Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An In Vitro Study
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Endodontic access cavities planned with the computer-aided static navigation system incorporating the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan (pink lines); (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) virtual template design according to planned virtual endodontic access cavities; and (<b>E</b>) manufactured stereolithography template fixed over dental surface of teeth placed over epoxy resin model.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Planning endodontic access cavities with treatment planning software of computer-aided dynamic navigation system (yellow cylinders), and (<b>B</b>) performing endodontic access cavities (green cylinders) controlled in all planes and depth with the black-and-white jaw tag fixed over the dental surface of the teeth with the thermoplastic template and the black-and-white drill tag (red arrow) attached to the high-speed handpiece (green arrow).</p> "> Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Planned endodontic access cavities (yellow cylinders) and access cavities performed manually (red cylinders). Guided endodontic access cavities planned and performed through (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) computer-aided static navigation system and (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) computer-aided dynamic navigation system.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Experimental Procedure
2.3. Measurement Procedure
2.4. Statistical Tests
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Reeh, E.S.; Messer, H.H.; Douglas, W.H. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J. Endod. 1989, 15, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Isufi, A.; Ioppolo, P.; Pedulla, E.; Bedini, R.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, D.; Khademi, J. Modern Molar Endodontic Access and Directed Dentin Conservation. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 54, 249–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macho, Á.Z.; Ferreiroa, A.; Rico-Romano, C.; Alonso-Ezpeleta, L.Ó.; Mena-Álvarez, J. Diagnosis and endodontic treatment of type II dens invaginatus by using cone-beam computed tomography and splint guides for cavity access: A case report. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2015, 146, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mena-Álvarez, J.; Rico-Romano, C.; Lobo-Galindo, A.B.; Zubizarreta-Macho, Á. Endodontic treatment of dens evaginatus by performing a splint guided access cavity. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2017, 29, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krastl, G.; Zehnder, M.S.; Connert, T.; Weiger, R.; Kühl, S. Guided Endodontics: A novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Dent. Traumatol. 2016, 32, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zehnder, M.S.; Connert, T.; Weiger, R.; Krastl, G.; Kühl, S. Guided endodontics: Accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venskutonis, T.; Plotino, G.; Juodzbalys, G.; Mickevičiene, L. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: A review of the literature. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giacomino, C.M.; Ray, J.J.; Wealleans, J.A. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Novel Approach to Anatomically Challenging Scenarios Using 3-dimensional–printed Guides and Trephine Burs—A Report of 3 Cases. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buchgreitz, J.; Buchgreitz, M.; Mortensen, D.; Bjørndal, L. Guided access cavity preparation using cone-beam computed tomography and optical surface scans—An ex vivo study. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultin, M.; Svensson, K.G.; Trulsson, M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: A systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 2012, 23, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jorba-García, A.; Figueiredo, R.; González-Barnadas, A.; Camps-Font, O.; Valmaseda-Castellón, E. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Med. Oral. Patol. Oral. Cir. Bucal. 2019, 24, e76–e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefanelli, L.; DeGroot, B.; Lipton, D.; Mandelaris, G. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant. 2019, 34, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanis, A.; Alvarez del Canto, O. The Combination of Digital Surface Scanners and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Technology for Guided Implant Surgery Using 3Shape Implant Studio Software: A Case History Report. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 28, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.K.; Yuh, D.Y.; Huang, R.Y.; Fu, E.; Tsai, C.F.C.C. Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratory guide, and freehand drilling. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant. 2018, 33, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gargallo-Albiol, J.; Barootchi, S.; Salomó-Coll, O.; Wang, H.L. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann. Anat. 2019, 225, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, M.; Emery, R.; Lank, K.; Ryan, J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implant. 2016, 32, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, B.S.; Dhesi, M.; Makdissi, J. Computer-aided dynamic navigation: A novel method for guided endodontics. Quintessence Int. 2019, 50, 196–202. [Google Scholar]
- Gilboe, D.B. Labial endodontic access opening for mandibular incisors: Endodontic and restorative considerations. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 1991, 57, 587–589. [Google Scholar]
- Mauger, M.J.; Waite, R.M.; Alexander, J.B.; Schindler, W.G. Ideal endodontic access in mandibular incisors. J. Endod. 1999, 25, 206–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Piasecki, L.; Ropini, P.; Miccoli, G.; Nardo, D.D.; Testarelli, L. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis on root and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molar among multiracial population in Western European population. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gambarini, G.; Piasecki, L.; Miccoli, G.; Gaimari, G.; Nardo, D.D.; Testarelli, L. Cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambarini, G.; Galli, M.; Stefanelli, L.V.; Di Nardo, D.; Morese, A.; Seracchiani, M.; De Angelis, F.; Di Carlo, S.; Testarelli, L. Endodontic Microsurgery Using Dynamic Navigation System: A Case Report. J. Endod. 2019, 45, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, T.K.; Wealleans, J.A.; Pratt, A.M.; Ray, J.J. Targeted endodontic microsurgery and endodontic microsurgery: A surgical simulation comparison. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishan, R.; Paqué, F.; Ossareh, A.; Kishen, A.; Dao, T.; Friedman, S. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siqueira, J.F., Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: Why well-treated teeth can fail. Int. Endod. J. 2001, 34, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
n | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coronal | SN | 10 | 7.44 | 1.57 | 5.40 | 10.0 | SN-DN = 0.654 |
DN | 10 | 3.14 | 0.86 | 2.00 | 5.10 | SN-MN < 0.001 | |
MN | 10 | 4.03 | 1.93 | 1.10 | 7.10 | DN-MN < 0.001 | |
Apical | SN | 10 | 7.13 | 1.73 | 4.80 | 9.80 | SN-DN = 0.914 |
DN | 10 | 2.48 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 3.80 | SN-MN < 0.001 | |
MN | 10 | 2.43 | 1.23 | 0.80 | 4.50 | DN-MN < 0.001 | |
Angular | SN | 10 | 10.04 | 5.20 | 4.10 | 19.40 | SN-DN = 0.072 |
DN | 10 | 5.58 | 3.23 | 1.70 | 10.40 | SN-MN < 0.001 | |
MN | 10 | 14.95 | 11.15 | 0.80 | 29.70 | DN-MN < 0.001 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zubizarreta-Macho, Á.; de Pedro Muñoz, A.; Riad Deglow, E.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Mena Álvarez, J. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An In Vitro Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010129
Zubizarreta-Macho Á, de Pedro Muñoz A, Riad Deglow E, Agustín-Panadero R, Mena Álvarez J. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(1):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010129
Chicago/Turabian StyleZubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro, Ana de Pedro Muñoz, Elena Riad Deglow, Rubén Agustín-Panadero, and Jesús Mena Álvarez. 2020. "Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An In Vitro Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 1: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010129