Decision Support Through Subgroup Discovery: Three Case Studies and the Lessons Learned

• Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., & Verkamo, A. I. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. In Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Berger, J. (1985). Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. Springer-Verlag.

• Berry, M., & Linoff, G. (2000). Mastering data mining, the art and science of customer relationship managemen. John Wiley.

• Cestnik, B., Lavrač, N., Železny, F., Gamberger, D., Todorovski, L., & Kline, M. (2002). Data mining for decision support in marketing:Acase study in targeting a marketing campaign. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD-2002 Workshop on Integration and Collaboration Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning (pp. 25–34).

• Clark, P., & Boswell, R. (1991). Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In Proc. Fifth European Working Session on Learning (pp. 151–163). Springer.

• Clark, P., & Niblett, T. (1989). The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning, 3, 261–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, W.W. (1995). Fast effective rule induction. In A. Prieditis & S. Russell (Eds.), Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 115–123). Morgan Kaufmann.

• Cohen, W. W., & Singer, Y. (1999). A simple, fast, and effective rule learner. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

• De Raedt, L., Blockeel, H., Dehaspe, L., & Laer, W. V. (2001). Three companions for data mining in first order logic. In S. Džeroski & N. Lavrač (Eds.), Relational Data Mining. Springer-Verlag.

• De Raedt, L., & Dehaspe, L. (1997). Clausal discovery. Machine Learning, 26, 99–146.

  Google Scholar 

• Flach, P. (2003). The geometry of ROC space: Understanding machine learning metrics through ROC isometrics. In Proc. 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML03) (pp. 194–201). AAAI Press.

• Flach, P., & Gamberger, D. (2001). Subgroup evaluation and decision support for direct mailing problem. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD-2001 Workshop on Integration Aspects of Data Mining, Decision Support and Meta-Learning (pp. 45–56).

• Fürnkranz, J., & Flach, P. (2003). An analysis of rule evaluation metrics. In Proc. 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML03) (pp. 202–209). AAAI Press.

• Gamberger, D., & Lavrač, N. (2002). Expert guided subgroup discovery: Methodology and application. Journal of Artificiel Intelligence Research, 17, 501–527.

  Google Scholar 

• Gamberger, D., Lavrač, N., & Krstačić, G. (2003). Active subgroup mining: A case study in coronary heart disease risk group detection. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 28, 27–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Holte, R. (1993).Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets.Machine Learning, 11, 63–91.

  Google Scholar 

• Kavšek, B., Lavrač, N., & Jovanoski, V. (2003). APROPRI-SD: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery. In M. Berthold, H. J. Lenz, E. Bradley, R. Kruse, & C. Borgelt (Eds.), Advances in intelligent data analysis (pp. 230–241). Springer-Verlag.

• Kloesgen,W. (1996). EXPLORA:Amultipattern and multistrategy discovery assistant. In M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, & R. Uthurusamy (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lavrač, N., Flach, P., Kavšek, B., & Todorovski, L. (2002). Adapting classification rule induction to subgroup discovery. In V. Kumar, S. Tsumoto, N. Zhong, P. Yu, & X.Wu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 266–273). IEEE Computer Society.

• Lavrač, N., Flach, P., & Zupan, B. (1999). Rule evaluation measures: A unifying view. In S. Džeroski & P. Flach (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (pp. 174–185). Springer-Verlag.

• Lavrač, N., Kavšek, B., Flach, P., & Todorovski, L. (2004). Subgroup discovery with CN2-SD. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 153–188.

  Google Scholar 

• Michalski, R., Mozetič, I., Hong, J., & Lavrač, N. (1986). The multi-purpose incremental learning system AQ15 and its testing application on three medical domains. In Proc. 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1041–1045). Morgan Kaufmann.

• Myers, J. (1996). Segmentation and positioning for strategic marketing decisions. American Marketing Association.

• Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Matheus, C. (1994). The interestingness of deviation. In Proceedings of the AAAI-94 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases (pp. 25–36).

• Provost, F. J., & Fawcett, T. (1998). Robust classification systems for imprecise environments. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 706–713).

• Rivest, R. L. (1987).Learning decision lists. Machine Learning, 2:3, 229–246.

  Google Scholar 

• Silberschatz, A., & Tuzhilin, A. (1995). On subjective measures of interestingness in knowledge discovery. In Knowledge Discovery and data mining (pp. 275–281).

• Wrobel, S. (1997). An algorithm for multi-relational discovery of subgroups. In J. Komorowski & J. Zytkow (Eds.), Proc. First European Symposion on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (PKDD-97) (pp. 78–87). Springer Verlag.

• Wrobel, S. (2001). Inductive logic programming for knowledge discovery in databases. In S.Džeroski & N. Lavrač (Eds.), Relational data mining. Springer-Verlag.

• Wrobel, S.,& Džeroski, S. (1995). The ILP description learning problem: Towards a general model-level definition of data mining in ILP. In K. Morik & J. Herrmann (Eds.), Proc. Fachgruppentreffen Maschinelles Lernen (FGML-95). 44221 Dortmund, Univ. Dortmund.

Download references