[go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Inapproximability for Antiferromagnetic Spin Systems in the Tree Nonuniqueness Region

Published: 10 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

A remarkable connection has been established for antiferromagnetic 2-spin systems, including the Ising and hard-core models, showing that the computational complexity of approximating the partition function for graphs with maximum degree Δ undergoes a phase transition that coincides with the statistical physics uniqueness/nonuniqueness phase transition on the infinite Δ-regular tree. Despite this clear picture for 2-spin systems, there is little known for multispin systems. We present the first analog of this in approximability results for multispin systems.
The main difficulty in previous inapproximability results was analyzing the behavior of the model on random Δ-regular bipartite graphs, which served as the gadget in the reduction. To this end, one needs to understand the moments of the partition function. Our key contribution is connecting: (i) induced matrix norms, (ii) maxima of the expectation of the partition function, and (iii) attractive fixed points of the associated tree recursions (belief propagation). The view through matrix norms allows a simple and generic analysis of the second moment for any spin system on random Δ-regular bipartite graphs. This yields concentration results for any spin system in which one can analyze the maxima of the first moment. The connection to fixed points of the tree recursions enables an analysis of the maxima of the first moment for specific models of interest.
For k-colorings we prove that for even k, in a tree nonuniqueness region (which corresponds to k < Δ) there is no FPRAS, unless NP = RP, to approximate the number of colorings for triangle-free Δ-regular graphs. Our proof extends to the antiferromagnetic Potts model, and, in fact, to every antiferromagnetic model under a mild condition.

Supplementary Material

a50-galanis-apndx.pdf (galanis.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Inapproximability for Antiferromagnetic Spin Systems in the Tree Nonuniqueness Region

References

[1]
Paola Alimonti and Viggo Kann. 1997. Hardness of Approximating Problems on Cubic Graphs. In Proceedings of the 3rd Italian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC'97), Gian Carlo Bongiovanni, Daniel P. Bovet, and Giuseppe Di Battista (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1203. Springer, 288--298.
[2]
G. Bennett. 1977. Schur multipliers. Duke Math. J. 44, 3 (1977), 603--639.
[3]
G. R. Brightwell and P. Winkler. 2002. Random colorings of a Cayley tree. In Contemporary Combinatorics, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud., Vol. 10. János Bolyai Math. Soc., Budapest, 247--276.
[4]
N. G. de Bruijn. 1981. Asymptotic Methods in Analysis (3rd ed.). Dover Publications, Inc., New York. xii &plus; 200 pages.
[5]
Andreas Galanis, Qi Ge, Daniel Štefankovič, Eric Vigoda, and Linji Yang. 2014. Improved inapproximability results for counting independent sets in the hard-core model. Random Struct. Algor. 45, 1 (2014), 78--110.
[6]
Andreas Galanis, Daniel Štefankovič, and Eric Vigoda. 2012. Inapproximability of the partition function for the antiferromagnetic Ising and hard-core models. CoRR abs/1203.2226 (2012).
[7]
Hans-Otto Georgii. 2011. Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions (2nd ed.). de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 9. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin. xiv &plus;&plus; 545 pages.
[8]
Leslie Ann Goldberg, Mark Jerrum, and Mike Paterson. 2003. The computational complexity of two-state spin systems. Random Structures Algorithms 23, 2 (2003), 133--154.
[9]
Catherine Greenhill. 2000. The complexity of counting colourings and independent sets in sparse graphs and hypergraphs. Comput. Complexity 9, 1 (2000), 52--72.
[10]
Roger A. Horn and Charles R. Johnson. 2013. Matrix Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. xviii &plus; 643 pages.
[11]
Svante Janson. 1995. Random regular graphs: Asymptotic distributions and contiguity. Combin. Probab. Comput. 4, 4 (1995), 369--405.
[12]
Svante Janson, Tomasz Luczak, and Andrzej Rucinski. 2000. Random Graphs. Wiley-Interscience, New York. xii &plus; 333 pages.
[13]
A. Johansson. 1996. Asymptotic choice number for triangle free graphs. Technical Report 91-5. Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS), Rutgers University, New Jersey.
[14]
Johan Jonasson. 2002. Uniqueness of uniform random colorings of regular trees. Statist. Probab. Lett. 57, 3 (2002), 243--248.
[15]
F. P. Kelly. 1991. Loss networks. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1, 3 (1991), 319--378.
[16]
Liang Li, Pinyan Lu, and Yitong Yin. 2013. Correlation Decay up to Uniqueness in Spin Systems. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2013), Sanjeev Khanna (Ed.). La., SIAM, 67--84.
[17]
David G. Luenberger and Yinyu Ye. 2008. Linear and Nonlinear Programming (3rd ed.). Springer, New York. xiv &plus; 546 pages.
[18]
Michael Molloy and Bruce Reed. 2002. Graph colouring and the probabilistic method. Algorithms and Combinatorics, 23. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. xiv &plus; 326 pages.
[19]
Michael Molloy and Bruce A. Reed. 2001. Colouring graphs when the number of colours is nearly the maximum degree. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Jeffrey Scott Vitter, Paul G. Spirakis, and Mihalis Yannakakis (Eds.). ACM, 462--470.
[20]
Robin A. Moser and Gábor Tardos. 2010. A constructive proof of the general Lovász local lemma. J. ACM 57, 2 (2010), Art. 11, 15.
[21]
Elchanan Mossel, Dror Weitz, and Nicholas Wormald. 2009. On the hardness of sampling independent sets beyond the tree threshold. Probab. Theory Related Fields 143, 3--4 (2009), 401--439.
[22]
R. W. Robinson and N. C. Wormald. 1994. Almost all regular graphs are Hamiltonian. Random Structures Algorithms 5, 2 (1994), 363--374.
[23]
Alistair Sinclair, Piyush Srivastava, and Marc Thurley. 2012. Approximation algorithms for two-state anti-ferromagnetic spin systems on bounded degree graphs. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2012), Yuval Rabani (Ed.). SIAM, 941--953.
[24]
Allan Sly. 2010. Computational transition at the uniqueness threshold. In Proceedings of the 51th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2010). IEEE Computer Society, 287--296.
[25]
Allan Sly and Nike Sun. 2012. The Computational Hardness of Counting in Two-Spin Models on d-Regular Graphs. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2012). IEEE Computer Society, 361--369.
[26]
Dror Weitz. 2006. Counting independent sets up to the tree threshold. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Jon M. Kleinberg (Ed.), ACM, 140--149.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Rapid Mixing of Glauber Dynamics via Spectral Independence for All DegreesSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/22M1474734(FOCS21-224-FOCS21-298)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Locally Stationary Distributions: A Framework for Analyzing Slow-Mixing Markov Chains*2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS61266.2024.00022(203-215)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)One-Step Replica Symmetry Breaking of Random Regular NAE-SAT IICommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-023-04868-6405:3Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Inapproximability for Antiferromagnetic Spin Systems in the Tree Nonuniqueness Region

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal of the ACM
      Journal of the ACM  Volume 62, Issue 6
      December 2015
      304 pages
      ISSN:0004-5411
      EISSN:1557-735X
      DOI:10.1145/2856350
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 December 2015
      Accepted: 01 August 2015
      Revised: 01 July 2015
      Received: 01 September 2014
      Published in JACM Volume 62, Issue 6

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Approximate counting
      2. inapproximability
      3. phase transitions
      4. random regular graphs

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Rapid Mixing of Glauber Dynamics via Spectral Independence for All DegreesSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/22M1474734(FOCS21-224-FOCS21-298)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Locally Stationary Distributions: A Framework for Analyzing Slow-Mixing Markov Chains*2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS61266.2024.00022(203-215)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)One-Step Replica Symmetry Breaking of Random Regular NAE-SAT IICommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-023-04868-6405:3Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
      • (2024)Approximating the chromatic polynomial is as hard as computing it exactlycomputational complexity10.1007/s00037-023-00247-833:1Online publication date: 18-Jan-2024
      • (2023)Inapproximability of Counting Hypergraph ColouringsACM Transactions on Computation Theory10.1145/355855414:3-4(1-33)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Approximately Counting Independent Sets of a Given Size in Bounded-Degree GraphsSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/21M146622052:2(618-640)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Optimal Mixing of Glauber Dynamics: Entropy Factorization via High-Dimensional ExpansionSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/21M1443340(STOC21-104-STOC21-153)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Uniqueness of the Gibbs Measure for the Anti-ferromagnetic Potts Model on the Infinite $$\Delta $$-Regular Tree for Large $$\Delta $$Journal of Statistical Physics10.1007/s10955-023-03145-z190:8Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
      • (2022)Computational thresholds for the fixed-magnetization Ising modelProceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3519935.3520003(1459-1472)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Correlation Decay and Partition Function Zeros: Algorithms and Phase TransitionsSIAM Journal on Computing10.1137/20M1317384(FOCS19-200-FOCS19-252)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media