research-article

Instructional Framework for CS1 Question Activities

Authors:

Katrina Falkner,

Rebecca VivianAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Pages 189 - 195

https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319732

Published: 02 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Questioning is a learning activity that can promote the use of critical thinking skills, where thinking processes are required to answer a posed question. In this paper, we map instructional question types to Bloom's Taxonomy--a classification of critical thinking skills required for cognition--to form a framework for educators to construct learning activities through questioning. The preliminary instructional framework is applied to a question activity within a blended CS1 learning environment to support students in better understanding on how to solve a programming assignment. Our results show students meeting the desired Bloom's cognitive level when answering the question activity. Future research opportunities are presented to test the framework for upper-division CS courses and further explore the framework as an intervention for programming assignments.

References

[1]

L. Anderson and D. Krathwohl. Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 2001.

[2]

J. B. Biggs and K. F. Collis. The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). In A. J. Edward, editor, Evaluating the Quality of Learning, New York, New York, 1982.

[3]

B. S. Bloom. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans, Green, New York, 1956.

[4]

K. E. Boyer,W. Lahti, R. Phillips, M. D.Wallis, M. A. Vouk, and J. C. Lester. Principles of asking effective questions during student problem solving. Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 460--464, 2010.

Digital Library

[5]

J. Buckley and C. Exton. Blooms' taxonomy: A framework for assessing programmers' knowledge of software systems. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, pages 165--174, 2003.

Digital Library

[6]

M. T. H. Chi, N. de Leeuw, M. Chiu, and C. LaVancher. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18:439--477, 1994.

[7]

A. Churches. Bloom's taxonomy blooms digitally. Educators' eZine, 2008.

[8]

A. Collins. Teaching reasoning skills. In . R. G. S. Chipman, J. Segal, editor, Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol 2, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[9]

A. Collins and A. Stevens. A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In C. Reigeluth, editor, Instructional-design theories and models, pages 203--230, Norwood, NJ, 1983. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[10]

J. Dillon. The classification of research questions. Review of Educational Research, 54:327--361, 1984.

[11]

A. Graesser and N. Person. Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1):104--137, 1994.

[12]

R. Howard, C. Carver, and W. Lane. Felder's learning styles, Bloom's taxonomy, and the Kolb learning cycle: Tying it all together in the CS2 course. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth SICSE Technical Symposium in Computer Science Education, 1996.

Digital Library

[13]

R. Lister, B. Simon, E. Thompson, J. L. Whalley, and C. Prasad. Not seeing the forest for the trees: Novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy. ITiCSE ?06 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 118--122, 2006.

Digital Library

[14]

R. D. Nielsen, J. Buckingham, G. Knoll, B. Marsh, and L. Palen. A taxonomy of questions for question generation. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Question Generation, 2008.

[15]

N. Pennington. Comprehension strategies in programming. Second Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, pages 100--113, 1987.

Digital Library

[16]

A. Petersen, M. Craig, and D. Zingaro. Reviewing cs1 exam question content. SIGCSE ?11, pages 631--636, 2011.

Digital Library

[17]

M. Roy and M. T. H. Chi. The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer, editor, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pages 271--286. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[18]

I. Sanders and C. Mueller. A fundamentals-based curriculum for first year computer science. Proceedings Thirty-First SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 227--231, 2000.

Digital Library

[19]

T. Scott. Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science. Proceedings of the 12th Annual CCSC Rocky Mountain Conference, Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, pages 267--274, 2003.

Digital Library

[20]

E. Soloway, J. Bonar, and K. Ehrlich. Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study. Communications of the ACM, 26(11):853--860, 1983.

Digital Library

[21]

A. Stolcke, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, D. Jurafsky, P. Taylor, R. Martin, C. V. Ess-Dykema, and M. Meteer. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339--373, 2000.

Digital Library

[22]

E. Thompson, A. Luxton-Reilly, J. L. Whalley, M. Hu, and P. Robbins. Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment. ACE '08 Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference, pages 155--161, 2008.

Digital Library

[23]

E. Tikhonova and N. Kudinova. Sophisticated thinking: higher order thinking skills. Journal of Language and Education, 1:12--23, 2015.

[24]

B. K. A. Weusijana, C. K. Reisbeck, and J. T. W. Jr. Fostering reflection with socratic tutoring software: Results of using inquiry teaching strategies with webbased HCI techniques. ICLS '04 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences, pages 561--567, 2004.

Digital Library

[25]

J. L. Whalley, R. Lister, E. Thompson, T. Clear, P. Robbins, P. A. Kumar, and C. Prasad. An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), pages 353--382, 2006.

Digital Library

[26]

A. Zohar and A. B. David. Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1):59--82, 2008.

Cited By

Bevilacqua JChiodini LMoreno Santos IHauswirth MStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Using Notional Machines to Automatically Assess Students' Comprehension of Their Own CodeProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3626253.3635524(1572-1573)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626253.3635524
Thomas A(2023)A Consolidated Catalogue of Question Types for Programming CoursesICT Education10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_9(119-133)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_9
Conceicao WHolanda MMacedo FIshikawa ENunes VDa Silva D(2022)Automatic Feedback in the Teaching of Programming in Undergraduate Courses: a Literature Mapping2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962723(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962723

Index Terms

Instructional Framework for CS1 Question Activities
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        CS1

Recommendations

Research on Multi-functional Teaching Activities Platform
CSSE '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering - Volume 05

This paper researches on the Multi-functional Teaching Activities Platform (MTAP). The platform is designed with multiple functions, such as the management of course, teacher, student and teaching plan, the activities for schoolwork, experiment and ...
Effectiveness of an Instructional Intervention in Developing Critical Thinking Skills
CSEDU 2016: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education

This paper is focused on how argument mapping (AM) software can be helpful for developing critical thinking (CT) skills of initial teacher educators. The study discusses the usefulness of argument mapping software for lessening the cognitive load of ...
Enhancing ChatGPT in POE Inquiry Learning for STEM Education to Improve Critical Thinking Skills
Innovative Technologies and Learning
Abstract
The importance of integrating inquiry-based strategies into STEM activities lies in creating a challenging and engaging teaching environment that promotes active learning among students. This educational setting not only sparks students’ interest ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

July 2019

583 pages

ISBN:9781450368957

DOI:10.1145/3304221

General Chairs:
Bruce Scharlau
University of Aberdeen, UK
,
Roger McDermott
Robert Gordon University, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Arnold Pears
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
,
Mihaela Sabin
University of New Hampshire, USA

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '19

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ITiCSE '19: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

July 15 - 17, 2019

Aberdeen, Scotland Uk

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
172
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 09 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bevilacqua JChiodini LMoreno Santos IHauswirth MStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Using Notional Machines to Automatically Assess Students' Comprehension of Their Own CodeProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 210.1145/3626253.3635524(1572-1573)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626253.3635524
Thomas A(2023)A Consolidated Catalogue of Question Types for Programming CoursesICT Education10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_9(119-133)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_9
Conceicao WHolanda MMacedo FIshikawa ENunes VDa Silva D(2022)Automatic Feedback in the Teaching of Programming in Undergraduate Courses: a Literature Mapping2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962723(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962723

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents