[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

An Equivalence Result for Single Facility Planar Location Problems with Rectilinear Distance and Barriers

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper considers planar location problems with rectilinear distance and barriers, where the objective function is any convex, nondecreasing function of distance. Such problems have a non-convex feasible region and a non-convex objective function. A modification of the barriers is developed based on properties of the rectilinear distance. It is shown that the original problem with barriers is equivalent to the problem with modified barriers. A particular modification is given that reduces the feasible region and permits its partitioning into convex subsets on which the objective function is convex. A solution algorithm based on the partitioning is the subject of a companion paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y.P. Aneja and M. Parlar, Algorithms for Weber facility location in the presence of forbidden regions and/or barriers to travel, Transportation Science 28 (1994) 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.M. Apostol, Mathematical Analysis, A Modern Approach to Advanced Calculus (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Batta, A. Ghose and U.S. Palekar, Locating facilities on the Manhattan metric with arbitrarily shaped barriers and convex forbidden regions, Transportation Science 23 (1989) 26-36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Batta and L.A. Leifer, On the accuracy of demand point solutions to the planar, Manhattan metric, p-median problem, with and without barrier to travel, Computers and Operations Research 15 (1988) 253-262.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.E. Butt and T.M. Cavalier, An efficient algorithm for facility location in the presence of forbidden regions, European Journal of Operational Research 90 (1996) 56-70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.M. Dearing, H.W. Hamacher and K. Klamroth, Dominating sets for rectilinear center location problems with polynomial barriers, Naval Research Logistics 49 (2002) 647-665.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.M. Dearing and R. Segars, Solving rectilinear planar location problems with barriers by a polynomial time partitioning, Annals of Operations Research 111 (2002) 109-131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.L. Francis, L.F. McGinnis and J.A. White, Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.W. Hamacher, Mathematical Methods in Planar Locational Planning (in German) (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.W. Hamacher and K. Klamroth, Planar location problems with barriers under polyhedral gauges, Technical Report No. 21, Department of Mathematics, Universität Kaiserslautern (1997).

  11. H.W. Hamacher and S. Nickel, Restricted planar location problems and applications, Naval Research Logistics 42 (1995) 967-992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I.N. Katz and L. Cooper, Facility location in the presence of forbidden regions, I: Formulation and the case of Euclidean distance with one forbidden circle, European Journal of Operational Research 6 (1981) 166-173.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Klamroth, Single facility location problems with barriers, Habilitations-schrift, Department of Mathematics, Universität Kaiserslautern (2000).

  14. K. Klamroth, Planar location problems with line barriers, Optimization 49 (2001) 517-527.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Klamroth, A reduction result for location problems with polygon barriers, European Journal of Operational Research 130 (2001) 486-497.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Klamroth and M. Wiecek, A bi-objective planar location problem with a line barrier, Operations Research, to appear 2001.

  17. R.C. Larson and V.O.K. Li, Finding minimum rectilinear distance paths in the presence of barriers, Networks 11 (1981) 285-304.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.C. Larson and G. Sadiq, Facility locations with the Manhattan metric in the presence of barriers to travel, Operations Research 31 (1983) 652-669.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.F. Love, J.G. Morris and G.O. Wesolowsky, Facilities Location: Models & Methods (North-Holland, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Nandikota, R. Batta and R. Nagi, The weighted one-center problem with arbitrarily shaped barriers, Presented at INFORMS, Salt Lake City (May, 2000).

  21. S. Nickel, Restricted center problems under polyhedral gauges, European Journal of Operational Research 104 (1998) 343-357.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Segars, Location problems with barriers using rectilinear distance, Ph.D. dissertation,Management Science, Clemson University (2000).

  23. J.E.Ward and R.E.Wendell, Using block norms for location modeling, Operations Research 33 (1985) 1074-1090.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dearing, P., Segars, R. An Equivalence Result for Single Facility Planar Location Problems with Rectilinear Distance and Barriers. Annals of Operations Research 111, 89–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020945501716

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020945501716

Keywords

Navigation