[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing video dissemination over urban VANETs using line of sight and QoE awareness mechanisms

  • Published:
Annals of Telecommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Video broadcasting in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) is beneficial for traffic management, entertainment, and advertising services because video notifications in active safety applications provide more information regarding accident scenarios than simple text messages. However, broadcasting videos over urban VANETs is challenging because of specificities, e.g., dynamic topology, shadowing phenomena, node mobility, and network partition. Moreover, the delay, jitter, and packet loss ratio associated with video streaming should not exceed strict thresholds for an acceptable quality of experience. To meet video streaming requirements, we propose a receiver-based, line-of-sight-aware and reliable bi-directional broadcasting protocol that obtains a tradeoff between broadcast reliability and coverage capabilities. The road network is segmented into a set of straight sections and the bi-directional broadcast method is applied to each section to address the obstructed line of sight problem and the coverage capacity simultaneously. Our protocol selects a sub-set of forwarders likely to have the best line of sight in a fully distributed manner. Furthermore, we overcame packet loss by designing an enhanced version of the store-carry-and-forward method that prioritizes the retransmission of packets containing more important video blocks. The simulation shows that our solution outperforms two innovative video broadcasting protocols in terms of frame loss, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and mean opinion score while keeping the end-to-end delay within the video streaming requirement range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Macke J, Casagrande R, Sarate JAR, Silva KA (2018) Smart city and quality of life: citizens’ perception in a brazilian case study. J Clean Prod 182:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Latif S, Afzaal H, Zafar NA (2018) Intelligent traffic monitoring and guidance system for smart city. In: 2018 International conference on computing, mathematics and engineering technologies (icoMET). IEEE, pp 1–6

  3. Mfenjou ML, Ari AAA, Abdou W, Spies F et al (2018) Methodology and trends for an intelligent transport system in developing countries. Sustain Comput Inform Syst 19:96–111

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ganin AA, Mersky AC, Jin AS, Kitsak M, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2019) Resilience in intelligent transportation systems (its). Transport Res Part C Emerg Technol 100:318–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guerrero-Ibáñez JA, Flores-Cortés C, Zeadally S (2013) Vehicular ad-hoc networks (vanets): architecture, protocols and applications. In: Next-generation wireless technologies. Springer, pp 49–70

  6. Hartenstein H, Laberteaux L P (2008) A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun Magaz 46(6):164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zribi N, Alaya B, Moulahi T (2019) Video streaming in vehicular ad hoc networks: applications, challenges and techniques. In: 2019 15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC). IEEE, pp 1221–1226

  8. Li Y, Azzedine B (2015) QuGu: A quality guaranteed video dissemination protocol over urban vehicular ad hoc networks. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl (TOMM) 11(4):55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tseng Y-C, Ni S-Y, Chen Y-S, Sheu J-P (2002) The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network. Wirel Nnetw 8(2-3):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naeimipoor F, Rezende C, Boukerche A (2012) Performance evaluation of video dissemination protocols over vehicular networks. In: 37th annual IEEE conference on local computer networks-workshops. IEEE, pp 694–701

  11. Slavik M, Mahgoub I (2013) Spatial distribution and channel quality adaptive protocol for multihop wireless broadcast routing in vanet. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(4):722–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie F, Hua KA, Wang W, Ho YH (2007) Performance study of live video streaming over highway vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2007 IEEE 66Th vehicular technology conference. IEEE, pp 2121–2125

  13. Khakbaz S, Fathy M (2008) A reliable broadcast method for vehicular ad hoc networks considering fragmentation and intersection problems. In: 2008 The second international conference on next generation mobile applications, services, and technologies. IEEE, pp 379–384

  14. Li D, Huang H, Li X, Li M, Tang F (2007) A distance-based directional broadcast protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc network. In: 2007 International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing. IEEE, pp 1520–1523

  15. Tung L-C, Gerla M (2010) An efficient road-based directional broadcast protocol for urban VANETs. In: 2010 IEEE Vehicular networking conference. IEEE, pp 9–16

  16. Viriyasitavat W, Tonguz OK, Bai F (2011) UV-CAST: An urban vehicular broadcast protocol. IEEE Commun Mag 49(11):116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khamer L, Labraoui N, Gueroui AM, Zaidi S, Ari AAA (2021) Road network layout based multi-hop broadcast protocols for urban vehicular ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 1–20

  18. Martinez FJ, Fogue M, Coll M, Cano J-C, Calafate CT, Manzoni P (2010) Evaluating the impact of a novel warning message dissemination scheme for vanets using real city maps. In: International conference on research in networking. Springer, pp 265– 276

  19. Hsieh Y-L, Wang K (2012) A road-based qos-aware multipath routing for urban vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2012 IEEE Global communications conference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, pp 189–194

  20. Alsharif N, Céspedes S, Shen XS (2013) Icar: Intersection-based connectivity aware routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE, pp 1736–1741

  21. Goudarzi F, Asgari H, Al-Raweshidy HS (2018) Traffic-aware vanet routing for city environments—a protocol based on ant colony optimization. IEEE Syst J 13(1):571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Darwish TSJ, Bakar KAbu, Haseeb K (2018) Reliable intersection-based traffic aware routing protocol for urban areas vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 10(1):60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleet H, Langar R, Naik K, Boutaba R, Nayak A, Goel N (2011) Intersection-based geographical routing protocol for vanets A proposal and analysis. Ieee Trans Vehic Technol 60(9):4560– 4574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maia G, Rezende C, Villas LA, Boukerche A, Viana AC, Aquino AL, Loureiro AA (2013) Traffic aware video dissemination over vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis & simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, pp 419–426

  25. Bradai A, Ahmed T, Abderrahim B (2014) Vicov Efficient video streaming for cognitive radio VANET. Vehicular Commun 1(3):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Torres A, Calafate CT, Cano J-C, Manzoni P, Ji Y (2015) Evaluation of flooding schemes for real-time video transmission in VANETs. Ad Hoc Netw 24:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rezende C, Pazzi RW, Boukerche A (2012) A reactive solution with a redundancy-based error correction mechanism for video dissemination over vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM, pp 343–352

  28. Rezende C, Mammeri A, Boukerche A, Loureiro AAF (2014) A receiver-based video dissemination solution for vehicular networks with content transmissions decoupled from relay node selection. Ad Hoc Netw 17:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang XM, Yan L, Zhang H, Sung DK (2019) A concurrent transmission based broadcast scheme for urban vanets. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 18(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Quadros C, Santos A, Gerla M, Cerqueira E (2016) Qoe-driven dissemination of real-time videos over vehicular networks. Comput Commun 91:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Togou MA, Hafid A, Lyes K (2016) Scrp: Stable cds-based routing protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(5):1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H.264 (2021) Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.264. (Accessed on 01/31/2021)

  33. Van de Velde E, Blondia C (2007) Adaptive react protocol for emergency applications in vehicular networks. In: 32nd IEEE conference on local computer networks (LCN 2007). IEEE, pp 613–619

  34. Video quality of service (qos) tutorial (2020) https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/quality-of-service-qos/qos-video/212134-Video-Quality-of-Service-QOS-Tutorial.html. (Accessed on 10/04/2020)

  35. Klaue J, Rathke B, EvalVid Wolisz A (2003) A framework for video transmission and quality evaluations. In: Proceedings of the international conference on modelling techniques and tools for computer performance evaluation, Urbana, IL, USA, pages 2–5

  36. OMNeT++ Discrete Event Simulator (2019). https://omnetpp.org/. (Accessed on 2019-04-18)

  37. Sommer C, German R, Dressler F (2011) Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved IVC analysis. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 10(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sommer C, Dressler F (2011) Using the right two-ray model? A measurement-based evaluation of PHY Models in VANETs

  39. Sommer C, Eckhoff D, German R, Dressler F (2011) A computationally inexpensive empirical model of IEEE 802.11p radio shadowing in urban environments. In: 2011 Eighth international conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services. IEEE, pp 84–90

  40. Klaue J, Rathke B, Wolisz A (2003) Evalvid–a framework for video transmission and quality evaluation. In: International conference on modelling techniques and tools for computer performance evaluation. Springer, pp 255–272

  41. YUV Sequences (2020) http://trace.eas.asu.edu/yuv/index.html. (Accessed on 2020-04-10)

  42. SUMO - Simulation of Urban Mobility (2019) https://sumo.dlr.de/index.html. (Accessed on 2019-04-10)

  43. Song Jie, Yi W u, Zhexin X u, Lin Xiao (2014) Research on car-following model based on SUMO. In: The 7th IEEE/international conference on advanced infocomm technology. IEEE, pp 47–55

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lazhar Khamer.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khamer, L., Labraoui, N., Gueroui, A.M. et al. Enhancing video dissemination over urban VANETs using line of sight and QoE awareness mechanisms. Ann. Telecommun. 76, 759–775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-021-00867-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-021-00867-7

Keywords

Navigation