[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

An Augmented Arborescence Formulation for the Two-Level Network Design Problem

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss formulations for the Two Level Network Design (TLND) problem. In particular, we present an arborescence based formulation with extra constraints guaranteeing that the set of primary nodes is spanned by primary edges. This characterization suggests an arborescence based Lagrangian relaxation where the extra constraints are dualized. Although the Linear Programming (LP) value of the new formulation is proved to be theoretically weaker than the LP bound given by the flow based formulation presented by Balakrishnan, Magnanti and Mirchandani, our computational results show that for certain classes of instances the two LP bounds are quite close. Our results also show that the Lagrangian relaxation based method is quite efficient, providing a reasonable alternative to handle the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Ahuja, T. Magnanti and J. Orlin, Network Flow: Theory, Algorithms and Applications (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Balakrishnan, T. Magnanti and P. Mirchandani, Modeling and heuristic worst–case performance analysis of the two–level network design problem, Management Science 40(7) (1994) 846–867.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Balakrishnan, T. Magnanti and P. Mirchandani, Dual–based algorithm for multi–level network design, Management Science 40(5) (1994) 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Current, C.S. Revelle and J.L. Cohon, The hierarchical network design problem, European Journal of Operational Research 27 (1986) 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Duin and T. Volgenant, The multi–weighted Steiner tree problem, Annals of Operations Research 33 (1991) 451–469.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fischetti, and P. Toth, An efficient algorithm for the min–sum arborescence problem on complete digraphs, ORSA Journal on Computing 5(4) (1993) 426–434.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Goemans and Y. Myung, A catalog of Steiner tree formulations, Networks 23 (1993) 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Held, P. Wolfe, and H.P. Crowder, Validation of subgradient optimization, Mathematical Programming 6 (1974) 62–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.W. Hwang and D.S. Richards, Steiner tree problems, Networks 22 (1992) 55–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.N. Khoury, P.M. Pardalos and D.W. Hearn, Equivalent formulations for the Steiner problem in graphs, in: Network Optimization Problems, eds. D.–Z. Du and P.M. Pardalos (1993) pp. 111–123.

  11. T.L. Magnanti and L.A. Wolsey, Optimal trees, in: Handbooks in OR & MS, Vol. 7, eds. M.O. Ball et al. (1995) pp. 503–615.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Voss, Steiner Probleme in Graphen, Mathematical Systems in Economics (1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gouveia, L., Telhada, J. An Augmented Arborescence Formulation for the Two-Level Network Design Problem. Annals of Operations Research 106, 47–61 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014553523631

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014553523631

Navigation