Dental Implants with External Hex Inclined Shoulder in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations of the Maxilla
<p>IBT External Hex implant (<b>left</b>) and IBR Co-Axis<sup>®</sup> Implants (Southern Implants) with a 12° (<b>center</b>) and 24° (<b>right</b>) angulation of the implant shoulder.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Preoperative panoramic radiograph of patient 1 included in the present research.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Intraoral pictures taken before treatment (<b>left</b>) and at the delivery of the immediate loading prosthesis (<b>right</b>) of the same patient of <a href="#dentistry-12-00131-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Extraoral pictures taken before treatment (<b>left</b>) and at the delivery of the immediate loading prosthesis (<b>right</b>) of the same patient.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Intraoral radiographs taken at the delivery of the immediate loading prosthesis (T0) and after 24 months in the same patient of <a href="#dentistry-12-00131-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Intraoral pictures taken before treatment (<b>left</b>), at the delivery of the immediate loading prosthesis (<b>center</b>), and 2 years after surgery (<b>right</b>) of the same patient in <a href="#dentistry-12-00131-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, <a href="#dentistry-12-00131-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a> and <a href="#dentistry-12-00131-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Outcomes
- Did you encounter any difficulties during the insertion of the standard implant?
- Did you encounter any difficulties during the insertion of the coaxial implant?
- Did you encounter more difficulty during the insertion of the standard or of the coaxial implant?
- With which implant design did you have more difficulty during the multiunit abutment connection?
- Do you think that the coaxial implant facilitated the optimization of the prosthodontic axes?
- During future interventions requiring the insertion of tilted implants, which implant type would you prefer?
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Goncalves, G.S.Y.; de Magalhaes, K.M.F.; Rocha, E.P.; Dos Santos, P.H.; Assuncao, W.G. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pera, P. Invited commentary: On immediately loaded fixed maxillary prostheses. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2014, 27, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pesce, P.; Menini, M.; Canullo, L.; Khijmatgar, S.; Modenese, L.; Gallifante, G.; Del Fabbro, M. Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials Used for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Residual Bone Height and Vertical Graft Size on New Bone Formation and Graft Shrinkage. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bijukumar, D.R.; McGeehan, C.; Mathew, M.T. Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2018, 16, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lombardo, G.; Signoriello, A.; Marincola, M.; Liboni, P.; Faccioni, P.; Zangani, A.; D’Agostino, A.; Nocini, P.F. Short and Ultra-Short Implants, in Association with Simultaneous Internal Sinus Lift in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Materials 2022, 15, 7995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magdy, M.; Abdelkader, M.A.; Alloush, S.; Fawzy El-Sayed, K.M.; Nawwar, A.A.; Shoeib, M.; ElNahass, H. Ultra-short versus standard-length dental implants in conjunction with osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2021, 23, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Apaza Alccayhuaman, K.A.; Soto-Penaloza, D.; Nakajima, Y.; Papageorgiou, S.N.; Botticelli, D.; Lang, N.P. Biological and technical complications of tilted implants in comparison with straight implants supporting fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. 18), 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chrcanovic, B.R.; Albrektsson, T.; Wennerberg, A. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: A meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 149–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Fabbro, M.; Ceresoli, V. The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: A systematic review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014, 7 (Suppl. 2), S171–S189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Papaspyridakos, P.; Chen, C.J.; Chuang, S.K.; Weber, H.P. Implant loading protocols for edentulous patients with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014, 29, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Fabbro, M.; Pozzi, A.; Romeo, D.; de Araujo Nobre, M.; Agliardi, E. Outcomes of Fixed Full-Arch Rehabilitations Supported by Tilted and Axially Placed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2022, 37, 1003–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Vico, G.; Bonino, M.; Spinelli, D.; Schiavetti, R.; Sannino, G.; Pozzi, A.; Ottria, L. Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports. Oral Implantol. 2011, 4, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Omori, Y.; Lang, N.P.; Botticelli, D.; Papageorgiou, S.N.; Baba, S. Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connected to fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Canullo, L.; Bignozzi, I.; Cocchetto, R.; Cristalli, M.P.; Iannello, G. Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2010, 3, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dhir, S. The peri-implant esthetics: An unforgettable entity. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2011, 15, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aktas, T.; Diker, N. Biomechanical effects of inclined implant shoulder design in all-on-four treatment concept: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomed. Tech. 2023, 68, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calvo Guirado, J.L.; Lucero-Sanchez, A.F.; Boquete Castro, A.; Abboud, M.; Gehrke, S.; Fernandez Dominguez, M.; Delgado Ruiz, R.A. Peri-Implant Behavior of Sloped Shoulder Dental Implants Used for All-On-Four Protocols: An Histomorphometric Analysis in Dogs. Materals 2018, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Weehaeghe, M.; De Bruyn, H.; Vandeweghe, S. A prospective, split-mouth study comparing tilted implants with angulated connection versus conventional implants with angulated abutment. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2017, 19, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S.D.; Payne, A.G. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 1-year report. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2011, 22, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandeweghe, S.; Cosyn, J.; Thevissen, E.; Van den Berghe, L.; De Bruyn, H. A 1-year prospective study on Co-Axis implants immediately loaded with a full ceramic crown. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012, 14 (Suppl. 1), e126–e138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egbert, N.; Ahuja, S.; Selecman, A.; Wicks, R. Angulated Implants for Fabrication of Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture in the Maxilla. J. Dent. 2017, 18, 304–313. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, S.; Tawse-Smith, A.; Brown, S.D.K.; Duncan, W. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 5-year results from a prospective single-arm clinical trial. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2019, 21, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, S.J.; Ostman, P.O.; Nicolopoulos, C.; Yuvanoglu, P.; Chow, J.; Nevins, M.; Tarnow, D.P. Prospective Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study of a Novel Macro Hybrid Implant in Maxillary Anterior Postextraction Sockets: 1-Year Results. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2018, 38, s17–s27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, S.J.; Saito, H.; Ostman, P.O.; Levin, B.P.; Reynolds, M.A.; Tarnow, D.P. Immediate Tooth Replacement Therapy in Postextraction Sockets: A Comparative Prospective Study on the Effect of Variable Platform-Switched Subcrestal Angle Correction Implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2020, 40, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wessels, R.; Cosyn, J.; Eghbali, A.; De Bruyn, H.; Christiaens, V. A 5 to 7-year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2021, 23, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korsch, M.; Marten, S.M.; Dotsch, A.; Jauregui, R.; Pieper, D.H.; Obst, U. Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: Comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2016, 27, e161–e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pesce, P.; Canullo, L.; Grusovin, M.G.; de Bruyn, H.; Cosyn, J.; Pera, P. Systematic review of some prosthetic risk factors for periimplantitis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2015, 114, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vetromilla, B.M.; Brondani, L.P.; Pereira-Cenci, T.; Bergoli, C.D. Influence of different implant-abutment connection designs on the mechanical and biological behavior of single-tooth implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019, 121, 398–403.e393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hotinski, E.; Dudley, J. Abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants: An in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019, 121, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galve-Huertas, A.; Zilleruelo-Pozo, M.J.; Garcia-Gonzalez, S.; Ortiz-Puigpelat, O.; Hernandez-Alfaro, F.; Aboul-Hosn Centenero, S. Clinical Evidence on a Novel Macrohybrid Design Dental Implant with 12 degrees Angled Platform: A Systematic Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menini, M.; Pesce, P.; Bagnasco, F.; Carossa, M.; Mussano, F.; Pera, F. Evaluation of internal and external hexagon connections in immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations: A within-person randomised split-mouth controlled trial. Int. J. Oral. Implantol. 2019, 12, 169–179. [Google Scholar]
Patient | Age | Gender | Location | Smoking | Implant Location | Type | Length (mm) | Diameter (mm) | Torque (N/cm3) | Tilted/Upright |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 43 | M | Maxilla | Yes | 16 | IBR24D | 18 | 4 | 50 | T |
13 | IBT | 18 | 4 | 40 | U | |||||
23 | IBT | 15 | 4 | 40 | U | |||||
26 | IBT | 15 | 4 | 40 | T | |||||
2 | 86 | M | Maxilla | No | 16 | IBT | 18 | 4 | 20 | T |
13 | IBT | 13 | 4 | 20 | U | |||||
11 | IBT | 15 | 4 | 15 | U | |||||
23 | IBT | 18 | 4 | 10 | U | |||||
26 | IBR24D | 15 | 4 | 30 | T | |||||
3 | 77 | M | Maxilla | No | 16 | IBT | 18 | 4 | 50 | T |
13 | IBT | 18 | 4 | 50 | U | |||||
23 | IBT | 15 | 4 | 40 | U | |||||
26 | IBR24D | 15 | 4 | 40 | T |
Time | Coaxial | Standard |
---|---|---|
MBL 3 m (mm) | 0.4 | 0.3 |
MBL 6 m (mm) | 0.7 | 0.6 |
MBL 12 m (mm) | 0.9 | 0.7 |
MBL 24 m (mm) | 1.1 | 1.0 |
PD 3 m (mm) | 1.83 | 1.25 |
PD 6 m (mm) | 2 | 1.33 |
PD 12 m (mm) | 2.08 | 1.5 |
PD 24 m (mm) | 2.08 | 1.75 |
BOP 3 m | 1.7 | 0.7 |
BOP 6 m | 0.7 | 0.3 |
BOP 12 m | 1 | 0.4 |
BOP 24 m | 1 | 1.4 |
PI 3 m | 1 | 1 |
PI 6 m | 1 | 0.92 |
PI 12 m | 1 | 0.8 |
PI 24 m | 1 | 0.94 |
Operator | Operator 1 | Operator 2 | Operator 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Did you encounter any difficulties during the insertion of the standard implant? | no | no | no |
2 | Did you encounter any difficulties during the insertion of the coaxial implant? | no | no | no |
3 | Did you encounter more difficulty during the insertion of the standard or of the coaxial implant? | overlapping | overlapping | overlapping |
4 | With which implant design did you have more difficulty during the multiunit abutment connection? | traditional | traditional | overlapping |
5 | Do you think that the coaxial implant facilitated the optimization of the prosthodontic axes? | no | no | no |
6 | During future interventions requiring the insertion of tilted implants, which implant type would you prefer? | overlapping | overlapping | overlapping |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bagnasco, F.; Pesce, P.; Baldi, D.; Motta, F.; Pera, F.; De Angelis, N.; Menini, M. Dental Implants with External Hex Inclined Shoulder in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations of the Maxilla. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12050131
Bagnasco F, Pesce P, Baldi D, Motta F, Pera F, De Angelis N, Menini M. Dental Implants with External Hex Inclined Shoulder in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations of the Maxilla. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12(5):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12050131
Chicago/Turabian StyleBagnasco, Francesco, Paolo Pesce, Domenico Baldi, Francesco Motta, Francesco Pera, Nicola De Angelis, and Maria Menini. 2024. "Dental Implants with External Hex Inclined Shoulder in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations of the Maxilla" Dentistry Journal 12, no. 5: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12050131