[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 January 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

EPortfolio use meets institutional reporting requirements and provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate learning, showcase their strengths to future employers, and develop lifelong reflective practice. At the same time, ePortfolio use offers students repeated opportunities to develop the skills necessary for academic progress and participation in contemporary online professional environments. To ensure that any ePortfolio implementation is making a positive impact across these areas it is important to be informed about the users’ attitudes, conceptual understanding and achievements when using this pedagogical and professional tool. We report student ePortfolio use at an Australian regional university. The paper compares students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio. It provides an overview of pertinent literature, outlines the research context and methodology, followed by the comparison results. Its contribution to ePortfolio research and practice, and implications for educators and institutional decision makers are also discussed. These results highlight the importance of adopting innovative ways to reinforce the value of ePortfolio for students through external motivation until they adopt their career persona and become intrinsically motivated to embrace strategies and tools that facilitate their progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Change history

  • 17 January 2020

    The original published version of this article unfortunately omitted data in Appendices 1 and 2.

References

  • Beetham, H. (2005). E-Portfolios in post-16 learning in the UK: Developments, issues and opportunities. A report prepared for the JISC e-Learning and Pedagogy strand of the JISC e-Learning Programme. Retrieved February 5, 2019 from http://www.recordingachievement.ac.uk/images/pdfs/case_studies/14-19/eportfolio.pdf.

  • Birks, M., Hartin, P., Woods, C., Emmanuel, E., & Hitchins, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the use of eportfolios in nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education in Practice, 18(May), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, D., Rowley, J., Bennett, D., Hitchcock, M., & Dunbar-Hall, P. (2014). Knowledge sharing: Exploring institutional policy and educator practice through ePortfolios in music and writing. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(2), 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. H., & Chittum, J. R. (2013). ePortfolio effectiveness: A (n Ill-fated) search for empirical support. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. (2006). A review of the literature on portfolios and electronic portfolios. A report for the eCDF ePortfolio Project, Massey University College of Education, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Retrieved on February 16, 2019 from http://www.eportfoliopractice.qut.edu.au/docs/Butler%20-%20Review%20of%20lit%20on%20ePortfolio%20research%20-%20NZOct%202006.pdf.

  • Chang, E., & Daly, J. (2016). Transitions in nursing: Preparing for professional practice. Chatswood: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatham-Carpenter, A., Seawel, L., & Raschig, J. (2010). Avoiding the pitfalls: Current practices and recommendations for ePortfolios in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(4), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E. (2010). The digital imperative: Making the case for a 21st century pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagley, V., & Berrington, B. (2005). Learning from an evaluation of an electronic portfolio to support general practitioners’ personal development planning, appraisal, and revalidation. Education for Primary Care, 16(5), 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, C. (2013). Learning through technology. HRD, 105, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer, T., & Slade, C. (2019). Starting early: Using ePortfolios to prepare first year midwifery students for professional practice. In K. Trimmer, T. Newman, & F. Padró (Eds.), Ensuring quality in professional education volume I. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M., Miller, C., Scholes, J., et al. (2004). Using portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence: The impact of four models. Nurse Education in Practice, 4(4), 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbic, P., Lewis, L., & Amin, N. (2011). Student perspectives of ePortfolios: Change over four semesters. In Proceedings from ASCILITE 2011 Changing demands, changing directions, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 4–7 December 2011.

  • Hartnell-Young, E. (2006). E-portfolios for knowledge and learning. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 125–134). Hershey: Idea Group Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P., Lee, C., & Chen, W. (2015). Students’ perspectives on e-portfolio development and implementation: A case study in Taiwanese higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JISC (2008). Effective practice with e-Portfolios. Retrieved on February 5, 2019 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/eportfolio.

  • Joyce, P. A. (2005). Framework for portfolio development in postgraduate nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(4), 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ learning experiences of constructing ePortfolios online. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Fernandez, O., & Rodriguz-Illera, J. L. (2009). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education, 52(3), 608–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, B. (2012). Portfolio assessment: Direct from the classroom. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers and Education, 55(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morbarhan, R., Rahman, A. A., & Majidi, M. (2015). Electronic portfolio motivational factors from students’ perspective: A qualitative study. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 7(2), 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, S., & Murray, S. (2009). Learners’ initial expectations and experiences of ePortfolios: A pilot study. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2(4). Retrieved from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/articles/learners_initial_expectations_and_experiences_of_eportfolios/.

  • Reardon, R., Lumsdon, J., & Meyer, K. (2005). Developing an E-Portfolio program: Providing a comprehensive tool for student development, reflection, and integration. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (NASPA), 42(3), 368–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, G., & Foti, S. (2006). Using ePortfolios to facilitate professional development among pre-service teachers. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 340–457). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A., Singh, O., & Seyferth, T. (2008). Development of the electronic portfolio student perspective instrument: An ePortfolio integration initiative. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(2), 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shroff, R., Deneen, C., & Lim, C. P. (2014). Student ownership of learning using e-portfolio for career development. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 7(18), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, C. (2015). Early student aspirations of using ePortfolios. In Paper presented at the Tertiary Education Management Conference (TEMC): Leading Locally Competing Globally, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

  • Slade, C., Murfin, K., & Readman, K. (2013). Evaluating processes and platforms for potential ePortfolio use: the role of the middle agent. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(2), 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, D., Light, T., Fleming, K., & Hayward, J. (2005). Engagement with electronic portfolios: Challenges from the student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26492/19674.

  • Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., Hou, H. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, J. (2011). Perceived values and prospective users’ acceptance of prospective technology: The case of a career ePortfolio system. Computers & Education, 56(1), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, A., Abrami, P. C., & Sclater, J. (2005). An electronic portfolio to support learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3). Retrieved from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26489/19671.

  • Watson, C. E., Kuh, G. D., Rhodes, T., Penny Light, T., & Chen, H. (2016). Editorial: ePortfolios—The eleventh high impact practice. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(2), 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, K., & Strudler, N. (2006). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Student voices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(3), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, L., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2001). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology. TechTrends, 45, 11–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuetherick, B., & Dickinson, J. (2015). Why ePortfolios? Student perceptions of ePortfolio use in continuing education learning environments. International Journal of ePortfolio, 5(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuesong, Z., Olfman, L., & Firpo, D. (2011). An information system design theory for collaborative ePortfolio systems. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1e10). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1955602&picked=prox.

  • Yancey, N. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review, 11(1), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. (2012). E-portfolio, a valuable job search tool for college students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(1), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Slade.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest in this study.

Ethical approval

Human ethics approval was given by the University of the Sunshine Coast.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participation was voluntary.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised to correct the truncated Appendices 1 and 2.

Appendices

Appendix 1: pre-use student survey

Student survey of initial expectations of ePortfolios at University of the Sunshine Coast

figure a
figure b
figure c

Appendix 2: post-use student survey

Student survey post ePortfolio use at University of the Sunshine Coast

figure d
figure e
figure f
figure g

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slade, C., Downer, T. Students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards technology and user experience before and after use of an ePortfolio. J Comput High Educ 32, 529–552 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09245-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09245-8

Keywords

Navigation