[go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Short-Time Fatigue Life Estimation for Heat Treated Low Carbon Steels by Applying Electrical Resistance and Magnetic Barkhausen Noise
Previous Article in Journal
Zeolite-Enhanced Portland Cement: Solution for Durable Wellbore-Sealing Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/ma16010031
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Storage Properties of Sol–Gel-Processed SrTiO3 Films

by
Jinpeng Liu
1,
Ying Wang
1,
Xiao Zhai
2,
Yinxiu Xue
1,
Lanxia Hao
3,
Hanfei Zhu
1,*,
Chao Liu
1,
Hongbo Cheng
1 and
Jun Ouyang
1,4,5,*
1
Institute of Advanced Energy Materials and Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
3
Key Laboratory for Liquid-Solid Structure Evolution and Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
4
Key Laboratory of Key Film Materials & Application for Equipments (Hunan Province), School of Material Sciences and Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
5
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Thin Film Materials and Devices, School of Material Sciences and Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010031
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Flow chart for the preparation of the STO films in a sol–gel process.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>XRD patterns of the STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>SEM characterizations of the STO thin film at 650 °C: (<b>a</b>) surface and cross-sectional morphologies, (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) EDS mappings of Sr, Ti and O elements.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Quantitative elemental EDS spectra and (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) AFM surface morphologies of the STO thin films annealed at (<b>b</b>) 650 °C and (<b>c</b>) 750 °C.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Leakage current density vs. electric field (<span class="html-italic">J</span>-<span class="html-italic">E</span>) curves, (<b>b</b>) frequency-dependent dielectric behaviors of STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Unipolar <span class="html-italic">P</span>-<span class="html-italic">E</span> loops of STO films annealed at different temperatures. The inset shows bipolar <span class="html-italic">P</span>-<span class="html-italic">E</span> loop of the STO film annealed at 750 °C.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Comparison of energy storage performances between the STO film annealed at 650°C in this work and some previously reported STO-based films deposited on Si substrates [<a href="#B7-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B16-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B20-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B22-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B26-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B38-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B39-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B40-materials-16-00031" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p> ">
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dielectric films with a high energy storage density and a large breakdown strength are promising material candidates for pulsed power electrical and electronic applications. Perovskite-type dielectric SrTiO3 (STO) has demonstrated interesting properties desirable for capacitive energy storage, including a high dielectric constant, a wide bandgap and a size-induced paraelectric-to-ferroelectric transition. To pave a way toward large-scale production, STO film capacitors were deposited on Pt(111)/Ti/SiO2/Si(100) substrates by the sol–gel method in this paper, and their electrical properties including the energy storage performance were studied as a function of the annealing temperature in the postgrowth rapid thermal annealing (RTA) process. The appearance of a ferroelectric phase at a high annealing temperature of 750 °C was revealed by X-ray diffraction and electrical characterizations (ferroelectric P-E loop). However, this high dielectric constant phase came at the cost of a low breakdown strength and a large hysteresis loss, which are not desirable for the energy storage application. On the other hand, when the RTA process was performed at a low temperature of 550 °C, a poorly crystallized perovskite phase together with a substantial amount of impurity phases appeared, resulting in a low breakdown strength as well as a very low dielectric constant. It is revealed that the best energy storage performance, which corresponds to a large breakdown strength and a medium dielectric constant, is achieved in STO films annealed at 650 °C, which showed a large energy density of 55 J/cm3 and an outstanding energy efficiency of 94.7% (@ 6.5 MV/cm). These findings lay out the foundation for processing high-quality STO film capacitors via the manufacturing-friendly sol–gel method.

1. Introduction

As environmental-friendly energy storage devices, dielectric capacitors have attracted extensive interests due to their fast charging and discharging speed and high power density [1,2]. With the rapid development of electrical and hybrid vehicles, mobile electronics and high-energy laser weapons [3,4,5,6], dielectric capacitors have become increasingly important as key components in these pulsed power systems. Compared with conventional ceramic capacitors, thin film ferroelectric capacitors exhibit a higher energy storage density and a larger breakdown electric field. The energy storage density and efficiency (η) for a ferroelectric capacitor can be calculated from its polarization–electric field (P-E) loop using the following equations [3,6,7,8]:
W r e c = ∫ P r P m a x E d P
W c = ∫ 0 P m a x E d P
η = W r e c W c
In these equations, Wrec and Wc are the recyclable energy density and charged energy density, respectively, E is the external electric field, and Pr and Pmax are the remnant and maximum electric polarizations, respectively.
The rich properties of SrTiO3 (STO), including a wide bandgap, a high dielectric constant, diamagnetic and thermal stabilities, etc., have created a broad spectrum of applications in a variety of research fields, including high-k gate layers, dynamic random access memories, microwave components, varistors, etc. [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Specifically, as a typical quantum paraelectric, STO not only possesses a high dielectric constant of ~300, but also shows a low dielectric loss and an excellent thermal stability [14]. These features demonstrate a great promise for STO to be used in energy storage dielectric capacitors. At present, there have been some studies on energy storage characteristics of STO-based thin films with a complex composition or structure, created by the methods of multielement doping or solid solutioning [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. For example, Diao et al. reported a large recoverable energy storage density of 23.8 J/cm3 with an efficiency of 69.8% in Mn-modified SrTiO3 thin films [22]. Khassaf et. al. studied the effect of interlayer coupling on the polarization response of a PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3/SrTiO3 bilayer and reported an excellent energy storage capability achieved in this system [23]. Moreover, Pan et al. revealed that enhanced energy storage properties could be achieved in 0.4BiFeO3-0.6SrTiO3 solid-solution films deposited on Nb-doped STO (Nb:STO) single crystalline substrates, including a large recoverable energy density of 70 J/cm3, by suppressing the formation of oxygen vacancies [24].
Apparently, although these above methods can improve energy storage performances of the STO thin films, the complex composition or film structure, as well as the costly single crystalline substrates being used, have inevitably increased the difficulties for practical applications of these film materials [25,26,27,28,29,30]. In addition, as far as we know, there are very few reports on the energy storage properties of pure STO thin films [14]. In this work, pure STO thin films were deposited on Pt(111)/Ti/SiO2/Si(100) substrates by a simple sol–gel method. We focus on the effects of annealing temperature on the microstructure, leakage current, dielectric and ferroelectric properties of the STO films. By selecting an appropriate annealing temperature, we achieved a pseudolinear P-E loop with a large maximum polarization and a small remanent one. This can be attributed to a well-controlled nanograin size. This finding has significantly enhanced the energy storage performance of sol–gel-processed STO films.

2. Experimental Section

In this work, STO thin films were prepared by using a sol–gel method. Strontium acetate hemihydrate (Sr(CHOO)2∙0.5H2O)) and tetrabutyl titanate (Ti[OCH(CH3)2]4) were chosen as raw materials, and 2-methoxyethanol, acetylacetone and acetic acid were used as solvents to prepare the precursor with a concentration of 0.25 M. Specifically, the strontium acetate hemihydrate and the tetrabutyl titanate were dissolved in acetic acid and 2-methoxyethanol, respectively. Strontium acetate was initially dissolved into hot acetic acid (60 ℃) in a beaker under constant stirring for half an hour and sealed with plastic wrap, leading to the formation of a transparent and colorless solution. Meanwhile, titanium tetra-butoxide was mixed with 2-methoxyethanol in another beaker at room temperature under constant stirring. Note that a small amount of acetylacetone was added to stabilize the tetrabutyl titanate solution. The above two solutions were mixed under constant stirring for 6 h and then aged for 24 h to obtain the final precursor solution. The film depositions were carried out by spin coating at 4500 rpm for 15 s on Pt(111)/Ti/SiO2/Si substrates. After each deposition, drying and pyrolysis of the film were performed on a hot plate at 150 °C for 3 min and 450 °C for 5 min, respectively. The spin coating deposition–drying–pyrolysis process cycle was repeated 8 times to obtain an amorphous STO film with a desired thickness (~300 nm). Lastly, the amorphous STO thin films were annealed in a pure oxygen atmosphere via a rapid thermal annealing (RTA) process at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C for 3 min, respectively. It is noted that RTA is an extremely fast heating method that can reach a high temperature in tens of seconds. Unlike the conventional furnace annealing process, RTA usually takes only 3~5 min to crystallize the amorphous films. This has been reported in a large number of reports in the literature [31,32,33,34,35]. The detailed process flow chart is shown in Figure 1 below.
The films’ phase structures and crystallographic orientations were examined using XRD θ-2θ scans (Rigaku Dmax-2500PC XRD diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Ni-filtered Cu Ka radiation source, Smartlab SE. The surface and cross-sectional film morphologies, as well as elemental compositions, were characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (ZEISS Gemini 300, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The surface morphologies of the films were recorded using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM, MFP-3D Infinity, Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) with a Ti/Ir-coated conductive ASYELEC.01-R2 probe. Prior to the electrical measurements, circular Au top electrodes (200 μm in diameter) were deposited on the STO films via a shadow mask. The electric polarization hysteresis loops (P-E loops) and leakage current characteristics of the STO films were measured using a Precision Premier II ferroelectric tester (Radiant Technologies). The frequency-dependent dielectric properties were examined using a precision LCR meter (TH2838H, Tonghui, Changzhou, China).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the STO films annealed at different temperatures, and a randomly oriented polycrystalline structure was revealed. Clearly, the STO film annealed at a low temperature of 550 °C shows a poor crystallinity with some secondary phases, which include nonstoichiometric strontium oxide (Sr3Ti2O7, Sr2Ti6O13) and titanium oxide (TiOx). With an increasing annealing temperature, an enhanced crystallization of the film is observed. The STO film annealed at 750 °C shows the strongest and sharpest diffraction peak, as well as the lowest number of impure phases. The grain size (D) of the STO films was analyzed by using the Scherrer equation below [36]:
D = K λ β   c o s θ
where K is a constant (K = 0.89), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray, β is the diffraction peak’s full width at half maximum height (FWHM) and θ is the diffraction angle. It is noted that the STO (200) peaks are used for this analysis. Consistent with the qualitative analysis above, D grows with the annealing temperature, which is computed to be ~10 nm, ~20 nm and ~40 nm for the STO films annealed at 550 °C, 650 °C and 750 °C, respectively. The different grain sizes and degrees of crystallinity of the STO films have significant impacts on their electrical properties, especially the energy storage characteristics. These impacts will be discussed in detail in subsequent sections.
Figure 3a shows the SEM surface morphology of the STO films deposited on Pt-coated Si and annealed at 650 °C. Clearly, a flat surface with densely packed nanograins is observed and there are no visible cracks. The cross-sectional SEM image of the film/electrode/substrate heterostructure, shown as the inset of Figure 3a, also allows a direct measurement of the layer thicknesses. The STO and Pt layers were measured to be ~300 nm and ~350 nm thick, respectively. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) studies were performed to investigate the chemical composition of the STO film. The EDS mappings of each element displayed in Figure 3b–d confirm the homogeneous distributions of the Sr, Ti and O elements. Moreover, as clearly shown in Figure 4a, only Sr, Pt, Si, Ti and O elements were detected from the STO/Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si thin film heterostructure, and a 1:0.8 chemical stoichiometric ratio of Sr/Ti was revealed. This small deviation from the chemical stoichiometry can be attributed to the semiquantitative nature of the EDS analysis, as well as some diffusion/evaporation losses of impurity species containing Ti [7,19,22,25]. It should be noted that the other two STO films have shown similar surface morphologies and chemical composition. To further understand the effect of annealing temperature on the surface morphologies of STO films, we performed atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses of the STO films. As shown in Figure 4b, the film annealed at 650 °C showed a fine-grained surface morphology with a root mean square (RMS) surface roughness of ~4.9 nm. Meanwhile, the film annealed at 750 °C (Figure 4c) displayed larger grains and a smoother surface, with an RMS surface roughness of ~0.6 nm. These observations are consistent with the XRD results.
Figure 5a gives the leakage current density (J-E) curves of the STO films measured in the electric field range of –800 to 800 kV/cm. Compared with that of the film annealed at 750 °C at 800 kV/cm (1.1 × 10−2 A/cm2), leakage current densities reduced by nearly four orders of magnitude at 800 kV/cm were observed in the STO films annealed at 650 °C (4.5 × 10−6 A/cm2) and 550 ℃ (1.2 × 10−6 A/cm2), respectively, indicating high electrical resistances for the latter two. To further understand the above leakage current characteristics, dielectric constants and losses of the three STO films as a function of frequency ranging from 10 kHz to 2 MHz were measured, and the results are shown in Figure 5b. Compared with the films annealed at 650 °C and 550 °C, a higher dielectric constant was achieved in the STO film annealed at 750 °C, which can be attributed to its higher degree of crystallinity and larger grain size [2]. Moreover, consistent with the leakage current characteristics, the STO films annealed at 650 °C and 550 °C display lower losses than that of the STO film annealed at 750 °C, when the measuring frequency exceeds 50 kHz. The higher dielectric losses near the low-frequency end for the 550 °C annealed film can be attributed to its poor crystallinity and substantial number of impurity phases. These crystalline defects are most likely accumulated near the interface of the film, leading to a prominent dielectric relaxation in the low-frequency range [29]. On the other hand, the STO film annealed at 650 °C shows a reduced loss throughout the measuring frequency range, indicating that interfacial and bulk defects were both significantly reduced in this film. These observations are consistent with the XRD results. Specifically, the dielectric constants and losses were measured at 100 kHz are 95 and 0.12, 14 and 0.023 and 6 and 0.052 for the STO films annealed at 750 °C, 650 °C and 550 °C, respectively. It is worth noting here that the dielectric characteristics of the STO film annealed at 650 °C shows almost frequency-independent behavior over a broad frequency range, i.e., its dielectric constant and loss tangent exhibits a good frequency stability.
Room temperature unipolar P-E loops (@ 1 kHz) of the STO films annealed at different temperatures are presented in Figure 6. The STO film annealed at 750 °C shows clear ferroelectric characteristics, which include a large remnant polarization and a sizable hysteresis loop. These features are better illustrated by its bipolar P-E loop (shown in the inset). The ferroelectric property observed in the 750-annealed STO thin film is closely related to the compressive strain and its increased grain size from the XRD pattens [37,38]. On the other hand, slim pseudolinear P-E loops with a small remnant polarization (Pr) and a reduced hysteresis loop are achieved in STO films annealed at 650 °C and 550 °C. In particular, the STO film annealed at 650 °C exhibits an elongated, tilted P-E loop with a Pmax of ~18 μC/cm2 and a Pr of ~0.5 μC/cm2, both being achieved under a large maximum applicable electric field of Emax = 6.5 MV/cm. These characteristics endow the film with an excellent energy storage capability. In the charging process of a dielectric capacitor, the polarization/electric displacement P increases from zero to its maximum Pmax as the applied electric field E increases from zero to Emax. The capacitive energy stored per unit volume can be calculated by W c = ∫ 0 P m a x E d P   [3]. On the other hand, during the discharging process, the polarization/electric displacement reduces from Pmax to Pr as the electric field across the capacitor decreases from Emax to zero. This part of stored energy that is released upon discharge, i.e., the recoverable/recyclable electric energy (density) Wrec, is calculated by W r e c = ∫ P r P m a x E d P   [3]. This energy term is represented by the shaded area in Figure 6 for the 650 °C-processed STO films. Lastly, the energy storage efficiency, i.e., charge–discharge efficiency η, is defined by η = ( W r e c / W c ) × 100 %   [3]. Based on the above definitions, the recoverable energy density (Wrec) and the efficiency (η) of the STO film annealed at 650 °C are calculated to be 55 J/cm3 and ~94.7%, respectively. These results are significantly improved against previously reported ones, as they are compared head-to-head in Figure 6 below.
Figure 7 summarizes the recoverable energy density (Wrec), efficiency (η) and breakdown field strength (Eb) of our STO film annealed at 650 °C, in direct comparisons with some representative STO-based films including doped, bilayer or multilayer films deposited on Si substrates [7,16,17,20,22,26,38,39,40]. Clearly, our results are superior to those STO-based films previously studied. With such large Wrec and η values, as well as an extremely high Eb and a simple composition, our sol–gel-processed STO films show a great potential in high-performance dielectric capacitors.

4. Conclusions

In this work, STO thin films were deposited on Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si substrates via a sol–gel process. Effects of annealing temperature in a postgrowth RTA process on the microstructures and energy storage characteristics of the STO films were discussed. By adjusting the annealing temperature to 650 °C, a pseudolinear P-E loop with a high energy storage performance was achieved in the STO film. Enhanced electrical properties, including a medium dielectric constant and a low dielectric loss, a low leakage current, a high breakdown strength, as well as a large maximum polarization and a small remanent one, were obtained in the 650 °C-annealed STO film. These features endow the film with the best energy storage characteristics, with a large recyclable energy density of 55 J/cm3 and an outstanding energy efficiency of 94.7% (@ 6.5 MV/cm). These findings lay out a foundation for the application of STO film capacitors in high-performance dielectric energy storage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.Z. and J.O., methodology: J.L. and H.Z., validation: J.L. and H.Z., formal analysis: H.Z., C.L. and H.C., investigation: H.Z., resources: H.Z. and J.O., data curation: J.L., Y.W., X.Z., Y.X. and L.H., writing—original draft preparation: J.L. and H.Z., writing—review and editing: H.Z. and J.O., visualization: J.L. and Y.W., supervision: H.Z. and J.O., project administration: J.O., funding acquisition: H.Z. and J.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 52002192, 51772175), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant Nos. ZR2022ZD39, ZR2020QE042) and the Science, Education and Industry Integration Pilot Projects of Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) (Grant Nos. 2022PY055, 2022GH018). J. Ouyang acknowledges the support from the Jinan City Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No. 2021GXRC055) and the Education Department of Hunan Province/Xiangtan University (Grant No. KZ0807969), as well as the seed funding for top talents at Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences). The APC was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 52002192).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. Zhu, H.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, K.; Cheng, H.; Su, Y. Achieving a Record-High Capacitive Energy Density on Si with Columnar Nanograined Ferroelectric Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 7805–7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, K.; Zhu, H.; Ouyang, J.; Tian, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, Q.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Cheng, H.; Zhai, X. Significantly improved energy storage stabilities in nanograined ferroelectric film capacitors with a reduced dielectric nonlinearity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 581, 152400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qian, J.; Han, Y.; Yang, C.; Lv, P.; Zhang, X.; Feng, C.; Lin, X.; Huang, S.; Cheng, X.; Cheng, Z. Energy storage performance of flexible NKBT/NKBT-ST multilayer film capacitor by interface engineering. Nano Energy 2020, 74, 104862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, L.; Kong, X.; Li, F.; Hao, H.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, J.-F.; Zhang, S. Perovskite lead-free dielectrics for energy storage applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 102, 72–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, M.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Chi, Q.; Lei, Q. Recent Advances in Multilayer-Structure Dielectrics for Energy Storage Application. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, T.; Wu, J.; Xiao, D.; Zhu, J. Recent development in lead-free perovskite piezoelectric bulk materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 98, 552–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Diao, C.; Liu, H.; Lou, G.; Zheng, H.; Yao, Z.; Hao, H.; Cao, M. Structure and electric properties of sandwich-structured SrTiO3/BiFeO3 thin films for energy storage applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 781, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.-M.; Ouyang, J. Boosting energy storage performance of low-temperature sputtered CaBi2Nb2O9 thin film capacitors via rapid thermal annealing. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haeni, J.H.; Irvin, P.; Chang, W.; Uecker, R.; Reiche, P.; Li, Y.L.; Choudhury, S.; Tian, W.; Hawley, M.E.; Craigo, B.; et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in strained SrTiO3. Nature 2004, 430, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Xu, K.; Yao, M.; Chen, J.; Zou, P.; Peng, Y.; Li, F.; Yao, X. Effect of crystallization on the band structure and photoelectric property of SrTiO3 sol–gel derived thin film. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 653, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Trabelsi, H.; Bejar, M.; Dhahri, E.; Graça, M.P.F.; Valente, M.A.; Khirouni, K. Structure, Raman, dielectric behavior and electrical conduction mechanism of strontium titanate. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2018, 99, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Balachandran, R.; Ong, B.H.; Wong, H.Y.; Tan, K.B.; Rasat, M.M. Dielectric Characteristics of Barium Strontium Titanate Based Metal Insulator Metal Capacitor for Dynamic Random Access Memory Cell. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 11895–11903. [Google Scholar]
  13. Trabelsi, H.; Bejar, M.; Dhahri, E.; Sajieddine, M.; Valente, M.A.; Zaoui, A. Effect of the oxygen deficiencies creation on the suppression of the diamagnetic behavior of SrTiO3 compound. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, C.; Huang, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, D.; Yin, Y.; Li, X. Ultrahigh Energy Density in SrTiO3 Film Capacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 20484–20490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, X.; Huang, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Yu, P. High energy density and high efficiency achieved in the Ca0.74Sr0.26Zr0.7Ti0.3O3 linear dielectric thin films on the silicon substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 112902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diao, C.; Liu, H.; Hao, H.; Cao, M.; Yao, Z. Enhanced recoverable energy storage density of Mn-doped Ba0.4Sr0.6TiO3 thin films prepared by spin-coating technique. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 5814–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qian, J.; Yang, C.H.; Han, Y.J.; Sun, X.S.; Chen, L.X. Reduced leakage current, enhanced energy storage and dielectric properties in (Ce,Mn)-codoped Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 thin film. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 20808–20813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Benes, F.; Dragomir, M.; Malič, B.; Deluca, M. Chemical Solution Deposition of BaxSr1-xTiO3 Thin Films for Energy Storage Applications. Proceedings 2020, 56, 9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Diao, C.; Liu, H.; Hao, H.; Cao, M.; Yao, Z.; Zheng, H. Dielectric, ferroelectric properties and photoconductivity effect of sol-gel grown SrTiO3/BaTiO3 thin film heterostructure. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 12157–12161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Sun, H.; Sui, H.; Yan, C. Enhanced recoverable energy storage density of barium strontium titanate-based thin films with compositionally graded structure. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 2193–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, W.; Yao, M.; Yao, X. Achieving Ultrahigh Breakdown Strength and Energy Storage Performance through Periodic Interface Modification in SrTiO3 Thin Film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 28745–28753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Diao, C.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Hao, H.; Yao, Z.; Liu, H. Significantly improved energy storage properties of sol-gel derived Mn-modified SrTiO3 thin films. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 11784–11791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khassaf, H.; Khakpash, N.; Vijayan, S.; Aindow, M.; Alpay, S.P. Electrostatically driven dielectric anomaly in mesoscopic ferroelectric–paraelectric bilayers. Acta Mater. 2016, 105, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pan, H.; Ma, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Guan, B.; Gu, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.J.; Li, L. Giant energy density and high efficiency achieved in bismuth ferrite-based film capacitors via domain engineering. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cole, M.W.; Ngo, E.; Hubbard, C.; Hirsch, S.G.; Ivill, M.; Sarney, W.L.; Zhang, J.; Alpay, S.P. Enhanced dielectric properties from barium strontium titanate films with strontium titanate buffer layers. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 164107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, J.; Hao, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Cao, M. Energy storage properties of low concentration Fe-doped barium strontium titanate thin films. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 5867–5873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pertsev, N.A.; Zembilgotov, A.G.; Hoffmann, S.; Waser, R.; Tagantsev, A.K. Ferroelectric thin films grown on tensile substrates: Renormalization of the Curie–Weiss law and apparent absence of ferroelectricity. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 1698–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aguirre-Tostado, F.S.; Herrera-Gómez, A.; Woicik, J.C.; Droopad, R.; Yu, Z.; Schlom, D.G.; Karapetrova, J.; Zschack, P.; Pianetta, P. Displacive phase transition in SrTiO3 thin films grown on Si (001). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2004, 22, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, J.; Weiss, C.V.; Alpay, S.P. Effect of thermal stresses on the dielectric properties of strontium titanate thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 31386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tkach, A.; Okhay, O.; Reaney, I.M.; Vilarinho, P.M. Mechanical strain engineering of dielectric tunability in polycrystalline SrTiO3 thin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 2467–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, T.; Li, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Fei, W. High Energy Storage Performance of Opposite Double-Heterojunction Ferroelectricity-Insulators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Qiao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Xia, H.; Li, Z.; Fei, W. 0.6ST-0.4NBT thin film with low level Mn doping as a lead-free ferroelectric capacitor with high energy storage performance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 093902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, C.; Han, Y.; Qian, J.; Lv, P.; Lin, X.; Huang, S.; Cheng, Z. Flexible, Temperature-Resistant, and Fatigue-Free Ferroelectric Memory Based on Bi(Fe0.93Mn0.05Ti0.02)O3 Thin Film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12647–12655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, F.; Jiang, N.; Yang, B.; Zhao, S. Segregation particles induced ultrahigh energy storage performances in BiMnO3 modified BaTiO3 films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 253901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, P.; Zhai, J.; Shen, B.; Li, W.; Zeng, H.; Zhao, K. High recoverable energy storage density and large piezoelectric response in (Bi0.5Na0.5) TiO3 -PbTiO3 thin films prepared by a sol-gel method. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 3319–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Holzwarth, U.; Gibson, N. The Scherrer equation versus the ‘Debye-Scherrer equation’. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, D.; Lu, H.; Gu, Y.; Choi, S.Y.; Li, S.D.; Ryu, S.; Paudel, T.R.; Song, K.; Mikheev, E.; Lee, S.; et al. Emergence of room-temperature ferroelectricity at reduced dimensions. Science 2015, 349, 1314–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Song, B.; Zhu, K.; Yan, H.; Xu, L.; Shen, B.; Zhai, J. High energy storage density with high power density in Bi0.2Sr0.7TiO3/BiFeO3 multilayer thin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 4652–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Hao, H.; Cao, M.; Yao, Z.; Xie, J.; Diao, C. The microstructure and energy storage properties of Ba0.3Sr0.7TiO3 crystallite thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 792, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Diao, C.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Yao, Z.; Hao, H.; Cao, M. Simultaneously achieved high energy storage density and efficiency in sol-gel-derived amorphous Mn-doped SrTiO3 thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 845, 5814–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 00031 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart for the preparation of the STO films in a sol–gel process.
Figure 1. Flow chart for the preparation of the STO films in a sol–gel process.
Materials 16 00031 g001
Materials 16 00031 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.
Materials 16 00031 g002
Materials 16 00031 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM characterizations of the STO thin film at 650 °C: (a) surface and cross-sectional morphologies, (b–d) EDS mappings of Sr, Ti and O elements.
Figure 3. SEM characterizations of the STO thin film at 650 °C: (a) surface and cross-sectional morphologies, (b–d) EDS mappings of Sr, Ti and O elements.
Materials 16 00031 g003
Materials 16 00031 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Quantitative elemental EDS spectra and (b,c) AFM surface morphologies of the STO thin films annealed at (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C.
Figure 4. (a) Quantitative elemental EDS spectra and (b,c) AFM surface morphologies of the STO thin films annealed at (b) 650 °C and (c) 750 °C.
Materials 16 00031 g004
Materials 16 00031 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Leakage current density vs. electric field (J-E) curves, (b) frequency-dependent dielectric behaviors of STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 5. (a) Leakage current density vs. electric field (J-E) curves, (b) frequency-dependent dielectric behaviors of STO thin films annealed at different temperatures.
Materials 16 00031 g005
Materials 16 00031 g006 550
Figure 6. Unipolar P-E loops of STO films annealed at different temperatures. The inset shows bipolar P-E loop of the STO film annealed at 750 °C.
Figure 6. Unipolar P-E loops of STO films annealed at different temperatures. The inset shows bipolar P-E loop of the STO film annealed at 750 °C.
Materials 16 00031 g006
Materials 16 00031 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of energy storage performances between the STO film annealed at 650°C in this work and some previously reported STO-based films deposited on Si substrates [7,16,17,20,22,26,38,39,40].
Figure 7. Comparison of energy storage performances between the STO film annealed at 650°C in this work and some previously reported STO-based films deposited on Si substrates [7,16,17,20,22,26,38,39,40].
Materials 16 00031 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, X.; Xue, Y.; Hao, L.; Zhu, H.; Liu, C.; Cheng, H.; Ouyang, J. Energy Storage Properties of Sol–Gel-Processed SrTiO3 Films. Materials 2023, 16, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010031

AMA Style

Liu J, Wang Y, Zhai X, Xue Y, Hao L, Zhu H, Liu C, Cheng H, Ouyang J. Energy Storage Properties of Sol–Gel-Processed SrTiO3 Films. Materials. 2023; 16(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jinpeng, Ying Wang, Xiao Zhai, Yinxiu Xue, Lanxia Hao, Hanfei Zhu, Chao Liu, Hongbo Cheng, and Jun Ouyang. 2023. "Energy Storage Properties of Sol–Gel-Processed SrTiO3 Films" Materials 16, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop