Educational dialogues and computer supported collaborative learning: critical analysis and research perspectives

• Allwood, J. (1997). Dialog as collective thinking. In Pylkkänen, P., Pylkkö, P., & Hautamäki, P. A., A. (Eds.), Brain, Mind and Physics (pp. 205–211). Amsterdam: IOS Press

  Google Scholar 

• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, M. J., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). “Argumentexturing”: a framework for integrating theories of argumentation and learning. In van Eemeren, F., & Garssen, B. (Eds.), Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 195–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.11bak

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Baker, M. J., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp.31–63. Amsterdam:Pergamon / Elsevier Science

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1919–1921). Towards a philosophy of the act. Translated with notes by V. Liapunov. In V. Liapunov & M. Holquist (1993) (Eds.), Towards a Philosophy of the Act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press

• Bakhtin, M. (1929/1977). In Volochinov, V. N. (Ed.), Le Marxisme et la Philosophie du Langage. [Marxism and the philosophy of language]. Paris: Éditions du Minuit[Ist edition, Voloshinov, Leningrad 1929]

• Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education

  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baxter, L. (2006). Communication as Perspectives on theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing, Inc

• Berkowitz, M. W. & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merill-Palmer Quarterly 29(4), 399–410

• Brooks, B., Hogan, B., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2014). Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks. Social Networks, 38, 1–15

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Buber, M. (1923). Ich und Du. Leipzig: Insel-Verlag

  Google Scholar 

• Bygstad, B., & Øvrelid, E. (2020). Architectural alignment of process innovation and digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital. European Journal of Information Systems. ISSN 0960-085X. s 220- 237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1728201

• Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). A new method for analyzing sequential processes. Dynamic multi-level analysis SmallGroup Research, 36, 600–631

• Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, D. (2001). Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classroom. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Cress, U., Oshima, J. Rosé, C. & Wise (2021). Foundations, Processes, Technologies, and Methods: An Overview of CSCL Through Its Handbook. International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Springer Verlag

• Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577946

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Mavrikis, M., & Millán, E. (2017, September). Machine and human observable differences in groups’ collaborative problem-solving behaviours. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 17–29). Cham: Springer

• Damşa, C. I. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 247–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9193-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davies, K., & Renshaw, P. (2019). Who’s talking (and what does it mean for us)? Provocations for beyond Humanist dialogic pedagogies. In Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook on Dialogic Education (pp. 38–49). London: Routledge

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon / Elsevier Science

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Mally, C. (1996). The evolution of research in collaborative learning. In Reimann, P., & Spada, H. (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science. Amsterdam: Pergamon

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Lemaignan, S., Sangin, M., et al. (2016). The symmetry of partner modelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9235-5

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 1, 5–32

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edwards, D. (1993). But What Do Children Really Think?: Discourse Analysis and Conceptual Content in Children’s Talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3/4), 207–225

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental ResearchHelsinki : Orienta-Konsultit Oy

• Fernyhough, C. (1996). The dialogic mind: a dialogic approach to the higher mental functions. New Ideas In Psychology, 14(1), 47–62

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2008). Students’ meaning-making of socio-scientific issues in computer- mediated settings: exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1775–1799

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Furberg, A., Kluge, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2013). Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9165-4

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: C. Geertz. The interpretation of cultures, (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books

• Habermas, J. (1987). [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press

• Habermas, J. (1988). [1970]. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Translated by Shierry Weber Nicholson and Jerry A. Stark. Introduction by Thomas A. McCarthy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press

• Habernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2017). Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 43, 125–179

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group

• Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1993). The Discursive Mind. London: Sage

  Google Scholar 

• Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. … José Barrera, M. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hennessy, S., Howe, C., Mercer, N., & Vrikki, M. (2020). Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404

• Herring, S. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612–634). Oxford: Blackwell

  Google Scholar 

• Howe, C., & Mercer, N. (2016). Commentary on the papers. Language and Education, 31(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230126.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher-student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact upon student outcomes? The Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hymes, D. (1972). Models of interaction in language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz, & D.Kershner, R., Hennessy, S., Wegerif, R. & Ahmed, A. (2020). Research methods for educational dialogue. London: Bloomsbury

• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Yu, Y. (2014). An examination of CSCL methodological practices and the influence of theoretical frameworks 2005–2009. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9198-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jeong, H., Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., et al. (2017). Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 133–151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9256-8

• Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koschmann, T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL. Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm. London: Routledge and Taylor and Francis

  Google Scholar 

• Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. (pp. 149–167) New York: Routledge

• Lefstein, A., Snell, J., & Israeli, M. (2015). From moves to sequences: Expanding the unit of analysis in the study of classroom discourse. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3164.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lemke (2000). Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind Culture & Activity, (4), 273–290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03

• Levinas, M. (1961). Totalité et Infini: Un Essai sur l’extériorité. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff

• Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company

• Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Ludvigsen, S., & Arnseth, H. C. (2017). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. In Duval, E., Sharples, M., & Sutherland, R. (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning. Research Themes (pp. 47–59). Springer

• Ludvigsen, S., & Steier, R. (2019). Reflections and looking ahead for CSCL: digital infrastructures, digital tools, and collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09312-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction.Language in Society, 33(5), 703–736

• Martinez-Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., Echeverria, V., Fernandez Nieto, G., Swiecki, Z., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2021). What Do You Mean by Collaboration Analytics? A Conceptual Model. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(1), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7227

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Matusov, E. (2011). Authorial teaching and learning. In White, E. J., & Peters, M. (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21–46). New York: Peter Lang Publishers

  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, S. (2018). Studying student efforts to frame (and pursue) academically substantive inquiries. Poster presented at European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI) SIG 20/26 inquiry learning and argumentation. Dialogue and Reasoning Conference: Jerusalem

• McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349–377

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mercer, N. (2000). Development through dialogue. In Mercer, N. (Ed.), Words and minds: How we use language to think together (pp. 131–166). London: Routledge

  Google Scholar 

• Mercer, N. (2008). The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793182

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom British. Educational Research Journal, 25(1),95–111

• Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools. Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.) Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 347–362). Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association

• Moeschler, J. (1985). Argumentation et Conversation: éléments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours. [Argumentation and Conversation: elements for a pragmatic analysis of discourse] Hatier: Paris

  Google Scholar 

• Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 285–305

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nasir, N. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & de McKinney, M. (2021). Rethinking Learning: What the Interdisciplinary Science Tells Us. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 557–565.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oshima, J., & Hoppe, H. U. (2021). Finding Meaning in Log-File Data. In Cress, U., Oshima, J., Rosé, C., & Wise (Eds.), The International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Cham: Springer Verlag

  Google Scholar 

• Perret-Clermont, A. N., Perret, J. F., & Bell, N. (1991). The Social Construction of Meaning and Cognitive Activity in Elementary School Children. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 41–62). Washington DC: American Psychological Association

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Picard, R. W., Papert, S., Bender, W., Blumberg, B., Breazel, C., Cavallo, D. … Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective learning—a manifesto. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 253–269

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2010). Learning with Computer Tools and Environments: A Sociocultural Perspective. In Littleton, K., Wood, C., Staarman, J., & Kleine (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 399–433). Bingley (UK): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  Google Scholar 

• Reimann, P. (2021). Socio-technical configurations for productive talk. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09354-6

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. In, C. (Ed.). O’Malley (Ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. pp. 69–100. Berlin:Springer-Verlag

• Rosé, C., Wang, Y. C., Cui, Y., et al. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roulet, E. (1992). On the structure of conversation as negotiation. In Searle, J. R., et al. (Ed.), (On) Searle on Conversation (pp. 91–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Van Sande, C., & Greeno, J. (2012). Achieving Alignment of Perspectival Framings in Problem-Solving Discourse. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 21, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395–442

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316493960

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Schwarz, B. B., & Shahar, N. (2017). Combining the dialogic and the dialectic: putting argumentation into practice for classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 113–132

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and teacher education, 57, 14–25

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Deliberative emotional talk. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 185–217

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sorsana, C., & Trognon, A. (2018). Conversing as Metaphor of Human Thinking. Is Mind like a Conversation? Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 52, 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9424-z

• Stahl, G. (2015). A decade of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9222-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Suthers, D. (2015). From contingencies to network-level phenomena: Multilevel analysis of activity and actors in heterogeneous networked learning environments. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 368–377)

• Suthers, D., Lund, K., Rosé, C. P., Teplovs, C., & Law, N. (2013). Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions. New York: Springer Verlag

  Book  Google Scholar 

• van Drie, J., & Dekker, R. (2013). Theoretical triangulation as an approach for revealing the complexity of a classroom discussion. British Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 338–360http://www.jstor.org/stable/24463934

  Google Scholar 

• Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Wegerif, R. B. (2011). ‘From dialectic to dialogic’. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice (pp. 201–221). New York: Springer Science

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. New York: Harvester

  Google Scholar 

• Wertsch, J. V., & Kazak, S. (2011). Saying more than you know in instructional settings. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (pp. 153–166). New York: Springer Science+Business Media

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Wise, A., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight Provocations for the Future of the Field. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 423–467

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W. Q., & Vytasek, J. M. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11–28

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

• Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-78125-685-5

Download references