[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Basketball lineup performance prediction using edge-centric multi-view network analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sports analytics is one of the fast-growing applications of machine learning and data mining. The major goal in sport analytics applications is to make informed decisions to gain a competitive advantage. In this paper, we propose a method to analyse and predict lineup performance in basketball which may assist the team managers and coaches to make informed decisions. The constant lineup change in basketball games makes it vital to always have the best move ready at every moment of the game. A complex decision-making system is very important for the coaches to navigate their team through a season. This system must make the decisions based on the pros and cons of the teams, past results and lineups, and both teams’ performance under similar situations. To create this system, authors have constructed a signed, directed, and weighted network from the results of all matchups and lineups of the teams in NBA from 2007 to 2019. The proposed approach uses machine learning and graph theory to develop a new metric called Inverse Square Metric and edge-centric multi-view networks to predict the performance of a lineup in a given situation. The edge-centric approach provides a deep analysis of any condition between two teams from 16 different perspectives. The average accuracy achieved by ISM and edge-centric multi-view is 68% and 80%, respectively. In the end, the training and test datasets are chosen from different seasons and results are reasonable compared to the baseline methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadalinezhad M, Makrehchi M, Seward N (2019) Basketball lineup performance prediction using network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, pp 519–524

  • Atlas M, Zhang YQ (2004) Fuzzy neural agents for online NBA scouting. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence. IEEE Computer Society, pp 58–63

  • Baghal T (2012) Are the “four factors” indicators of one factor? An application of structural equation modeling methodology to NBA data in prediction of winning percentage. J Quant Anal Sports 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1559-0410.1355

  • Beckler M, Wang H, Papamichael M (2013) NBA oracle. Zuletzt besucht am 17(20082009.9)

  • Berri DJ (2017) National basketball association. In: Fizel J (ed) Handbook of sports economics research. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao C (2012) Sports data mining technology used in basketball outcome prediction. Technological University Dublin

  • Caudill SB (2003) Predicting discrete outcomes with the maximum score estimator: the case of the ncaa mens basketball tournament. Int J Forecast 19(2):313–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng G, Zhang Z, Kyebambe MN, Kimbugwe N (2016) Predicting the outcome of NBA playoffs based on the maximum entropy principle. Entropy 18(12):450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover A, Leskovec J (2016) node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 855–864

  • Harville DA (2003) The selection or seeding of college basketball or football teams for postseason competition. J Am Stat Assoc 98(461):17–27

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA, Smith MH (1994) The home-court advantage: how large is it, and does it vary from team to team? Am Stat 48(1):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MB (2007) Home advantage in the nba as a game-long process. J Quant Anal Sports 3(4). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1081

  • Jones MB (2008) A note on team-specific home advantage in the NBA. J Quant Anal Sports 4(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1128

  • Kubatko J, Oliver D, Pelton K, Rosenbaum DT (2007) A starting point for analyzing basketball statistics. J Quant Anal Sports 3(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1070

  • Leskovec J, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J (2010) Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 641–650

  • Loeffelholz B, Bednar E, Bauer KW (2009) Predicting NBA games using neural networks. J Quant Anal Sports 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1156

  • Miljković D, Gajić L, Kovačević A, Konjović Z (2010) The use of data mining for basketball matches outcomes prediction. In: 2010 8th International symposium on intelligent systems and informatics (SISY). IEEE, pp 309–312

  • Oh Mh, Keshri S, Iyengar G (2015) Graphical model for basketball match simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 MIT sloan sports analytics conference, Boston, MA, USA, vol. 2728

  • Pelechrinis K (2017) Linnet: probabilistic lineup evaluation through network embedding. In: Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Springer, pp 20–36

  • Stefani RT (1977) Football and basketball predictions using least squares. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 7(2):117–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefani RT (1980) Improved least squares football, basketball, and soccer predictions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10(2):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stekler HO, Klein A et al (2012) Predicting the outcomes of ncaa basketball championship games. J Quant Anal Sports 8(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Teramoto M, Cross CL (2010) Relative importance of performance factors in winning NBA games in regular season versus playoffs. J Quant Anal Sports 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1260

  • Wasserman S, Pattison P (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. an introduction to markov graphs andp. Psychometrika 61(3):401–425

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, Canada

    Mahboubeh Ahmadalinezhad & Masoud Makrehchi

Authors
  1. Mahboubeh Ahmadalinezhad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masoud Makrehchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahboubeh Ahmadalinezhad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadalinezhad, M., Makrehchi, M. Basketball lineup performance prediction using edge-centric multi-view network analysis. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 10, 72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00677-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00677-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation