[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Bisociation networks analysis for business process

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bisociation Network (BisoNet) is a novel approach for creative information discovery, and it can be projected to many real application domains. Bisociation of business processes onto a network is one of such applications. In this paper, we investigate business processes on the BisoNet, and develop a directed graph model to map the relations between business process flows. Based on the BisoNet model, we analyze the real-world data provided by a call service centre. The network-based statistics show that some special process steps could be key steps that greatly affect the performance of the service, and could result in a case unsolved. The network is simplified through constructing the network with shortest path of each process flow, and the simplified network may represent an optimal process pattern. This may provide a reference to the business organization for improving the quality of their service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Jackson AD, Somers KM, Harvey HH (1989) Similarity coefficients: measures of co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence? Am Nat 133(3):436–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates RA, Ribeiro-Neto B (1999) Modern information retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston

  3. Koestler A (1964) The act of creation. Hutchinson, London

  4. Berthold MR, Dill F, Kötter T, Thiel K (2008) Supporting creativity: towards associative discovery of new insights. In: Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, the proceedings of Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 12th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2008 Osaka, Japan, May 20–23

  5. Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47C 97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bales ME, Johnson SB (2006) Graph theoretic modeling of large-scale semantic networks. J Biomed Inform 39(4): 451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosman DWJ, Blom E-J, Ogao PJ, Kuipers OP, Roerdink JBTM (2007) MOVE: a multilevel ontology-based visualization and exploration framework for genomic networks. Silico Biol 7:35–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shen Z, Ma K-L, Eliassi-Rad T (2006) Visual analysis of large heterogeneous saocial networks by semantic and structural abstraction. IEEE Transact Vis Comput Graphics 12(6):1427–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tollis IG, Di Battista G, Eades P, Tamassia R (1999) Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  10. Zhong Z, Liu Z, Li C, Guan Y (2011) Event ontology reasoning based on event class influence factors. Int J Mach Learn Cyber. doi:10.1007/s13042-011-0046-8

  11. Castillo JJ (2011) A WordNet-based semantic approach to textual entailment and cross-lingual textual entailment. Int J Mach Learn Cyber 2(3):177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kötter T, Thiel K, Berthold MR (2010) Domain bridging associations support creativity. In Proceedings of the first international conference on computational creative (ICCC-X), Lisbon, Portugal, pp 7–9

  13. Mozetič I, Lavrač N, Podpecan V, Novak PK, Motaln H, Petek M, Gruden K, Toivonen H, Kulovesi K (2010) Bisociative knowledge discovery for microarray data analysis. In Proceedings of the first international conference on computational creative (ICCC-X), Lisbon, Portugal, pp 7–9

  14. http://www.knime.org

  15. Andersen B (1999) Business improvement toolbox. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

  16. Trischler WE (1996) Understanding and applying value added assessment. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee

  17. http://www.netmba.com/operations/process/analysis

  18. Martin TP, Shen Y, Azvine B (2008) Incremental evolution of fuzzy grammar fragments to enhance instance matching and text mining. IEEE Transact Fuzzy Syst 16:1425–1438

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X-Z, Tsang E, Zhao S-Y, Chen D-G, Yeung D (2007) Learning fuzzy rules from fuzzy examples based on rough set techniques. Inform Sci 177(20):4493–4514

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X-Z, Dong C-R (2009) Improving generalization of fuzzy if-then rules by maximizing fuzzy entropy. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(3):556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is based on the research supported by the EU PF7 BISON project, when the first author worked on the project in the University of Bristol. ZQ also thanks the NECT Program of MOE, China and the SRF for ROCS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zengchang Qin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, H., Qin, Z. Bisociation networks analysis for business process. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 4, 419–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-012-0113-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-012-0113-9

Keywords

Navigation