unfortunately, as discussed in previous sections, although a VCII may be used to realize such types of readout circuits without any particular problem, the literature on this kind of VCII application is lacking, and an extensive study on this has to be performed. As shown, most of the solution in Table 1 uses OAs, CCIIs, or OTAs, although many other active blocks may be obviously used.
Concerning the differential capacitive sensor case, Table 2 compares the current-mode solution (Figure 11) with others in the literature for this sensor type. The VCII- and CCII-based circuits provide good comparable performance in terms of sensitivity and measurement range, but with simpler topologies like those considered in Section 3.3.
Related to SiPM sensors, Table 3 compares other solutions with the VCII SiPM interfaces of Figure 13. Due to the distinctive property of constant bandwidth of the VCII, very high transimpedance gain and low power consumption are obtained. Moreover, the VCII-based circuit can easily perform the current summing operation (due to the low-impedance current input port) that is very useful in SiPM read-out circuits. Unfortunately, a similar comparison for the CCII case is not possible because no such CCII applications have been reported in the literature until now.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, some examples of traditional and current-mode read-out circuits for various types of sensors and bioelectrical signals are analyzed and compared. The comparison shows that the processing of signals in the current domain makes VCII and CCII more flexible with respect to other active building blocks. These circuits may be applied to a broad range of sensors, from the widespread biosensors now used in glucose/cholesterol meters and in oximetry to more specific sensors such as ISFETs, SiPMs, and ultrasonic sensors. The study results indicate that current-mode read-out circuits have several benefits. Among these, we have intrinsic linearity, very simple read-out circuits for sensors configured in the CMWB, better accuracy with parasitic-insensitive operation for differential capacitive sensors, and very simple read-out circuitry for SiPM and PVDF sensors with extended bandwidth and low power operation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., L.S. and G.F.; methodology, M.S., G.B., L.S. and G.F.; validation, V.S.; formal analysis, G.B.; investigation, M.S.; resources, V.S.; data curation, G.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and G.F.; visualization, V.S.; supervision, G.B. and G.F.; project administration, V.S.; funding acquisition, V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, P.; Xu, G.; Qin, L.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y. Cell-Based Biosensors for Single Cell Monitoring and Drug Analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Francisco, CA, USA, 14 March 2005; pp. 1949–1952. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, M.; Chen, C.; Yuan, Q.; Zhuang, L.; Wang, P. Olfactory Bulb Biosensor Monitoring the Effect of Treatment Drugs for AD In Vitro. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN), Aveiro, Portugal, 29 May–1 June 2022; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rehacek, V.; Novotny, I.; Tvarozek, V.; Riepl, M.; Hirsch, T.; Mass, M.; Schweiss, R.; Mirsky, V.M.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Capacitive Detection in Thin Film Chemical Sensors and Biosensors. In Proceedings of the ASDAM ’98. Conference Proceedings, Second International Conference on Advanced Semiconductor Devices and Microsystems (Cat. No.98EX172), Slomenice, Slovakia, 5–7 October 1998; pp. 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu, C.; Du, L.; Hu, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.; Wang, P. New Acid Biosensor for Taste Transduction Based on Extracellular Recording of PKD Channels. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 3113–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hyo Chung, K.; Ahn, C.-G.; Choi, Y.H.; Yang, J.-H.; Woo Park, C.; Kim, W.-J.; Seong Ah, C.; Yong Sung, G. Magnetically-Actuated Blood Filter for a CMOS-Based Nanowire Biosensor. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings, Limerick, Ireland, 28–31 October 2011; pp. 316–319. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, C.-C.; Lin, C.-C.; Hong, C.-L.; Chang, P.-H. Low Cost and High Specific Anesthetic Biosensors with Functionally Imprinted Nanocavities on Polymer Films. In Proceedings of the 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, Beijing, China, 5–9 June 2011; pp. 1196–1199. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, F.; Kosel, J. A Magnetic Biosensor System for Detection of E. Coli. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2013, 49, 3492–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chou, J.-C.; Chen, R.-T.; Liao, Y.-H.; Chen, J.-S.; Huang, M.-S.; Chou, H.-T. Dynamic and Wireless Sensing Measurements of Potentiometric Glucose Biosensor Based on Graphene and Magnetic Beads. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 5718–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cross, G.H.; Reeves, A.A.; Brand, S.; Popplewell, J.F.; Peel, L.L.; Swann, M.J.; Freeman, N.J. A New Quantitative Optical Biosensor for Protein Characterisation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 19, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, J.; Chicharro, M.; Rivas, G.; Cai, X.; Dontha, N.; Farias, P.A.M.; Shiraishi, H. DNA Biosensor for the Detection of Hydrazines. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2251–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.X.; Sun, X.W.; Wei, A.; Lei, Y.; Cai, X.P.; Li, C.M.; Dong, Z.L. Zinc Oxide Nanocomb Biosensor for Glucose Detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 233106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Atanasov, P.; Wilkins, E. Biosensor for Continuos Glucose Monitoring. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 43, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Newman, J.D.; Turner, A.P.F. Home Blood Glucose Biosensors: A Commercial Perspective. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 20, 2435–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Narwal, V.; Deswal, R.; Batra, B.; Kalra, V.; Hooda, R.; Sharma, M.; Rana, J.S. Cholesterol Biosensors: A Review. Steroids 2019, 143, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crepaldi, P.C.; Pimenta, T.C.; Moreno, R.L.; Rodriguez, E.C. A Low Power CMOS Voltage Regulator for a Wireless Blood Pressure Biosensor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2012, 61, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yoo, E.-H.; Lee, S.-Y. Glucose Biosensors: An Overview of Use in Clinical Practice. Sensors 2010, 10, 4558–4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Guliga, H.; Abdullah, W.F.H.; Herman, S.H. Integrated Constant Voltage Constant Current Readout Interfacing Circuit for EGFET Electrochemical Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE2014), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27–29 August 2014; pp. 440–443. [Google Scholar]
  18. Furtado da Silva, L.L.; Silveira, F.; de Moraes Cruz, C.A.; Daniel de Oliveira Moura, T. Active ISFET Sensor Readout Circuit. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Symposium on Instrumentation Systems, Circuits and Transducers (INSCIT), Fortaleza, Brazil, 28 August–1 September 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Da Rocha, J.G.V.; da Rocha, P.F.A.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Capacitive Sensor for Three-Axis Force Measurements and Its Readout Electronics. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2009, 58, 2830–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, M.C.; Huang, Y.R.; Chou, H.P. A Low-Noise CMOS Readout Circuit for Capacitive Micro-Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2006 5th IEEE Conference on Sensors, Daegu, Republic of Korea, 22–25 October 2006; pp. 1135–1138. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rocha, D.; Ferrari, V.; Jakoby, B. Improved Electronic Readout Circuit for Resonant Acoustic Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Sensors, Vienna, Austria, 24–27 October 2004; pp. 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  22. Long, J. A Novel PWM Based Readout Circuit for Pressure Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), Beijing, China, 8–10 July 2016; pp. 779–783. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chung, W.-Y.; Silverio, A.A.; Tsai, V.F.S. An Amperometric Sensor Readout Circuit for Multiple Electrochemical Sensor Cells. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Integrated Circuits (ISIC), Singapore, 10–12 December 2014; pp. 528–531. [Google Scholar]
  24. Riesch, C.; Jakoby, B. Novel Readout Electronics for Thickness Shear-Mode Liquid Sensors Compensating for Spurious Conductivity and Capacitances. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Xiao, J.; Chen, J. A High Dynamic Range CMOS Readout Chip for Electrochemical Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 3504–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P. A Novel 6-Decades Fully-Analog Uncalibrated Wheatstone Bridge-Based Resistive Sensor Interface. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 189, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P. Analog Wheatstone Bridge-Based Automatic Interface for Grounded and Floating Wide-Range Resistive Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 187, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mantenuto, P.; de Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G. Uncalibrated Analog Bridge-Based Interface for Wide-Range Resistive Sensor Estimation. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 1413–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V.; Depari, A.; Flammini, A.; Marioli, D. A novel op-amp based front-end for high valued resistive sensors. In Proceedings of the Sensors and Microsystems, Roma, Italy, 19–21 February 2008; pp. 540–544. [Google Scholar]
  30. Scotti, G.; Pennisi, S.; Monsurro, P.; Trifiletti, A. 88-μ A 1-MHz Stray-Insensitive CMOS Current-Mode Interface IC for Differential Capacitive Sensors. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2014, 61, 1905–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G. A New Versatile Full Wave Rectifier Using Voltage Conveyors. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 122, 153267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kulshrestha, S.; Bansal, D.; Bansal, S. A New Voltage Mode KHN Biquad Using VCII. J. Circuits Syst. Comput. 2021, 30, 2150232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pushkar, K.L. Single-Resistance Controlled Sinusoidal Oscillator Employing Single Universal Voltage Conveyor. Circuits Syst. 2018, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stornelli, V.; Barile, G.; Pantoli, L.; Scarsella, M.; Ferri, G.; Centurelli, F.; Tommasino, P.; Trifiletti, A. A New VCII Application: Sinusoidal Oscillators. J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2021, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yesil, A.; Minaei, S.; Psychalinos, C. ± 0.45 V CMOS Second-Generation Voltage Conveyor Based on Super Source Follower. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 2022, 41, 1819–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferri, G.; Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Scarsella, M.; Stornelli, V. New Resistor-Less Electronically Controllable ±C Simulator Employing VCII, DVCC, and a Grounded Capacitor. Electronics 2022, 11, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Minaei, S.; Ferri, G. Towards Realization of a Low-Voltage Class-AB VCII with High Current Drive Capability. Electronics 2021, 10, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Ragnoli, M.; Stornelli, V. A New Realization of Electronically Tunable Multiple-Input Single-Voltage Output Second-Order LP/BP Filter Using VCII. Electronics 2022, 11, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stornelli, V.; Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G. A New Extremely Low Power Temperature Insensitive Electronically Tunable VCII-Based Grounded Capacitance Multiplier. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2021, 68, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barile, G.; Safari, L.; Pantoli, L.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G. Electronically Tunable First Order AP/LP and LP/HP Filter Topologies Using Electronically Controllable Second Generation Voltage Conveyor (CVCII). Electronics 2021, 10, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stornelli, V.; Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G. A New VCII Based Grounded Positive/Negative Capacitance Multiplier. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 137, 153793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V. High Performance Voltage Output Filter Realizations Using Second Generation Voltage Conveyor. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2018, 28, e21534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V. Traditional Op-Amp and New VCII: A Comparison on Analog Circuits Applications. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 110, 152845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G. An Overview on the Second Generation Voltage Conveyor: Features, Design and Applications. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2019, 66, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stornelli, V.; Barile, G.; Leoni, A. A Novel General Purpose Combined DFVF/VCII Based Biomedical Amplifier. Electronics 2020, 9, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Pullano, S.A.; Fiorillo, A.S.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G. A Second-Generation Voltage-Conveyor-Based Interface for Ultrasonic PVDF Sensors. Micromachines 2021, 12, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Psychalinos, C.; Minaei, S.; Safari, L. Ultra Low-Power Electronically Tunable Current-Mode Instrumentation Amplifier for Biomedical Applications. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 117, 153120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pantoli, L.; Barile, G.; Leoni, A.; Muttillo, M.; Stornelli, V. A Novel Electronic Interface for Micromachined Si-Based Photomultipliers. Micromachines 2018, 9, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tanaphatsiri, C.; Jaikla, W.; Siripruchyanun, M. A Current-Mode Wheatstone Bridge Employing Only Single DO-CDTA. In Proceedings of the APCCAS 2008—2008 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Macao, China, 30 November–3 December 2008; pp. 1494–1497. [Google Scholar]
  50. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G.; Leoni, A. New Current Mode Wheatstone Bridge Topologies with Intrinsic Linearity. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME), Prague, Czech Republic, 2–5 July 2018; pp. 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ferri, G.; Parente, F.R.; Stornelli, V. Current Conveyor-Based Differential Capacitance Analog Interface for Displacement Sensing Application. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017, 81, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barile, G.; Safari, L.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V. A VCII-Based Stray Insensitive Analog Interface for Differential Capacitance Sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P. A CCII-Based Non-Inverting Schmitt Trigger and Its Application as Astable Multivibrator for Capacitive Sensor Interfacing. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2017, 45, 1060–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Pantoli, L.; Ragnoli, M.; Stornelli, V.; Safari, L.; Centurelli, F.; Tommasino, P.; Trifiletti, A. Low Power Class-AB VCII with Extended Dynamic Range. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2022, 146, 154120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V.; Di Simone, A. A Ccii-Based High Impedance Input Stage For Biomedical Applications. J. Circuits Syst. Comput. 2011, 20, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G. A Review on VCII Applications in Signal Conditioning for Sensors and Bioelectrical Signals: New Opportunities. Sensors 2022, 22, 3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Veerendranath, P.S.; Sharma, V.; Nithin Kumar, Y.B.; Vasantha, M.H.; Bonizzoni, E. Current Conveyor Based Novel Gyrator Filter for Biomedical Sensor Applications. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2019—2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Kochi, India, 17–20 October 2019; pp. 658–661. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yenkar, R.V.; Nigam, M. Design and Simulation of Novel Variable Gain Differential Voltage Current Conveyor. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends and Advances in Engineering and Technology (ICITAET), Shegaon, India, 27–28 December 2019; pp. 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  59. Banerjee, K.; Paul, S.K. Negative Inductance and Immittance Simulators Employing Differential Voltage Current Conveyor. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Microelectronics, Computing and Communications (MicroCom), Durgapur, India, 23–25 January 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  60. Becvar, D.; Vrba, K.; Zeman, V.; Musil, V. Novel Universal Active Block: A Universal Current Conveyor. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Emerging Technologies for the 21st Century, Geneva, Switzerland, 28–31 May 2000; pp. 471–474. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tandel, S.; Bhagat, N.; Khot, U.P. CMOS CFOA Based Quadrature Oscillator. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC), Coimbatore, India, 2–4 July 2020; pp. 940–943. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen, H.-P.; Wang, S.-F.; Li, P.-H.; Chou, N.-H.; Chang, C.-H. Single FDCCII-Based Current-Mode Universal Biquadratic Filter. In Proceedings of the 2012 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), Yichang, China, 21–23 April 2012; pp. 2076–2079. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hamed, H.F.A.; Khalaf, A.A.M. Differential Voltage Current Conveyor and Fully Differential Current Conveyor in Standard CMOS Technology for Low Voltage Analog Circuits Applications. In Proceedings of the 2005 12th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Gammarth, Tunisia, 11–14 December 2005; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  64. Vijay, V.; Srinivasulu, A. A Square Wave Generator Using Single CMOS DCCII. In Proceedings of the 2013 International SoC Design Conference (ISOCC), Busan, Republic of Korea, 17–19 November 2013; pp. 322–325. [Google Scholar]
  65. Vijay, V.; Srinivasulu, A. A DCCII Based Square Wave Generator with Grounded Capacitor. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Nagercoil, India, 18–19 March 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lattenberg, I.; Vrba, K.; Dostal, T. Bipolar CCIII+ and CCIII- Conveyors and Their Current Mode-Filter Application. In Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Caracas Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.02TH8611), Oranjestad, The Netherlands, 9 April 2002; pp. C036-1–C036-4. [Google Scholar]
  67. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Guerrini, N.C.; Scotti, G.; Stornelli, V.; Trifiletti, A. A Novel Low-Voltage Low-Power Fully Differential Voltage and Current Gained CCII for Floating Impedance Simulations. Microelectron. J. 2009, 40, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Parveen, T.; Ahmed, M.T.; Khan, I.A. Low Component Voltage Mode Universal Biquadratic Filter Using Low Voltage DOCCII. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies, Aligarh, India, 14–16 March 2009; pp. 78–80. [Google Scholar]
  69. Beniamin, D. First Generation Current Conveyor Macromodel. In Proceedings of the 2010 9th International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications, Timisoara, Romania, 11–12 November 2010; pp. 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  70. Elsayed, F.; Ibrahim, M.F.; Ghallab, Y.H.; Badawy, W. A CMOS Operational Floating Current Conveyor Circuit. In Proceedings of the 2009 4th International Design and Test Workshop (IDT), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 15–17 November 2009; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  71. Stornelli, V.; Ferri, G.; Pantoli, L.; Barile, G.; Pennisi, S. A Rail-to-Rail Constant-g m CCII for Instrumentation Amplifier Applications. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2018, 91, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stornelli, V.; Pantoli, L.; Ferri, G.; Liberati, L.; Centurelli, F.; Monsurrò, P.; Trifiletti, A. The AB-CCII, a Novel Adaptive Biasing LV-LP Current Conveyor Architecture. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017, 79, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ferri, G.; Safari, L.; Barile, G.; Pantoli, L.; Stornelli, V. Noise Analysis and Optimization of VCII-Based SiPM Interface Circuit. Analog. Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2021, 109, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Safari, L.; Stornelli, V. A New High Drive Class-AB FVF-Based Second Generation Voltage Conveyor. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Barile; Stornelli; Ferri; Safari; D’Amico A New Rail-to-Rail Second Generation Voltage Conveyor. Electronics 2019, 8, 1292. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Naresh, V.; Lee, N. A Review on Biosensors and Recent Development of Nanostructured Materials-Enabled Biosensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sharma, S.K.; Kaur, N.; Singh, J.; Sankar, S.; Gaur, S.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.Y.; Singh, N.; Singh, H. Electrochemical Sensitive Determination of Nanomolar Guanine from ZnO Nanorods Coated on Platinum Electrode. Electroanalysis 2015, 27, 2537–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sahu, S.; Singh, G. Modelling of Phase Shift Bragg Grating Biosensor for Non Invasive Detection of Blood Components. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), Kedah, Malaysia, 1–3 December 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lai, J.-L.; Huang, S.-Y.; Lin, R.-S.; Tsai, S.-C. Design a Non-Invasive near-Infrared LED Blood Glucose Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Okinawa, Japan, 26–30 May 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jha, M.; Gupta, R.; Saxena, R. A Review on Non-Invasive Biosensors for Early Detection of Lung Cancer. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC), Noida, India, 5–7 March 2020; pp. 162–166. [Google Scholar]
  81. Singh, A.K.; Jha, S.K. Fabrication and Validation of a Handheld Non-Invasive, Optical Biosensor for Self-Monitoring of Glucose Using Saliva. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 8332–8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pedro, B.; Marcôndes, D.; Bertemes-Filho, P. Analytical Model for Blood Glucose Detection Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. Sensors 2020, 20, 6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ertürk, G.; Mattiasson, B. Capacitive Biosensors and Molecularly Imprinted Electrodes. Sensors 2017, 17, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P.; Valente, F.; Cantalini, C.; Giancaterini, L. CCII-Based Interface for Capacitive/Resistive Sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2011, Limerick, Ireland, 28–31 October 2011; pp. 1133–1136. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kaabi, H.; Azhari, S.J. AZKA Cell, the Current-Mode Alternative of Wheatstone Bridge. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Fundam. Theory Appl. 2000, 47, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghallab, Y.H.; Badawy, W. A New Topology for a Current-Mode Wheatstone Bridge. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2006, 53, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Berney, H.; Alderman, J.; Lane, W.; Collins, J.K. A Differential Capacitive Biosensor Using Polyethylene Glycol to Overlay the Biolayer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1997, 44, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sisinni, E.; Depari, A.; Flammini, A.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V.; Barile, G. Full-Analog Parasitic Capacitance Compensation for AC-Excited Differential Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 5890–5899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, C.; Zhao, Y. A Novel Current-Mode Readout Circuit for ISFET Sensor. In Proceedings of the APCCAS 2008—2008 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Macao, China, 30 November–3 December 2008; pp. 407–410. [Google Scholar]
  90. Santangelo, M.F.; Sciuto, E.L.; Lombardo, S.A.; Busacca, A.C.; Petralia, S.; Conoci, S.; Libertino, S. Si Photomultipliers for Bio-Sensing Applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016, 22, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Santangelo, M.F.; Sanfilippo, D.; Fallica, G.; Busacca, A.C.; Pagano, R.; Sciuto, E.L.; Lombardo, S.; Libertino, S. SiPM as Novel Optical Biosensor Transduction and Applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 Fotonica AEIT Italian Conference on Photonics Technologies, Naples, Italy, 12–14 May 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Q.; Wang, L.; Kuang, J.; Xiao, Y. Comparison of Three Pre-Amplifier Circuits for Time Readout of SiPM in TOF-PET Detectors. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Sapporo, Japan, 26–29 May 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  93. Vinayaka, V.; Namboodiri, S.P.; Roy, A.; Baker, R.J. Segmented Digital SiPM. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 62nd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Dallas, TX, USA, 4–7 August 2019; pp. 1118–1121. [Google Scholar]
  94. Shung, K.K.; Cannata, J.M.; Zhou, Q.F. Piezoelectric Materials for High Frequency Medical Imaging Applications: A Review. J. Electroceram 2007, 19, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tressler, J.F.; Alkoy, S.; Newnham, R.E. Piezoelectric Sensors and Sensor Materials. J. Electroceram 1998, 2, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Akdogan, E.K.; Allahverdi, M.; Safari, A. Piezoelectric Composites for Sensor and Actuator Applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52, 746–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Barile, G.; Scarsella, M.; Pullano, S.A.; Fiorillo, A.S.; Critello, C.D. Exploiting Wideband Ultrasonic Signal Reception Trough Spiral-Shaped PVDF Sensors and Second Generation Voltage Conveyors. In Sensors and Microsystems: Proceedings of AISEM 2021–In Memory of Arnaldo D’Amico; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 350–355. [Google Scholar]
  98. De Marcellis, A.; Ferri, G.; Mantenuto, P. Uncalibrated Operational Amplifier-based Sensor Interface for Capacitive/Resistive Sensor Applications. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 2015, 9, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. De Marcellis, A.; Depari, A.; Ferri, G.; Flammini, A.; Marioli, D.; Stornelli, V.; Taroni, A. A CMOS Integrable Oscillator-Based Front End for High-Dynamic-Range Resistive Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2008, 57, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. De Marcellis, A.; Cubells-Beltrán, M.; Reig, C.; Madrenas, J.; Zadov, B.; Paperno, E.; Cardoso, S.; Freitas, P.P. Quasi-digital Front-ends for Current Measurement in Integrated Circuits with Giant Magnetoresistance Technology. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 2014, 8, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bruschi, P.; Nizza, N.; Piotto, M. A Current-Mode, Dual Slope, Integrated Capacitance-to-Pulse Duration Converter. IEEE J. Solid-state Circuits 2007, 42, 1884–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. De Marcellis, A.; Depari, A.; Ferri, G.; Flammini, A.; Sisinni, E. A CMOS Integrated Low-Voltage Low-Power Time-Controlled Interface for Chemical Resistive Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 179, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ferri, G.; di Carlo, C.; Stornelli, V.; de Marcellis, A.; Flammini, A.; Depari, A.; Jand, N. A Single-Chip Integrated Interfacing Circuit for Wide-Range Resistive Gas Sensor Arrays. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 143, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abuelma’atti, M.T.; Al-Absi, M.A. A Current Conveyor-Based Relaxation Oscillator as a Versatile Electronic Interface for Capacitive and Resistive Sensors. Int. J. Electron. 2005, 92, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Almashary, B.; Alhokail, H. Current-Mode Triangular Wave Generator Using CCIIs. Microelectron. J. 2000, 31, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pal, D.; Srinivasulu, A.; Pal, B.B.; Demosthenous, A.; Das, B.N. Current Conveyor-Based Square/Triangular Waveform Generators With Improved Linearity. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2009, 58, 2174–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Depari, A.; Sisinni, E.; Flammini, A.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V.; Barile, G.; Parente, F.R. Autobalancing Analog Front End for Full-Range Differential Capacitive Sensing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 67, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. George, B.; Kumar, V.J. Switched Capacitor Signal Conditioning for Differential Capacitive Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2007, 56, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Madhu Mohan, N.; Shet, A.R.; Kedarnath, S.; Jagadeesh Kumar, V. Digital Converter for Differential Capacitive Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2008, 57, 2576–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mochizuki, K.; Watanabe, K.; Masuda, T. A High-Accuracy High-Speed Signal Processing Circuit of Differential-Capacitance Transducers. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1998, 47, 1244–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V.; Parente, F.R.; Barile, G. Full Range Analog Wheatstone Bridge-Based Automatic Circuit for Differential Capacitance Sensor Evaluation. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2017, 45, 2149–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Areekath, L.; George, B.; Reverter, F. A Closed-Loop Capacitance-to-Frequency Converter for Single-Element and Differential Capacitive Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 8773–8782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Singh, T.; Saether, T.; Ytterdal, T. Current-Mode Capacitive Sensor Interface Circuit With Single-Ended to Differential Output Capability. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2009, 58, 3914–3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. De Medeiros Silva, M.; Oliveira, L.B. Regulated Common-Gate Transimpedance Amplifier Designed to Operate With a Silicon Photo-Multiplier at the Input. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2014, 61, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Albuquerque, E.; Bexiga, V.; Bugalho, R.; Carriço, B.; Ferreira, C.S.; Ferreira, M.; Godinho, J.; Gonçalves, F.; Leong, C.; Lousã, P.; et al. Experimental Characterization of the 192 Channel Clear-PEM Frontend ASIC Coupled to a Multi-Pixel APD Readout of LYSO:Ce Crystals. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2009, 598, 802–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Giannakopoulos, S.; He, Z.S.; Darwazeh, I.; Zirath, H. Differential Common Base TIA with 56 DB Ohm Gain and 45 GHz Bandwidth in 130 Nm SiGe. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–16 November 2017; pp. 1107–1110. [Google Scholar]
  117. Tang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J. A Low-Power 16-Channel SiPM Readout Front-End with a Shared SAR ADC in 180 Nm CMOS. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Solid-State & Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), Kunming, Chian, 3–6 November 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  118. Trigilio, P.; Busca, P.; Quaglia, R.; Occhipinti, M.; Fiorini, C. A SiPM-Readout ASIC for SPECT Applications. IEEE Trans. Radiat Plasma Med. Sci. 2018, 2, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Song, Z. An Analog Front-End ASIC Design for 16-Channel SiPM Readout in PET Detectors. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Manchester, UK, 6 October–2 November 2019; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
Sensors 23 03194 g001 550
Figure 1. Second generation current conveyor: (a) circuit symbol, (b) ideal equivalent circuit.
Figure 1. Second generation current conveyor: (a) circuit symbol, (b) ideal equivalent circuit.
Sensors 23 03194 g001
Sensors 23 03194 g002 550
Figure 2. Real second-generation current conveyor.
Figure 2. Real second-generation current conveyor.
Sensors 23 03194 g002
Sensors 23 03194 g003 550
Figure 3. Second generation voltage conveyor: (a) circuit symbol, (b) equivalent circuit.
Figure 3. Second generation voltage conveyor: (a) circuit symbol, (b) equivalent circuit.
Sensors 23 03194 g003
Sensors 23 03194 g004 550
Figure 4. Real second-generation voltage conveyor.
Figure 4. Real second-generation voltage conveyor.
Sensors 23 03194 g004
Sensors 23 03194 g005a 550Sensors 23 03194 g005b 550
Figure 5. Basic CCII applications: (a) voltage amplifier; (b) current amplifier; (c) V-I converter; (d) I-V converter; (e) voltage differentiator; (f) voltage integrator; (g) current differentiator; (h) current integrator; (i) differential voltage amplifier.
Figure 5. Basic CCII applications: (a) voltage amplifier; (b) current amplifier; (c) V-I converter; (d) I-V converter; (e) voltage differentiator; (f) voltage integrator; (g) current differentiator; (h) current integrator; (i) differential voltage amplifier.
Sensors 23 03194 g005aSensors 23 03194 g005b
Sensors 23 03194 g006a 550Sensors 23 03194 g006b 550
Figure 6. Basic VCII applications: (a) voltage amplifier; (b) current amplifier; (c) V-I converter; (d) I-V converter; (e) voltage differentiator; (f) voltage integrator; (g) current differentiator; (h) current integrator; (i) differential voltage amplifier.
Figure 6. Basic VCII applications: (a) voltage amplifier; (b) current amplifier; (c) V-I converter; (d) I-V converter; (e) voltage differentiator; (f) voltage integrator; (g) current differentiator; (h) current integrator; (i) differential voltage amplifier.
Sensors 23 03194 g006aSensors 23 03194 g006b
Sensors 23 03194 g007 550
Figure 7. Traditional interfaces for resistive sensors. (a) Resistive voltage divider; (b) resistive Wheatstone bridge.
Figure 7. Traditional interfaces for resistive sensors. (a) Resistive voltage divider; (b) resistive Wheatstone bridge.
Sensors 23 03194 g007
Sensors 23 03194 g008 550
Figure 8. Traditional interfaces for capacitive sensors. (a) Capacitive voltage divider; (b) capacitive Wheatstone bridge. Here, V a c and V o u t denote AC amplitude values.
Figure 8. Traditional interfaces for capacitive sensors. (a) Capacitive voltage divider; (b) capacitive Wheatstone bridge. Here, V a c and V o u t denote AC amplitude values.
Sensors 23 03194 g008
Sensors 23 03194 g009a 550Sensors 23 03194 g009b 550
Figure 9. Two different CCII-based proposed interfaces using a square-wave generator for resistive and capacitive sensors: (a) the square-wave generator proposed in [53]; (b) the square-wave generator proposed in [84]; (c) the sine-wave oscillator proposed in [34].
Figure 9. Two different CCII-based proposed interfaces using a square-wave generator for resistive and capacitive sensors: (a) the square-wave generator proposed in [53]; (b) the square-wave generator proposed in [84]; (c) the sine-wave oscillator proposed in [34].
Sensors 23 03194 g009aSensors 23 03194 g009b
Sensors 23 03194 g010a 550Sensors 23 03194 g010b 550
Figure 10. (a) The concept of a current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (b) CCII-based current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (c) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a couple of resistive sensors in differential operation; (d) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a single resistive sensor.
Figure 10. (a) The concept of a current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (b) CCII-based current-mode Wheatstone bridge; (c) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a couple of resistive sensors in differential operation; (d) VCII-based current-mode bridge for a single resistive sensor.
Sensors 23 03194 g010aSensors 23 03194 g010b
Sensors 23 03194 g011 550
Figure 11. Two different current-mode interfaces for differential capacitive sensors: (a) is the CCII-based circuit proposed in [51]; (b) is the VCII-based circuit proposed in [52].
Figure 11. Two different current-mode interfaces for differential capacitive sensors: (a) is the CCII-based circuit proposed in [51]; (b) is the VCII-based circuit proposed in [52].
Sensors 23 03194 g011
Sensors 23 03194 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Comparison of ISFET and MOSFET; (b) standard differential current-mode approach.
Figure 12. (a) Comparison of ISFET and MOSFET; (b) standard differential current-mode approach.
Sensors 23 03194 g012
Sensors 23 03194 g013 550
Figure 13. VCII-based interface circuits for (a) a single SiPM and (b) an array of SiPMs.
Figure 13. VCII-based interface circuits for (a) a single SiPM and (b) an array of SiPMs.
Sensors 23 03194 g013
Sensors 23 03194 g014 550
Figure 14. Equivalent circuit of a piezoelectric transducer in reception. The current I is the derivative of the charge that develops in response to an applied force.
Figure 14. Equivalent circuit of a piezoelectric transducer in reception. The current I is the derivative of the charge that develops in response to an applied force.
Sensors 23 03194 g014
Sensors 23 03194 g015 550
Figure 15. VCII-based second-order low-pass and bandpass filter.
Figure 15. VCII-based second-order low-pass and bandpass filter.
Sensors 23 03194 g015
Table
Table 1. Comparison between some current-mode oscillator-based read-out circuits and conventional voltage-mode ones.
Table 1. Comparison between some current-mode oscillator-based read-out circuits and conventional voltage-mode ones.
Ref.Dynamic RangeEmployed ComponentsSensitivityOutput
Waveform
[98]C (floating):
4.7 pF–2.2 uF
R (floating):
820 kΩ–9.1 MΩ
or 500 kΩ–5.95 MΩ		2 OA
6 R
1 C		C (floating):
21 us/pF
R (floating):
50–90 ms/MΩ
or 170–900 ms/MΩ		square
[53] 1C (grounded):
22 pF–5.5 uF
R (floating):
47–470 kΩ		1 CCII
3 R
1 C		C (grounded):
178 ns/pF
R (floating):
30 us/kΩ		square
[99]C (floating):
1–47 pF
R (floating):
100 kΩ–100 GΩ		4 OA
1 XOR gate
3 R
2 C		Not availablesquare
[100]R (grounded):
0.7–7 kΩ		2 OA
4 R
1 C		R (grounded):
330 us/kΩ		square
[101]C (floating):
0.8–1.2 pF		4 OTA
1 OA
1 AND
3 C		C (floating):
15–47 us/pF		square
[102]C (floating):
1–22 pF
R (floating):
10 kΩ–1 GΩ		4 OTA
1 AND gate
7 R
3 C		C (floating):
330 us/kΩ		square/
triangular
[103]C (floating):
0–33 pF
R (floating):
470 kΩ–100 GΩ		4 OTA
1 XOR gate
3 R
2 C		C (floating):
Not available
R (floating):
320 us/MΩ		square
[104] 1R (floating):
10 kΩ		1 CCII
3 R
1 C		R (floating):
222 Hz/kΩ		square
[105] 1R (floating):
0.2–1 kΩ
C (grounded):
10 nF–20 uF		2 CCII
3 R
2 C		R (floating):
3.1 kHz/kΩ
C (grounded):
0.02 Hz/pF		square/
triangular
[106] 1R (floating):
2–100 kΩ
C (floating):
500 pF–10 uF		2 CCII
3 R
1 C		R (floating):
250 us/kΩ
C (floating):
4 ns/pF		square/
triangular
1 Current-mode circuit.
Table
Table 2. Comparison between current-mode read-out circuits for differential capacitive sensors and conventional ones.
Table 2. Comparison between current-mode read-out circuits for differential capacitive sensors and conventional ones.
Ref.Baseline
Capacitance		ApproachSensitivityVariation
Range
[51] 1400 pFC to V
conversion		Not available ± 30%
[52] 110–200 pFMixed412/21 mV/pF ± 100%
[107]140 pF–14 nFC to V
conversion		71 mV/pF ± 100%
[108]500 pFC to V
conversion		5 mV/pF ± 50%
[109]400 pFC to digital
conversion		4 counts/pF ± 50%
[30]1 pFC to I
conversion		50 nA/fF ± 100%
[110]20 pFC to V
conversion		833 mV/pF ± 60%
[111]400 pFC to V
conversion		nonlinear ± 100%
[112]250 pFC to freq.
conversion		0.8 kHz/pF ± 60%
[113]1 pFC to I
conversion		Not available ± 75%
1 Current-mode circuit.
Table
Table 3. Comparison between current-mode SiPM read-out circuits and conventional ones.
Table 3. Comparison between current-mode SiPM read-out circuits and conventional ones.
Ref.TechSupplyPowerT-I GainBandwidthNoise
[48] 1CMOS
130 nm		1.2 V0.34 uW100 dB10 MHz27 m V r m s
(output)
[114]CMOS
350 nm		3.3 V0.68 uW100 dB50 MHz1300 e-(ENC)
[115]CMOS
350 nm		3.3 V0.68 uW500150 MHz2 u V r m s
(input)
[116]SiGe
130 nm		−3.2 V82 uW56 dB45 GHz30.6 p A H z
[117]CMOS
180 nm		1.8 V743 uW
(16 channels)		Not
available		Not
available		56.48 dB (SNDR)
[118]CMOS
350 nm		3.3 V380 mW
(36 channels)		Not
available		Not
available		Not
available
[119]CMOS
180 nm		Not
available		Not
available		10 dB5 MHzNot
available
1 Current-mode circuit.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scarsella, M.; Barile, G.; Stornelli, V.; Safari, L.; Ferri, G. A Survey on Current-Mode Interfaces for Bio Signals and Sensors. Sensors 2023, 23, 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063194

AMA Style

Scarsella M, Barile G, Stornelli V, Safari L, Ferri G. A Survey on Current-Mode Interfaces for Bio Signals and Sensors. Sensors. 2023; 23(6):3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scarsella, Massimo, Gianluca Barile, Vincenzo Stornelli, Leila Safari, and Giuseppe Ferri. 2023. "A Survey on Current-Mode Interfaces for Bio Signals and Sensors" Sensors 23, no. 6: 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop