The impact of rhetorical devices in text on public displays
Pages 148 - 153
Abstract
Passers-by prefer video and images as content types on public displays. Despite of this preference, text has its added value for transmitting messages via public displays. In this paper, a comparative study is described that aims to uncover the quantifiable effect of using rhetorical devices in text on public displays with respect to attractiveness, which can be subdivided into attention, readability and understandability. Research shows that in general - hence not specifically for public displays - rhetorical devices increase the attractiveness of a text. This paper describes a case study that involved texts on a large public display on a square in a city center, which showed three variations of the same message: an anaphora (repetition of words at the beginning of successive sentences), a parallelism (the use of an identical structure in successive sentences) and a regular text without rhetorical devices. Although the rhetorical devices show higher percentages of viewers for the public display, the difference in attention is not significant. However, results indicate significant increase in readability on the public display for the anaphora in comparison with the regular text.
References
[1]
Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali, Rahini Wahid, Khairulanuar Samsudin and Muhammad Zaffwan.2013. Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type has Effects on Web Text Readability? International Education Studies, 6(3).
[2]
Ronald E. Anderson. 1992. Social impacts of computing: Codes of professional ethics. Soc Sci Comput Rev 10, 2: 453--469.
[3]
Daniel R. Anderson, Aletha C. Huston, Deborah L. Linebarger, Reed Larson, Kelly L. Schmitt, and John C. Wright. 2001. Early Childhood Television Viewing and Adolescent Behavior: The Recontact Study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 66(1), 97--90.
[4]
Jean-Luc Vinot. and Sylvie Athènes. 2012. Legible, are you sure? An experimentation-based typographical design in Safety-critical context. CHI 2012, ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 2012, Austin, United States. pp 2287--2296, 2012.
[5]
Jan Borchers, Elaine M. Huang and Anna Koster. 2008. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? In: Pervasive Computing (pp. 228--243). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
[6]
Jeanne S. Chall and Edgar Dale. 1949. The Concept of Readability. Elementary Englisch, 26(1), 19--26.
[7]
Ying Cui and Yanli Zhao. 2014. Translation of rhetorical figures in the advertising discourse: A case study. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 2(2), 57--67.
[8]
J. Elhorst and H. Seker. 2014. Binnenstadsmonitor Enschede Uitkomstenboek passanten en winkels. Consulted on 04 February 2015 via http://ondernemen.enschede.nl/bestanden/binnenstad/Binnenstadsmonitor_2014_-_kennispunt.pdf/
[9]
R. Esselink, M. Meurs and J. Severijn. 2013. Binnenstad houdt stand. Binnenstadsmonitor Enschede2013. Consulted on 16 March 2015 via http://ondernemen.enschede.nl/bestanden/binnenstad
[10]
Massimo Greco, Natale Stucchi, Barbara Marino and Daniele Zavagno. 2008. On the Portability of Computer-Generated Presentations: The Effect of Text-Background Color Combinations on Text Legibility. Human Factors, 50 (5), 821--833.
[11]
H. Hoeken, R. van Enschot and M. van Mulken. 2006. Retoriek in reclame. Waardering voor verbo-picturale retorische vormen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 28 (2).
[12]
Eve Hoggan, Giulio Jacucci, Kai Kuikkaniemi, Jörg Müller and Marko Turpeinen. 2011. From Space to Stage: How Interactive Screens Will Change Urban Life. Computer 44 (06), 40--47.
[13]
Carel Jansen. 2011. Don't be a fool, put a condom on your tool. Effecten van retorische figuren in HIV/AIDSvoorlichtingsmateriaal in Zuid-Afrika. Internationale Neerlandistiek, 49 (2), 103--116.
[14]
Walter Kintsch. 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163--182
[15]
William G. McGuire, W. J. 2000. Standing on the shoulders of ancients: consumer research, persuasion, and figurative language. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 109--114.
[16]
G. H. McLaughlin. 1974. Temptations of the Flesh. Instructional Science 2 (4), 367--383.
[17]
Edward F. McQuarrie and David Glen Mick. 1996. Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (4), 424--438.
[18]
Henk Pander Maat. 2006. De effectiviteit van tekst en beeld. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 28 (2). Consulted on 02 February 2015 via http://e.aup.nl/wosmedia/1037/
[19]
Barbara Phillips. 2000. The Impact of Verbal Anchoring on Consumer Response to Image Ads. Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 15--24.
[20]
Janet Robinson and Leslie Z. McArthur. 1982. Impact of salient vocal qualities on causal attribution for a speaker's behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 236--247
[21]
Karen Smith. 2006. Rhetorical figures and the translation of advertising headlines. Language and Literature, 15 (2), 159--182.
[22]
Gail Tom and Annemarie Eves. 1999. The use of rhetorical devices. Journal of Advertising Research, 25 (3), 13--27.
[23]
Mettina Veenstra, Marije Kanis, Maarten Groen, Wouter Meys and Wout Slakhorst. Beyond Advertising: Large Displays for Supporting People's Needs and Activities in Public Space. In Proc. of Workshop on Large Displays in Urban Life, CHI2011, ACM, 2011.
[24]
Eric Michael Weisenmiller. 1999. A study of the readability of on-screen text. Consulted on 17 February 2015 via https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/29400/WeisenmillerDissertation.pdf
Index Terms
- The impact of rhetorical devices in text on public displays
Recommendations
3D mobile interactions for public displays
SA '14: SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Mobile Graphics and Interactive ApplicationsWe propose the use of 3D mobile interactions as a way to give public displays viewers (users) new ways to collaborate among them with the public display. Getting and maintaining the user attention is one of the main struggles of public displays but ...
Cross-device interaction with large displays in public: insights from both users' and observers' perspectives
OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction1Using a mixture of physical gestures and one's smartphone is a convenient way for people to engage and interact with large displays in public. Yet, one of the challenges of cross-device interactions is to design techniques that encourage participation. ...
Does the Public Still Look at Public Displays?: A Field Observation of Public Displays in the Wild
Public displays are widely used for displaying information in public space, such as shopping centres. They are typically programmed to display advertisements or general information about the space in which they are situated. Due to recent advances in ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2016
266 pages
ISBN:9781450343664
DOI:10.1145/2914920
- General Chairs:
- Timo Ojala,
- Vassilis Kostakos,
- Program Chairs:
- Jörg Müller,
- Nemanja Memarovic
Copyright © 2016 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 June 2016
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
PerDis '16
Acceptance Rates
PerDis '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 47 submissions, 60%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 213 of 384 submissions, 55%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 147Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)7
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in