Problem-Solving Preferences of Mathematics Teachers: Focusing on Symmetry

• Askew, M. (2001). Policy, practices and principles in teaching numeracy: What makes a difference? In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 105–119). London: Routledge Falmer.

  Google Scholar 

• Ball, D.L. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about the subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching scademic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teaching College.

  Google Scholar 

• Ball, D.L. (1997). What do students know? Facing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In B.J. Biddle, T.L. Good & I.F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teacher and teaching (pp. 769–818). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York: Teachers College.

  Google Scholar 

• Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experience in collaboration with teachers. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–333). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Comiti, C. & Ball, D.L. (1996). Preparing teachers to teach mathematics: A comparative perspective. In A.J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1123–1153). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooney, T.J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D.B. Aichele & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 9–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooney, T.J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F.L. Lin & T.J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9–31). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooney, T.J. & Krainer, K. (1996). In-service mathematics teacher education: The importance of listening. In A.J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1155–1185). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Dhombres, J. (1993). Is one proof enough? Travels with a mathematician of the baroque period. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 401–419.

  Google Scholar 

• Dreyfus, T. & Eisenberg, T. (1990). Symmetry in mathematics learning. ZDM – International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 2, 53–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Good, T.L., Mulryan, C. & McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165–196). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Jaworski, B. (1992). Mathematics teaching: What is it? For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(1), 8–14.

  Google Scholar 

• Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, R. (1997). Symmetry as a way of thought – a tool for professional development of mathematics teachers. Doctorate Dissertation, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa (In Hebrew).

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, R., Berman, A. & Zaslavsky, O. (1998). Definition of symmetry. Symmetry: Culture and science: Order and disorder, 9(2–4), 375–382.

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, R., Berman, A. & Zaslavsky, O. (2000). Applications of symmetry to problem solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31, 799–809.

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating students' interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 331–354.

  Google Scholar 

• Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1999). Connecting research to teaching: Cooperative learning in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 92(3), 240–246.

  Google Scholar 

• Ma. L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teacher's understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• National Academy of Education (NAE) (1999). Recommendations regarding research priorities: An advisory report to the national educational research policy and priorities board. www.nae.nyu.edu/pubs/download.htm (downloaded December 1999).

• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

  Google Scholar 

• Noddings, N. (1985). Small groups as a setting for research on mathematical problem solving. In E.A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 345–359). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Polya, G. (1963). On learning, teaching, and learning teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 70, 605–619.

  Google Scholar 

• Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Romberg, T.A. & Collins, A. (2000). The impact of standards-based reform methods of research in schools. In A.E. Kelly and R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 73–85). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. An introduction to epistemology and education. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman & Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. USA: Academic Press, Inc.

• Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of 'welltaught' mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Schoenfeld, A.H. (2000). Models of teaching process. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 243–261.

  Google Scholar 

• Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 157–189.

  Google Scholar 

• Silver, E.A. & Marshall S.P. (1990). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: Findings, issues, and instructional implications. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (vol. 1) (pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Sullivan, P. & Mousley, J. (2001). Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. In F.L. Lin & T.J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–163). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Ward, M. & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked out examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1–39.

  Google Scholar 

• Webb, N.M. (1991). Task-related verbal interactions and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390–408.

  Google Scholar 

• Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Yaglom, I.M. (1962). Geometric transformations. Vol. 1. Displacements and symmetry. New York: Random House.

  Google Scholar 

• Yerushalmy, M., Chazan, D. & Gordon, M. (1990). Mathematical problem posing: Implications for facilitating student inquiry in classrooms. Instructional Science, 19, 219–245.

  Google Scholar 

• Zaslavsky, O. & Leikin, R. (1999). Interweaving the training of mathematics teachereducators and the professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 1 (pp. 143–158).

• Zhu, S. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137–166.

  Google Scholar 

Download references