[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Analysis of a 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Considering the Tower and Platform Flexibility

  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine technologies have received considerable attention. For the coupled simulation of semisubmersible floating offshore wind energy, the platform is usually considered a rigid model, which could affect the calculation accuracy of the dynamic responses. The dynamic responses of a TripleSpar floating offshore wind turbine equipped with a 10 MW offshore wind turbine are discussed herein. The simulation of a floating offshore wind turbine under regular waves, white noise waves, and combined wind-wave conditions is conducted. The effects of the tower and platform flexibility on the motion and force responses of the TripleSpar semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine are investigated. The results show that the flexibility of the tower and platform can influence the dynamic responses of a TripleSpar semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine. Considering the flexibility of the tower and platform, the tower and platform pitch motions markedly increased compared with the fully rigid model. Moreover, the force responses, particularly for tower base loads, are considerably influenced by the flexibility of the tower and platform. Thus, the flexibility of the tower and platform for the coupled simulation of floating offshore wind turbines must be appropriately examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS, 2016. AQWA User’s Manual Release 17.0. ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 112pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcona, J., and Vittori, F., 2019. Mooring system design for the 10 MW triple spar floating wind turbine at a 180 M sea depth location. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1356(1): 012 003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, C., Zahle, F., Bitsche, R., Kim, T., Yde, A., Henriksen, L. C., et al., 2013. The DTU10-MW Reference Wind Turbine. Sound/Visual Production. DTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark.

  • Borg, M., Bredmose, H., and Hansen, A. M., 2017. Elastic deformations of floaters for offshore wind turbines: Dynamic modelling and sectional load calculations. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Trondheim, Norway, 57786: V010T09A044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, R., Jonkman, J., and Hayman, G., 2015. SubDyn User’s Guide and Theory Manual. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO, 60pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S., Zhang, L., Shi, W., Wang, B., and Li, X., 2021. Dynamic responses for WindFloat floating offshore wind turbine at intermediate water depth based on local conditions in China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(10): 1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWEC, 2021. Global Offshore Wind Report 2021. Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels, Belgium, 80pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman, J. M., and Buhl, M. L., 2005. FAST User’s Guide. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO, 143pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman, J. M., Damiani, R. R., Branlard, E. S. P., Hall, M., Robertson, A. N., and Hayman, G. J., 2019. Substructure flexibility and member-level load capabilities for floating offshore wind turbines in OpenFAST. International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. St. Julian’s, Malta, 59353: V001T01A004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikogiannis, G., Sørum, S. H., Bachynski, E. E., and Amdahl, J., 2021. Environmental lumping for efficient fatigue assessment of large-diameter monopile wind turbines. Marine Structures, 77: 102939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmer, F., Amann, F., Raach, S., and Schlipf, D., 2016. Definition of the SWE-Triplespar floating platform for the DTU 10 MW reference wind turbine. Stuttgart Wind Energy (SWE).

  • Lemmer, F., Yu, W., Müller, K., and Cheng, P. W., 2020. Semisubmersible wind turbine hull shape design for a favorable system response behavior. Marine Structures, 71: 102725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, W., Shi, W., Li, X., and Li, Y., 2022. Dynamic responses of monopile wind turbine with coupled spring boundaries in bed rock-soil-seawater offshore site under offshore ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 158: 107311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, C., Gao, Z., and Moan, T., 2017. Development and verification of a time-domain approach for determining forces and moments in structural components of floaters with an application to floating wind turbines. Marine Structures, 51: 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Z., Zhen, X., Jiang, Z., Gao, Z., Li, Y., and Shi, W., 2023. Underactuated control and analysis of single blade installation using a jackup installation vessel and active tugger line force control. Marine Structures, 88: 103338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W., Liu, Y., Wang, W., Cui, L., and Li, X., 2023a. Numerical study of an ice-offshore wind turbine structure interaction with the pile-soil interaction under stochastic wind loads. Ocean Engineering, 273: 113984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W., Zhang, L., Karimirad, M., Michailides, C., Jiang, Z., and Li, X., 2023b. Combined effects of aerodynamic and second-order hydrodynamic loads for floating wind turbines at different water depths. Applied Ocean Research, 130: 103416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si, Y., Chen, Z., Zeng, W., Sun, J., Zhang, D., Ma, X., et al., 2021. The influence of power-take-off control on the dynamic response and power output of combined semi-submersible floating wind turbine and point-absorber wave energy converters. Ocean Engineering, 227: 108835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Jiang, Z., and Yuan, W., 2021. Numerical and analytical analysis of a monopile-supported offshore wind turbine under ship impacts. Renewable Energy, 167: 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, K. F., 2016. Structural design and dynamic analysis of a tension leg platform wind turbine, considering elasticity in the hull. Master thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

  • Tang, Y., Shi, W., Ning, D., You, J., and Michailides, C., 2020. Effects of spilling and plunging type breaking waves acting on large monopile offshore wind turbines. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7: 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, J. B., Bergua, R., Jonkman, J., Robertson, A., Mendoza, N., Brown, C., et al., 2021. Modeling the TetraSpar floating offshore wind turbine foundation as a flexible structure in OrcaFlex and OpenFAST. Energies, 14(23): 7866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Hu, Y., Li, Y., Yang, J., Duan, L., Wang, T., et al., 2019. Foundations of offshore wind turbines: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104: 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Yang, Y., Bashir, M., Li, C., and Wang, J., 2022. Dynamic analysis of 10 MW offshore wind turbines with different support structures subjected to earthquake loadings. Renewable Energy, 193: 758–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., Shi, W., Feng, X., Shao, Y., and Li, X., 2023. Investigation of higher-harmonic wave loads and low-frequency resonance response of floating offshore wind turbine under extreme wave groups. Marine Structures, 89: 103401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Chen, Z., Liu, X., Sun, J., Yu, H., Zeng, W., et al., 2022a. A coupled numerical framework for hybrid floating offshore wind turbine and oscillating water column wave energy converters. Energy Conversion and Management, 267: 115933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Shi, W., Karimirad, M., Michailides, C., and Jiang, Z., 2020. Second-order hydrodynamic effects on the response of three semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering, 207: 107371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Shi, W., Zeng, Y., Michailides, C., Zheng, S., and Li, Y., 2023. Experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic effects of heave plates used in floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering, 267: 113103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Shi, W., Li, D., Li, X., Duan, Y., and Verma, A., 2022b. A novel framework for modeling floating offshore wind turbines based on the vector form intrinsic finite element (VFIFE) method. Ocean Engineering, 262: 112221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Key Technology Research and Development Program (Nos. 2022YFB42013 01, and 2022YFB4201304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52101333, 52071058, 51939002, and 52071301), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LQ21E090009). This work is also partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No. 2022-KF-18-01), and the special funds for Promoting High-Quality Development from the Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province (No. GDNRC [2020]016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, S., Zhang, L., Shi, W. et al. Dynamic Analysis of a 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Considering the Tower and Platform Flexibility. J. Ocean Univ. China 23, 358–370 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-024-5604-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-024-5604-2

Key words

Navigation