[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the risk assessment of dangerous small-sized reservoirs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is large number of small-sized reservoirs and widely distributed in mainland of China, but most of them short of management or the security situation is grim. Once the dam break, the loss caused by damage is very serious. Therefore, it is very necessary to look for a general assessment method to monitor the reservoir safety and avoid dam-breaking accident timely. Currently, the common method for reservoirs risk assessment is a traditional approach based on Certainty Criterion, this method can give the overall safety degree by qualitative assessment, which need a large number of monitoring data and mainly suitable for large and medium sized reservoirs. However, vast majority small-sized reservoirs were neglected and had no monitoring equipment, went short of operation statistical data, so it is difficult to assess using the traditional Certainty Criterion. Aiming at the characteristics of small-sized reservoirs, in this paper we proposed the fuzzy AHP assessment method suitable for small-sized reservoirs’ risk analysis, which is based on statistics analysis of the wracked small-sized reservoirs and effective identification of risk factors, then verified the applicability and effectiveness of this method by two engineering cases. The result show that this method can be more truly reflect the security status of the reservoir, and also has the reference value and application prospect for dangerous reservoirs reinforcement in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2014) 2013 Statistic bulletin on China water activities [M]. China Water Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gu CS, He XF (2008) Risk analysis model for landslide mass of high slope in dam area. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci 5:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou J, Zhang X, Tang C (2012) Dam risk analysis of Shaheji reservoir based on Bayesian network. J Hohai Univ Nat Sci 40(3):287–293

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee BS, You GJY (2013) An assessment of long-term overtopping risk and optimal termination time of dam under climate change. J Environ Manage 121:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuo JT, Hsu YC (2008) Dam overtopping risk assessment considering inspection program. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 22(3):303–313

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiang Y, Yuan H (2013) Risk assessment of emergency disposal of reservoir dam in high altitude areas. Disaster Adv 6(3):378–387

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goes Filho A (2013) Risk analysis in the spillway of dam Oros by excess of influent flow. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias 85(1):405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li H, Quan W (2012) Research on calculation method for hydropower station dam site scheme comparison based on landslide risk assessment. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 39(5):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chao L, Jingqiang L, Aifu W (2012) Risk sort analysis on small reservoirs group-dam. J Shandong Agric Univ Nat Sci 43:564–568

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dam Safety Management Center of the Ministry of Water Resources, [Online]. Available: http://www.damsafety.cn/LawShow.aspx?id=0000000127. Accessed 21 April 2015

  11. Gamal AA (2011) Multi-objectives model to process security risk assessment based on AHP-PHO. Modem Appl Sci 5:246–250

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang X, Wei C (2013) An Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on entropy and similarity measure. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 5(3):435–444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdullah L (2014) A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 41(7):3297–3305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CJ, Yang SM, Chang SC (2013) A model integrating fuzzy AHP with QFD for assessing technical factors in aviation safety. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 5(5):761–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dagdeviren M (2008) Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf Sci 178(6):1717–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun CC (2010) A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:7745–7754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katagiri H, Uno T, Kato K, Tsuda H, Tsubaki H (2012) Random fuzzy bilevel linear programming through possibility-based value at risk model. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 5(2):211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Zheng CC, Jiang DJ, Hu DX (2014) Research advances in risk assessment and enforcement of unsafe reservoirs. Adv Water Sci 25(1):148–154

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naihua R, Yunguang N (2001) Statistical analysis on accidents and failures of Embankment dams. Larg Dam Saf 1(1):31–37. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1092.2001.01.008

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruipeng T, Dawei C (2009) Accident risk analysis and flood control operation of Cascade Reservoir. China Saf Sci J 19(3):119–124

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hu DX, Yang J, Zhou XD (2009) Analysis on complex uncertainty for the run risk of ill reservoir. J Northwest A F Univ Nat Sci Ed 37(3):230–234

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dagdeviren M, Yuksel I (2008) Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf Sci 178(6):1717–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Razavi Davoudi M, Sheikhvand K (2012) An approach towards enterprise architecture analysis using AHP and Fuzzy AHP. Int J Mach Learn Comput 2(1):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RMS, Kabli MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ali JS, Maryam M (2014) Environmental risk assessment of dams by using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of the Polrood dam, Guilan Province, Iran. Human Ecol Risk Assess 20(1):69–85. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.725159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tiryaki F, Ahlatcioglu B (2009) Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Inf Sci 179(1-2):53–69

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiwei S, Lei L (2010) Comprehensive hazard assessment model for consequences caused by dam failure based on fuzzy mathematics method. Hydro-Sci Eng 4:16–20. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2010.04.004

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luo YJ, Kang Z, Luo Z, Li A (2009) Continuum topology optimization with non-probabilistic reliability constraints based on multi-ellipsoid convex model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(3):297–310. doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0329-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Tapaswini S, Chakraverty S (2014) Non-probabilistic uncertainty analysis of forest fire model by solving fuzzy hyperbolic reaction-diffusion equation. Fire saf J 66:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of national natural science foundation of China (No.41301597), the national key laboratory of northwest arid area ecological hydraulic engineering foundation project of Shaanxi Province in China (106-221225), and supported by Program 2013KCT-15 for Shannxi Provincial Key Innovative Research Team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, 710048, Xi’an, China

    Ma Jing

  2. State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-Hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, 710048, Xi’an, China

    Yang Jie

  3. Faculty of Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, 710048, Xi’an, China

    Li Shou-yi & Wang Lu

Authors
  1. Ma Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Jie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Shou-yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wang Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ma Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jing, M., Jie, Y., Shou-yi, L. et al. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the risk assessment of dangerous small-sized reservoirs. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 113–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0363-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0363-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation