Open AccessArticle

The Perizonium Ultrastructure, Divided Apical Pore Fields, Various Pore Occlusions and Visible Intermissio of Cymbella (Bacillariophyceae) with Descriptions of Four New Species

Bin Yang

Bing Liu

^1,*

Saúl Blanco

and

Patrick Rioual

^3,4

College of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China

Laboratorio de Diatomología, La Serna 58, 24007 León, Spain

Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

⁴

CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044, China

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Plants 2024, 13(13), 1851; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131851

Submission received: 14 June 2024 / Revised: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 5 July 2024

(This article belongs to the Section Plant Systematics, Taxonomy, Nomenclature and Classification)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

The initial valves of two Cymbella species are observed under a scanning electron microscope, and the perizonium ultrastructure of Cymbella is revealed for the first time. The perizonium is composed of alternate nodes and internodes and lacks transverse perizonium bands. Four new species, Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., C. hunanensis sp. nov., C. juglandis sp. nov. and C. menyuanensis sp. nov., are described using light and scanning electron microscopy based on epilithon samples collected from rivers in Hunan and Qinghai Provinces, China. Cymbella menyuanensis is a typical Cymbella species that closely resembles species in the group around C. cymbiformis Agardh, the type species of the genus. Cymbella apiculatophora is similar to C. sinensis Metzeltin & Krammer, while Cymbella hunanensis is closer to the C. hustedtii Krasske group. The last species, C. juglandis, has a cymbelloid valve outline, an obscured intermissio, internal occlusions of the areolae, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures and a divided apical pore field at each apex, and it does not appear to belong to any group. In addition, new observations on C. cf. excisiformis Krammer and C. hustedtii are reported. The current concept of the genus Cymbella does not represent a monophyletic group as shown by molecular phylogenetic analyses. However, these analyses are still at the preliminary stage and are not yet sufficient to support a complete revision of the genus. Thus, although extremely diverse ultrastructural features are observed in the six Cymbella species investigated in this paper, we prefer to keep them within Cymbella at this moment for the sake of nomenclatural stability.

Keywords:

apical pore fields; cymbelloid; initial valve; perizonium; synapomorphy

1. Introduction

Species of the genus Cymbella C. Agardh (type species: C. cymbiformis C. Agardh) are biraphid diatoms, characterized by dorsiventral valves, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures, a hidden intermissio, the presence of apical pore fields (APFs) and stigmata [1]. In addition to the above characteristics, the type species, C. cymbiformis, also possesses areolae with internal occlusions [1]. According to the AlgaeBase website [2], the genus Cymbella currently includes 372 valid species names, 173 accepted varieties and 56 accepted formae. From these Cymbella taxa, we can see extreme diversity of morphological structures. Here, we focus on three characters in Cymbella: the APFs, pore occlusions and intermissio.

Liu et al. [3] defined two types of APFs in the genus Cymbella: type I is a complete APF located in an uninterrupted area; type II corresponds to an APF divided by the distal raphe fissure into two unequal areas, a larger ventral one and a smaller dorsal one. These authors only listed a few species with the type II APFs. Here, based on a more systematic review of illustrations published in the literature, we propose a list 16 Cymbella taxa possessing type II APFs (Table 1). For example, Lee et al. [4] thoroughly examined C. orientalis J.H. Lee and clearly showed that this species has type II APFs. Similarly, Krammer [1] provided an SEM image showing that C. hustedtii Krasske also has type II APFs. Unfortunately, neither Lee [4] nor Krammer [1] discussed the structure of the APFs. The first mention of type II APFs was most likely made by Rodionova et al. [5], who stated that “[APFs] are divided by dorsally deflected terminal endings in C. hustedtii and C. orentalis…”.

Regarding the occlusions of the internal apertures of APFs, Krammer [13] termed these occlusions “costal constructions”. For Cymbella fontinalis Bahls, Bahls [14] stated that “internally, each column of poroids in the apical pore field is partially covered by a knobby jointed ridge of silica” and thus provided the first detailed description of the internal occlusions of the APFs. Later, Liu et al. [15] described these occlusions as “an undulate flap-like silica strip above internal apertures of each row of foramina, but not occluding internal apertures completely”. The same group of authors also found similar occlusions in three Delicatophycus species [3].

We checked the references on Cymbella published since 1970 and found at least eight taxa for which the internal occlusions of the areolae are clearly illustrated (Table 2). These occlusions are simple: solid closing plates, either rounded or reniform, developed from a strut attached to the lumen wall of the areola.

The intermissio (i.e., the gap between the two internal proximal raphe endings) is hidden by a silica hood in most Cymbella species. However, some Cymbella taxa have a clearly visible intermissio. We have found at least four species with this character: C. bourrellyi Maillard ex Moser, Steindorf & Lange-Bertalot [18], C. cognata [5], C. hustedtii [1] and C. subleptoceros Krammer [1].

To our knowledge, the ultrastructure of the perizonium in Cymbella has never been illustrated in the literature. In this paper, we first describe four new species of Cymbella following the criteria and the characteristics of the type species of C. cymbiformis as provided by Krammer [1]—dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures, presence of apical pore fields and internal occlusions of the areolae—and provide new observations on C. cf. excisiformis Krammer and C. hustedtii. Then we provide preliminary observations on the perizonium of two Cymbella species. Finally, we analyze, summarize and discuss the results.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

Cymbella apiculatophora Bing Liu and S. Blanco sp. nov. (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Description. LM (Figure 1). Living cells in valve view have same outlines as valves (Figure 1A,B). Valves moderately dorsiventral with convex dorsal margin and slightly tumid ventral margin. Valve apices apiculate. Valve dimensions (n = 23): length 60–66 μm, width 15.5–18.5 μm, length/width ratio range 3.5–4.5. Axial area lanceolate. Central area trapezoid, more developed on dorsal side. Raphe slightly lateral, becoming filiform near distal and proximal ends. Central pores visible, bulbous. Striae radiate throughout valve surface. One shortened stria, widely spaced from each adjacent stria, less than half length of adjacent stria, always present on dorsal middle part of valve (e.g., Figure 1C–F, arrows; see also Figure 2A and Figure 3A,B). Striae, 10–12 in 10 μm in ventral middle part of valve. Areolae discernible, 18–24 in 10 μm. Stigmata, four to six, present on ventral side of central nodule, very close to ends of corresponding ventral striae.

SEM, external view (Figure 2 and Figure 4A–C). Proximal raphe endings expanded (Figure 2A,B,E,F), distal raphe fissures deflected towards dorsal side of valve and dividing each apical pore field into two unequal areas: a larger ventral one composed of ca. 14–18 pervalvar columns of rounded porelli (each column comprising ca. 2–8 porelli) and a smaller dorsal one composed of ca. 6–9 pervalvar columns of rounded porelli (each column comprising ca. 2–8 porelli) (Figure 2C,D and Figure 4C). Four to six stigmata located on the ventral side of central nodule with rounded to oblong outer openings (Figure 2B,E,F). Areola openings rounded near apex, similar to porelli of apical pore field (Figure 2C,D) or dumbbell-like (Figure 2B,E, arrows). Girdle bands open with a row of large, elongated pores located along midline of copula (Figure 4A–C, two arrows, respectively).

SEM, internal view (Figure 3 and Figure 4D–F). Raphe straight, almost along valve midline, proximal raphe endings hidden, i.e., intermissio invisible due to being covered by siliceous hood (Figure 3A–D), distal raphe fissures terminating in raised bilabiate helictoglossae (Figure 3E,F). Four to six stigmata located on ventral side of central nodule with convoluted internal occlusions (Figure 3C,D, arrowheads). Structure of areolar inner openings similar to that of manhole covers, i.e., areolar inner openings located in the middle of rounded depression that is completely covered by rounded to oblong solid silica plates (Figure 4D–F). Apical pore fields composed of a larger ventral area and a smaller dorsal area (Figure 3E). Porellus openings of apical pore fields covered by columns of silica strips composed of V-shaped plates (Figure 3F, arrows).

Holotype designated here. Slide DIA2024004, specimen circled on the slide, illustrated here as Figure 1I, deposited in the herbarium of Jishou University (JIU), China. Registration: http://phycobank.org/104759.

Type locality. China. Hunan Province, Shimen County, Huping Town, Xie River. A specific sampling location (29°57′6″ N, 110°45′37″ E, 230 m a.s.l.) in a riffle of the Xie River, collected by Bing Liu, 14 March 2021.

Etymology. The epithet apiculatophora refers to the abrupt, short, pointed valve apices of this new species.

Ecology and distribution. The samples that included this species were scraped off the surface of stones collected in the Xie River. Hence, this is an epilithic species. The following environmental parameters were measured in the field with three replications: Conductivity = 236.3 ± 1.2 μS∙cm⁻¹; pH = 8.49 ± 0.02; water temperature = 13.6 ± 0.1 °C. Known only from the type locality so far.

Comments. Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov. is characterized by its dorsiventral valve outline, one shortened stria located on the dorsal middle part of valve, a large dorsal central area and its apiculate apices. The most similar species to C. apiculatophora is C. neuquina Frengueli and its variety C. neuquina var. fastigata (Krasske) Krammer, Maidana & Villanueva. All three taxa have similar valve outlines and apices, but C. apiculatophora bears one distinctly shortened stria on the dorsal middle part, whereas C. neuquina and the variety fastigata do not have this character (Table 3). The morphometric data, such as stria and areola densities, are also noticeably different (see Table 3). Four low-resolution SEM images for C. neuquina were provided in Maidana et al. [19]. From their figure 23, we can see that C. neuquina has an APF composed of a complete area, thus differing from that composed of two unequal areas in C. apiculatophora (Table 3). Cymbella orientalis and its variety C. orientalis var. delicatula Stancheva & Ivanov also have a large dorsal central area, but these two taxa differ from C. apiculatophora by their weakly dorsiventral valve outline, narrowly rounded apices and lack of a stigma (Table 3). Interestingly, the apical pore fields of C. apiculatophora and C. orientalis are very similar in structure and their areola internal openings are completely covered by solid closing plates. For both species, the porelli have similar size and shape as the areolae, such that they could be classified as undifferentiated [20], i.e., their APFs are not clearly physically separated and morphologically differentiated from the striae.

Description. LM (Figure 5). Pre-normal valves somewhat vaulted (Figure 5A–I). Normal valves dorsiventral, dorsal margin strongly convex, ventral margin slightly convex. Apices subrostrate to subcapitate. Valve dimensions (n = 36): length 44–53 μm, width 8–9.5 μm. Axial area narrow. Central area present only in pre-normal valves (Figure 1A–I), in normal valves nearly absent (Figure 1J–R). Raphe lateral, slightly reverse-lateral towards valve central part. Striae slightly radiate in middle of valve, radiate towards apices. Areolae difficult to discern under LM. An isolated stigma located on ventral side of central nodule. Striae in dorsal middle part, 8–10 in 10 μm; in ventral middle part, 9–12 in 10 μm. Puncta, 28–32 in 10 μm.

SEM, external view (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Pre-normal valves more vaulted and having lineolate areola openings oriented more transapically or at an angle relative to apical axis than in normal vegetative valves (Figure 6A–D). Proximal raphe fissures reverse-lateral (Figure 7A,B), dorsal raphe fissures deflected towards dorsal side (Figure 7C,D). External opening of stigma rounded (Figure 7B, arrow). Most areola openings lineolate, apically oriented; some not. Apical pore fields composed of a single area, not divided by distal raphe into two unequal areas (Figure 7C,D, arrows, respectively).

SEM, internal view (Figure 8). Proximal raphe endings obscured by a silica hood so that the intermissio is invisible (Figure 8A,B, wavy arrow). Distal raphe fissures terminating in raised, bilabiate helictoglossae. Internal opening of stigma with convoluted occlusions (Figure 8B, arrow). Internal areola openings located in shallow depressions between two adjacent virgae, rounded, no occlusion present. APFs composed of a single area. An undulate silica strip covering each column of foramina but not completely occluding (Figure 8C,D, two arrows, respectively).

Comments. Cymbella cf. excisiformis was commonly found with C. menyuanensis sp. nov. in an unnamed river (37°27′28″ N, 101°23′15″ E, 2940 m a.s.l.) in Menyuan County, Qinghai Province, China. It lives on the stone surfaces of a plateau river. In the original description of C. excisiformis, Krammer [1] reported that its valve length range is 18–44 μm and its density of puncta is 24–30 in 10 μm. Our population has larger cells than Krammer’s (44–53 vs. 18–44 μm) and has a higher density of areolae (28–32 vs. 24–30 in 10 μm). In our population we found an initial valve and many pre-normal valves but did not find specimens smaller than 44 µm in length. Our population is similar to the larger specimens of C. excisiformis illustrated by Krammer [1]; therefore, we identified it as C. cf. excisiformis. Below, we will describe in detail its initial valve.

Cymbella hunanensis Bing Liu & Rioual sp. nov. (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11).

Description. LM (Figure 9). Valves slightly dorsiventral, almost rhombic–lanceolate, dorsal margin highly arched, ventral margin slightly convex due to presence of a slightly gibbous central portion. Valve apices cuneate, obtuse, not protracted. Valve dimensions (n = 42): length 32–56 μm, width 8.5–12.5 μm. Axial area lanceolate. Central area elliptical. Raphe slightly lateral, proximal raphe fissures almost straight with small central pores. Stigmata absent. Striae radiate throughout valve surface, 10–12 in 10 μm in dorsal middle part, 11–13 in 10 μm in ventral middle part. A shortened stria sometimes produced on dorsal middle part (Figure 9C,D,F,I,J, arrows, respectively). Areolae discernible, 20–25 in 10 μm.

SEM, external view (Figure 10). Proximal raphe endings expanded (Figure 10A–D), distal raphe fissures dorsally deflected, divided apical pore fields into two unequal areas: a larger ventral area (LA) composed of ca. 14–18 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–7 porelli) and a smaller dorsal area (SA) composed of 4–7 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–7 porelli) (Figure 10E,F). Areola outer openings reniform; areolar occlusions (closing plates) also reniform, with strut affixed to areolar wall, produced below valve surface, partially occluding areolae (Figure 10D, arrows).

SEM, internal view (Figure 11). Raphe straight, proximal raphe endings interrupted by central nodule, intermissio clearly visible (ca. 1.5 μm long), i.e., no silica hood obscuring intermissio (Figure 11A,B,E), distal raphe fissure terminating in raised bilabiate helictoglossa (Figure 11C,F). Areolae’s internal openings oblong, located in depression between two adjacent virgae, occluded by reniform closing plates. APFs composed of a larger ventral area and a smaller dorsal area (Figure 11C,F). An undulate flap-like silica strip covering apertures of each pervalvar column of porelli but not completely occluding them (Figure 11F, two arrows).

Holotype. Slide DIA2024005, specimen circled on the slide, illustrated here as Figure 9A, deposited in the herbarium of Jishou University (JIU), China.

Registration: http://phycobank.org/104760.

Type locality. China. Hunan Province, Yuanling County, Shenxi River. A specific sampling location (28°44′48″ N, 110°25′27″ E, 200 m asl.) in a riffle of the Shenxi River, collected by Bing Liu, 17 March 2017.

Etymology. The epithet hunanensis is derived from Hunan Province, where this new species was found.

Ecology and distribution. The diatom samples were scraped off of stone surfaces. Hence, this is an epilithic species. The following environmental parameters were measured in the field. pH = 8.3 ± 0.1, conductivity = 215.7 ± 2.6 μS∙cm⁻¹, water temperature = 12.2 ± 0.1 °C. Known from the type locality and the Li River, Sangzhi County, Hunan Province, China.

Comments. Cymbella hunanensis sp. nov. is characterized by its slightly dorsiventral and almost rhombic-lanceolate valve outline, lack of stigma, clearly visible intermissio, areolae occluded by reniform closing plates and apical pore fields divided by the distal raphe fissure into two unequal areas. The two most similar species to C. hunanensis are C. stigmaphora and C. subleptoceros (Table 4). However, unlike these two species, which do not possess a central area, C. hunanensis has an elliptical central area (Table 4). Moreover, the apices of C. hunanensis are more obtuse than those of C. stigmaphora and C. subleptoceros.

Description. LM (Figure 12). Valves slightly dorsiventral, both valve margins convex, but dorsal margin markedly more arched than ventral one. Valve apices cuneate to acute. Valve dimensions (n = 45): length 23–37 μm, breadth 5.5–7.5 μm. Axial area narrow; central area absent or, in some specimens, not well expressed on dorsal side. Raphe nearly along valve midline except approaching valve center, where raphe is ventrally displaced. Central pores absent. Striae slightly radiate in middle part, radiate towards apices. Striae in dorsal middle part, 10–14 in 10 μm; in ventral middle part, 10–12 in 10 μm. Stigmata absent. Areolae difficult to discern under LM, 25–31 in 10 μm.

SEM, external view (Figure 13 and Figure 14). Frustule with deeper dorsal mantle than ventral mantle (Figure 13A,B). Epicingulum comprising a single valvocopula composed of two parts: one part inserting dorsal mantle margin (Figure 13A), another part inserting ventral mantle margin (Figure 13B). Hypocingulum comprising valvocopula and two connective bands. Valvocopulae of hypocingulum and epicingulum identical in structure and position. Connective bands short, surrounding and inserting each apex of hypovalve (Figure 13D,E, arrows, respectively). For each frustule, there are two split locations for all girdle bands, each split location situated near apex (Figure 13A–C, labelled split location). A row of rounded to oblong poroids dividing valvocopula into pars exterior and pars interior (Figure 13C, three black arrowheads). Proximal raphe endings slightly displaced towards ventral side, distal raphe fissures dorsally deflected, dividing apical pore fields into two unequal areas: a larger ventral area (LA) composed of ca. 9–12 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–5 porelli) and a smaller dorsal area (SA) composed of 4–7 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–5 porelli) (Figure 14A,B,D,E). Areola outer openings reniform, areolae close to axial area smaller than most other areolae (Figure 14A, arrows). Areola occlusions (closing plates) also reniform, developed from strut affixed to areola wall on either its dorsal or ventral side (Figure 14C,D, arrows and wavy arrows, respectively). Reniform closing plates projecting in areola lumens, partially occluding each areolar opening below valve surface (Figure 14F).

SEM, internal view (Figure 15). Proximal raphe endings interrupted by central nodule, intermissio clearly visible (ca. 1 μm long), not hidden by a silica hood (Figure 15A,B,E,F). Areolae’s internal openings oblong, located in depression between two adjacent virgae, occluded by reniform closing plates.

Distal raphe fissures terminating in raised bilabiate helictoglossae. Apical pore fields composed a larger area and a smaller area (Figure 15C,D). An undulate flap-like silica strip covering internal apertures of each column of porelli but not completely occluding them (Figure 15D, two arrows).

Comments. Cymbella hustedtii was commonly found with C. hunanensis sp. nov. (see above). Cymbella hustedtii differs from most Cymbella species in its divided APFs, clearly visible intermissio and reniform areola outer openings and closing plates. Five Cymbella species have this combination of characters: C. bourrellyi Maillard ex Moser, Steindorf & Lange-Bertalot [18], C. cognata [5], C. hustedtii Krasske [1], C. subleptoceros Krammer [1] and C. hunanensis sp. nov. (see above). The type species, C. cymbiformis, shares dorsal deflected distal raphe fissures, APFs and internal areola occlusions with C. hustedtii. The intermissio in C. cymbiformis is hidden by a silica hood whereas the intermissio in C. hustedtii is clearly visible. These characteristics make C. hustedtii an interesting species. Its transfer to the genus Cymbopleura by Novelo et al. [21] is, in our opinion, unjustified. On the other hand, Liu et al. [22] did not mention this species when they described the genus Qinia Y. Liu, Kociolek & Kulikovskiy, as they only focused their discussion at the generic level.

Cymbella juglandis Bing Liu & S. Blanco sp. nov. (Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18 and Figure 19)

Description. LM (Figure 16). Valves slightly dorsiventral, almost lanceolate, dorsal margin arched, ventral side slightly convex except in smaller specimens where ventral side almost straight (Figure 16L,M). Valve apices acuminate. Valve dimensions (n = 39): length 28–75 μm, width 8–12 μm. Axial area variable, from narrow in smaller specimens to moderately wide in larger specimens, broadening gradually towards valve center. Central area elliptical in larger specimens, indistinct in smaller specimens. Raphe located along midline, straight (filiform). Central pores small. Stigmata absent. Striae radiate throughout valve surface, 10–12 in 10 μm in dorsal middle part, 10–13 in 10 μm in ventral middle part. Areolae discernible under LM, 22–27 in 10 μm.

SEM, external view (Figure 17 and Figure 18). Raphe straight (Figure 17A–C), proximal raphe endings slightly expanded (Figure 17D–F), distal raphe fissures deflected towards dorsal side (Figure 18). External openings of areolae mostly slit-like, some rounded. Particularly, a few of the openings bordering dorsal central area are slit-like, transapically oriented (Figure 17D–F, wavy arrows), while a few bordering ventral central area are rounded, separate from ventral striae (Figure 17D–F, arrows). Distal raphe fissures dividing apical pore fields into two unequal areas: a larger ventral area (LA) composed of ca. 14–16 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–7 porelli) and a smaller dorsal area (SA) composed of 9–11 pervalvar columns of porelli (each column composed of ca. 1–7 porelli) (Figure 18). Occlusions produced below valve surface, partially occluding areolae (Figure 18B,D).

SEM, internal view (Figure 19). Raphe straight, proximal raphe endings obscured by silica hood, i.e., intermissio invisible (Figure 19A,B,E), distal raphe fissures terminating in raised bilabiate helictoglossae. Internal view confirms absence of stigmata (Figure 19B,E,F). Internal openings of areolae located in depressions between adjacent virgae, rounded, elliptical, or oblong; areola occlusions (volae) in the shape of walnut kernels, developed from two or more struts that are affixed to areolar wall (Figure 19F, arrows). Apical pore fields composed of two unequal areas (Figure 19C). An undulate silica strip covering each column of porelli but not completely occluding them (Figure 19D, two arrows).

Holotype. Slide DIA2024006, specimen circled on the slide, illustrated here as Figure 16A, deposited in the herbarium of Jishou University (JIU), China. Registration: http://phycobank.org/104761.

Type locality. China. Hunan Province, Suining County, Changpu Town, Wu River. A specific sampling location (26°34.59′ N, 110°09.19′ E, 300 m a.s.l.) in a riffle of the Wu River, collected by Bing Liu, 22 March 2021.

Etymology. The epithet juglandis refers to the areola occlusions, which resemble walnut kernels.

Ecology and distribution. Epilithic in a mountain river with oligotrophic waters. The following environmental parameters were measured in the field. Conductivity was 99.7 ± 0.3 μS∙cm^–1, pH was 7.9 ± 0.1 and water temperature was 13.2 ± 0.2 °C. Known only from the type locality so far.

Comments. Cymbella juglandis has a unique suite of characters: acuminate apices, divided APFs, lack of stigma and areola inner occlusions (volae) in the shape of walnut kernels. Cymbella juglandis differs from C. shii by morphometrics such as the valve width (the former having much narrower width than the latter, Table 5). Cymbella juglandis is distinguished from C. subleptoceros by its obscured intermissio, whereas the latter has a clearly visible intermissio (Table 5).

Description. LM (Figure 20). Initial or pre-normal valves vaulted (Figure 20A). Valves strongly dorsiventral, dorsal margin high, strongly arched, ventral margin concave with a swelling in the middle except in small valves which have a straight ventral margin (Figure 20L). Apices rostrate to subcapitate, slightly turned towards dorsal side. Valve dimensions (n = 29): length 46–91 μm, width 12.5–20.5 μm. Axial area narrow, linear. Central area small. Raphe lateral, proximal raphe fissures relatively short. Central pores visible. 3–6 stigmata located on ventral side of central nodule, slightly detached from ventral striae. Striae radiate throughout valve surface, 8–11 in 10 μm in both dorsal and ventral middle parts. Areolae discernible under LM, 22–26 in 10 μm.

SEM, external view (Figure 21 and Figure 22). Areola openings of pre-normal valves have various shapes and orientations (Figure 21, arrows). Apical pore fields not well developed in pre-normal valves (Figure 21C,D). Proximal raphe endings expanded; external openings of stigmata rounded to oblong (Figure 22B). Distal raphe fissures deflected towards dorsal side, not dividing apical pore fields (Figure 22C,D). Most external openings of areolae lineolate (Figure 22B–D).

SEM, internal view (Figure 23). Raphe straight, proximal raphe endings obscured by silica hood, i.e., intermissio invisible (Figure 23A–C), distal raphe fissures terminating in raised bilabiate helictoglossae (Figure 23E,F). Internal openings of stigmata with convoluted occlusions (Figure 23B,D, arrows). Internal openings of areolae located in depressions between adjacent virgae, rounded, elliptical or oblong, with mushroom-shaped closing plates developed from strut that is affixed to either dorsal or ventral areolar wall (Figure 23D, wavy arrows). Apical pore fields composed of a single area, an undulate silica strip covering each column of foramina but not completely occluding them (Figure 23F, two arrows).

Holotype. Slide DIA2024007, specimen circled on the slide, illustrated here as Figure 20B, deposited in the herbarium of Jishou University (JIU), China.

Registration: http://phycobank.org/104762.

Type locality. China. Qinghai Province, Menyuan County, an unnamed river. A specific sampling location (37°27′28″ N, 101°23′15″ E, 2940 m a.s.l.) in a riffle of the unnamed river, collected by Bing Liu, 18 July 2019.

Etymology. The epithet menyuanensis is derived from Menyuan County of Qinghai Province where this new species was found.

Ecology and distribution. The sampling site is located in the plateau which belongs to the highland continental climate zone. The diatom samples were scraped off of the stone surfaces, Cymbella menyuanensis is therefore epilithic. The following environmental parameters were measured in the field: Conductivity was 448.3 ± 0.5 μS∙cm⁻¹, pH was 8.3 ± 0.1 and water temperature was 11.9 ± 0.5 °C. So far, its distribution is known from the type locality and a river in Huzhu County, Qinghai Province.

Comments. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov. is characterized by its strongly dorsiventral valve outline and rostrate to subcapitate apices, 3–6 stigmata and areolae occluded internally by the mushroom-shaped closing plates. It is similar to C. neocistula, C. nepalensis and C. proxima in morphometry. However, it differs from C. neocistula and C. nepalensis in its rostrate to subcapitate apices, whereas the latter two have non-protracted, rounded apices (Table 6). It also differs from C. proxima in its much higher areola density (22–26 vs. 14–18 in 10 µm, Table 6).

A pre-normal valve (Figure 6) and an initial valve (Figure 24 and Figure 25) of Cymbella cf. excisiformis and an initial frustule (Figure 26 and Figure 27) of C. menyuanensis sp. nov. were investigated using SEM. The observed initial valve of C. cf. excisiformis was 52 µm long, 8 µm wide. It had slightly radiate striae, 10 in 10 μm in ventral middle part, and an areola density of 30–32 in 10 μm (Figure 24). The initial frustule of C. menyuanensis was 147 µm long, 24 µm wide, with radiate striae, 8 in 10 μm in both the dorsal and ventral middle parts and an areola density of 19–22 in 10 μm (Figure 26).

The perizonia in both C. cf. excisiformis and C. menyuanensis are very similar in structure. They are composed of a whole silica sheet covering the surface of the initial frustule (Figure 24, Figure 25 and Figure 26). The whole perizonium joins (overlaps) at the girdle bands (Figure 26C–F and Figure 27A,C) and is composed of two parts: nodes and internodes (Figure 25 and Figure 27C). The nodes are solid and thickened, resembling the transverse perizonium bands in other diatoms. The internodes are also composed of two parts: strips and openings between them (Figure 25D and Figure 27C). The nodes and internodes are fused together and do not merely overlap with each other. The perizonium is composed of alternate nodes and internodes (Figure 25 and Figure 27C). No transverse perizonium bands were observed.

Figure 1. Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., LM. (A,B). Two uncleaned cells. (C–K). Nine valves showing a size diminution series; note one shortened stria on the dorsal middle part (arrows in C,D,E,F, respectively) and the apiculate apices. (I). Illustration of the holotype specimen. Scale bars (A,B) = 10 μm, (C–K) = 10 μm.

Figure 2. Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., SEM, valve external view. (A). A frustule. (B). Middle part details; note ca. 5 stigmata (five arrowheads) and rounded or dumbbell-like (three arrows) outer openings of areolae. (C,D). Details of two apices from A; note the apical field divided by the distal raphe fissure into two unequal areas—a larger area (LA) and a smaller area (SA)—and the rounded outer openings of areolae near each apex. (E,F). Two other middle part details; note ca. 5 stigmata (five arrowheads) and the rounded or dumbbell-like (four arrows) outer openings of areolae. Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–F) = 2 μm.

Figure 3. Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., SEM, valve internal view. (A,B). Two valves; note a shortened stria on the dorsal middle part (two arrows). (C,D). Middle part details, note ca. 4 or 5 stigmata (arrowheads) and obscured intermissio (two arrows, respectively). (E). Apical detail; note the apical field divided by the distal raphe fissure into two unequal areas: a larger area (LA) and a smaller area (SA). (F). Apical detail; note the columns of V-shaped occlusions (three arrows). Scale bars (A,B) = 10 μm, (C) = 2 μm, (D–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 4. Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., SEM. (A–C). Details showing open girdle bands and a row of large, elongated pores located along the midline of copula (two arrows, respectively). (D–F). Internal details; note manhole-shaped internal openings (arrows) and their rounded to oblong silica closing plates (wavy arrows). Scale bars (A–C) = 2 μm, (D–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 5. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, LM. (A–I). Nine pre-normal valves; note that their somewhat vaulted outline. (J–R). Nine normal vegetative valves. Scale bar (A–R) = 10 μm.

Figure 6. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, pre-normal valve, SEM, external view. (A). A complete pre-normal valve. (B–D). Details from A. Note lineolate areola openings; most of them are oriented parallel to the apical axis, but some are oriented transapically or at an angle relative to the apical axis (arrows). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–D) = 2 μm.

Figure 7. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, SEM, external view. (A). A complete valve; note the lateral-reverse proximal raphe fissures. (B). Detail of middle part; note the stigma (arrow). (C,D). Two apical details; note that the distal raphe fissure does divide the apical pore field into two areas (arrows). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–D) = 2 μm.

Figure 8. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, SEM, internal view. (A). A complete valve. (B). Detail of middle part; note the stigma (arrow) and obscured intermissio (wavy arrow). (C,D). Two apical details; note an undulate flap-like silica strip covering the internal apertures of each column of foramina but not occluding the apertures completely (two arrows, respectively). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–D) = 2 μm.

Figure 9. Cymbella hunanensis, sp. nov., LM. (A–N). Fourteen valves in a series of diminishing size; note that a shortened stria is sometimes present on the dorsal central part (arrows). (A). Illustration of the holotype specimen. Scale bar (A–N) = 10 μm.

Figure 10. Cymbella hunanensis, sp. nov., SEM, external view. (A–C). Three valves; note that a shortened stria is sometimes present on the dorsal central part (arrow in B). (D). Middle part details; note the reniform closing plates (black arrows) and absence of a stigma. (E,F). Details of two apices from C. Note the apical field divided by the distal raphe fissure into two areas: a larger area (LA) and a small area (SA). Scale bars (A–C) = 10 μm, (D–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 11. Cymbella hunanensis, sp. nov., SEM, internal view. (A). A complete valve. (B). Middle part details; note the two internal proximal raphe endings interrupted by the central nodule (two arrows) and the absence of stigmata. (C,D). Apical details. Note the apical field divided into two areas: a large area (LA) and a small area (SA). (E). Other middle part details; note the two internal proximal raphe endings interrupted by the central nodule (two arrows) and the absence of stigmata (arrows). (F). Details showing an undulate flap-like silica strip above the internal apertures of each column of foramina but not occluding the internal apertures completely (two arrows in F). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 12. Cymbella hustedtii, LM. (A–T). Twenty valves in a series of diminishing size. Scale bar (A–T) = 10 μm.

Figure 13. Cymbella hustedtii, SEM, external view. (A,B). Two frustules; note girdle bands and split locations in girdle view. (C) Valve with valvocopula; note row of poroids along suture (three black arrowheads). (D,E). Two apices; note that connective band surrounds insertion of each apex and that two valvocopulae split near apex (E, two vs; v = valvocopula). Scale bar (A–E) = 5 μm.

Figure 14. Cymbella hustedtii, SEM, external view. (A,B). Two valves; note that the areolae close to the axis are smaller than the other areolae (A, arrows). (C,F). Details showing reniform external openings of areolae and reniform closing plates. Note the struts attached to the areola lumens on either the dorsal or ventral side (arrows and wavy arrows, respectively). (D,E). Two apical details. Note the apical field divided by the distal raphe fissure into two unequal areas: a larger ventral area (LA) and a smaller dorsal area (SA). Scale bars (A,B) = 5 μm, (C–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 15. Cymbella hustedtii, SEM, internal view. (A,E). Two complete valves. (B,F). Middle part details; note that the intermissio is clearly visible (not obscured by a silica hood; two arrows, respectively). (C,D). Two apical details; note the apical field composed of two areas—a larger area (LA) and a smaller area (SA)—and an undulate flap-like silica strip covering the internal apertures of each column of foramina but not occluding the internal apertures completely (two arrows in D). Scale bars (A,E) = 3 μm, (B,F) = 1 μm, (C,D) = 400 nm.

Figure 16. Cymbella juglandis, sp. nov., LM. (A–M). Thirteen valves in a series of diminishing size; note that the ventral margin becomes straighter and straighter in smaller specimens. (A). Illustration of the holotype specimen. Scale bars (A–M) = 10 μm.

Figure 17. Cymbella juglandis, sp. nov., SEM, external view. (A–C). Three valves; note the almost straight raphes and the acute apices. (D–F). Middle part details; note that ca. 2–4 terminal areolae in the dorsal central part have different shapes from the others (wavy arrows) and that ca. 4–7 terminal areolae in the ventral central part also have different shapes from the others (arrows). Scale bars (A–C) = 10 μm, (D–F) = 2 μm.

Figure 18. Cymbella juglandis, sp. nov., SEM, external view. (A–F). Apical details. Note the apical field divided by the distal raphe fissure into two areas: a larger area on the ventral side (LA) and a small area on the dorsal side (SA). Scale bars (A–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 19. Cymbella juglandis, sp. nov., SEM, internal view. (A). A complete valve. (B). Middle part details; note the obscured intermissio (two arrows) and absence of stigmata. (C,D). Apical details; note the apical field divided into two areas—a large area (LA) and a small area (SA)—and an undulate flap-like silica strip above internal apertures of each row of foramina but not occluding the internal apertures completely (two arrows in D). (E). Other middle part details; note the obscured intermissio (two wavy arrows) and absence of stigmata (arrows). (F). Details showing the walnut-kernel-like closing plates (arrows). Scale bars (A) = 4 μm, (B–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 20. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., LM. (A). Initial valve or pre-normal valve; note its vaulted outline. (B–L). Eleven normal vegetative valves in a series of diminishing size. (B). Illustration of the holotype specimen. Scale bar (A–L) = 10 μm.

Figure 21. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., pre-normal valve, SEM, external view. (A). Pre-normal valve. (B–D). Details from (A); note stigmata (arrowheads), various areola openings and orientations (arrows) and poorly developed apical pore fields. Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–D) = 2 μm.

Figure 22. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., SEM, external view. (A). Normal valve. (B). Detail of middle part, note stigmata (arrows). (C,D). Two apical details, note that the distal raphe fissure does not divide the apical pore field into two areas (two arrows). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–D) = 2 μm.

Figure 23. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., SEM, internal view. (A,C). Two complete valves. (B,D). Details of the middle part; note the stigmata (arrows) and mushroom-shaped closing plates (wavy arrows). (E,F). Two apical details; note that there is an undulate flap-like silica strip above the internal apertures of each row of foramina but not occluding the internal apertures completely (two arrows). Scale bars (A,C) = 10 μm, (B,D–F) = 2 μm.

Figure 24. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, SEM, initial valve. (A). An initial valve. (B). Detail of the middle part; note the irregular central nodule and two proximal raphe endings (two arrows). (C,D). Two apical details; note the perizonium composed of a node (two arrows) and internode (wavy arrow). (E,F). Details showing that the perizonium covers the valve surface before being removed (two arrows). Scale bars (A) = 4 μm, (B–F) = 1 μm.

Figure 25. Cymbella cf. excisiformis, SEM, details of perizonium. (A–D). The structures of the perizonium, which is composed of two parts: the nodes and the internodes (labeled in A). The internode is also composed of two parts: strips and openings between them (labelled in D). Scale bars (A–C) = 1 μm, (D) = 400 nm.

Figure 26. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., SEM, initial frustule. (A). An initial frustule. (B). Detail of the middle part; note the rectangle to oblong external openings of areolae and two girdle bands (two arrows). (C,D). Two apical details; note that the perizonium encloses the entire frustule, the rectangle to oblong external openings of areolae (white arrow) and irregular apical pore field (black arrow). (E,F). Details showing that the perizonium covers the valve surface and irregular apical pore field (one black arrow). Scale bars (A) = 10 μm, (B–E) = 3 μm, (D,F) = 1 μm.

Figure 27. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov., SEM, details of perizonium. (A,B). Details showing that the perizonium encloses the entire frustule (three arrows). (C). Detail showing that the perizonium is composed of two parts: the nodes and the internodes. The internode is also composed of two parts: strips and openings between them. Scale bars (A–C) = 3 μm.

2.2. Discussion

The perizonium in Cymbella. Kaczmarska et al. [24] defined the perizonium in diatoms as “a part of the auxospore wall comprising silica bands or rings, hoops and strips that is formed underneath the incunabula as the auxospore expands, apparently to control polarity and shape of the growing auxospore and hence also the species-specific shape of the initial cell”. These authors also illustrated two types of perizonia: the transverse and the longitudinal perizonium. Liu and Williams [25] found that Hannaea inaequidentata (Lagerstedt) Genkal and Kharitonov only produced the longitudinal perizonium and lacked any transverse perizonium bands. Interestingly, transverse perizonium bands were not found in the two Cymbella species investigated in this paper. Liu and Williams [25] defined the pre-normal vegetative period as “the time between immediately after the initial cell’s first division and the presence of the first new normal vegetative cells”. We also found a pre-normal population of C. cf. exciformis (Figure 5A–I) and illustrated a pre-normal valve (Figure 6). As the ultrastructure of the perizonium in Cymbella has never been illustrated in the literature until this study, we hope our findings can generate more interest in investigating this important structure of the life cycle.

The visible intermissio in Cymbella. Visible intermissiones are seen in a few cymbelloid genera, such as Cymbopleura [26,27], Encyonema [28,29] and Vladinikolaevia [30]. On the contrary, hidden intermissiones have been found in a few cymbelloid genera, such as Celebesia [31], Cymbella [1,15,32], Delicatophycus [3,33], Karthickia [34] and Qinia [22]. Whether visible intermissio represents a homologous character is unknown. Even in the genus Cymbella, at least five species possess a clearly visible intermissio; therefore, whether the intermissio can be used as one of the defining characters to separate a monophyletic group from Cymbella sensu lato needs further explorations.

The divided apical pore fields in Cymbella. Many authors used the term “bisected apical pore fields” for Cymbella. This is, however, somewhat misleading, as “bisected” usually refers to a structure divided into two equal parts, which is not the case for Cymbella because its distal raphe fissure divides the apical pore fields into two unequal parts. Thus, a more precise terminology for Cymbella would require using “divided apical pore fields”. APFs divided by terminal raphe fissures have been observed in other genera within the Cymbellaceae, such as Cymbellafalsa, Celebesia, Qinia or Reimeria, and has been a feature typically associated with gomphonemoid diatoms [35]. From our literature survey, we found 16 Cymbella species (Table 1) possessing such divided apical pore fields, to which we can add C. apiculatophora sp. nov., C. hunanensis sp. nov. and C. juglandis sp. nov. from the observations presented in this study. Based on the literature for studies with molecular information on Cymbella species, there are 18 species of Cymbella that have been sequenced [6,27,36,37,38]. Among these 18 species, three have divided APFs and belong to the “aspera group”. A very interesting point is that the “aspera group”, which is composed of C. aspera, C. himalaspera, C. baicalaspera and also includes C. bengalensis, is well separated from the other Cymbella species in all the molecular studies [6,27,36,37,38]. This would suggest that the character “divided APFs” is supported by molecular data. We could not find a SEM image of C. bengalensis in the literature (only some LM images in [39]); therefore, we could not confirm if this species also has divided APFs. At this stage, it is unclear if these 19 Cymbella species represent a monophyletic group within the Cymbellales. To evaluate this possibility, further explorations, especially molecular analyses, are required.

The various pore occlusions in Cymbella. In this study, the outer openings of areolae are lineolate, and the inner openings of areolae are rounded without occlusions in Cymbella cf. excisiformis. On the other hand, Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov., C. hunanensis sp. nov., C. hustedtii, C. menyuanensis sp. nov. and C. juglandis sp. nov. all produce internal occlusions (Figure 28).

The areola (pore) occlusions were defined in Ross and Sims [40], Ross et al. [41] and Mann [42]. Cox [43] reassessed their structure and terminology and concluded that the closing plate in Ulnaria cannot be attributed to a cribrum, hymen, rica, or rota, but it may be considered a vola, which is a catch-all term. To be precise, we use the term closing plate rather than vola. The internal occlusions in C. hunanensis, C. hustedtii and C. menyuanensis are solid plates which may be termed as flaps [42] or volae [43]. For this type of structure, the term “closing plates” [44] is more precise. The type of internal occlusions observed in C. juglandis appears to be extremely rare in the literature. The shapes and sizes of median-size areolae in the six Cymbella species investigated in this study are summarized in Table 7.

Taxonomic position of the four new species in this paper. Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov. has a typical cymbelloid valve outline, an obscured intermissio, 3–6 stigmata, internal occlusions of areolae, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures, and a complete APF at each apex. These features irrefutably support that this taxon is a typical Cymbella species belonging to the C. cymbiformis Agardh group as defined by Krammer [1]. Cymbella apiculatophora has a cymbelloid valve outline, an obscured intermissio, 4–6 stigmata, internal occlusions of areolae, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures and a divided APF at each apex. These features support a close relationship with the C. sinensis Metzeltin & Krammer group according to the phylogenetic hypotheses proposed in Thirouin [35]. Cymbella hunanensis sp. nov. has a cymbelloid valve outline, clearly visible intermissio, internal occlusions of areolae, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures and a divided APF at each apex. These features suggest that it is closely related to the C. hustedtii group as defined by Krammer [1]. The last species, Cymbella juglandis sp. nov., has a cymbelloid valve outline, an obscured intermissio, internal occlusions of areolae, dorsally deflected distal raphe fissures and a divided APF at each apex. Except for the divided APF at each apex, the features of C. juglandis support its classification as a Cymbella species. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Cymbellales are at the preliminary stage, although the character “divided APFs” is supported by molecular data [6,27,36,37,38]. However, whether the divided APF is a synapomorphy is still unknown. Therefore, at this moment, it is preferable to place C. juglandis in the genus Cymbella.

Figure 28. Areolae and their occlusions in five Cymbella species. (A,B). Shapes and sizes of external (A) and internal (B) openings and occlusions in C. apiculatophora. (C,D). Shapes and sizes of external (C) and internal (D) openings and occlusions in C. hunanensis. (E,F). Shapes and sizes of external (E) and internal (F) openings and occlusions in C. hustedtii. (G,H). Shapes and sizes of external (G) and internal (H) openings and occlusions in C. menyuanensis. (I,J). Shapes and sizes of external (I) and internal (J) openings and occlusions in C. juglandis.

3. Materials and Methods

The diatom samples of this study were collected from one river in Qinghai and three rivers in Hunan Provinces, China. Qinghai Province occupies the northeast corner of the Qinghai–Tibet plateau, has an average elevation of over 3000 m a.s.l. and has a highland continental climate. Hunan Province is situated in south-central China, which has a subtropical climate. The four rivers sampled are an unnamed river in Menyuan County (37°27′28″ N, 101°23′15″ E, 2940 m a.s.l.), Qinghai Province (Cymbella cf. excisiformis Krammer and C. menyuanensis sp. nov. are described from this river); the Shenxi River in Yuanling County (28°44′48″ N, 110°25′27″ E, 200 m a.s.l.), Hunan Province (C. hunanensis sp. nov. and C. hustedtii Krasske are described from this river); the Wu River in Suining County (26°34.59′ N, 110°09.19′ E, 300 m a.s.l.), Hunan Province (C. juglandis sp. nov. is described from this river); and the Xie River in Shimen County (29°57′6″ N, 110°45′37″ E, 230 m a.s.l.), Hunan Province (C. apiculatophora sp. nov. is described from this river). The method of collecting the diatom samples is the same as in Liu [45] and consists of sampling numerous submerged stones showing yellow–brown surfaces that indicate the presence of diatoms. Each stone was placed on a plastic plate, and its surface was brushed using a toothbrush, with the brushed-off diatom samples being washed onto the plate. The diatom samples were transferred into two 100 mL sampling bottles. One bottle was fixed with 70% ethanol, and the other was left unfixed. At the time of sample collection, temperature, pH and conductivity were measured in situ with a portable multimeter (HQ40D, HACH Company).

The laboratory methods are also the same as in Liu [45] and consist of the following: “The collected diatom samples were transported to the lab and used to observe living cells. Part of the samples were fixed with ethanol to a final concentration of ca. 70%. A total of 100 μL diatom samples were transferred into a round chamber (diameter 14 mm, depth 0.35 mm) located in the middle of a custom-made slide by using a pipette, then examined using a Leica DM3000 light microscope (LM), equipped with a Leica MC190 HD digital camera. The collected diatom samples to which 70% alcohol was added were processed (cleaned) for microscopic examination with 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 30% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). Permanent slides were prepared using Naphrax mountant and examined using the same light microscope as above. Slides are deposited in the Herbarium of Jishou University, Hunan, People’s Republic of China (JIU) (Herbarium acronyms follow Index Herbarium http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/). Samples were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Several drops of the cleaned diatom material were air-dried on to glass coverslips. The coverslips were attached to aluminium stubs using double-sided conductive carbon strips and sputter-coated with platinum (Cressington Sputter Coater 108auto, Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA, USA). Samples were examined and visualised using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) Sigma HD (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) available at Huaihua University, China”.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L. and B.Y.; methodology, B.L. and B.Y.; validation, B.L. and B.Y.; investigation, B.L. and B.Y.; resources, B.L. and B.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and B.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.B. and P.R.; visualization, B.L., S.B. and P.R.; supervision, B.L.; funding acquisition, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication is based on research carried out with financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (grant number 2022JJ30473), and the Scientific Research Project of the Education Department of Hunan Province, China [grant number 22A0376].

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the two anonymous reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

Krammer, K. Cymbella. In Diatoms of Europe, Diatoms of the European Inland Waters and Comparable Habitats; Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed.; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2002; Volume 3, pp. 1–584. [Google Scholar]
Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase; World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2024; Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 16 April 2024).
Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Blanco, S.; Williams, D.M. Three new species of Delicatophycus M.J. Wynne (Bacillariophyta) from China, all possessing apical pore fields. Fottea 2022, 22, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lee, J.H.; Gotoh, T.; Chung, J. Cymbella orientalis sp. nov., a freshwater diatom from the Far East. Diatom Res. 1993, 8, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Rodionova, Y.V.; Pomazkina, G.V.; Makarevich, O.Y. Encyonema mirabilis, Cymbella olgae and C. cognata: New diatom species from Lake Baikal. Diatom Res. 2013, 28, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Glushchenko, A.M.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Molecular and morphological investigations of two giant diatom Cymbella species from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia) with comments on their distributions. Plants 2022, 11, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mirzahasanlou, J.P.; Qarebesloum, T.; Farasati, M.; Bahalkeh, A. Cymbella golestanica sp. nov. a new diatom species from Agh Su Waterfall Golestan National Park, Northeastern Iran. Phytotaxa 2024, 637, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Edlund, M.B.; Kheiri, S.; Mirzahasanlou, J.P. Nomenclature and biogeography of the genus Qinia (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyceae). Not. Algarum 2024, 330, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
Jüttner, I.; Gurung, S.; Sharma, C.; Sharma, S.; De Haan, M.; Van de Vijver, B. Morphology of new taxa in the Cymbella aspera and Cymbella neocistula groups, Cymbella yakii sp. nov. and Cymbella cf. hanzschiana from Everest National Park, Nepal. Pol. Bot. J. 2010, 55, 73–92. [Google Scholar]
Le Cohu, R.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Van de Viver, B.; Tudesque, T. Analysis and critical evaluation of structural features in four Cymbellaceae taxa from New Caledonia. Fottea 2020, 20, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Garcia, M.; Dutra, D.B. Cymbella loescherae sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) from first-order streams of southern Brazil. Pol. Bot. J. 2016, 61, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stancheva, R.; Ivanov, P. Cymbella orientalis var. delicatula var. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new epilithic stream diatom from Bulgaria. Nova Hedwig. 2011, 93, 453–464. [Google Scholar]
Krammer, K. Valve Morphology in the Genus Cymbella C.A. Agardh. In Micromorphology of Diatom Valves; Helmcke, J.-G., Krammer, K., Eds.; J. Cramer: Vaduz, Liechtenstein, 1982; Volume XI, pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
Bahls, L. Cymbella fontinalis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta, Cymbellaceae) from springs in the Rocky Mountains of North America. Nova Hedwig. 2019, 108, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, B.; Williams, D.M.; Li, Y.; Tang, Z.S. Two new species of Cymbella (Bacillariophyceae) from China, with comments on their valve dimensions. Diatom Res. 2020, 35, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Solak, C.N.; Balkis-Ozdelice, N.; Yilmaz, E.; Durmus, T.; Blanco, S. Description of two new Cymbella (Bacillariophyta) species from Sakarbaşı spring, Turkey. Phytotaxa 2021, 484, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vishnyakov, V.S.; Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Dorofeyuk, N.I.; Genkal, S.I. Morphology and Distribution of Cymbella neocistula Krammer and Cymbella nepalensis (Jüttner & Van de Vijver) Vishnyakov stat. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) in Water Ecosystems of South Siberia and Mongolia. Inland Water Biol. 2015, 8, 325–333. [Google Scholar]
Moser, G.; Steindorf, A.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Neukaledonien Diatomeenflora einer Tropeninsel. Revision der Collection Maillard und Untersuchungen neuen Materials. Bibl. Diatomol. 1995, 32, 1–340. [Google Scholar]
Maidana, N.I.; Villanueva, V.D.; Krammer, K. Taxonomy and valve structure of Cymbella neuquina Frenguelli (Bacillariophyceae), including a new combination, C. neuquina var. fastigata (Krasske) nov. comb. Nova Hedwig. 2002, 74, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cox, E.J. Ontogeny, homology, and terminology—Wall morphogenesis as an aid to character recognition and character state definition for pennate diatom systematics. J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Novelo, E.; Tavera, R.; Ibarra, C. Bacillariophyceae from Karstic Wetlands in Mexico. Bibl. Diatomol. 2007, 54, 1–136. [Google Scholar]
Liu, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M.; Glushchenko, A.; Yu, P.; Wang, Q.; Lu, X.; Fan, Y. Qinia gen. nov. (Bacillariophyceae: Cymbellales) from Yunnan Province, China. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2023, 41, 1965–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gong, Z.J.; Li, Y.L.; Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H. New species of Cymbella and Placoneis (Bacillariophyta) from late Pleistocene fossil, China. Phytotaxa 2013, 150, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kaczmarska, I.; Poulíčková, A.; Sato, S.; Edlund, M.B.; Idei, M.; Watanabe, T.; Mann, D.G. Proposals for a terminology for diatom sexual reproduction, auxospores and resting stages. Diatom Res. 2013, 28, 263–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, B.; Williams, D.M. From chaos to order: The life history of Hannaea inaequidentata (Lagerstedt) Genkal and Kharitonov (Bacillariophyta), from initial cells to vegetative cells. PhytoKeys 2020, 162, 81–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bahls, L.; Luna, T. Cymbopleura laszlorum spec. nov. (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyceae), a glacial relic from a calcium-rich floodplain fen in southwestern Montana, USA. Phytotaxa 2018, 349, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Glushchenko, A.; Gusev, E.; Maltsev, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kuznetsova, I.; Kulikovskiy, M. Cymbopleura natellia—A new species from Transbaikal area (Russia, Siberia) described on the basis of molecular and morphological investigation. PhytoKeys 2021, 183, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kulikovskiy, M.; Lange–Bertalot, H.; Witkowski, A.; Dorofeyuk, N. Morphology and taxonomy of selected cymbelloid diatoms from a Mongolian Sphagnum ecosystem with a description of three species new to science. Fottea 2009, 9, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Harper, M.A.; Van De Vijver, B.; Kaulfuss, U.; Lee, D.E. Resolving the confusion between two fossil freshwater diatoms from Otago, New Zealand: Encyonema jordanii and Encyonema jordaniforme (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyta). Phytotaxa 2019, 394, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kulikovskiy, M.; Kociolek, J.P.; Liu, Y.; Kuznetsova, I.; Glushchenko, A. Vladinikolaevia, gen. nov.—A new enigmatic freshwater diatom genus (Cymbellaceae; Bacillariophyceae) from Mongolia. Fottea 2022, 22, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kapustin, D.A.; Kulikovskiy, M.; Kociolek, J.P. Celebesia gen. nov., a new cymbelloid diatom genus from the ancient Lake Matano (Sulawesi Island, Indonesia). Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 2017, 146, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, B.; Williams, D.M.; Liu, Q.Y. A new species of Cymbella (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyceae) from China, possessing valves with both uniseriate and biseriate striae. Phytotaxa 2018, 344, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, B.; Blanco, S.; Lan, Q.Y. Ultrastructure of Delicata sinensis Krammer et Metzeltin and D. williamsii sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta) from China. Fottea 2018, 18, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Glushchenko, A.; Kuznetsova, I.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M. Karthickia verestigmata gen. et sp. nov.—An interesting diatom with frustular morphology similar to several different cymbelloid diatom genera. Phycologia 2019, 58, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thirouin, K.R. Systematics of the Freshwater Cymbelloid Diatoms (Bacillariophyta): History, Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Relationships. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, 2021; pp. 1–155. [Google Scholar]
Kermarrec, L.; Ector, L.; Bouchez, A.; Rimet, F.; Hoffmann, L. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the Cymbellales based on 18S rDNA gene sequencing. Diatom Res. 2011, 26, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nakov, T.; Ruck, E.C.; Galachyants, Y.; Spaulding, S.A.; Theriot, E.C. Molecular phylogeny of the Cymbellales (Bacillariophyceae, Heterokontophyta) with a comparison of models for accommodating rate variation across sites. Phycologia 2014, 53, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kezlya, E.; Glushchenko, A.; Maltsev, Y.; Gusev, E.; Genkal, S.; Kuznetsov, A.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M. Placoneis cattiensis sp. nov.—A new diatom (Bacillariophyceae: Cymbellales) soil species from Cát Tiên National Park (Vietnam). Phytotaxa 2020, 460, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Karthick, B.; Hamilton, P.B.; Kociolek, J.P. An Illustrated Guide to Common Diatoms of Peninsular India; Gubbi Labs: Gubbi, Karnataka, 2013; pp. 1–136. [Google Scholar]
Ross, R.; Sims, P.A. The fine structure of the frustule in centric diatoms: A suggested Terminology. Br. Phycol. J. 1972, 7, 139–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ross, R.; Cox, E.J.; Karayeva, N.I.; Mann, D.G.; Paddock, T.B.B.; Simonsen, R.; Sims, P.A. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 1979, 64, 513–533. [Google Scholar]
Mann, D.G. Sieves and flaps: Siliceous minutiae in the pores of raphid diatoms. In Proceedings of the 6th Diatom Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, 1–5 September 1980; Ross, R., Ed.; Koeltz: Koenigstein, Germany, 1981; pp. 279–300. [Google Scholar]
Cox, E.J. Pore occlusions in raphid diatoms—A reassessment of their structure and terminology with particular reference to members of the Cymbellales. Diatom 2004, 20, 33–46. [Google Scholar]
Williams, D.M. Comparative morphology of some species of Synedra Ehrenb. with a new definition of the genus. Diatom Res. 1986, 1, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, B. The diatom genus Ulnaria (Bacillariophyta) in China. PhytoKeys 2023, 228, 1–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Table 1. Sixteen taxa of Cymbella having apical pore fields divided by the distal raphe fissure into dorsal and ventral areas.

Taxon	Reference
C. aspera	[1] p. 192, plate 1, figure 5; [3] p. 138, figs. 1, 2
C. cognata	[5] p. 499, figs. 79, 80
C. baicalaspera	[6] p. 5, figs. 6, 7
C. golestanica (=Qinia golestanica)	[7] p. 100, figs. 13–15; [8]
C. himalaspera	[9] p. 77, figure 3
C. hustedtii	[1] p.577, plate 193, figs. 1, 4
C. latarea	[10] p. 81, figs. 42, 44
C. loescherae	[11] p. 193, figure 15
C. neoleptoceros	[1] p. 503, plate 156, figure 5
C. olgae	[5] p. 496, figs. 51, 53
C. orientalis	[4] p.102, figs. 17, 18, 22
C. orientalis var. delicatula	[12] p. 460, figs. 16–19
C. peraspera	[1] p. 453, plate 131, figure 6
C. sinensis	[1] p. 433, plate 121, figure 7
C. subhimalaspera	[9] p. 81, figs. 3, 4
C. subleptoceros	[1] p. 501, plate 155, figs. 1, 3, 6

Table 2. Eight taxa of Cymbella producing internal pore occlusions.

Taxon	Shape of Internal Occlusions	Reference
C. arctica	Rounded closing plates	[1] p. 399, plate 104, figure 8
C. balkii	Manhole, rounded closing plate	[16] p. 198, figs. 14, 15
C. cognata	Likely reniform occlusion, eroded	[5] p. 499, figs. 79, 80
C. cymbiformis	Rounded closing plate	[1] p. 307, plate 58, figure 7; p. 309, plate 59, figs. 7, 8; p. 311, plate 60, figure 2; p. 319, plate 64, 4–6; p. 333, plate 71, figs. 7, 8
C. nepalensis	Rounded closing plate	[17] p. 330, figure 4e
C. orientalis	Rounded closing plate	[4] p. 102, figs. 20, 21
C. orientalis var. delicatula	Rounded closing plate	[12] p. 460, figs. 16–19
C. schimanskii	Rounded closing plate	[1] p. 349, plate 79, figure 6

Table 3. Comparison of features between Cymbella apiculatophora sp. nov. and similar taxa.

Feature	C. apiculatophora	C. neuquina	C. neuquina var. fastigata	C. orientalis	C. orientalis var. delicatula
Valve outline	Moderately dorsiventral	Moderately dorsiventral	Moderately dorsiventral	Weakly dorsiventral	Weakly dorsiventral
Apices	Apiculate	Bluntly cuneate	Cuneately rounded	Narrowly rounded	Rounded cuneate, subrostrate
Valve dimensions (μm)	Length 38–62, width 8–12	Length 58–127, width (17)19–24	Length 50–100, width 14.5–18.5	Length 17.5–46, width 5.5–8.5	Length 17.6–26.8, width 6–7.4
Central area	Trapezoid, more evident on dorsal side	Rounded, more evident on ventral side	Rounded, more evident on ventral side	Unilateral, transversely rectangular	Unilateral, transversely rectangular
Striae in 10 µm	11–12 (ventral)	6–8 (dorsal and ventral)	7–8 (dorsal and ventral)	11–12 (dorsal), 10–12 (ventral)	9–12 (dorsal), 10–13 (ventral)
Areolae in 10 µm	18–24	14–16	14–18	Ca. 25	28–32
Apical pore field	Composed of two unequal areas	One undivided area	No data	Composed of two unequal areas	Composed of two unequal areas
No. of stigmata	4–6	1–4	1–4	No stigma	No stigma
Reference	This paper	[19]	[19]	[4]	[12]

Cymbella cf. excisiformis Krammer (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8).

Table 4. Comparison of features between Cymbella hunanensis sp. nov. and similar taxa.

Feature	C. hunanensis	C. stigmaphora	C. subleptoceros
Valve outline	Slightly dorsiventral, almost rhombic–lanceolate	Slightly dorsiventral, rhombic–lanceolate	Slightly dorsiventral, lanceolate
Apices	Cuneate, obtuse, not protracted	Acutely rounded	Narrowly rounded to acuminate– rounded
Valve dimensions (μm)	Length 32–58, width 8.5–12.5,	Length 27–57, width 10.7–14	Length 17–45, width 7.5–10
Central area	Elliptical	Absent	Absent
Striae in 10 µm	10–12 (dorsal), 11–13 (ventral)	9–13 (dorsal and ventral)	9–11 (dorsal and ventral)
Areolae in 10 µm	20–25	20–24	22–25
Stigmata	Absent	Absent	Absent
Intermissio	Clearly visible, ca. 1.5 μm long	No data	Clearly visible
Reference	This paper	[1]	[1]

Cymbella hustedtii Krasske (Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15).

Table 5. Comparison of features between Cymbella juglandis and similar taxa.

Feature	C. juglandis	C. shii	C. subleptoceros
Valve outline	Slightly dorsiventral, almost lanceolate	Dorsiventral, rhomboid–lanceolate	Slightly dorsiventral, lanceolate
Apices	Acuminate	More or less obtusely rounded	Narrowly to acuminate–rounded
Valve dimensions (μm)	Length 28–75, width 8–12,	Length 46–88, width 15–18	Length 17–45, width 7.5–10
Striae in 10 µm	10–12 (dorsal), 10–13 (ventral)	8–9 (dorsal and ventral)	9–11 (dorsal and ventral)
Areolae in 10 µm	22–27	15–19	22–25
Stigmata	Absent	Absent	Absent
Intermissio	Obscured	No data	Clearly visible plate 155, Figure 2
Reference	This paper	[23]	[1]

Cymbella menyuanensis Bing Liu & Rioual sp. nov. (Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22 and Figure 23).

Table 6. Comparison of features between Cymbella menyuanensis sp. nov. and similar taxa.

Feature	C. menyuanensis	C. neocistula	C. nepalensis	C. proxima
Valve outline	Strongly dorsiventral	Strongly dorsiventral	Strongly dorsiventral	Strongly dorsiventral
Apices	Rostrate to subcapitate slightly bent towards dorsal side	Not protracted rounded	Broadly rounded	Not protracted rounded
Valve dimensions (μm)	Length 46–91, width 12.5–20.5	Length 34–110, width 12–19	Length 37–118, width 15–27	Length 38–120, width 18–24
Striae in 10 µm	8–11 (dorsal and ventral)	7–9 (dorsal and ventral)	8–10 (dorsal and ventral)	7–10 (dorsal and ventral)
Areolae in 10 µm	22–26	17–20	18–20	14–18
No. of stigmata	3–6	3–5	4–6	2–5
Reference	This paper	[1]	[9,17]	[1]

The perizonia of two Cymbella species.

Table 7. Shapes and sizes of median-size areolae in five Cymbella species.

Taxon	Shape and Size of External Areola Openings	Shape and Size of Internal Areola Openings	Shape and Size of the Occlusions of Internal Areola Openings
C. apiculatophora	Rounded (diameter ca. 250 nm) or dumbbell-shaped (ca. 200 nm long and 120 nm wide)	Oblong, ca. 240 nm long and 200 nm wide	Rounded solid plate without strut, diameter ca. 200–240
C. cf. excisiformis	Lineolate, ca	Rounded,	No occlusion
C. hunanensis	Reniform, ca. 420 nm long and 100 nm wide	Reniform, ca. 470 nm long and 240 nm wide	Reniform solid plate with one strut
C. hustedtii	Reniform, ca. 410 nm long and 100 nm wide	Reniform, ca. 380 nm long and 250 nm wide	Reniform solid plate with one strut
C. menyuanensis	Lineolate, ca. 580 nm long and 200 nm wide	Mushroom-shaped, ca. 160 nm long	Mushroom-shaped solid plate with one strut
C. juglandis	Slit-like or oblong, ca. 340 nm long and 100 nm wide	Elliptical, ca. 280 nm long and 250 nm wide	Shaped like walnut kernels (vola)

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, B.; Liu, B.; Blanco, S.; Rioual, P. The Perizonium Ultrastructure, Divided Apical Pore Fields, Various Pore Occlusions and Visible Intermissio of Cymbella (Bacillariophyceae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. Plants 2024, 13, 1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131851

AMA Style

Yang B, Liu B, Blanco S, Rioual P. The Perizonium Ultrastructure, Divided Apical Pore Fields, Various Pore Occlusions and Visible Intermissio of Cymbella (Bacillariophyceae) with Descriptions of Four New Species. Plants. 2024; 13(13):1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Bin, Bing Liu, Saúl Blanco, and Patrick Rioual. 2024. "The Perizonium Ultrastructure, Divided Apical Pore Fields, Various Pore Occlusions and Visible Intermissio of Cymbella (Bacillariophyceae) with Descriptions of Four New Species" Plants 13, no. 13: 1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu