[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Measurement of parity violation in electron–quark scattering

Nature volume 506, pages 67–70 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Symmetry permeates nature and is fundamental to all laws of physics. One example is parity (mirror) symmetry, which implies that flipping left and right does not change the laws of physics. Laws for electromagnetism, gravity and the subatomic strong force respect parity symmetry, but the subatomic weak force does not1,2. Historically, parity violation in electron scattering has been important in establishing (and now testing) the standard model of particle physics. One particular set of quantities accessible through measurements of parity-violating electron scattering are the effective weak couplings C2q, sensitive to the quarks’ chirality preference when participating in the weak force, which have been measured directly3,4 only once in the past 40 years. Here we report a measurement of the parity-violating asymmetry in electron–quark scattering, which yields a determination of 2C2u − C2d (where u and d denote up and down quarks, respectively) with a precision increased by a factor of five relative to the earlier result. These results provide evidence with greater than 95 per cent confidence that the C2q couplings are non-zero, as predicted by the electroweak theory. They lead to constraints on new parity-violating interactions beyond the standard model, particularly those due to quark chirality. Whereas contemporary particle physics research is focused on high-energy colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider, our results provide specific chirality information on electroweak theory that is difficult to obtain at high energies. Our measurement is relatively free of ambiguity in its interpretation, and opens the door to even more precise measurements in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of the present results with those of earlier experiments and predictions of the standard model.
Figure 2: Mass exclusion limits Λ on the electron and quark compositeness and contact interactions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, T. D. & Yang, C.-N. Question of parity conservation in weak interactions. Phys. Rev. 104, 254–258 (1956)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D. & Hudson, R. P. Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay. Phys. Rev. 105, 1413–1415 (1957)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Prescott, C. Y. et al. Parity nonconservation in inelastic electron scattering. Phys. Lett. B 77, 347–352 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Prescott, C. Y. et al. Further measurements of parity nonconservation in inelastic electron scattering. Phys. Lett. B 84, 524–528 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cahn, R. N. & Gilman, F. J. Polarized-electron-nucleon scattering in gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions. Phys. Rev. D 17, 1313–1322 (1978)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glashow, S. L. Partial symmetries of weak interactions. Nucl. Phys. 22, 579–588 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinberg, S. A model of leptons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264–1266 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salam, A. Weak and electromagnetic interactions. In Elementary Particle Theory: Relativistic Groups and Analyticity (ed. Svartholm, N. ) 367–377 (Almqvist and Wiksell, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anthony, P. L. et al. Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Czarnecki, A. & Marciano, W. J. Electrons are not ambidextrous. Nature 435, 437–438 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abrahamyan, S. et al. Measurement of the neutron radius of 208Pb through parity-violation in electron scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112502 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Armstrong, D. S. & McKeown, R. D. Parity-violating electron scattering and the electric and magnetic strange form factors of the nucleon. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 337–359 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alcorn, J. et al. Basic instrumentation for Hall A at Jefferson Lab. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 522, 294–346 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Subedi, R. et al. A scaler-based data acquisition system for measuring parity violation asymmetry in deep inelastic scattering. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 724, 90–103 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, A. D., Stirling, W. J., Thorne, R. S. & Watt, G. Parton distributions for the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189–285 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Androic, D. et al. First determination of the weak charge of the proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 141803 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood, C. S. et al. Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium. Science 275, 1759–1763 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett, S. C. & Wieman, C. E. Measurement of the 6S →7S transition polarizability in atomic cesium and an improved test of the Standard Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484–2487 (1999); erratum. 83, 889 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginges, J. S. M. & Flambaum, V. V. Violations of fundamental symmetries in atoms and tests of unification theories of elementary particles. Phys. Rep. 397, 63–154 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dzuba, V. A., Berengut, J. C., Flambaum, V. V. & Roberts, B. Revisiting parity nonconservation in cesium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203003 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Erler, J. & Su, S. The weak neutral current. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119–149 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beise, E. J., Pitt, M. L. & Spayde, D. T. The SAMPLE experiment and weak nucleon structure. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 54, 289–350 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eichten, E., Lane, K. D. & Peskin, M. E. New tests for quark and lepton substructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 811–814 (1983)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schael, S. et al. Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP. Phys. Rep. 532, 119–244 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chekanov, S. et al. Search for contact interactions, large extra dimensions and finite quark radius in ep collisions at HERA. Phys. Lett. B 591, 23–41 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aaron, F. D. et al. Search for contact interactions in e±p collisions at HERA. Phys. Lett. B 705, 52–58 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aad, G. et al. Search for contact interactions and large extra dimensions in dilepton events from pp collisions at with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 87, 015010 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the personnel of Jefferson Lab for their efforts which resulted in the successful completion of the experiment, and A. Accardi, P. Blunden, W. Melnitchouk and their collaborators for carrying out the calculations necessary for the completion of the data analysis. X.Z. thanks the Medium Energy Physics Group at the Argonne National Laboratory for support during the initial work on this experiment. J.E. was supported by PAPIIT (DGAPAUNAM) project IN106913 and CONACyT (México) project 151234, and acknowledges the hospitality and support by the Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP) where part of his work was completed. This work was supported in part by the Jeffress Memorial Trust (award no. J-836), the US NSF (award no. 0653347), and the US DOE (award nos DE-SC0003885 and DE-AC02-06CH11357). This work was authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under US DOE contract no. DE-AC05-06OR23177. The US Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce this manuscript for US Government purposes.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Present addresses: Richland College, Dallas County Community College District, Dallas, Texas 75243, USA (R.S.); College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA (W.D.); Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho 83201, USA (D.M.); Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA (K.E.M.); Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand (K.S.).

  2. A. Saha: Deceased.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22904, Virginia, USA

    D. Wang, R. Subedi, X. Deng, G. D. Cates, M. M. Dalton, C. W. de Jager, D. Jones, N. Liyanage, V. Nelyubin, K. D. Paschke, S. Riordan, K. Saenboonruang, R. Silwal, W. A. Tobias & X. Zheng

  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, Massachusetts, USA

    K. Pan, W. Bertozzi, W. Deconinck, S. Gilad, J. Huang, S. Kowalski, N. Muangma & V. Sulkosky

  3. Syracuse University, Syracuse, 13244, New York, USA

    Z. Ahmed, R. Holmes, C. M. Jen, A. Rakhman & P. A. Souder

  4. University of Kentucky, Lexington, 40506, Kentucky, USA

    K. Allada & C. Dutta

  5. California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90032, USA.,

    K. A. Aniol & D. J. Margaziotis

  6. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, 23187, Virginia, USA

    D. S. Armstrong, J. H. Lee & B. Zhao

  7. Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 60439, Illinois, USA

    J. Arrington, K. Hafidi, R. J. Holt, P. E. Reimer & J. Rubin

  8. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Dipt. di Fisica dell'Univ. di Catania, I-95123 Catania, Italy.,

    V. Bellini, A. Giusa, G. Russo & C. M. Sutera

  9. Ohio University, Athens, 45701, Ohio, USA

    R. Beminiwattha, P. M. King, J. H. Lee, J. Roche & B. Waidyawansa

  10. Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, 23606, Virginia, USA

    J. Benesch, A. Camsonne, J.-P. Chen, E. Chudakov, C. W. de Jager, A. Deur, J.-O. Hansen, D. W. Higinbotham, J. J. LeRose, D. G. Meekins, R. Michaels, S. Nanda, A. Saha, B. Sawatzky, R. Suleiman & B. Wojtsekhowski

  11. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 15213, Pennsylvania, USA

    F. Benmokhtar, G. B. Franklin, M. Friend, D. Parno & B. Quinn

  12. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, 23529, Virginia, USA

    M. Canan, S. Golge & C. E. Hyde

  13. INFN, Sezione di Roma, gruppo Sanità and Istituto Superiore di Sanità, I-00161 Rome, Italy.,

    E. Cisbani, S. Frullani & F. Garibaldi

  14. Università di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.,

    R. De Leo

  15. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, 07102, New Jersey, USA

    L. El Fassi

  16. Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México D.F., Mexico.,

    J. Erler

  17. Temple University, Philadelphia, 19122, Pennsylvania, USA

    D. Flay & Z.-E. Meziani

  18. Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov 61108, Ukraine.,

    A. Glamazdin

  19. Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, 71272, Louisiana, USA

    K. Grimm

  20. Longwood University, Farmville, 23909, Virginia, USA

    T. Holmstrom & K. Rider

  21. Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, FR-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.,

    C. E. Hyde

  22. Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea.,

    Hoyoung Kang & Y. Oh

  23. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, 01003, Massachusetts, USA

    K. S. Kumar, D. McNulty & L. Mercado

  24. Kent State University, Kent, 44242, Ohio, USA

    E. Long

  25. INFN, Sezione di Roma and Sapienza — Università di Roma, I-00161 Rome, Italy.,

    F. Meddi & G. M. Urciuoli

  26. Institut Jožef Stefan, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia.,

    M. Mihovilovic & S. Sirca

  27. George Washington University, 20052, Washington DC, USA

    K. E. Myers

  28. Mississippi State University, Starkeville, 39762, Mississippi, USA

    A. Narayan &  Nuruzzaman

  29. University of New Hampshire, Durham, 03824, New Hampshire, USA

    S. K. Phillips

  30. Duke University, Durham, 27708, North Carolina, USA

    X. Qian & Y. Qiang

  31. Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan 0036, Armenia.,

    A. Shahinyan

  32. China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China.,

    L. Ye

Consortia

The Jefferson Lab PVDIS Collaboration

  • D. Wang
  • , K. Pan
  • , R. Subedi
  • , X. Deng
  • , Z. Ahmed
  • , K. Allada
  • , K. A. Aniol
  • , D. S. Armstrong
  • , J. Arrington
  • , V. Bellini
  • , R. Beminiwattha
  • , J. Benesch
  • , F. Benmokhtar
  • , W. Bertozzi
  • , A. Camsonne
  • , M. Canan
  • , G. D. Cates
  • , J.-P. Chen
  • , E. Chudakov
  • , E. Cisbani
  • , M. M. Dalton
  • , C. W. de Jager
  • , R. De Leo
  • , W. Deconinck
  • , A. Deur
  • , C. Dutta
  • , L. El Fassi
  • , J. Erler
  • , D. Flay
  • , G. B. Franklin
  • , M. Friend
  • , S. Frullani
  • , F. Garibaldi
  • , S. Gilad
  • , A. Giusa
  • , A. Glamazdin
  • , S. Golge
  • , K. Grimm
  • , K. Hafidi
  • , J.-O. Hansen
  • , D. W. Higinbotham
  • , R. Holmes
  • , T. Holmstrom
  • , R. J. Holt
  • , J. Huang
  • , C. E. Hyde
  • , C. M. Jen
  • , D. Jones
  • , Hoyoung Kang
  • , P. M. King
  • , S. Kowalski
  • , K. S. Kumar
  • , J. H. Lee
  • , J. J. LeRose
  • , N. Liyanage
  • , E. Long
  • , D. McNulty
  • , D. J. Margaziotis
  • , F. Meddi
  • , D. G. Meekins
  • , L. Mercado
  • , Z.-E. Meziani
  • , R. Michaels
  • , M. Mihovilovic
  • , N. Muangma
  • , K. E. Myers
  • , S. Nanda
  • , A. Narayan
  • , V. Nelyubin
  • ,  Nuruzzaman
  • , Y. Oh
  • , D. Parno
  • , K. D. Paschke
  • , S. K. Phillips
  • , X. Qian
  • , Y. Qiang
  • , B. Quinn
  • , A. Rakhman
  • , P. E. Reimer
  • , K. Rider
  • , S. Riordan
  • , J. Roche
  • , J. Rubin
  • , G. Russo
  • , K. Saenboonruang
  • , A. Saha
  • , B. Sawatzky
  • , A. Shahinyan
  • , R. Silwal
  • , S. Sirca
  • , P. A. Souder
  • , R. Suleiman
  • , V. Sulkosky
  • , C. M. Sutera
  • , W. A. Tobias
  • , G. M. Urciuoli
  • , B. Waidyawansa
  • , B. Wojtsekhowski
  • , L. Ye
  • , B. Zhao
  •  & X. Zheng

Contributions

Authors contributed to one or more of the following areas: proposing, leading, and running the experiment; design, construction, optimization, and testing of the data acquisition system; data analysis; simulation; extraction of the physics results from measured asymmetries; and the writing of this Letter.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

J.E. is currently on sabbatical leave at the PRISMA Cluster of Excellence and MITP, Johannes Gutenberg University.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References and Supplementary Tables 1-2. (PDF 244 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The Jefferson Lab PVDIS Collaboration. Measurement of parity violation in electron–quark scattering. Nature 506, 67–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12964

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12964

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing