[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification using granular computing approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tehran, capital of Iran, is located on a number of known and unknown faults which make this mega city exposed to huge earthquakes. Determining locations and intensity of seismic vulnerability of a city is considered as a complicated disaster management problem. As this problem generally depends on various criteria, one of the most important challenges concerned is the existence of uncertainty regarding inconsistency in combining those effective criteria. The emergence of uncertainty in seismic vulnerability map results to some biases in risk management which has multilateral effects in dealing with the consequences of the earthquake. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a new approach for Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification based on granular computing. One of the most significant properties of this method is inference of accurate rules having zero entropy from predefined classification undertaken based on training datasets by the expert. Furthermore, not-redundant covering rules will be extracted for consistent classification where one object maybe classified with two or more nonredundant rules. In this paper, Tehran statistical zones (3,173 according to 1996 census) are considered as the study area. Since this city has not experienced a disastrous earthquake since 1830, this work’s results is the relative accurate with respect to the results of previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghataher R, Delavar MR, Kamalian N (2005) Weighing of contributing factors in vulnerability of cities against earthquakes. Proc. map Asia conference, Jakarta, Indonesia, pp 22–25

  • Amiri AR, Delavar MR, Zahrai SM and Malek MR (2007) Tehran seismic vulnerability assessment using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Proc. map Asia conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 14–16, p 9

  • Berberian M (1976) Contribution to the seismotectonics of Iran (part II). Geological Survey of Iran, Report no. 39

  • Berberian M, Yeats RS (1999) Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian plateau. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(1):120–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M, Yeats RS (2001) Contribution of archaeological data to studies of earthquake history in the Iranian plateau. J Struct Geol 23:563–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demri S, Orlowska E (1998) Logical analysis of indiscernibility. In: Orlowska E (ed) Incomplete information: rough set analysis. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 347–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganascia J-G (1993) TDIS: an algebraic formalization. Proc IJCAI 1993:1008–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari MK, Kamalian M, Razmkhah A, Sohrabi A (2004) North of Tehran site effect microzonation. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Jahankhah M, Moshiri B, Delavar MR, Zare M (2009) The evidential reasoning approach for a multi attribute decision making method in geospatial information. In: Journal of Control. ISICE, a Joint Publication of the Iranian Society of Instrument and Control Engineers and the K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp 52–63

  • JICA (2000) The study on seismic microzoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Final report. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

  • JICA (2001) Frontier Magazine

  • Lin TY, Yao YY, Zadeh LA (eds) (2002) Data mining, rough sets and granular computing. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RE (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazari H, Ritz J-F, Salamati R, Solaymani S, Balescu S, Michelot J-L Ghassemi A, Talebian M, Lamothe M and Massault M (2007) Paleoseismological analysis in Central Alborz, Iran. 50th Anniversary earthquake conference commemorating the 1957 Gobi-Altay earthquake

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comp Inf Sci 11:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan JR (1983) Learning efficient classification procedures and their applications to chess end-games. In: Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach, Vol. 1

  • Ritz J-F, Balescu S, Soleymani S, Abbassi M, Nazari H, Feghhi K, Shabanian E, Tabassi H, Farbod Y, Lamothe M, Michelot J-L, Massault M, Chéry J, Vernant P (2003) Determining the long-term slip rate along the Mosha Fault, Central Alborz, Iran. Fourth international conference of earthquake engineering and seismology

  • Samadi Alinia H (2010) Assessment of vulnerability of earthquake in Tehran using granular computing model, M.Sc. thesis. (in Persian with English abstract). College of Engineering, University of Tehran

  • Samadi Alinia H, Delavar MR, Yao YY (2010a) An ID3-improved approach of for optimum rule mining through granular computing search algorithm. Proc. spatial accuracy conference, 20–23 July, Leicester, UK

  • Samadi Alinia H, Delavar MR, Yao YY (2010b) Support and confidence parameters to induct decision rules to classify Tehran’s seismic vulnerability. Proc. 6th international symposium on geo-information for disaster management (Gi4DM), September 15, Torino, Italy

  • Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiee A, Kamalian M, Jafari MK, Hamzehloo H (2011) Ground motion studies for microzonation in Iran. In: Natural hazards, Vol. I. Int J Sci Bus

  • Silavi T, Delavar MR, Malek MR, Kamalian N, Karimizand K (2006) An integrated strategy for GIS-based fuzzy improved earthquake vulnerability assessment. The second international symposium on geo-information for disaster management. ISPRS, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille R (1992) Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Comp Math Appl 23:493–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao YY (2000) Granular computing: basic issues and possible solutions. In: Wang PP (ed) Proceedings of the 5th joint conference on information sciences, Atlantic City, NJ, USA. Association for intelligent machinery, Vol. I, pp 186–189

  • Yao YY (2001) On modelling data mining with granular computing. Proceedings 25th annual international computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC’01), pp 638–643

  • Yao YY (2004) A partition model of granular computing. LNCS Trans Rough Sets I:232–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao JT, Yao YY (2002a) Induction of classification rules by granular computing. Proceedings, the third international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, pp 331–338

  • Yao JT, Yao YY (2002b) A granular computing approach to machine learning, Proceedings of the first international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD’02), Singapore, pp 732–736

  • Yao YY, Zhong N (1999) Potential applications of granular computing in knowledge discovery and data mining. In: Proceedings of world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics, Orlando, FL, July 14—18, pp 573–580

  • Zadeh LA (1997) Towards a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Set Syst 90:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1998) Some reflections on soft computing, granular computing and their roles in the conception, design and utilization of information/intelligent systems. Soft Computing 2(1):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M (2003) Seismic hazard analysis of Tehran, ongoing research project. IIEES, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Bard PY, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (1999) Site categorization for the Iranian strong motion network. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18:101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Yao YY (2005) Interactive user-driven classification using a granule network, Proceedings of the fifth international conference of cognitive informatics, pp 250–259

  • Zhao Y, Yao YY, Yan M (2007) ICS: an interactive classification system. Proceedings of the 20th Canadian conference on artificial intelligence (CAI’07), pp 134–145

  • Zhong W, He J, Harrison R, Tai PC, Pan Y (2007) Clustering support vector machines for protein local structure prediction. Exp Syst Appl 32(2):518–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank associate prof. M. Zare, Associate Professor of Engineering Seismology, and Director of National Center for Earthquake Prediction International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, for constructive discussions and collaborations on seismic vulnerability assessment. The authors would also like to thank Dr. M. Olsen, Assistant Professor of GeomaticsSchool of Civil and Construction Engineering Oregon State University for his helpful comments related to our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadis Samadi Alinia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samadi Alinia, H., Delavar, M.R. Tehran’s seismic vulnerability classification using granular computing approach. Appl Geomat 3, 229–240 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0068-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-011-0068-7

Keywords

Navigation