[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective optimal preliminary planning of multi-debris active removal mission in LEO

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to develop a preliminary plan for a multi-nanosatellite active debris removal platform (MnADRP) for low-Earth-orbit (LEO) missions. A dynamic multi-objective traveling salesman problem (TSP) scheme is proposed in which three optimization objectives, i.e., the debris removal priority, the MnADRP orbital transfer energy, and the number of required nanosatellites are modeled respectively. A modified genetic algorithm (GA) is also proposed to solve the dynamic multi-objective TSP. Finally, numerical experiments involving partially real-world the debris data set are conducted to verify the efficacy of the proposed models and the solution method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liou J C. Engineering and technology challenges for active debris removal. Progr Propul Phys, 2013, 4: 735–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun V, Lüpken A, Flegel S, et al. Active debris removal of multiple priority targets. Adv Space Res, 2013, 51: 1638–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogdan U, Nayak M. A cooperative multi-satellite mission for controlled active debris removal from low Earth orbit. In: Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, 2015. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbee B W, Alfano S, Pinon E, et al. Design of spacecraft missions to remove multiple orbital debris objects. In: Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, 2011. 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liou J C. An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation. Adva Space Res, 2011, 47: 1865–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liou J C, Johnson N L. Instability of the present LEO satellite populations. Adv Space Res, 2008, 41: 1046–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Izzo D, Getzner I, Hennes D, et al. Evolving solutions to TSP variants for active space debris removal. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Madrid, 2015. 1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cerf M. Multiple space debris collecting mission: optimal mission planning. J Optimiz Theory App, 2015, 167: 195–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu J, Chen X Q, Chen L H. Optimal planning of LEO active debris removal based on hybrid optimal control theory. Adv Space Res, 2015, 55: 2628–2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Madakat D, Morio J, Vanderpooten D. Biobjective planning of an active debris removal mission. Acta Astronaut, 2013, 84: 182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bérend N, Olive X. Bi-objective optimization of a multiple-target active debris removal mission. Acta Astronaut, 2016, 122: 324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jing Y, Chen X Q, Chen L H. Biobjective planning of GEO debris removal mission with multiple servicing spacecrafts. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 105: 311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nations U. Technical Report on Space Debris. 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehrholz D, Leushacke L, Flury W, et al. Detecting, tracking and imaging space debris. ESA Bull, 2002, 40: 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cerf M. Multiple space debris collecting mission-debris selection and trajectory optimization. J Optimiz Theory App, 2013, 156: 761–796

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin T, Pérot E, Desjean M C, et al. Active debris removal mission design in low Earth orbit. Progr Propul Phys, 2013, 4: 763–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chobotov V A. Orbital Mechanics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 87–115

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Stuart J, Howell K, Wilson R. Application of multi-agent coordination methods to the design of space debris mitigation tours. Adv Space Res, 2015, 57: 1680–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hokamoto S. Genetic-algorithm-based rendezvous trajectory design for multiple active debris removal. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, Okinawa, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li C M. Optimization Method. 1st ed. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  21. Braun V, Lüpken A, Flegel S, et al. Active debris removal of multiple priority targets. Adv Space Res, 2013, 51: 1638–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas S. Properties of the high area-to-mass ratio space debris population at high altitudes. Adv Space Res, 2008, 41: 1039–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61503304, 61374162), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3102015ZY048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Y. et al. Multi-objective optimal preliminary planning of multi-debris active removal mission in LEO. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60, 072202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0566-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0566-7

Keywords

Navigation