Abstract
Regardless of annual rainfall amount changes, daily rainfall events are becoming more intense but less frequent with anthropogenic warming. Larger rainfall events and longer dry spells have complex and sometimes opposing effects on plant photosynthesis and growth, challenging abilities to understand broader consequences on the carbon cycle. In this Review, we evaluate global plant responses to rainfall regimes characterized by fewer, larger rainfall events across evidence from field experiments, satellites and models. Plant function responses vary between −28% and 29% (5th to 95th percentile) under fewer, larger rainfall events, with the direction of response contingent on climate; productivity increases are more common in dry ecosystems (46% positive; 20% negative), whereas responses are typically negative in wet ecosystems (28% positive; 51% negative). Contrasting responses in dry and wet ecosystems are attributed to nonlinear plant responses to soil moisture driven by several ecohydrological mechanisms. For example, dry ecosystem plants are more sensitive to large rainfall pulses compared with wet ecosystem plants, partly driving dry ecosystem positive responses to fewer, larger rainfall events. Knowledge gaps remain over optimal rainfall frequencies for photosynthesis, the relative dominance of rainfall pulse and dry spell mechanisms and the disproportionate role of extreme rainfall pulses on plant function.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
CMIP6 rainfall projections can be obtained from https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu. Observation-based rainfall data sets from MERRA, CPC and GPCC can be obtained from https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2/data_access, https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.cpc.globalprecip.html and https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.gpcc.html, respectively. FLUXNET observations can be downloaded from https://fluxnet.org.
References
Ruehr, S. et al. Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 518–534 (2023).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022).
Yang, Y. et al. Evapotranspiration on a greening Earth. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 626–641 (2023).
Green, J. K. et al. Regionally strong feedbacks between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. Nat. Geosci. 10, 410–414 (2017).
Forzieri, G., Alkama, R., Miralles, D. G. & Cescatti, A. Satellites reveal contrasting responses of regional climate to the widespread greening of Earth. Science 360, 1180–1184 (2018).
Spracklen, D. V., Arnold, S. R. & Taylor, C. M. Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests. Nature 489, 282–285 (2012).
Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 1560–1563 (2003).
Humphrey, V. et al. Sensitivity of atmospheric CO2 growth rate to observed changes in terrestrial water storage. Nature 560, 628–631 (2018).
Madani, N., Kimball, J. S., Jones, L. A., Parazoo, N. C. & Guan, K. Global Analysis of bioclimatic controls on ecosystem productivity using satellite observations of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens. 9, 530 (2017).
Poulter, B. et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509, 600–603 (2014).
Ahlström, A. et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science 348, 895–900 (2015).
Green, J. K. et al. Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake. Nature 565, 476–479 (2019).
Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).
Ciais, P. et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533 (2005).
Reyer, C. P. O. et al. A plant’s perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 75–89 (2013).
Sala, O. E., Parton, W. J., Joyce, L. A. & Lauenroth, W. K. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69, 40–45 (1988).
Biederman, J. A. et al. CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration across dryland ecosystems of southwestern North America. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 4204–4221 (2017).
Ukkola, A. M. et al. Annual precipitation explains variability in dryland vegetation greenness globally but not locally. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 4367–4380 (2021).
Pendergrass, A. G. & Knutti, R. The uneven nature of daily precipitation and its change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 11,980–11,988 (2018).
Fowler, H. J. et al. Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 107–122 (2021).
Kannenberg, S. A., Bowling, D. R. & Anderegg, W. R. L. Hot moments in ecosystem fluxes: high GPP anomalies exert outsized influence on the carbon cycle and are differentially driven by moisture availability across biomes. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 054004 (2020).
Trenberth, K. E. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47, 123–138 (2011).
Pendergrass, A. G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C. & Sanderson, B. M. Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017). This study estimates daily rainfall frequency and intensity trends, both observed and model projected, and compares with trends with annual rainfall totals.
Giorgi, F., Raffaele, F. & Coppola, E. The response of precipitation characteristics to global warming from climate projections. Earth Syst. Dyn. 10, 73–89 (2019). An investigation of daily rainfall frequency and intensity-projected trends within CMIP5 experiments.
Holdrege, M. C., Kulmatiski, A., Palmquist, K. A. & Beard, K. H. Precipitation intensification increases shrub dominance in arid, not mesic, ecosyst. Ecosystems 26, 568–584 (2023).
Thomey, M. L. et al. Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 1505–1515 (2011).
Short Gianotti, D. J., Akbar, R., Feldman, A. F., Salvucci, G. D. & Entekhabi, D. Terrestrial evaporation and moisture drainage in a warmer climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086498 (2020).
McColl, K. A. et al. Global characterization of surface soil moisture drydowns. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3682–3690 (2017).
Zhang, F., Biederman, J. A. & Dannenberg, M. P. Five decades of observed daily precipitation reveal longer and more variable drought events across much of the Western United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL092293 (2021).
Feldman, A. F., Short Gianotti, D. J., Trigo, I. F., Salvucci, G. D. & Entekhabi, D. Land–atmosphere drivers of landscape-scale plant water content loss. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL090331 (2020).
Grossiord, C. et al. Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. N. Phytol. 226, 1550–1566 (2020).
Ross, I. et al. How do variations in the temporal distribution of rainfall events affect ecosystem fluxes in seasonally water-limited Northern Hemisphere shrublands and forests? Biogeosciences 9, 1007–1024 (2012).
Liu, J. et al. Impact of temporal precipitation variability on ecosystem productivity. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 7, e1481 (2020).
Knapp, A. K. et al. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298, 2202–2205 (2002). One of the first field experiments evaluating effects of fewer, larger rainfall events on soil and plants at a Kansas site where many rainfall manipulation experiments have been performed.
Liu, W. J. et al. Repackaging precipitation into fewer, larger storms reduces ecosystem exchanges of CO2 and H2O in a semiarid steppe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 247, 356–364 (2017).
Fay, P. A., Kaufman, D. M., Nippert, J. B., Carlisle, J. D. & Harper, C. W. Changes in grassland ecosystem function due to extreme rainfall events: implications for responses to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 14, 1600–1608 (2008).
Heisler-White, J. L., Blair, J. M., Kelly, E. F., Harmoney, K. & Knapp, A. K. Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 2894–2904 (2009).
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).
Baudena, M., Boni, G., Ferraris, L., von Hardenberg, J. & Provenzale, A. Vegetation response to rainfall intermittency in drylands: results from a simple ecohydrological box model. Adv. Water Resour. 30, 1320–1328 (2007).
Feng, X., Porporato, A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 811–815 (2013).
Su, J., Zhang, Y. & Xu, F. Divergent responses of grassland productivity and plant diversity to intra- annual precipitation variability across climate regions: a global synthesis. J. Ecol. 111, 1–14 (2023). Synthesized plant responses to changing rainfall frequency and intensity from field experiments across the globe.
Knapp, A. K. et al. Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 58, 811–821 (2008). Uses a soil water bucket model to provide a framework for why plants in dry and wet ecosystems would have opposing responses to fewer, larger wet days.
Wang, L. et al. Dryland productivity under a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 981–994 (2022).
Lian, X. et al. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 232–250 (2021).
Huxman, T. E. et al. Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141, 254–268 (2004).
Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).
Lee, J.-Y. et al. in Climate Change 2021 — The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Ch. 4 (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 553–672 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).
Byrne, M. P. & O’Gorman, P. A. The response of precipitation minus evapotranspiration to climate warming: why the ‘wet-get-wetter, dry-get-drier’ scaling does not hold over land. J. Clim. 28, 8078–8093 (2015).
Zaitchik, B. F., Rodell, M., Biasutti, M. & Seneviratne, S. I. Wetting and drying trends under climate change. Nat. Water 1, 502–513 (2023).
Alexander, L. V. et al. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, 1–22 (2006).
Ziese, M. et al. GPCC full data daily version 2022 at 1.0°: daily land-surface precipitation from rain-gauges built on GTS-based and historic data. GPCC https://doi.org/10.5676/DWD_GPCC/FD_D_V2022_100 (2022).
Reichle, R. H. et al. Land surface precipitation in MERRA-2. J. Clim. 30, 1643–1664 (2017).
Chen, M. et al. Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based analyses of global daily precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, 1–13 (2008).
Pendergrass, A. G. What precipitation is extreme? Science 360, 1072–1073 (2018).
O’Gorman, P. A. & Schneider, T. The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).
Pendergrass, A. G. & Gerber, E. P. The rain is askew: two idealized models relating vertical velocity and precipitation distributions in a warming world. J. Clim. 29, 6445–6462 (2016).
Pfahl, S., O’Gorman, P. A. & Fischer, E. M. Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 423–427 (2017).
Lu, J., Vecchi, G. A. & Reichler, T. Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 2–6 (2007).
Vecchi, G. A. & Soden, B. J. Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J. Clim. 20, 4316–4340 (2007).
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 508–513 (2016).
Donat, M. G., Angélil, O. & Ukkola, A. M. Intensification of precipitation extremes in the world’s humid and water-limited regions. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 065003 (2019).
Fischer, E. M., Beyerle, U. & Knutti, R. Robust spatially aggregated projections of climate extremes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 1033–1038 (2013).
Miranda, J., Padilla, F. M., Lázaro, R. & Pugnaire, F. I. Do changes in rainfall patterns affect semiarid annual plant communities? J. Veg. Sci. 20, 269–276 (2009).
Zhang, J. et al. Moderately prolonged dry intervals between precipitation events promote production in Leymus chinensis in a semi-arid grassland of Northeast China. BMC Plant. Biol. 21, 1–11 (2021).
Grant, K., Kreyling, J., Beierkuhnlein, C. & Jentsch, A. Importance of seasonality for the response of a mesic temperate grassland to increased precipitation variability and warming. Ecosystems 20, 1454–1467 (2017).
Ma, Y., Zhang, T. & Liu, X. Effect of intensity of small rainfall simulation in spring on annuals in Horqin Sandy Land, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 74, 727–735 (2015).
Padilla, F. M. et al. Effects of extreme rainfall events are independent of plant species richness in an experimental grassland community. Oecologia 191, 177–190 (2019).
Schuster, M. J., Smith, N. G. & Dukes, J. S. Responses of aboveground C and N pools to rainfall variability and nitrogen deposition are mediated by seasonal precipitation and plant community dynamics. Biogeochemistry 129, 389–400 (2016).
Arca, V., Power, S. A., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Pendall, E. & Ochoa-Hueso, R. Seasonal effects of altered precipitation regimes on ecosystem-level CO2 fluxes and their drivers in a grassland from Eastern Australia. Plant Soil 460, 435–451 (2021).
Zhang, F. et al. Precipitation temporal repackaging into fewer, larger storms delayed seasonal timing of peak photosynthesis in a semi‐arid grassland. Funct. Ecol. 36, 646–658 (2021).
Holdrege, M. C., Beard, K. H. & Kulmatiski, A. Woody plant growth increases with precipitation intensity in a cold semiarid system. Ecology 102, 1–11 (2021).
Fay, P. A. et al. Relative effects of precipitation variability and warming on tallgrass prairie ecosystem function. Biogeosciences 8, 3053–3068 (2011).
Kulmatiski, A. & Beard, K. H. Woody plant encroachment facilitated by increased precipitation intensity. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 833–837 (2013).
Berry, R. S. & Kulmatiski, A. A savanna response to precipitation intensity. PLoS ONE 12, 1–18 (2017).
Williams, K. J., Wilsey, B. J., McNaughton, S. J. & Banyikwa, F. F. Temporally variable rainfall does not limit yields of Serengeti grasses. Oikos 81, 463 (1998).
Xie, Y., Li, Y., Xie, T., Meng, R. & Zhao, Z. Impact of artificially simulated precipitation pattern change on the growth and morphology of Reaumuria soongarica seedlings in Hexi Corridor of China. Sustain 12, 2439 (2020).
Good, S. P. & Caylor, K. K. Climatological determinants of woody cover in Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4902–4907 (2011).
Zhao, H., Jia, G., Xu, X., Zhang, A. & Wang, H. Divergent effects of intensified precipitation on primary production in global drylands. Sci. Total Environ. 892, 164736 (2023).
Case, M. F. & Staver, A. C. Soil texture mediates tree responses to rainfall intensity in African savannas. N. Phytol. 219, 1363–1372 (2018).
Ritter, F., Berkelhammer, M. & Garcia-Eidell, C. Distinct response of gross primary productivity in five terrestrial biomes to precipitation variability. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 34 (2020).
Fang, J. et al. Precipitation patterns alter growth of temperate vegetation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 1–5 (2005).
Xu, X. et al. Tree cover shows strong sensitivity to precipitation variability across the global tropics. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 450–460 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Extreme precipitation patterns and reductions of terrestrial ecosystem production across biomes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 148–157 (2013).
Zhang, W., Brandt, M., Tong, X., Tian, Q. & Fensholt, R. Impacts of the seasonal distribution of rainfall on vegetation productivity across the Sahel. Biogeosciences 15, 319–330 (2018).
Guo, Q. et al. Contrasting responses of gross primary productivity to precipitation events in a water-limited and a temperature-limited grassland ecosystem. Agric. For. Meteorol. 214–215, 169–177 (2015).
D’Onofrio, D., Sweeney, L., von Hardenberg, J. & Baudena, M. Grass and tree cover responses to intra-seasonal rainfall variability vary along a rainfall gradient in African tropical grassy biomes. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).
Porporato, A., Daly, E. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Soil water balance and ecosystem response to climate change. Am. Nat. 164, 625–632 (2004). This study uses a minimalist process model to predict and attribute plant responses to fewer, larger rainfall events at the Knapp et al. (2002) Kansas field experiment.
Zhang, D. H., Li, X. R., Zhang, F., Zhang, Z. S. & Chen, Y. L. Effects of rainfall intensity and intermittency on woody vegetation cover and deep soil moisture in dryland ecosystems. J. Hydrol. 543, 270–282 (2016).
Nordbotten, J. M., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. & Celia, M. A. Stochastic coupling of rainfall and biomass dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 43, 1–7 (2007).
Xu, X., Medvigy, D. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Relation between rainfall intensity and savanna tree abundance explained by water use strategies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12992–12996 (2015).
Guan, K. et al. Continental-scale impacts of intra-seasonal rainfall variability on simulated ecosystem responses in Africa. Biogeosciences 11, 6939–6954 (2014).
Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W. & Moorcroft, P. R. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems and carbon budgets to current and future environmental variability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8275–8280 (2010).
Peng, S. et al. Precipitation amount, seasonality and frequency regulate carbon cycling of a semi-arid grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China: a modeling analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 178–179, 46–55 (2013).
Fay, P. A. et al. Altered rainfall patterns, gas exchange, and growth in grasses and forbs. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 549–557 (2002).
Griffin-Nolan, R. J., Slette, I. J. & Knapp, A. K. Deconstructing precipitation variability: rainfall event size and timing uniquely alter ecosystem dynamics. J. Ecol. 109, 3356–3369 (2021).
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., D’Odorico, P., Porporato, A. & Ridolfi, L. On the spatial and temporal links between vegetation, climate, and soil moisture. Water Resour. 35, 3709–3722 (1999).
Laio, F., Porporato, A., Fernandez-Illescas, C. P. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics. Adv. Water Resour. 24, 707–723 (2001).
Daly, E., Porporato, A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Coupled dynamics of photosynthesis, transpiration, and soil water balance. Part II: stochastic analysis and ecohydrological significance. J. Hydrometeorol. 5, 559–566 (2004).
Daly, E., Porporato, A. & Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. Coupled dynamics of photosynthesis, transpiration, and soil water balance. Part I: upscaling from hourly to daily level. J. Hydrometeorol. 5, 546–558 (2004).
Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).
Porporato, A., Laio, F., Ridolfi, L. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress III. Vegetation water stress. Adv. Water Resour. 24, 725–744 (2001).
Guan, K. et al. Simulated sensitivity of African terrestrial ecosystem photosynthesis to rainfall frequency, intensity, and rainy season length. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 025013 (2018).
Nippert, J. B., Knapp, A. K. & Briggs, J. M. Intra-annual rainfall variability and grassland productivity: can the past predict the future? Plant Ecol. 184, 65–74 (2006).
Noy-Meir, I. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 25–52 (1973). This paper poses the ‘pulse reserve paradigm’ to describe dryland plant responses to individual rainfall events.
Felton, A. J., Slette, I. J., Smith, M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Precipitation amount and event size interact to reduce ecosystem functioning during dry years in a mesic grassland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 658–668 (2020).
Fay, P. A., Carlisle, J. D., Knapp, A. K., Blair, J. M. & Collins, S. L. Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C 4-dominated grassland. Oecologia 137, 245–251 (2003).
Post, A. K. & Knapp, A. K. How big is big enough? Surprising responses of a semiarid grassland to increasing deluge size. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 1157–1169 (2021).
Robinson, T. M. P. & Gross, K. L. The impact of altered precipitation variability on annual weed species. Am. J. Bot. 97, 1625–1629 (2010).
Wilcox, K. R., von Fischer, J. C., Muscha, J. M., Petersen, M. K. & Knapp, A. K. Contrasting above- and belowground sensitivity of three Great Plains grasslands to altered rainfall regimes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 335–344 (2015).
Slette, I. J., Blair, J. M., Fay, P. A., Smith, M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Effects of compounded precipitation pattern intensification and drought occur belowground in a mesic grassland. Ecosystems 25, 1265–1278 (2021).
Zeppel, M. J. B., Wilks, J. V. & Lewis, J. D. Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants. Biogeosciences 11, 3083–3093 (2014).
Huang, H., Calabrese, S. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. J. Variability of ecosystem carbon source from microbial respiration is controlled by rainfall dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2115283118 (2021).
Berg, A., Sultan, B. & De Noblet-Ducoudré, N. What are the dominant features of rainfall leading to realistic large-scale crop yield simulations in West Africa? Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 1–6 (2010).
Harper, C. W., Blair, J. M., Fay, P. A., Knapp, A. K. & Carlisle, J. D. Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil CO2 flux in a grassland ecosystem. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11, 322–334 (2005).
Felton, A. J. et al. Climate disequilibrium dominates uncertainty in long-term projections of primary productivity. Ecol. Lett. 25, 2688–2698 (2022).
Knapp, A. K. et al. Past, present, and future roles of long-term experiments in the LTER network. Bioscience 62, 377–389 (2012).
Beier, C. et al. Precipitation manipulation experiments — challenges and recommendations for the future. Ecol. Lett. 15, 899–911 (2012).
Adler, P. B., White, E. P. & Cortez, M. H. Matching the forecast horizon with the relevant spatial and temporal processes and data sources. Ecography 43, 1729–1739 (2020).
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K. & Collins, S. L. A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90, 3279–3289 (2009).
Feng, X., Dawson, T. E., Ackerly, D. D., Santiago, L. S. & Thompson, S. E. Reconciling seasonal hydraulic risk and plant water use through probabilistic soil–plant dynamics. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 3758–3769 (2017).
Throop, H. L., Reichmann, L. G., Sala, O. E. & Archer, S. R. Response of dominant grass and shrub species to water manipulation: an ecophysiological basis for shrub invasion in a Chihuahuan Desert Grassland. Oecologia 169, 373–383 (2012).
Javadian, M. et al. Thermography captures the differential sensitivity of dryland functional types to changes in rainfall event timing and magnitude. N. Phytol. 240, 114–126 (2023).
Reynaert, S. et al. Risk of short-term biodiversity loss under more persistent precipitation regimes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 1614–1626 (2021).
Jackson, R. B., Banner, J. L., Jobbagy, E. G., Pockman, W. T. & Wall, D. H. Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418, 623–626 (2002).
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass- and increases shrub-productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12735–12740 (2015).
Schreiner-McGraw, A. P. et al. Woody plant encroachment has a larger impact than climate change on dryland water budgets. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–9 (2020).
Hao, Y. et al. Climate-induced abrupt shifts in structural states trigger delayed transitions in functional states. Ecol. Indic. 115, 106468 (2020).
Harrison, S. P., Gornish, E. S. & Copeland, S. Climate-driven diversity loss in a grassland community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8672–8677 (2015).
Barbeta, A., Ogaya, R. & Peñuelas, J. Dampening effects of long-term experimental drought on growth and mortality rates of a Holm oak forest. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 3133–3144 (2013).
Jones, S. K., Collins, S. L., Blair, J. M., Smith, M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Altered rainfall patterns increase forb abundance and richness in native tallgrass prairie. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–10 (2016).
Zhang, Y., Keenan, T. F. & Zhou, S. Exacerbated drought impacts on global ecosystems due to structural overshoot. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1490–1498 (2021).
Jump, A. S. et al. Structural overshoot of tree growth with climate variability and the global spectrum of drought-induced forest dieback. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 3742–3757 (2017).
Collins, S. L. et al. Stability of tallgrass prairie during a 19-year increase in growing season precipitation. Funct. Ecol. 26, 1450–1459 (2012).
Keenan, T. F. et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499, 324–327 (2013).
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., McVicar, T. R. & Farquhar, G. D. Impact of CO2 fertilization on maximum foliage cover across the globe’s warm, arid environments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3031–3035 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2. Nat. Commun. 13, 4875 (2022).
Roby, M. C., Scott, R. L. & Moore, D. J. P. High vapor pressure deficit decreases the productivity and water use efficiency of rain-induced pulses in semiarid ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 125, 1–14 (2020).
Katul, G. G., Oren, R., Manzoni, S., Higgins, C. & Parlange, M. B. Evapotranspiration: a process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil–plant–atmosphere–climate system. Rev. Geophys. 50, 1–25 (2012).
Reynolds, J. F., Kemp, P. R., Ogle, K. & Fernández, R. J. Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve’ paradigm for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. Oecologia 141, 194–210 (2004).
Fensham, R. J., Butler, D. W. & Foley, J. How does clay constrain woody biomass in drylands? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 950–958 (2015).
Wei, L. et al. Experimental investigation of relationship between infiltration rate and soil moisture under rainfall conditions. Water 14, 1–11 (2022).
Penna, D., Tromp-Van Meerveld, H. J., Gobbi, A., Borga, M. & Dalla Fontana, G. The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 689–702 (2011).
Western, A. W. & Grayson, R. B. The Terrawarra data set: soil moisture patterns, soil characteristics, and hydrological flux measurements. Water Resour. Res. 34, 2765–2768 (1998).
Vereecken, H. et al. Soil hydrology in the Earth system. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 573–587 (2022).
Lian, X., Zhao, W. & Gentine, P. Recent global decline in rainfall interception loss due to altered rainfall regimes. Nat. Commun. 13, 7642 (2022).
Thomey, M. L., Collins, S. L., Friggens, M. T., Brown, R. F. & Pockman, W. T. Effects of monsoon precipitation variability on the physiological response of two dominant C 4 grasses across a semiarid ecotone. Oecologia 176, 751–762 (2014).
Lauenroth, W. K. & Bradford, J. B. Ecohydrology of dry regions of the United States: water balance consequences of small precipitation events. Ecohydrology 5, 46–53 (2012).
Demaria, E. M. C., Hazenberg, P. & Meles, M. B. Intensification of the North American Monsoon rainfall as observed from a long‐term high‐density gauge network geophysical research letters. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6839–6847 (2019).
Pockman, W. T. & Small, E. E. The influence of spatial patterns of soil moisture on the grass and shrub responses to a summer rainstorm in a Chihuahuan desert ecotone. Ecosystems 13, 511–525 (2010).
McDonald, A. K., Kinucan, R. J. & Loomis, L. E. Ecohydrological interactions within banded vegetation in the northeastern Chihuahuan Desert, USA. Ecohydrology 2, 66–71 (2009).
Schreiner-Mcgraw, A. P., Ajami, H. & Vivoni, E. R. Extreme weather events and transmission losses in arid streams. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 084002 (2019).
Scott, R. L. & Biederman, J. A. Critical zone water balance over 13 years in a semiarid savanna. Water Resour. Res. 55, 574–588 (2019).
Nippert, J. B. & Holdo, R. M. Challenging the maximum rooting depth paradigm in grasslands and savannas. Funct. Ecol. 29, 739–745 (2015).
Potts, D. L. et al. Antecedent moisture and seasonal precipitation influence the response of canopy-scale carbon and water exchange to rainfall pulses in a semi-arid grassland. N. Phytol. 170, 849–860 (2006).
He, Z., Zhao, W., Liu, H. & Chang, X. The response of soil moisture to rainfall event size in subalpine grassland and meadows in a semi-arid mountain range: a case study in northwestern China’s Qilian Mountains. J. Hydrol. 420–421, 183–190 (2012).
Tumber-Dávila, S. J., Schenk, H. J., Du, E. & Jackson, R. B. Plant sizes and shapes above and belowground and their interactions with climate. N. Phytol. 235, 1032–1056 (2022).
Jackson, R. B. et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108, 389–411 (1996).
Raz-Yaseef, N., Yakir, D., Rotenberg, E., Schiller, G. & Cohen, S. Ecohydrology of a semi-arid forest: partitioning among water balance components and its implications for predicted precipitation changes. Ecohydrology 3, 143–154 (2010).
Fravolini, A. et al. Precipitation pulse use by an invasive woody legume: the role of soil texture and pulse size. Oecologia 144, 618–627 (2005).
Zhu, X. et al. Soil coarsening alleviates precipitation constraint on vegetation growth in global drylands. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 11 (2022).
Ogle, K., Wolpert, R. L. & Reynolds, J. F. Reconstructing plant root area and water uptake profiles. Ecology 85, 1967–1978 (2004).
Schwinning, S., Sala, O. E., Loik, M. E. & Ehleringer, J. R. Thresholds, memory, and seasonality: understanding pulse dynamics in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141, 191–193 (2004).
Brodribb, T. J. & Cochard, H. Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers. Plant Physiol. 149, 575–584 (2009).
Bassiouni, M., Good, S. P., Still, C. J. & Higgins, C. W. Plant water uptake thresholds inferred from satellite soil moisture. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087077 (2020).
Jonard, F., Feldman, A. F., Gianotti, D. J. S. & Entekhabi, D. Observed water- and light-limitation across global ecosystems. Biogeosciences 19, 5575–5590 (2022).
Short Gianotti, D. J., Rigden, A. J., Salvucci, G. D. & Entekhabi, D. Satellite and station observations demonstrate water availability’s effect on continental-scale evaporative and photosynthetic land surface dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 55, 540–554 (2019).
Feldman, A. F., Short Gianotti, D. J., Trigo, I. F., Salvucci, G. D. & Entekhabi, D. Satellite-based assessment of land surface energy partitioning–soil moisture relationships and effects of confounding variables. Water Resour. Res. 55, 10657–10677 (2019).
Schwinning, S. & Sala, O. E. Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141, 211–220 (2004).
Famiglietti, C. A., Michalak, A. M. & Konings, A. G. Extreme wet events as important as extreme dry events in controlling spatial patterns of vegetation greenness anomalies. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074014 (2021).
Novick, K. A. et al. Confronting the water potential information gap. Nat. Geosci. 15, 158–164 (2022).
Feldman, A. F., Short Gianotti, D. J., Konings, A. G., Gentine, P. & Entekhabi, D. Patterns of plant rehydration and growth following pulses of soil moisture availability. Biogeosciences 18, 831–847 (2021).
Post, A. K. & Knapp, A. K. Plant growth and aboveground production respond differently to late-season deluges in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 191, 673–683 (2019).
Huxman, T. E. et al. Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture. Oecologia 141, 295–305 (2004).
Raz-Yaseef, N., Yakir, D., Schiller, G. & Cohen, S. Dynamics of evapotranspiration partitioning in a semi-arid forest as affected by temporal rainfall patterns. Agric. For. Meteorol. 157, 77–85 (2012).
Klein, T., Cohen, S. & Yakir, D. Hydraulic adjustments underlying drought resistance of Pinus halepensis. Tree Physiol. 31, 637–648 (2011).
Feldman, A. F., Chulakadabba, A., Short Gianotti, D. J. & Entekhabi, D. Landscape-scale plant water content and carbon flux behavior following moisture pulses: from dryland to mesic environments. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR027592 (2021).
Potts, D. L., Barron-Gafford, G. A. & Scott, R. L. Ecosystem hydrologic and metabolic flashiness are shaped by plant community traits and precipitation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 279, 107674 (2019).
Guo, Q. et al. Responses of gross primary productivity to different sizes of precipitation events in a temperate grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Land 8, 36–46 (2016).
Williams, C. A., Hanan, N., Scholes, R. J. & Kutsch, W. Complexity in water and carbon dioxide fluxes following rain pulses in an African savanna. Oecologia 161, 469–480 (2009).
Parton, W., Morgan, J., Smith, D. & Grosso, S. D. E. L. Impact of precipitation dynamics on net ecosystem productivity. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 915–927 (2012).
Scott, R. L., Biederman, J. A., Hamerlynck, E. P. & Barron-Gafford, G. A. The carbon balance pivot point of southwestern U.S. semiarid ecosystems: insights from the 21st century drought. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 2612–2624 (2015).
Pastorello, G., Trotta, C. & Canfora, E. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data 7, 225 (2020).
Post, A. K. & Knapp, A. K. The importance of extreme rainfall events and their timing in a semi-arid grassland. J. Ecol. 108, 2431–2443 (2020).
Collins, S. L. et al. A multiscale, hierarchical model of pulse dynamics in arid-land ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 397–419 (2014).
Feldman, A. F. et al. Moisture pulse-reserve in the soil-plant continuum observed across biomes. Nat. Plants 4, 1026–1033 (2018). An evaluation of plant sensitivity to individual rainfall pulses and their soil moisture thresholds using satellite measurements across the tropics.
Harris, B. L. et al. Satellite-observed vegetation responses to intraseasonal precipitation variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 1–11 (2022).
Roman, D. T. et al. The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought. Oecologia 179, 641–654 (2015).
Ignace, D. D., Huxman, T. E., Weltzin, J. F. & Williams, D. G. Leaf gas exchange and water status responses of a native and non-native grass to precipitation across contrasting soil surfaces in the Sonoran Desert. Oecologia 152, 401–413 (2007).
Craine, J. M. et al. Timing of climate variability and grassland productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3401–3405 (2012).
Hao, Y. B. et al. Aboveground net primary productivity and carbon balance remain stable under extreme precipitation events in a semiarid steppe ecosystem. Agric. For. Meteorol. 240–241, 1–9 (2017).
Brown, R. F., Sala, O. E., Sinsabaugh, R. L. & Collins, S. L. Temporal effects of monsoon rainfall pulses on plant available nitrogen in a Chihuahuan desert grassland. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 127, e2022JG006938 (2022).
Sitch, S. et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Chang. Biol. 9, 161–185 (2003).
Zhang, F. et al. Using high frequency digital repeat photography to quantify the sensitivity of a semi-arid grassland ecosystem to the temporal repackaging of precipitation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 338, 109539 (2023).
Paschalis, A. et al. Rainfall manipulation experiments as simulated by terrestrial biosphere models: where do we stand? Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 3336–3355 (2020).
McColl, K. A. et al. The global distribution and dynamics of surface soil moisture. Nat. Geosci. 10, 100–104 (2017).
Cherwin, K. & Knapp, A. Unexpected patterns of sensitivity to drought in three semi-arid grasslands. Oecologia 169, 845–852 (2012).
Cochard, H., Bréda, N. & Granier, A. Whole tree hydraulic conductance and water loss regulation in Quercus during drought: evidence for stomatal control of embolism? Ann. For. Sci. 53, 197–206 (1996).
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).
Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).
North, G. B. & Nobel, P. S. Changes in hydraulic conductivity and anatomy caused by drying and rewetting roots of agave deserti (Agavaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78, 906 (1991).
McDowell, N. G. et al. Mechanisms of woody-plant mortality under rising drought, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 294–308 (2022).
Choat, B. et al. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491, 752–755 (2012).
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Effect of interannual precipitation variability on dryland productivity: a global synthesis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 269–276 (2019).
Konings, A. G. & Gentine, P. Global variations in ecosystem-scale isohydricity. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 891–905 (2017).
Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J. & DeFries, R. S. Global distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation: carbon cycle implications. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1006 (2003).
Yu, K. & D’Odorico, P. Climate, vegetation, and soil controls on hydraulic redistribution in shallow tree roots. Adv. Water Resour. 66, 70–80 (2014).
Larsen, L., Thomas, C., Eppinga, M. & Coulthard, T. Exploratory modeling: extracting causality from complexity. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 95, 285–286 (2014).
Weltzin, J. F. et al. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 53, 941 (2003).
Kröel-Dulay, G. et al. Field experiments underestimate aboveground biomass response to drought. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 540–545 (2022).
Novick, K. A. et al. The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 1023–1027 (2016).
Lundholm, J. T. & Larson, D. W. Experimental separation of resource quantity from temporal variability: seedling responses to water pulses. Oecologia 141, 346–352 (2004).
Ogle, K. & Reynolds, J. F. Plant responses to precipitation in desert ecosystems: integrating functional types, pulses, thresholds, and delays. Oecologia 141, 282–294 (2004).
Orth, R. When the land surface shifts gears. AGU Adv. 2, 2019–2022 (2021).
Hsu, J. S., Powell, J. & Adler, P. B. Sensitivity of mean annual primary production to precipitation. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 2246–2255 (2012).
Maurer, G. E., Hallmark, A. J., Brown, R. F., Sala, O. E. & Collins, S. L. Sensitivity of primary production to precipitation across the United States. Ecol. Lett. 23, 527–536 (2020).
Feldman, A. F., Gianotti, D. J. S., Trigo, I. F., Salvucci, G. D. & Entekhabi, D. Observed landscape responsiveness to climate forcing. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR030316 (2022).
Dong, J., Akbar, R., Feldman, A., Gianotti, D. S. & Entekhabi, D. Land surfaces at the tipping-point for water and energy balance coupling. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2022WR032472 (2023).
Fu, Z. et al. Critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress in terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 7827, 1–13 (2022).
Fu, Z. et al. Uncovering the critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress for European ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 2111–2123 (2022).
Jensen, J. On the convex functions and inequalities between mean values. Acta Math. 30, 175–193 (1906).
Heisler-White, J. L., Knapp, A. K. & Kelly, E. F. Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 158, 129–140 (2008).
Guan, K., Sultan, B., Biasutti, M., Baron, C. & Lobell, D. B. What aspects of future rainfall changes matter for crop yields in West Africa? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8001–8010 (2015).
Seyfried, M. S. et al. Ecohydrological control of deep drainage in arid and semiarid regions. Ecology 86, 277–287 (2005).
Sala, O. E., Gherardi, L. A. & Peters, D. P. C. Enhanced precipitation variability effects on water losses and ecosystem functioning: differential response of arid and mesic regions. Clim. Change 131, 213–227 (2015).
Berkelhammer, M., Stefanescu, I. C., Joiner, J. & Anderson, L. High sensitivity of gross primary production in the Rocky mountains to summer rain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3643–3652 (2017).
Nielsen, U. N. & Ball, B. A. Impacts of altered precipitation regimes on soil communities and biogeochemistry in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1407–1421 (2015).
Biederman, J. A. et al. Terrestrial carbon balance in a drier world: the effects of water availability in southwestern North America. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 1867–1879 (2016).
Siteur, K. et al. How will increases in rainfall intensity affect semiarid ecosystems? Water Resour. Res. 50, 5980–6001 (2014).
Li, L. et al. Nonlinear carbon cycling responses to precipitation variability in a semiarid grassland. Sci. Total Environ. 781, 147062 (2021).
Swemmer, A. M., Knapp, A. K. & Snyman, H. A. Intra-seasonal precipitation patterns and above-ground productivity in three perennial grasslands. J. Ecol. 95, 780–788 (2007).
Fu, Z. et al. Atmospheric dryness reduces photosynthesis along a large range of soil water deficit. Nat. Commun. 13, 989–999 (2022).
Rigden, A. J., Mueller, N. D., Holbrook, N. M., Pillai, N. & Huybers, P. Combined influence of soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand is important for accurately predicting US maize yields. Nat. Food 1, 127–133 (2020).
Kannenberg, S. A. et al. Quantifying the drivers of ecosystem fluxes and water potential across the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum in an arid woodland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 329, 109269 (2023).
Konings, A. G., Williams, A. P. & Gentine, P. Sensitivity of grassland productivity to aridity controlled by stomatal and xylem regulation. Nat. Geosci. 10, 284–288 (2017).
Zscheischler, J. et al. A few extreme events dominate global interannual variability in gross primary production. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 035001 (2014).
Zscheischler, J. et al. Short-term favorable weather conditions are an important control of interannual variability in carbon and water fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2186–2198 (2016).
Smith, M. D. The ecological role of climate extremes: current understanding and future prospects. J. Ecol. 99, 651–655 (2011).
Smith, M. D. An ecological perspective on extreme climatic events: a synthetic definition and framework to guide future research. J. Ecol. 99, 656–663 (2011).
Knapp, A. K. et al. Characterizing differences in precipitation regimes of extreme wet and dry years: implications for climate change experiments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 2624–2633 (2015).
Sala, O. E. & Lauenroth, W. K. Small rainfall events: an ecological role in semiarid regions. Oecologia 53, 301–304 (1982).
Rezaei, E. E. et al. Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 831–846 (2023).
Donohue, R. J., McVicar, T. R. & Roderick, M. L. Climate-related trends in Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations, 1981–2006. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 1025–1039 (2009).
Haverd, V., Ahlström, A., Smith, B. & Canadell, J. G. Carbon cycle responses of semi-arid ecosystems to positive asymmetry in rainfall. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 793–800 (2017).
Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store. CMIP6 climate projections. C3S https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.c866074c (2021).
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V. Y. & Caporali, E. Investigating interannual variability of precipitation at the global scale: is there a connection with seasonality? J. Clim. 25, 5512–5523 (2012).
Hajek, O. L. & Knapp, A. K. Shifting seasonal patterns of water availability: ecosystem responses to an unappreciated dimension of climate change. N. Phytol. 233, 119–125 (2022).
Paschalis, A., Fatichi, S., Katul, G. G. & Ivanov, V. Y. Cross-scale impact of climate temporal variability on ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 641–660 (2015).
Guo, Q. et al. Spatial variations in aboveground net primary productivity along a climate gradient in Eurasian temperate grassland: effects of mean annual precipitation and its seasonal distribution. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 3624–3631 (2012).
Chou, C. et al. Increase in the range between wet and dry season precipitation. Nat. Geosci. 6, 263–267 (2013).
Good, S. P., Guan, K. & Caylor, K. K. Global patterns of the contributions of storm frequency, intensity, and seasonality to interannual variability of precipitation. J. Clim. 29, 3–15 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The research of A.F.F. was supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities under contract with NASA. A.F.F. was partly supported by a NASA Terrestrial Ecology scoping study for a dryland field campaign. A.G.K. was supported by NSF DEB 1942133 and by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The authors acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. The authors thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF. This work used eddy covariance data acquired and shared by the FLUXNET community, including AmeriFlux. The FLUXNET eddy covariance data processing and harmonization was carried out by the ICOS Ecosystem Thematic Center, AmeriFlux Management Project and Fluxdata project of FLUXNET, with the support of CDIAC, and the OzFlux, ChinaFlux and AsiaFlux offices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.F.F. led the Review and wrote the initial draft. X.F., A.J.F., A.G.K, A.K.K, J.A.B. and B.P. all contributed substantial edits to the initial outline, manuscript and figures. All authors contributed equally to the generation of the central ideas in the manuscript and initial figure concepts.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks Madelon Case, Rene Orth, Yuting Yang and Yao Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Glossary
- C4 photosynthesis
-
An evolutionary adaptation of photosynthesis occurring mainly in some grass and crop species under which photosynthesis is more efficient because photorespiration is largely avoided.
- CAM photosynthesis
-
An evolutionary adaptation of photosynthesis occurring mainly in plant species in arid environments that allows them to save water by only exchanging gases with the atmosphere at night.
- Community composition
-
The species types and their relative abundance within a defined ecosystem, here referring specifically to plants.
- Clausius–Clapeyron relationship
-
A thermodynamic equation that describes the nonlinear increase of saturation vapour pressure, or the capacity of air to hold water, with increases in air temperature.
- Hadley and Walker cells
-
Some of the largest organized circulations of air in the atmosphere of the Earth that contribute substantially to weather and climate patterns of the Earth.
- Interception
-
Rainfall that is captured and stored by vegetation, even briefly, such that it is prevented from infiltrating into the soil or running off of the ground surface.
- Normalized difference vegetation index
-
A commonly used satellite-based vegetation index that estimates greenness at the top of the vegetation canopy based on satellite measurements in the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.
- Phenology
-
The annual cyclic nature of plant functioning, specifically referring to its periodic increase and decrease in functioning during similar months of each year.
- Plant water status
-
A general indicator based on how much water is available for plants to use towards essential plant functions such as photosynthesis and transpiration.
- Rainfall intensity
-
The rainfall rate or rainfall depth over a defined time period. The rainfall rate is often defined hourly across hydrological sciences, although it is designated to be daily in this Review.
- Rooting profile
-
The distribution of the root volume of a plant across the soil depth.
- Satellite-based vegetation indices
-
Vegetation metrics derived from satellite measurements that typically span large spatial extents, including vegetation areal cover, greenness, height, photosynthetic capacity, water content and others.
- Soil moisture stress functions
-
An empirical relationship between decreasing soil moisture and decline in plant functions such as photosynthesis or transpiration.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Feldman, A.F., Feng, X., Felton, A.J. et al. Plant responses to changing rainfall frequency and intensity. Nat Rev Earth Environ 5, 276–294 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00534-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00534-0
This article is cited by
-
Untangling the environmental drivers of gross primary productivity in African rangelands
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Effects of drought and moisture stress on the growth and ecophysiological traits of Schima superba seedlings
Photosynthesis Research (2024)