[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Earthworm community in conventional, organic and direct seeding with living mulch cropping systems

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of biodiversity by intensification of agricultural practices is a major environmental issue that calls for the design of new cropping systems. For instance, negative effects of tillage on earthworm populations have been reported. However, few field studies have compared full cropping systems. Here, we assessed diversity, density and biomass of earthworm populations for 3 years. We use a combined method involving a diluted solution of allyl isothiocyanate to expel earthworms followed by hand sorting. In a long-term trial, we compared 3 systems: (1) a conventional system, (2) a direct seeding living mulch-based cropping system, named a living mulch cropping system, and (3) an organic system. These three cropping systems differed in terms of soil tillage, pesticide and nitrogen use, and crop biomass production. The results showed that measured variables, except diversity, varied depending on the year of sampling. Further, anecic and epigeic density was 3.2–7.2 times higher in the living mulch cropping system than in the conventional and organic systems. There were 3.4–12.5 times more anecic and epigeic earthworm biomass in the living mulch cropping system. The conventional and organic systems showed, respectively, 2.8 and 2.2 times more earthworm density, and 1.9 and 1.8 times more endogeic earthworm biomass than in the living mulch cropping system. Shannon-Wiener and equitability indices were superior in the living mulch cropping system compared with the conventional and organic systems. Cropping systems thus modified specific and functional diversity as well as earthworm community biomass. On the other hand, the organic and conventional systems did not differ in their earthworm density, biomass or diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFSSA, Agritox (2005) http://www.dive.afssa.fr/agritox/php/fiches.php.

  • Bengtsson J., Ahnstrom J., Weibull A.C. (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis, J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry E.C., Karlen D.L. (1993) Comparisons of alternative farming systems. II. Earthworm population density and species diversity, Am. J. Altern. Agr. 8, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouché M.B. (1972) Lombriciens de France: Écologie et Systématique, INRA Ann. Zool. Ecol. Anim. Publication, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan K.Y. (2001) An overview of some tillage impacts on earthworm population abundance and diversity — implications for functioning in soils, Soil Till. Res. 57, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki A.J., Paprocki R. (1998) An attempt to characterize complex properties of agroecosystems based on soil fauna, soil properties and farming system in the north of Poland, Biol. Agric. Hortic. 15, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby P.R., Baker G.H., Smith S.E. (1995) Glyphosate, 2,4-DB and dimethoate: effects on earthworm survival and growth, Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1661–1662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards C.A., Bohlen P.J. (1996) Biology and Ecoloy of Earthworms, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foissner W. (1992) Comparative studies on the soil life in ecofarmed and conventionally farmed fields and grasslands of Austria, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 40, 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högger C.H., Ammon H.U. (1994) Testing the toxicity of pesticides to earthworms in laboratory and field tests, Bulletin OILB/SROP 17, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole D.G., Perkins A.J., Wilson J.D., Alexander I.H., Grice P.V., Evans A.D. (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 122, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland J.M. (2004) The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 103, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias J., Castillejo J., Castro R. (2003) The effects of repeated applications of the molluscicide metaldehyde and the biocontrol nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita on molluscs, earthworms, nematodes, acarids and collembolans: a two-year study in north-west Spain, Pest. Manag. Sci. 59, 1217–1224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R., Gentlemen R. (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivask M., Kuu A., Sizov E. (2007) Abundance of earthworm species in Estonian arable soils, Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C.G., Lawton J.H., Shachak M. (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers, Oikos 69, 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones H.D., Santoro G., Boag B., Neilson R. (2001) The diversity of earthworms in 200 Scottish fields and the possible effect of New Zealand land flatworms (Arthurdendyus triangulatus) on earthworm populations, Ann. Appl. Biol. 139, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kula H., Kokta C. (1992) Side effects of selected pesticides on earthworms under laboratory and field conditions, Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 1711–1714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacoste A., Salanon R. (2005) Éléments de biogéographie et d’écologie, in: Colin A. (Ed.), France.

  • Lee K.E. (1985) Earthworms: their ecology and relationship with soils and land use, New York.

  • Mele P.M., Carter M.R. (1999) Impact of crop management factors in conservation tillage farming on earthworm density, age structure and species abundance in south-eastern Australia, Soil Till. Res. 50, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moonen A.-C., Bàrberi P. (2008) Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 127, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen V. (1992) Earthworm community response to tillage and residue management on different soil types in southern Finland, Soil Till. Res. 23, 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen V., Haukka J. (1990) Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia. VII: Earthworms, J. Agr. Sci. Finland 62, 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti M.G. (1999) The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi C., Bertrand M., Roger-Estrade J. (2008a) Earthworm collection from agricultural fields: comparisons of selected expellants in presence/absence of hand sorting, Eur. J. Soil Biol. (in press).

  • Pelosi C., Bertrand M., Makowski D., Roger-Estrade J. (2008b) WORMDYN: A model of Lumbricus terrestris population dynamics in agricultural fields, Ecol. Model. 218, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner L., Mäder P. (1998) Effects of biodynamic, organic and conventional production systems on earthworm populations, Biol. Agric. Hortic. 15, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulleman M., Jongmans A., Marinissen J., Bouma J. (2003) Effects of organic versus conventional arable farming on soil structure and organic matter dynamics in a marine loam in the Netherlands, Soil Use Manag. 19, 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley H., Pommeresche R., Eltun R., Hansen S., Korsaeth A. (2008) Soil structure, organic matter and earthworm activity in a comparison of cropping systems with contrasting tillage, rotations, fertilizer levels and manure use, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 124, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt O., Curry J.P., Hackett R.A., Purvis G., Clements R.O. (2001) Earthworm communities in conventional wheat monocropping and low-input wheat-clover intercropping systems, Ann. Appl. Biol. 138, 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt O., Clements R.O., Donaldson G. (2003) Why do cereal-legume intercrops support large earthworm populations? Appl. Soil Ecol. 22, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scullion J., Neale S., Philipps L. (2002) Comparisons of earthworm populations and cast properties in conventional and organic arable rotations, Soil Use Manag. 18, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist S., Schaub D., Pfiffner L., Mader P. (1998) Does organic agriculture reduce soil erodibility? The results of a long-term field study on loess in Switzerland, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ 69, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R.W., Gerard B.M. (1999) Earthworms, FSC Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant K.A., Field S.A., Langton S.D., Hart A.D.M. (1997) Effects on earthworm populations of reducing pesticide use in arable crop rotations, Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 657–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tebrügge F., Düring R.A. (1999) Reducing tillage intensity — a review of results from a long-term study in Germany, Soil Till. Res. 53, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen J.K. (2004) Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Quebec, Canada, Appl. Soil Ecol. 27, 143–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen J.K., Parmelee R.W., Edwards C.A. (1998) Population dynamics of earthworm communities in corn agroecosystems receiving organic or inorganic fertilizer amendments, Biol. Fert. Soils 27, 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss E., Glasstetter M. (1992) Tillage treatments and earthworm distribution in a Swiss experimental corn field, Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 1635–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates G.W., Bardgett R.D., Cook R., Hobbs P.J., Bowling P.J., Potter J.F. (1997) Faunal and microbial diversity in three Welsh grassland soils under conventional and organic management regimes, J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaborski E.R. (2003) Allyl isothiocyanate: an alternative chemical expellant for sampling earthworms, Appl. Soil Ecol. 22, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMR211, INRA/AgroParisTech, AgroParisTech, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

    Céline Pelosi & Jean Roger-Estrade

  2. UMR211, INRA/AgroParisTech, INRA, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

    Michel Bertrand

Authors
  1. Céline Pelosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel Bertrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Roger-Estrade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Pelosi.

About this article

Cite this article

Pelosi, C., Bertrand, M. & Roger-Estrade, J. Earthworm community in conventional, organic and direct seeding with living mulch cropping systems. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, 287–295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008069

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008069