Multispecies cropping systems in India: Predictions of their productivity, stability, resilience and ecological sustainability

• Akonde TP, Leihner DE and Steinmuller N (1996) Alley cropping on an ultisol in sub-humid Benin. Part 1. Long-term effect on maize, cassava and tree productivity. Agroforestry Systems 34: 1–12

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Allen BJ, Bourke RM and Hide RL (1995) The sustainability of Papua New Guinea agricultural systems: the conceptual background. Global Environmental Change 5: 297–312

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ali (1996) Pigeonpea-based cropping systems in the semi-arid tropics. In: Ito O, Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Katayama K, Kumar Rao JVDK and Rego TJ (eds) Dynamics of roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics), pp 41–58. Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Ibaraki

  Google Scholar 

• Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology, 2nd ed. Westview, Boulder, 433 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Andrew JS (1957) Proteins and nutrition. Cereal Science Today 2: 242; cited from Reeves JT (1958) The relationship of yield and protein in wheat. MSc thesis, The University of Western Australia, 118 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Anon (1994) Caught in an export trap. International Agricultural Development 14: 9–10

• Aykroyd WR and Doughty J (1970) Wheat in Human Nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 163 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Bandy DE, Garrity DP and Sanchez PA (1993) The worldwide problem of slash-and-burn agriculture. Agroforestry Today 5: 2–6

  Google Scholar 

• Barnard CS and Nix JS (1973) Farm planning and control. Cambridge University Press, UK, 549 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Bellows BC, Hildebrand PE, and Hubbell DM (1996) Sustainability of bean production systems on steep slopes in Costa Rica. Agricultural Systems 50: 391–410

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bressani R and Scrimshaw NS (1961); cited from Aykroyd WR and Doughty J (1964) Legumes in human nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 138 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Chacon JJ and Gliessman SR (1982) Use of the ‘non-weed’ concept in traditional tropical agroecosystems of southeastern Mexico. Agroecosystems 8: 1–11

  Google Scholar 

• de Wit CT (1960) On competition. Verslag Landbouwerk Onderzoek 66: 1–82

  Google Scholar 

• Cox GW and Atkins MD (1979) Agricultural ecology: an analysis of world food production systems. WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 721 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Das BL (1996) Slash-and-burn in India. Agroforestry Today 8: 3

  Google Scholar 

• Davis JHC, Wooley JN and Moreno RA (1986) Multiple cropping with legumes and starchy roots. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems, pp 133–160. Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Duguma B, Kang BT and Okali DUU (1988) Effect of pruning intensities of three woody leguminous species grown in alley cropping with maize and cowpea on an alfisol. Agroforestry Systems 6: 19–35

  Google Scholar 

• Ehrlich PR and Ehrlich AH (1972) Population, resources, environment: issues in human ecology. WH Freeman, San Francisco, 509 pp

  Google Scholar 

• FAO (1949) Food composition tables for international use. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 62 pp. Cited from Aykroyd and Doughty (1964)

  Google Scholar 

• FAO (1959) Report of the FAO/CCTA technical meeting on legumes in agriculture and human nutrition in Africa, Bukavu, Belgian Congo, 1958. Cited from Aykroyd and Doughty (1964)

• FAO (1970) Amino-acid content of foods and biological data on proteins. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 285 pp

  Google Scholar 

• FAO (1974) Handbook on human nutritional requirements. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, 66 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Finlay RC (1974) Intercropping soybeans with cereals. Regional Soybean Conference, Addis-Ababa, October 14–17, 1974, pp 77–85

• Francis CA (1986) Introduction: distribution and importance of multiple cropping. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems, pp 1–19. Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Fukai S (ed) (1993) Intercropping — bases of productivity. Field Crops Research (special issue) 34: 239–467

• Gautam RC (1996) Intercropping in pearlmillet: a remunerative practice of rainfed farming. Indian Farming 45: 21–31

  Google Scholar 

• Gliessman SR (1989) Quantifying the agroecological component of sustainable agriculture: a goal. In: Gliessman SR (ed) Agroecology — researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture, pp 366–370. Springer-Verlag, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Hart RD (1986) Ecological framework for multiple cropping research. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems, pp 40–56. Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systgems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hore DK, Govind S and Singh IP (1997) Collecting Citrus germ plasm from the Mizoram and Tripura hills of India. Plant Genetics Resources Newsletter No. 110: 57–59

  Google Scholar 

• Hulse et al. (1980) Cited from Hoseney RC, Andrews DJ and Clark H (1987). Sorghum and pearl millet. In: Olson RA and Frey KJ (eds) Nutritional quality of cereal grains: genetic and agronomic improvement, pp 397–456. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin

  Google Scholar 

• IARI (1976) Beneficial effects from the introduction of legumes into crop rotations and intercropping systems. Indian Agricultural Research Institute Reporter 1: 1–5

  Google Scholar 

• Jong W (1996) Swidden-fallow agroforestry in Amazonia: diversity at close distance. Agroforestry Systems 34: 277–290

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kang BT, Versteeg MN, Osiname O and Gichuru M (1991) Agroforestry in Africa's humid tropics: three success stories. Agroforestry Today 3: 4

  Google Scholar 

• Kumar Rao JVDK, Wani SP and Lee KK (1996) Biological nitrogen fixation through grain legumes in different cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics. In: Ito O, Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Katayama K, Kumar Rao JVDK and Rego TJ (eds) Dynamics of roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics, pp 323–334. Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Ibaraki

  Google Scholar 

• Lentner C (ed) (1992) Geigy Scientific Tables. CIBA-GEIGY, Basle, Switzerland. Vol. 1, 295 pp

  Google Scholar 

• McCown RL and Jones RK (1992) Agriculture of semi-arid Eastern Kenya: problems and possibilities. In: Probert ME (ed) A search for strategies for sustainable dryland cropping in semi-arid Eastern Kenya, pp 8–14. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra

  Google Scholar 

• Natarajan M and Willey RW (1980) Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density. 1. Growth and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 51–58

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Noy-Meir I (1975) Stability of grazing ecosystems: an application of predator-prey graphs. Journal of Ecology 63: 459–481

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Papadakis JS (1941) Small grains and winter legumes grown mixed for grain production. Agronomy Journal 33: 504–511

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Petterson DS and Mackintosh JB (1994) The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian grain legumes. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, 68 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Platt BS (1962) Tables of representative values of foods commonly used in tropical countries. Medical Research Council, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 46 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Puckridge DW and French RJ (1983) The annual legume pasture in cereal-ley farming systems of southern Australia: a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 9: 229–267

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ramakrishnan PS (1984) The science behind the rotation al bush fallow agriculture system (jhum). Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science (Plant Sciences) 93: 379–400

  Google Scholar 

• Ranganathan R (1993) Analysis of yield advantages in mixed cropping. Ph.D. Thesis, Landbouwuniversiteit, Wageningen, 93 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Rao MR (1986) Cereals in multiple cropping. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple Cropping Systems, pp 96–132. Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Rao MR and Coe R (1992) Evaluating the results of agroforestry research. Agroforestry Today 4: 4–8

  Google Scholar 

• Rao MR and Willey RW (1978) Current status of intercropping research and some suggested experimental approaches. Proceedings of the 2nd INPUTS Review Meeting, EastWest Center, 17 May 1978, pp 123–137. Honolulu, Hawaii

• Rao MR and Willey RW (1981) Stability of performance of a pigeonpea/sorghum intercrop system. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, 10–13 January 1979, Hyderabad, India, pp 306–317. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, AP India

  Google Scholar 

• Rao MR and Willey RW (1983). Effects of genotype in cereal/pigeonpea intercropping on the alfisols of the semi-arid tropics of India. Experimental Agriculture 19: 67–78

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reddy MS and Willey RW (1981) A study of pearl millet/groundnut intercropping with particular emphasis on the efficiencies of leaf canopy and rooting pattern. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, 10–13 January 1979, Hyderabad, India, pp 202–209. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, AP India

  Google Scholar 

• Rego TJ and Seeling B (1996) Long-term effects of legume-based cropping systems on soil nitrogen status and mineralization in vertisols. In: Ito O, Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Katayama K, Kumar Rao JVDK and Rego TJ (eds) Dynamics of roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics, pp 469–479. Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Ibaraki

  Google Scholar 

• Roger JH and Rao MR (1990) Discovering the hard facts. Agroforestry Today 2: 4–7

  Google Scholar 

• Smith ME and Francis CA (1986) Breeding for multiple cropping systems. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems, pp 219–249. Macmillan, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Subedi KD (1997) Wheat intercropped with tori (Brassica campestris var. toria) and pea (Pisum sativum) in the subsistence farming system of the Nepalese hills. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128: 283–289

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1974) Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26: 177–210

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1976) Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In: Papendick RI, Sanchez PA, Triplett GB and Bronson RD (eds) Multiple Cropping, pp 129–169. American Society of Agronomy, Special Publication, Madison

  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1981) Comment on a paper by Mead and Riley on the statistical aspects of intercropping. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 144: 492–493

  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1984a) Decline of soil fertility and the collapse of shifting cultivation systems under intensification. In: Chadwick AC and Sutton SL (eds) Tropical Rain-forest: the Leeds Symposium, pp 279–292. Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Leeds

  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1984b) The dynamic proporties of mixed crops. In: Frontiers of Research in Agriculture, Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference, Calcutta, Sept/Oct 1982, pp 265–286. Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta

  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR (1993) Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Research 34: 381–405

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR, Conway GR and Craig IA (1989) Threats to sustainability in intensified agricultural systems: analysis and implications for management. In: Gliessman SR (ed) Agroecology-researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture, pp 337–365. Springer-Verlag, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Trenbath BR and Smith ADM (1980) Basic concepts for a systems analysis of eucalypt dieback in New England. In: Old KM, Kile GA and Ohmart CP (eds) Eucalypt dieback in Forests and Woodlands, pp 234–244. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organisation, Melbourne

  Google Scholar 

• Vandermeer J (1989) The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 237 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Vandermeer J, Van Noordwijk M, Ong C, Anderson J and Perfecto Y (1998) Global change and multi-species agroecosystems: concepts and issues. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 67: 1–22

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Noordwijk M, Hairiah K, Partoharjono S, Labios RV and Garrity D P (1997) Sustainable food-crop based production systems, as alternative to Imperata grasslands? Agroforestry Systems 36: 55–82

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walker BH, Ludwig D, Holling CS and Peterman RM (1981) Stability of semi-arid savannah grazing systems. Journal of Ecology 69: 473–498

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wendt JW, Jones RB and Itimu OA (1994) An integrated approach to soil fertility improvement in Malawi, including agroforestry. In: Crasswell ET and Simpson J (eds) Soil fertility and climatic constraints in dryland agriculture, pp 74–79. Australian Council for International Agricultural Research, Canberra

  Google Scholar 

• Willey RW (1979a) Intercropping — its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 1–10

  Google Scholar 

• Willey RW (1979b) Intercropping — its importance and research needs. Part II. Agronomy and research approaches. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 73–85

  Google Scholar 

• Worldwatch Institute (1994) Report on progress toward a sustainable society. WW Norton and Co., New York. 265 pp

  Google Scholar 

• Xi C (1995) Slash-and-burn in China. Agroforestry Today 7: 2–3

  Google Scholar 

• Zinke PJ, Sabhasri S and Kunstadter P (1978) Soil fertility aspects of the Luao forest fallow system of shifting cultivation. In: Kunstadter P, Chapman EC and Sabhasri S (eds) Farmers in the forest, pp 134–159. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu

  Google Scholar 

Download references