[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expressions of critical thinking in role-playing simulations: comparisons across roles

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of critical thinking is crucial in professional education to augment the capabilities of pre-professional students. One method for enhancing critical thinking is participation in role-playing simulation-based scenarios where students work together to resolve a potentially real situation. In this study, undergraduate nursing students were divided into small groups (2–3) to role-play a medical emergency (stroke) within a high fidelity simulation environment. The research team utilized a cross-case comparison design; cases were defined by the different roles played by the nursing students (e.g., primary nurse, secondary nurse, and family member). Results indicated that although students in all three roles displayed instances of reflection, contextual perspective, and logical reasoning, these were not distributed evenly across roles, with family members demonstrating fewer instances of reflection and logical reasoning and secondary nurses demonstrating fewer instances of contextual perspective. However, evidence of students’ abilities to apply clinical standards was observed fairly equally across all three roles. Implications for the use of role-plays within high-fidelity simulations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54, 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astedt-Kurki, P., Paavilianen, E., Tammentie, T., & Paunonen-Ilmonen, M. (2001). Interaction between adult patients’ family members and nursing staff on a hospital ward. Nordic College of Caring Sciences, 15, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambini, D., Washburn, J., & Perkins, R. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40, 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1993). Who ya gonna call? Thoughts about teaching problem solving. In P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive perspective on educational leadership (pp. 171–191). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, M. N., Aduddell, K., Bennett, D. N., & VanGeest, J. B. (2006). The use of human patient simulators: Best practices with novice nursing students. Nurse Educator, 31(4), 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S., Bridges, E. J., & Holcomb, J. B. (2003). Preparing to respond: Joint trauma training center and USAF nursing warskills simulation laboratory. Critcial Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 15, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cato, M., Lacaster, K., & Peeples, A. (2009). Nursing students’ self-assessment of their simulation experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, J. C., & Sepples, S. (2006). Clinical teaching by simulation: Lessons learned from a complex patient care scenario. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27, 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, S. K. (2005). Patient care simulations: Role playing to enhance clinical understanding. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. O., & Pramling, I. (1985). Conceptions of knowledge, professionalism, and contemporary problems in some professional academic subcultures. Studies in Higher Education, 10(2), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Bueno, D. (2005). A crisis in critical thinking. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreifuerst, K. T. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement for expert consensus for purpose of educational assessment and instruction. Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, R., & Gaba, D. (2008). Simulation-based learning as an educational tool. In J. Stonemetz & K. Ruskin (Eds.), Anesthesia informatics (pp. 459–479). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, M. L. (2003). Patient simulation for training basic and advanced clinical skills. Medical Education, 37, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffer, A. G., & Raingruber, B. (1998). Discovering confidence in clinical reasoning and critical thinking development in baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 37(2), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneman, E. A., & Cunningham, H. (2005). Using clinical simulation to teach patient safety in an acute/critical care nursing course. Nurse Educator, 30, 172–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoke, M. M., & Robbins, L. K. (2005). The impact of active learning on nursing students’ clinical success. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23, 348–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop-Marginson, E. J., & Armstrong, J. L. (2004). Critical thinking in career education: The democratic importance of foundational rationality. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 21(1), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, P. R. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(2), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, P. R. (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (pp. xvi, 168 p.). New York, NY: National League for Nursing.

  • Jones, S. (2007). Adding value to online role plays: Virtual situated learning environment. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/jones-s.pdf.

  • Julian, M., Kinzie, M. B., & Larsen, V. A. (2000). Compelling case experiences: Performance, practice, and application for emerging instructional designers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 164–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflection reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self-regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, C. H., Tseng, C. C., & Lai, K. R. (2008, July). Developing a negotiation-based intelligent tutoring system to support problem solving: A case study in role-play learning. Paper presented at the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Cantabria, France.

  • Leininger, M. (1994). Teaching and learning in transcultural nursing. In T. G. Mashaba & H. I. Brink (Eds.), Nursing education: An international perspective (pp. 207–226). Kenwyn, South Africa: Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, N., Ravitz, P., Wadell, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Psychiatric education and simulation: A review of the literature. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(2), 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, C. F., & Horne, C. (2004). Using simulation technology for undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(1), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian, J. (2008). Using simulated sessions to enhance clincial social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(3), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L., & Blenkin, C. (2007). The power of online role-play simulations: Technology in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 4(1). Retreived November 23, 2009, from http://www.bepress.com/ijnes/vol4/iss1/art1/.

  • Nikendei, C., Zeuch, A., Dieckmann, P., Roth, C., Schäfer, S., Völkl, M., et al. (2005). Role-playing for more realistic technical skills training. Medical Teacher, 27(2), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (2007). Case study. In W. Outhwaite & S. P. Turner (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social science methodology (pp. 100–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenfeld, M. G., & Scheffer, B. K. (2006). Critical thinking tactics for nurses. Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggenberg, S. (2008). The effect of simulated clinical experience on knowledge, near transfer, and far transfer in nursing education. Unpublished Dissertation, University of San Francisco.

  • Rush, K. L., Dyches, C. E., Waldrop, S., & Davis, A. (2008). Critical thinking among RN-to-BSN distance students participating in human patient simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 47, 501–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, B. K., & Rubenfeld, M. G. (2000). A consensus statement on critical thinking in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practicioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E., & Courtney, M. D. (2002) Critical thinking in nursing education: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8(April), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom, I.-M., Benzein, E., & Saveman, B.-I. (2003). Nurses’ experiences of interactions with family members in intensive care units. Nordic College of Caring Sciences, 17, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogunro, O. A. (2004). Efficacy of role-playing pedagogy in training leaders: Some reflections. The Journal of Management Development, 23, 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepich, D. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Lane, M. M. (2001). Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switky, R. (2006). Simulating the free trade area of the Americas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, California. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p98758_index.html.

  • Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgement in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. N., Estabrooks, C. A., & Degner, L. F. (2006). Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 691–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 740–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education: And other essays. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The researchers express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Maria Young and Ms. Lyn Nuti for their guidance in designing and implementing the study, and to the 17 nursing students who willingly participated. We dedicate this work to our dear friend, Xi. We continue to be inspired by memories of her great dedication and passion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy A. Ertmer.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 Definitions of habits of mind and skills of critical thinking in nursing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ertmer, P.A., Strobel, J., Cheng, X. et al. Expressions of critical thinking in role-playing simulations: comparisons across roles. J Comput High Educ 22, 73–94 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9030-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9030-7

Keywords

Navigation