[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses

Nature volume 406, pages 752–757 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

Sample damage by X-rays and other radiation limits the resolution of structural studies on non-repetitive and non-reproducible structures such as individual biomolecules or cells1. Cooling can slow sample deterioration, but cannot eliminate damage-induced sample movement during the time needed for conventional measurements1,2. Analyses of the dynamics of damage formation3,4,5 suggest that the conventional damage barrier (about 200 X-ray photons per Å2 with X-rays of 12 keV energy or 1 Å wavelength2) may be extended at very high dose rates and very short exposure times. Here we have used computer simulations to investigate the structural information that can be recovered from the scattering of intense femtosecond X-ray pulses by single protein molecules and small assemblies. Estimations of radiation damage as a function of photon energy, pulse length, integrated pulse intensity and sample size show that experiments using very high X-ray dose rates and ultrashort exposures may provide useful structural information before radiation damage destroys the sample. We predict that such ultrashort, high-intensity X-ray pulses from free-electron lasers6,7 that are currently under development, in combination with container-free sample handling methods based on spraying techniques, will provide a new approach to structural determinations with X-rays.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ionization of a lysozyme molecule in intense X-ray pulses.
Figure 2: Explosion of T4 lysozyme (white, H; grey, C; blue, N; red, O; yellow, S) induced by radiation damage.
Figure 3: Elastic scattering from a variety of samples.
Figure 4: The landscape of damage tolerance.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henderson, R. The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q. Rev. Biophys. 28, 171–193 ( 1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Henderson, R. Cryoprotection of protein crystals against radiation-damage in electron and X-ray diffraction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 241, 6–8 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Solem, J. C. Imaging biological specimens with high-intensity soft X-rays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3, 1551–1565 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hajdu, J. in Frontiers in Drug Research (eds Jensen, B., Jorgensen, F. S. & Kofod, H.) 375–395 (Alfred Benzon Symposium 28, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doniach, S. Studies of structure of matter with photons from an X-ray free electron laser. J. Synchr. Rad. 3, 260– 267 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Winick, H. The linac coherent light source (LCLS): A fourth-generation light source using the SLAC linac. J. Elec. Spec. Rel. Phenom. 75, 1–8 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiik, B. H. The TESLA project: an accelerator facility for basic science. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B 398, 1– 8 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyson, N. A. X-Rays in Atomic and Nuclear Physics (Longman, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krause, M. O. & Oliver, J. H. Natural width of atomic K and L level Kα X-ray lines and several KLL Auger lines. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8, 329–338 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Veigele, W. J. Photon cross sections from 0.1 keV to 1 MeV for elements with Z = 1 to Z = 94. Atomic Data 5, 51– 111 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hubbell, J. H. et al. Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 4, 471–494 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ditmire, T. Simulation of exploding clusters ionized by high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A 57, 4094– 4097 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reiss, H. R. Physical basis for strong-field stabilization of atoms against ionization. Laser Phys 7, 543–550 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weaver, L. H. & Matthews, B. W. Structure of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme refined at 1.7 ångstroms resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 193, 189–199 ( 1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rischel, C. et al. Femtosecond time-resolved X-ray diffraction from laser-heated organic films. Nature 390, 490– 492 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison, S. C., Olson, A. J., Schutt, C. E., Winkler, F. K. & Bricogne, G. Tomato bushy stunt virus at 2.9 Å resolution. Nature 276, 368– 372 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bottcher, B., Wynne, S. A. & Crowther, R. A. Determination of the fold of the core protein of hepatitis b virus by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 386, 88–91 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Heel, M. et al. Angular reconstitution in three-dimensional electron microscopy. Historical and theoretical aspects. Scanning Micros. 11, 195–210 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mueller, F. et al. The 3D arrangement of the 23 S and 5 S rRNA in the Escherichia coli 50 S ribosomal subunit based on a cryo-electron microscopic reconstruction at 7.5 angstrom resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 35–59 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stowell, M. H. B., Miyazawa, A. & Unwin, N. Macromolecular structure determination by electron microscopy: new advances and recent results. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 595–600 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miao, J. W., Charalambous, P., Kirz, J. & Sayre, D. Extending the methodology of X-ray crystallography to allow imaging of micrometre-sized non-crystalline specimens. Nature 400, 342 –344 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szöke, A. Holographic methods in X-ray crystallography. 2. Detailed theory and connection to other methods of crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. A 49, 853–866 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faigel, G. & Tegze, M. X-ray holography. Rep. Progr. Phys. 62, 355-393 (1999 ).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tito, M. A., Tars, K., Valegard, K., Hajdu, J. & Robinson, C. V. Electrospray time of flight mass spectrometry of the intact MS2 virus capsid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 3550–3551 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siuzdak, G. et al. Mass-spectrometry and viral analysis. Chem. Biol. 3, 45–48 (1996 ).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rostom, A. A. Detection and characterization of intact ribosomes in the gas phase of a mass spectrometer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5185–5190 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, T. W., Porta, C., Lomonossoff, G. & Johnson, J. E. Structure-based design of peptide presentation on a viral surface: The crystal structure of a plant/animal virus chimera at 2.8 Ångström resolution. Fold. Des. 1, 179– 187 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berendsen, H. J. C., van der Spoel, D. & van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comp. Phys. Comm. 91, 43 –56 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Gunsteren, W. F. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Gromos-87 Manual (Biomos BV, Groningen, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F. & Hermans, J. in Intermolecular Forces (ed. Pullman, B.) 331– 342. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to G. Faigel, S. Hovmöller, A. Szöke, M. van Heel and A. Pratt for discussions. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Councils NFR and TFR as well as the EU-BIOTECH programme.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Edgar Weckert

    Present address: HASYLAB at DESY, Notkestr. 85, D-22607, Hamburg, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Biomedical Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Box 576, S-75123, Sweden

    Richard Neutze, Remco Wouts, David van der Spoel & Janos Hajdu

  2. Institut für Kristallographie, Universität Karlsruhe, Kaiserstrasse 12, D-76128, Germany

    Edgar Weckert

Authors
  1. Richard Neutze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Remco Wouts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David van der Spoel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edgar Weckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Janos Hajdu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janos Hajdu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neutze, R., Wouts, R., van der Spoel, D. et al. Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 406, 752–757 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35021099

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35021099

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing