[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era

  • Occupational Allergies (JA Poole, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory animal workers face a high risk of developing laboratory animal allergy as a consequence of inhaling animal proteins at work; this has serious consequences for their health and future employment. Exposure to animal allergen remains to be the greatest risk factor although the relationship is complex, with attenuation at high allergen exposure. Recent evidence suggests that this may be due to a form of natural immunotolerance. Furthermore, the pattern of exposure to allergen may also be important in determining whether an allergic or a tolerant immune response is initiated. Risk associated with specific tasks in the laboratory need to be determined to provide evidence to devise a code of best practice for working within modern laboratory animal facilities. Recent evidence suggests that members of lipocalin allergens, such as Mus m 1, may act as immunomodulatory proteins, triggering innate immune receptors through toll-like receptors and promoting airway laboratory animal allergy. This highlights the need to understand the relationship between endotoxin, animal allergen and development of laboratory animal allergy to provide a safe working environment for all laboratory animal workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Draper A, Newman Taylor A, Cullinan P. Estimating the incidence of occupational asthma and rhinitis from laboratory animal allergens in the UK, 1999–2000. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(8):604–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemiere C, Forget A, Dufour MH, Boulet LP, Blais L. Characteristics and medical resource use of asthmatic subjects with and without work-related asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(6):1354–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres JG, Boyd R, Cowie H, Hurley JF. Costs of occupational asthma in the UK. Thorax. 2011;66(2):128–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeal HL, Jones MG, Cullinan PC. Epidemiology of laboratory animal allergy. In: Sigsgaard T, Heederik D, editors. Occupational Asthma (Progress in Inflammation Research). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag AG; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Renström A, Karlsson AS, Malmberg P, Larsson PH, van Hage-Hamsten M. Working with male rodents may increase risk of allergy to laboratory animals. Allergy. 2001;56(10):964–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cullinan P, Cook A, Gordon S, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Tee RD, Venables KM, et al. Allergen exposure, atopy and smoking as determinants of allergy to rats in a cohort of laboratory employees. Eur Respir J. 1999;13(5):1139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeal H, Draper A, Harris J, Newman Taylor A, Cullinan P, Jones M. Modified Th2 responses at high-dose exposures to allergen: using an occupational model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(1):21–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollander A, Doekes G, Heederik D. Cat and dog allergy and total IgE as risk factors of laboratory animal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98(3):545–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeal H, Draper A, Jones M, Harris J, Welsh K, Newman Taylor A, et al. HLA associations with occupational sensitization to rat lipocalin allergens: a model for other animal allergies? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(4):795–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gautrin D, Infante-Rivard C, Ghezzo H, Malo JL. Incidence and host determinants of probable occupational asthma in apprentices exposed to laboratory animals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(4):899–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Botham PA, Lamb CT, Teasdale EL, Bonner SM, Tomenson JA. Allergy to laboratory animals: a follow up study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy and pre-existing sensitisation on its development. Occup Environ Med. 1995;52(2):129–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher R, Saunders WB, Murray SJ, Stave GM. Prevention of laboratory animal allergy. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40(7):609–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipman NS. Isolator Rodent Caging Systems (State of the Art): A Critical View. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1999;38(5):9–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reeb C, Jones R, Bearg D, Bedigan H, Myers D, Paigen B. Microenvironment in Ventilated Animal Cages with Differing Ventilation Rates, Mice Populations, and Frequency of Bedding Changes. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1998;37(2):43–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reeb-Whitaker CK, Paigen B, Beamer WG, Bronson RT, Churchill GA, Schweitzer IB, et al. The impact of reduced frequency of cage changes on the health of mice housed in ventilated cages. Lab Anim. 2001;35(1):58–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon S, Fisher SW, Raymond RH. Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(2):288–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Renstrom A, Bjoring G, Hoglund AU. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: occupational health aspects. Lab Anim. 2001;35(1):42–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Curtin-Brosnan J, Paigen B, Hagberg KA, Langley S, O’Neil EA, Krevans M, et al. Occupational mouse allergen exposure among non-mouse handlers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010;7(12):726–34. This study measures mouse allergen exposure in a contemporary laboratory animal facility across a range of jobs, including non-mouse handling jobs and demonstrated that approximately half of non-mouse handlers had levels of exposure similar in levels to mouse handlers.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thulin H, Bjorkdahl M, Karlsson AS, Renstrom A. Reduction of exposure to laboratory animal allergens in a research laboratory. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46(1):61–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon S, Preece R. Prevention of laboratory animal allergy. Occup Med (Lond). 2003;53(6):371–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krop EJ, Doekes G, Stone MJ, Aalberse RC, van der Zee JS. Spreading of occupational allergens: laboratory animal allergens on hair-covering caps and in mattress dust of laboratory animal workers. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(4):267–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krakowiak A, Szulc B, Gorski P. Allergy to laboratory animals in children of parents occupationally exposed to mice, rats and hamsters. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(2):352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandenplas O, Dressel H, Nowak D, Jamart J. ERS Task Force on the Management of Work-related Asthma. What is the optimal management option for occupational asthma? Eur Respir Rev. 2012;21:97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. HSE. Guidance note EH76—Control of laboratory animal allergy. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/eh76.pdf (13November 2013, date last accessed).

  25. Stave GM, Darcey DJ. Prevention of laboratory animal allergy in the United States: a national survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:558–63. This study documents the broad variation in policy and practice to prevent laboratory animal allergy in 198 organisations within the US.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Renström A, Karlsson AS, Tovey E. Nasal air sampling used for the assessment of occupational allergen exposure and the efficacy of respiratory protection. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:1769–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Botham PA, Davies GE, Teasdale EL. Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy on its development. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44:627–32.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones M, Schofield S, Jeal H, Cullinan P. Respiratory protective equipment reduces occurrence of sensitization to laboratory animals. Occup Med. 2014;64:104–8. This study examines the effect of respiratory protective equipment on the risk of sensitisation to laboratory animals and concluded that use of face masks at first employment was associated with a lower prevalence of sensitisation.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Slovak AJ, Orr RG, Teasdale EL. Efficacy of the helmet respirator in occupational asthma due to laboratory animal allergy (LAA). Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985;46:411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peng RD, Paigen B, Eggleston PA, Hagberg KA, Krevans M, Curtin-Brosnan J, et al. Both the variability and level of mouse allergen exposure influence the phenotype of the immune response in workers at a mouse facility. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:390–6. This study concluded that a pattern of stable moderate exposure was associated with the development of allergic sensitisation, whereas a more variable pattern of exposure was associated with an IgG 4 response.

  31. Westall L, Graham IR, Bussell J. A risk-based approach to reducing exposure of staff to laboratory animal allergens. Lab Anim (NY). 2015;44(1):32–8. A systematic programme of Mus m 1 allergen monitoring, specifically to assess the risk of allergen exposure was carried out to inform decisions about the risk of exposure to staff in the facility.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor AN, Longbottom JL, Pepys J. Respiratory allergy to urine proteins of rats and mice. Lancet. 1977;2(8043):847–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bayard C, Holmquist L, Vesterberg O. Purification and identification of allergenic alpha (2u)-globulin species of rat urine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1290(2):129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mancini MA, Majumdar D, Chatterjee B, Roy AK. Alpha 2u-globulin in modified sebaceous glands with pheromonal functions: localization of the protein and its mRNA in preputial, meibomian, and perianal glands. J Histochem Cytochem. 1989;37(2):149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Longbottom JL, Price JA. Allergy to laboratory animals: characterization and source of two major mouse allergens, Ag 1 and Ag 3. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1987;82(3–4):450–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Price JA, Longbottom JL. Allergy to mice. II. Further characterization of two major mouse allergens (AG 1 and AG 3) and immunohistochemical investigations of their sources. Clin Exp Allergy. 1990;20(1):71–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hilger C, Kuehn A, Hentges F. Animal lipocalin allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012;12:438–47. Excellent review on animal lipocalin allergens.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saarelainen S, Rytkönen-Nissinen M, Rouvinen J, Taivainen A, Auriola S, Kauppinen A, et al. Animal-derived lipocalin allergens exhibit immunoglobulin E cross-reactivity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(2):374–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jeal H, Harris J, Draper A, Taylor AN, Cullinan P, Jones M. Dual sensitization to rat and mouse urinary allergens reflects cross-reactive molecules rather than atopy. Allergy. 2009;64(6):855–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Virtanen T, Kinnunen T, Rytkönen-Nissinen M. Mammalian lipocalin allergens-insights into their enigmatic allergenicity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42:494–504. Excellent review on mammalian lipocalin allergens.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jeal H, Draper A, Harris J, Taylor AN, Cullinan P, Jones M. Determination of the T cell epitopes of the lipocalin allergen, Rat n 1. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:1919–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ohman Jr JL, Hagberg K, MacDonald MR, Jones Jr RR, Paigen BJ, Kacergis JB. Distribution of airborne mouse allergen in a major mouse breeding facility. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;94(5):810–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Platts-Mills TA, Heymann PW, Longbottom JL, Wilkins SR. Airborne allergens associated with asthma: particle sizes carrying dust mite and rat allergens measured with a cascade impactor. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77(6):850–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Heederik D, Venables KM, Malmberg P, Hollander A, Karlsson AS, Renström A, et al. Exposure-response relationships for work-related sensitization in workers exposed to rat urinary allergens: results from a pooled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(4):678–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jeal H, Draper A, Harris J, Taylor AN, Cullinan P, Jones M. Modified Th2 responses at high-dose exposures to allergen: using an occupational model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(1):21–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Matsui EC, Diette GB, Krop EJ, Aalberse RC, Smith AL, Curtin-Brosnan J, et al. Mouse allergen-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin G4 and allergic symptoms in immunoglobulin E-sensitized laboratory animal workers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(10):1347–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Portengen L, de Meer G, Doekes G, Heederik D. Immunoglobulin G4 antibodies to rat urinary allergens, sensitization and symptomatic allergy in laboratory animal workers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(8):1243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Platts-Mills T, Vaughan J, Squillace S, Woodfolk J, Sporik R. Sensitisation, asthma, and a modified Th2 response in children exposed to cat allergen: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):752–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Matsui EC, Diette GB, Krop EJ, Aalberse RC, Smith AL, Eggleston PA. Mouse allergen-specific immunoglobulin G4 and risk of mouse skin test sensitivity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(8):1097–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Portengen L, de Meer G, Doekes G, Heederik D. Immunoglobulin G4 antibodies to rat urinary allergens, sensitization and symptomatic allergy in laboratory animal workers. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(8):1243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Krop EJ, Doekes G, Heederik DJ, Aalberse RC, van der Zee JS. IgG4 antibodies against rodents in laboratory animal workers do not protect against allergic sensitization. Allergy. 2011;66(4):517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jones M, Jeal H, Schofield S, Harris JM, Shamji MH, Francis JN, et al. Rat-specific IgG and IgG4 antibodies associated with inhibition of IgE-allergen complex binding in laboratory animal workers. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(9):619–23. This study demonstrated a functional role for specific IgG and IgG 4 antibodies, suggesting immunotolerance.

  53. van Neerven RJ, Arvidsson M, Ipsen H, Sparholt SH, Rak S, Würtzen PA. A double-blind, placebo-controlled birch allergy vaccination study: inhibition of CD23-mediated serum-immunoglobulin E-facilitated allergen presentation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(3):420–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wachholz PA, Soni NK, Till SJ, Durham SR. Inhibition of allergen-IgE binding to B cells by IgG antibodies after grass pollen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(5):915–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Herre J, Grönlund H, Brooks H, Hopkins L, Waggoner L, Murton B, et al. Allergens as immunomodulatory proteins: the cat dander protein Fel d 1 enhances TLR activation by lipid ligands. J Immunol. 2013;191(4):1529–35. This study propses that Fel d 1 and Can f 6 (a lipocalin) belong to a group of immunomodulatory proteins that enhance immune signalling.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Trompette A, Divanovic S, Visintin A, Blanchard C, Hegde RS, Madan R, et al. Allergenicity resulting from functional mimicry of a Toll-like receptor complex protein. Nature. 2009;457(7229):585–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schmidt M, Raghavan B, Müller V, Vogl T, Fejer G, Tchaptchet S, et al. Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(9):814–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Raghavan B, Martin SF, Esser PR, Goebeler M, Schmidt M. Metal allergens nickel and cobalt facilitate TLR4 homodimerization independently of MD2. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(12):1109–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pacheco K, Maier L, Silveira L, Goelz K, Noteware K, Luna B, et al. Association of Toll-like receptor 4 alleles with symptoms and sensitization to laboratory animals. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(5):896–902.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pacheco KA, McCammon C, Thorne PS, O’Neill ME, Liu AH, Martyny JW, et al. Characterization of endotoxin and mouse allergen exposures in mouse facilities and research laboratories. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006;50(6):563–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lieutier-Colas F, Meyer P, Larsson P, Malmberg P, Frossard N, Pauli G, et al. Difference in exposure to airborne major rat allergen (Rat n 1) and to endotoxin in rat quarters according to tasks. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(9):1449–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jacobs R. Endotoxins in the environment. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1997;3:3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Pacheco KA, McCammon C, Liu AH, Thorne PS, O’Neill ME, Martyny J, et al. Airborne endotoxin predicts symptoms in non-mouse-sensitized technicians and research scientists exposed to laboratory mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(7):983–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College, 1B Manresa Rd, London, SW3 6LR, UK

    Meinir Jones

Authors
  1. Meinir Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meinir Jones.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Jones declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Occupational Allergies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, M. Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 15, 73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-015-0575-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-015-0575-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation