[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations to building institutional trustworthiness through e-government: a comparative study of two e-services in Chile

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

There is much interest in the application of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) to improve the quality, performance, and responsiveness of public sector institutions thereby potentially improving trust. However, there is little empirical evidence about the interaction of ICT implementations on institutional trust of the public sector. This article extends our understanding of the interplay of ICTs in the public sector and institutional trust through an in-depth comparative case-study of two successful Chilean e-services. The article begins by developing a relational conception of institutional trust of which institutional trustworthiness is a component of that relationship. It then analyses the two cases separately with respect to three dimensions of institutional trustworthiness: good performance, aligned incentives, and the values of fairness and distributive justice. Following this, a comparative analysis of the two cases shows that while the implementation of technology may bring anticipated efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency gains, there are fundamental limitations to improving institutional trustworthiness through technological interventions. In particular, where points of discretion and ambiguity remain, or power asymmetries are exacerbated, trustworthiness is challenged. Furthermore, drawing on the cases and the relational conception of institutional trust, the article argues that enhancing trustworthiness is a constrained optimisation problem in an environment of competing and often conflicting values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ChileCompra means ‘Chile buys’ in Spanish.

  2. ‘Servicios de Impuestos Internos’ in Spanish.

References

  • AED (2003). Digital Opportunities for Development: A sourcebook on access and applications, Washington, DC: AED.

  • Anderson, K.V. (2004). E-Government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding: Dilettantes, wheel barrows, and diamonds, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The morphogenetic approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., Cordella, A., Kallinikos, J. and Smith, M.L. (2005). The Role of Information and Communication Technology in Building Trust in Governance: Toward effectiveness and results, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., Cordella, A., Kallinikos, J. and Smith, M.L. (2006). E-Government and trust in the state: Lessons from electronic tax systems in Chile and Brazil, LSE Department of Information Systems Working Paper Series #146 [www document] http://is2.lse.ac.uk/wp/pdf/WP146.PDF.

  • Avgerou, C., Ganzaroli, A., Poulymenakou, A. and Reinhard, N. (2009). Interpreting the Trustworthiness of Government Mediated by Information and Communication Technology: Lessons from electronic voting in Brazil, Information Technology for Development 15 (2): 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraza, F. and Hervias, A. (2006). Pre-Filled Tax Return Systems & Third Party Reporting Systems: Electronic invoice (Vat), On Fifth Meeting of the FTA Taxpayer Services Sub-Group [PPT]. Instanbul: Servicios de Impuestos Internos.

  • Bekkers, V. and Homburg, V. (2007). The Myths of E-Government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government, The Information Society 23: 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J.A. (1998). Governing in the Information Age, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, S. (2004). E-Government: From vision to implementation, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (1998). Trust, Cooperation, and Human Psychology, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds.) Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blendon, R.J., Benson, J.M., Morin, R., Altman, D.E., Brodie, M., Brossard, M. and James, M. (1997). Changing Attitudes in America, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds.) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1997). Measuring the Performance of Government, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds.) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. and Zouridis, S. (2002). From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control, Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G.A., Neubauer, B.J. and Geiselhart, K. (2006). Designing and Implementing E-Government Systems: Critical implications for public administration and democracy, Administration & Society 38 (4): 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanley, V.A., Rudolph, T.J. and Rahn, W.M. (2000). The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A time series analysis, Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1994). Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K.S., Hardin, R. and Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A. (2007). E-Government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology 22: 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, J.N., Dutton, W.H., Kling, R. and Kraemer, K.L. (1982). Computers and Politics: High technology in American local governments, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a Commodity, in D. Gambetta (ed.) Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc, pp. 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCCP (2002). Public Procurement System: Strategic plan 2002–2004, Santiago: Dirección de Compras y Contratación Publica, Ministry of Finance, Government of Chile.

  • DCCP (2006a). Balance De La Reforma Al Mercado De Las Compras Publicas: Memoria 2003–2006, Santiago: Dirección de Compras y Contratación Publica, Ministry of Finance, Government of Chile.

  • DCCP (2006b). Informe Mipe Chilecompra Período 2005–2006, Santiago: Dirección de Compras y Contratación Publica, Ministry of Finance, Government of Chile.

  • DCCP (2007). Informe De Gestion Chilecompra: Balance Año 2006, Santiago: Dirección de Compras y Contratación Publica, Ministry of Finance, Government of Chile.

  • Díaz, Á. and Rivas, G. (2005). Innovacíon Technológica Y Desarrollo Digital: El Aporte De Los Gobiernos De La Concertación, in P. Miller (ed.) La Paradoja Aparente. Equidad Y Eficiencia: Resolviendo El Dilema, Santiago: Taurus, pp. 473–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital Era Governance: It corporations, the state, and e-government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinal, R., Hartlyn, J. and Kelley, J.M. (2006). Performance Still Matters: Explaining trust in government in the Dominican republic, Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 200–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H. (2004). Trust, Distrust and Power, in R. Hardin (ed.) Distrust, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. and Hamill, H. (2005). Streetwise: How taxi drivers establish their customers’ trustworthiness, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelders, D. (2005). Public Information Provision about Policy Intentions: The Dutch and Belgian experience, Government Information Quarterly 22: 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and practices, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigli, J. (2006). Chile: Operación Renta 2006 Marca Récord De 97,04% De Declaraciones Hechas Por Internet, [www document] http://www.gobiernoelectronico.org/?q=node/4717 (accessed 15th September 2007).

  • Glaser, H. (1999). Service Delivery Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay Taxes: Citizen recognition of local government performance, Public Productivity & Management Review 23 (1): 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimsley, M. and Meehan, A. (2007). E-Government Information Systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust, European Journal of Information Systems 16: 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1991). Trusting Persons, Trusting Institutions, in R.J. Zeckhauser (ed.) Strategy and Choice, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1993). The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust, Politics & Society 21 (4): 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1996). Trustworthiness, Ethics 107 (1): 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1999). Do We Want Trust in Government? in M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2000). The Public Trust, in S.J. Pharr and R.D. Putnam (eds.) Disaffected Democracies, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2002). Trust & Trustworthiness, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1999). Trust and Its Surrogates: Psychological foundations of political process, in M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–272.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M.J. (1998). The Political Relevance of Political Trust, The American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organisations and states, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussmann, A.A. (2004). La Promesa De Las Compras Públicas Electrónicas: El Caso De Chilecompra (2000–2003), Unpublished Masters, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

  • IADB (2004). Government Procurement over the Internet [www document] http://www.iadb.org/news/articledetail.cfm?language=english&artid=2148&arttype=ws (accessed 2007).

  • Introna, L.D. and Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters, The Information Society 16 (3): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2004). The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order, Organization 11 (1): 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, I. (2004). Public Value and E-Government, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, H.W. and Knox, R.E. (1970). Conceptual and Methodological Considerations in the Study of Trust and Suspicion, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 14 (3): 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. and Iacono, S. (1984). The Control of Information Systems Developments after Implementation, Communications of ACM 27 (12): 1218–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumlin, S. (2004). The Personal and the Political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998). A State of Trust, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds.) Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.D. and Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality, Social Forces 63 (4): 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marakas, G.M., Johnson, R.D. and Palmer, J.W. (2000). A Theoretical Model of Differential Social Attributions toward Computing Technology: When the metaphor becomes the model, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52: 719–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A.J. (2007). Publishing Public Performance Results on the Internet: Do stakeholders use the internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? Government Information Quarterly 24: 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (1997). Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies, The Journal of Politics 59 (2): 418–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M.J. (2003). Can IT Help Government to Restore Public Trust? Declining Public Trust and Potential Prospects of It in the Public Sector, in 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii, 2003); Washington, DC.

  • Murphy, K. (2004). The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders, Law and Human Behavior 28 (2): 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noir, C. and Walsham, G. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector, Information Technology and People 20 (4): 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003). Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity, Public Administration 81 (4): 853–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1999). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? in P. Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global support for democratic government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr., J.S. (1997). Introduction: The decline of confidence in government, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds.) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr., J.S. (2002). Information Technology and Democratic Governance, in E.C. Kamarck and J.S. Nye Jr. (eds.) Governance.Com: Democracy in the information age, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr., J.S. and Zelikow, P.D. (1997). Conclusions: Reflections, conjectures, and puzzles, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds.) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, K. (2004). Trust: From Socrates to spin, Duxford, Cambridge: Icon Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1999). How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens? in M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–87.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2006). Democracy and Trust, in F.R. Ankersmit and H. te Velde (eds.) Trust: Cement of democracy, Leuven: Peeters, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orren, G. (1997). Fall from Grace: The public's loss of faith in government, in J.S. Nye, P.D. Zelikow and D.C. King (eds.) Why People Don’t Trust Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 77–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayiotou, N.A., Gayialis, S.P. and Tatsiopoulos, I.P. (2004). An E-Procurement System for Governmental Purchasing, International Journal of Production Economics 90: 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panzardi, R., Calcopietro, C. and Ivanovic, E.F. (2002). Electronic Government and Governance: Lessons for Argentina, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M., Vandebeek, C.A. and Gemino, A.C. (2004). Government Information Quarterly: Building Citizen Trust through E-Government, Government Information Quarterly 22 (4): 720–736.

  • Pegnato, J.A. (1997). Is a Citizen a Customer? Public Productivity & Management Review 20 (4): 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P. (1995). The Cunning of Trust, Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: 202–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterson, W., Ebbers, W. and van Dijk, J. (2007). Personalization in the Public Sector: An inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector, Government Information Quarterly 24: 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PUCV (2006). Estudio De Efectos Del Sistema Chilecompra: Informe Final: Estimación Del Impacto En Procesos, Santiago: Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa Chile, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso.

  • Reddick, C.G. (2005). Citizen Interaction with E-Government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22: 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M.I. (2001). Organization, Trust and Control: A realist analysis, Organization Studies 22 (2): 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. and Boudreau, M.C. (1999). Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications, Information Systems Research 10 (2): 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, O. (2005). The Political Economy of Tax Policy in Chile and Argentina, Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J. (2003). The Contested Rise of a Modernist Technology Politics, in T.J. Misa, P. Brey and A. Freenberg (eds.) Modernity & Technology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L. (2006). Overcoming Theory-Practice Inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research, Information and Organization 16 (13): 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L. (2010). Testable Theory Development for Small-N Studies: Critical realism, middle-range, & case-specific theory, International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach 3 (1): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L., Noorman, M.E. and Martin, A.K. (2010). Automating the Public Sector and Organizing Accountabilities, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 26: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snellen, I.T.M. (1998). Street Level Bureaucracy in an Information Age, in I.T.M. Snellen and W.B.H.J. van de Donk (eds.) Public Administration in an Information Age, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. and Flores, F. (2001). Building Trust: In business, politics, relationships, and life, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talero, E. (2001). Electronic Government Procurement: Concepts and country experiences, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Santiago Times (2006). Chile and poverty, [www document] http://www.tcgnews.com/santiagotimes/index.php?nav=story&story_id=11917&topic_id=1 (accessed 5th March 2006).

  • Tiano, S. (1986). Authoritarianism and Political Culture in Argentina and Chile in the Mid-1960s, Latin American Research Review 21 (1): 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, C. and Mossberger, K. (2006). The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government, Public Administration Review 66 (3): 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2006). Handbook for Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement, Berlin, Germany: Transparency international.

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. and Hoy, W.K. (2000). A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature. Meaning, and Measurement of Trust, Review of Educational Research 70 (4): 547–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. (1998). Trust and Democratic Governance, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds.) Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 269–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2003). World Public Sector Report 2003: E-government at the crossroads, New York: United Nations.

  • Valenzuela, A. (1995). Chile: Origins and consolidation of a Latin American democracy, in L. Diamond, J.J. Linz and S.M. Lipset (eds.) Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing experiences with democracy, 3rd edn, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, pp. 67–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.E. (1999). Democratic Theory and Trust, in M.E. Warren (ed.) Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–345.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.E. (2004). Trust in Democratic Institutions, in F. Ankersmit and H. te Velde (eds.) Trust: Cement of Democracy, Vol. 49–69. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weare, C. (2002). The Internet and Democracy: The causal links between technology and politics, International Journal of Public Administration 25 (5): 659–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the Information Society, 2nd edn, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, D.M. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review 64 (1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D.M. (2005). Digital Government: Technology and public sector performance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1988). Formal Structures and Social Reality, in D. Gambetta (ed.) Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1986). Do Artefacts Have Politics, in L. Winner (ed.) The Whale and the Reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. and Welch, E. (2004). Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability, Governance: An international journal of policy, administration, and institutions 17 (2): 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2001). Chile Poverty and Income Distribution in a High-Growth Economy: 1987–1998 (No. 22037-CH), Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • World Bank (2004). Republic of Chile: Country procurement assessment report (No. 28914-CL), Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 3rd edn, Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1986). Production of Trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920, Organizational Behavior 8: 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank various people who have commented on this work including Aaron Martin, Shirin Madon, Geoff Walsham, Carsten Sørensen, Marshall Smith, Jannis Kallinikos, and Carolina Seward. I am particularly indebted to Antonio Cordella, Susan Winter, and the reviewers for their very insightful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew L Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, M. Limitations to building institutional trustworthiness through e-government: a comparative study of two e-services in Chile. J Inf Technol 26, 78–93 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.17

Keywords

Navigation