short-paper

Twitter as a first draft of the present: and the challenges of preserving it for the future

Authors:

Katrin WellerAuthors Info & Claims

WebSci '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science

Pages 183 - 189

https://doi.org/10.1145/2908131.2908174

Published: 22 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides a framework for understanding Twitter as a historical source. We address digital humanities scholars to enable the transfer of concepts from traditional source criticism to new media formats, and to encourage the preservation of Twitter as a cultural artifact. Twitter has established itself as a key social media platform which plays an important role in public, real-time conversation. Twitter is also unique as its content is being archived by a public institution (the Library of Congress). In this paper we will show that we still have to assume that much of the contextual information beyond the pure tweet texts is already lost, and propose additional objectives for preservation.

References

[1]

Allen, E. 2013. Update on the Twitter archive at the Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2013/01/update-on-the-twitter-archive-at-the-library-of-congress/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6RfTg63)

[2]

Assmann, J. 1995. Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique 65 (1995), 125--133.

[3]

BBC. 2015. Twitter's 'favourite' stars change into 'like' hearts. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34713811/twitters-favourite-stars-change-into-like-hearts (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6fC8Aqjgw)

[4]

Berry, D. 2011. The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities. Culture Machine 12. http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/440/470.

[5]

Bruns, A., Burgess, J., and Highfield, T. 2014. A "big data" approach to mapping the Australian Twittersphere. In Advancing Digital Humanities: Research, Methods, Theories, P. L. Arthur and K. Bode, Eds. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, 113--129.

[6]

Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Banks, J., Tjondronegoro, D., Dreiling, A., Hartley, J., Leaver, T., Aly, A., Highfield, T., Wilken, R., Rennie, E., Lusher, D., Allen, M., Marshall, D., Demetrious, K., and Sadkowsky, T. 2015. TrISMA: Tracking Infrastructure for Social Media Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.trisma.org/

[7]

Bruns, A., and Highfield, T. 2016. May the best tweeter win: the Twitter strategies of key campaign accounts in the 2012 US election. In Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012: Analysen der Politik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, C. Bieber and K. Kamps, Eds. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, 425--442.

[8]

Bruns, A., and Sauter, T. 2015. Anatomie eines Trending Topics. In Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken, Eds. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 141--161. DOI= http://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.7

[9]

Bruns, A., Weller, K., and Harrington, S. 2014. Twitter and sports: football fandom in emerging and established markets. In Twitter and Society, K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt and C. Puschmann, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, 263--280.

[10]

Bruns, A., Woodford, D., and Sadkowsky, T. 2014. Exploring the global demographics of Twitter. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers conference, Daegu, 22--25 Oct. 2014. Retrieved from http://snurb.info/node/1963

[11]

Burgess, J., and Bruns, A. 2015. Easy data, hard data: the politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn. In Compromised Data: From Social Media to Big Data, G. Langlois, J. Redden, and G. Elmer, Eds. Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 93--111.

[12]

Burns, A. 2010. Oblique strategies for ambient journalism. M/C Journal 13, 2 (2010). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/230

[13]

Chowdhury, A. 2011. Global pulse. Twitter blog (29 June 2011). Retrieved from http://blog.twitter.com/2011/06/global-pulse.html (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[14]

Crawford, K. 2009. Following you: disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum 23, 4 (2009), 525--535. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1080/10304310903003270.

[15]

Crueger, J. 2013. Die Dark Ages des Internet? In Was Bleibt? Nachhaltigkeit in der digitalen Welt, P. Klimpel and J. Kneiper, Eds. iRights:Media, 191--197. Retrieved from http://irights-media.de/publikationen/was-bleibt-nachhaltigkeit-der-kultur-in-der-digitalen-welt/

[16]

Dewan, P., and Kumaraguru, P. 2014. It doesn't break just on Twitter: characterizing Facebook content during real world events. arXiv 1405, 4820 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4820

[17]

Facebook, Inc. 2007, 24 May. Facebook unveils platform for developers of social applications. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2007/05/facebook-unveils-platform-for-developers-of-social-applications/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[18]

Haber, P. 2011. Digital Past: Geschichtswissenschaft im digitalen Zeitalter. Oldenbourg.

[19]

Halavais, A. 2014. Structure of Twitter: social and technical. In Twitter and Society, K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt and C. Puschmann, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, 29--41.

[20]

Hermida, A. 2010. From TV to Twitter: how ambient news became ambient journalism. M/C Journal 13, 2 (2014). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/220

[21]

Hermida, A., Lewis, S. C., and Zamith, R. 2014. Sourcing the Arab Spring: a case study of Andy Carvin's sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 3 (2014), 479--499. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12074

Digital Library

[22]

ICWSM. 2012. ICWSM Dataset Sharing Service. Retrieved from: http://icwsm.cs.mcgill.ca (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6fC7JfFyR).

[23]

IIPC. International Internet Preservation Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.netpreserve.org/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[24]

Internet Live Stats. 2016. Twitter usage statstics. http://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/

[25]

Kelly, R. 2009. Twitter study. Pear Analytics, San Antonio. Retrieved from http://pearanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[26]

Landgraf, G. 2010. Historians await access to the Library of Congress's Twitter archive. American Libraries. Retrieved from http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2010/05/17/historians-await-access-to-the-library-of-congresss-twitter-archive/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6SjXzT2).

[27]

Lasica, J. D. 2003. Blogs and journalism need each other. Nieman Reports (Fall 2003), 70--74. Retrieved from http://1e9svy22oh333mryr83l4s02.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/03fall.pdf (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[28]

Library of Congress. 2013. Update on the Twitter archive at the Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2013/files/twitter_report_2013jan.pdf (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6TGRHnp).

[29]

Marwick, A. E., and boyd, d. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (2011), 114--133.

[30]

McLemee, S. (2015) The archive is closed. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/06/03/article-difficulties-social-media-research (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[31]

Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., and Castillo, C. 2010. Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA '10), Washington, DC.

Digital Library

[32]

Palen, L., Starbird, K., Vieweg, S., and Hughes, A. 2010. Twitter-based information distribution during the 2009 Red River Valley flood threat. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 36, 5 (2010), 13--17.

[33]

Papacharissi, Z., and de Fatima Oliveira, M. 2012. Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication 62, 2 (2012), 266--282. DOI= http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x

[34]

Rambukkana, N., Ed. 2015. Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. Peter Lang, New York.

Digital Library

[35]

Raymond, M. 2010a. How tweet it is! Library acquires entire Twitter archive. Library of Congress Blog (14 April). Retrieved from http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6TUANAj).

[36]

Raymond, M. 2010b. The Library and Twitter: An FAQ, Library of Congress Blog (28 April). Retrieved from http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/the-library-and-twitter-an-faq/ (accessed Feb 6, 2016, archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6TbjMyG).

[37]

Risse, T., Peters, W., Senellart, P., and Maynard, D. 2014. Documenting contemporary society by preserving relevant information from Twitter. In Twitter and Society, K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt and C. Puschmann, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, 207--219.

[38]

Rogers, R. 2012. Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[39]

Rogers, R. 2014. Debanalising Twitter: the transformation of an object of study. In Twitter and Society, K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt and C. Puschmann, Eds. Peter Lang, New York, xi-xxvi.

[40]

Schreiber, C. 2012. Genuine Internetdaten als Historische Quellen: Entwurf einer korrealistischen Quellentheorie. Zeitschrift für digitale Geschichtswissenschaften 1. Retrieved from http://universaar.unisaarland.de/journals/index.php/zdg/article/view/292/357

[41]

Shafer, J. 2010. Who said it first? Slate (30 Aug. 2010). Retrieved from http://primary.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/2010/08/who_said_it_first.html (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[42]

Silverman, C., Ed. 2014. Verification Handbook: An Ultimate Guideline on Digital Age Sourcing for Emergency Coverage. European Journalism Centre, Maastricht.

[43]

Summers, E. 2014. ferguson-tweet-ids. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ferguson-tweet-ids (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[44]

Summers, E. 2015. Tweets and deletes: silences in the social media archive. Retrieved from https://medium.com/on-archivy/tweets-and-deletes-727ed74f84ed#.pay32r3eu (accessed Feb 6, 2016; archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6KxoikL)

[45]

Stone, B. 2010. Tweet preservation. Twitter Blog (14 April 2010). Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2010/tweet-preservation (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[46]

Tiropanis, T., Hall, W., Shadbolt, N., De Roure, D. Contractor, N., and Hendler, J. 2013. The web science observatory. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28, 2 (2013), 100--104.

Digital Library

[47]

Twitter, Inc. 2014. Share a tweet through direct messages. Twitter Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2014/share-a-tweet-through-direct-messages (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[48]

Twitter, Inc. 2015. Developer agreement & policy. Retrieved from: https://dev.twitter.com/overview/terms/agreement-and-policy (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[49]

Twitter, Inc. 2016. Twitter usage: company facts. Retrieved from: https://about.twitter.com/company (accessed Feb 6, 2016).

[50]

Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., and Puschmann, C., Eds. 2014. Twitter and Society. Peter Lang, New York.

Digital Library

[51]

Zimmer, M. 2015. The Twitter archive at the Library of Congress: challenges for information practice and information policy. First Monday 20, 7 (2015). DOI= http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i7.5619

Cited By

Cannelli B(2024)Making social media archives: Limitations and archiving practices in the development of representative social media collectionsExploring the Archived Web during a Highly Transformative Age10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.08Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.08
Mannheimer SMannheimer S(2024)Big Social Research in PracticeScaling Up: How Data Curation Can Help Address Key Issues in Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social Research10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4(47-72)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4
Tikka MHuhtamäki JHarju ASumiala J(2023)Developing digital team ethnography of global media events on social mediaNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448231207784Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231207784
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Twitter as a first draft of the present: and the challenges of preserving it for the future
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Social media

Recommendations

Measuring influence on Twitter
i-KNOW '11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies

There are currently over 175 million Twitter accounts worldwide, making Twitter one of the most popular and most observed Social Media platform. But Twitter is not so much a social network where the exchange of personal information is facilitated -- in ...
Information resonance on Twitter: watching Iran
SOMA '10: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics

Twitter has undoubtedly caught the attention of both the general public, and academia as a microblogging service worthy of study and attention. Twitter has several features that sets it apart from other social media/networking sites, including its 140 ...
Breaking news on twitter
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

After the news of Osama Bin Laden's death leaked through Twitter, many people wondered if Twitter would fundamentally change the way we produce, spread, and consume news. In this paper we provide an in-depth analysis of how the news broke and spread on ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

WebSci '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science

May 2016

392 pages

ISBN:9781450342087

DOI:10.1145/2908131

General Chairs:
Wolfgang Nejdl
Leibniz University Hannover & L3S Research Center, Germany
,
Wendy Hall
University of Southampton, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Paolo Parigi
Stanford University
,
Steffen Staab
University of Koblenz, Germany

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 May 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper

Conference

WebSci '16

Sponsor:

SIGWEB

WebSci '16: ACM Web Science Conference

May 22 - 25, 2016

Hannover, Germany

Acceptance Rates

WebSci '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 70 submissions, 19%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

27
Total Citations
View Citations
485
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)41
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Cannelli B(2024)Making social media archives: Limitations and archiving practices in the development of representative social media collectionsExploring the Archived Web during a Highly Transformative Age10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.08Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0413-2.08
Mannheimer SMannheimer S(2024)Big Social Research in PracticeScaling Up: How Data Curation Can Help Address Key Issues in Qualitative Data Reuse and Big Social Research10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4(47-72)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49222-8_4
Tikka MHuhtamäki JHarju ASumiala J(2023)Developing digital team ethnography of global media events on social mediaNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448231207784Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231207784
Wang CZhang Y(2023)A Research on Analysis Methods of B&B’s Image Perception Based on Online UGC Big Data2023 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD)10.1109/ICAIBD57115.2023.10206198(197-202)Online publication date: 26-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD57115.2023.10206198
Hu YLeBlanc ZDiesner JUnderwood TLayne-Worthey GDownie J(2023)Complexities of leveraging user-generated book reviews for scholarly research: transiency, power dynamics, and cultural dependencyInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z25:2(317-340)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-023-00376-z
Kriesberg A(2023)Examining Social Media Policy and Records Management in Massachusetts Municipal GovernmentsProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.78260:1(213-222)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.782
İRALI A(2022)Review of Publishing Through Convergence and Integration in the Context of AdvertisingCelal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi10.18026/cbayarsos.873577(1-16)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.873577
Harel T(2022)Archives in the making: documenting the January 6 capitol riot on RedditInternet Histories10.1080/24701475.2022.21039896:4(391-411)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2022.2103989
Kriesberg AAcker A(2022) The second US presidential social media transition: How private platforms impact the digital preservation of public records Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2465973:11(1529-1542)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24659
Wicke PBolognesi M(2021)Covid-19 Discourse on Twitter: How the Topics, Sentiments, Subjectivity, and Figurative Frames Changed Over TimeFrontiers in Communication10.3389/fcomm.2021.6519976Online publication date: 16-Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.651997
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten