Abstract
Malaysia’s growing trends in energy production–elated emissions throw doubt on the country’s possibility of meeting the Paris Climate Change Agreement and SDG obligations. Taking into account Malaysia’s current growth pattern and climatic circumstances, this study evaluates the association between ecological footprint and its potential determinants: economic growth, oil consumption, renewable energy and domestic capital investment for the period between 1965 and 2017. The stationary nature of the parameters is investigated using the conventional unit root approach (ADF and PP unit root) and structural break unit root (ZA unit root). The bounds approach in combination with the critical approximation p-values of Kripfganz and Schneider (2018) established a cointegration association between the observed parameters. The ARDL approach uncovered that economic growth and oil consumption contribute to ecological footprint. Furthermore, renewable energy consumption and gross capital formation reduce the ecological footprint. The FMOLS and DOLS estimators were applied as the sensitivity analysis of the ARDL estimators. Furthermore, the spectral BC causality approach was also utilized to investigate the causal association betweefataln ecological footprint and its determinants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbas Q, Nurunnabi M, Alfakhri Y, Khan W, Hussain A, Iqbal W (2020) The role of fixed capital formation, renewable and non-renewable energy in economic growth and carbon emission: a case study of Belt and Road Initiative project. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:45476–45486
Adebayo TS (2020) Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: an application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. SN Applied Sciences 2(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03705-y
Adebayo TS, Acheampong AO (2021) Modelling the globalization-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–16
Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Oladipupo SD, Agyekum EB, Jayakumar A, Kumar NM (2021) Dominance of fossil fuels in Japan’s national energy mix and implications for environmental sustainability. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(14):7347
Aeknarajindawat N, Suteerachai B, Suksod P (2020) The impact of natural resources, renewable energy, economic growth on carbon dioxide emission in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10(3):211–218
Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Cary M (2021) Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecol Indic 121:107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582
Akinsola GD, Awosusi AA, Kirikkaleli D, Umarbeyli S, Adeshola I (2021) Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy, and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15791-5
Al-mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed H (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Ind 48:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
Alola AA, Adebayo TS, Onifade ST (2021) Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 1–14
Anatasia V (2015) The causal relationship between GDP, exports, energy consumption, and CO2 in Thailand and Malaysia. International Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4):37–48
Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Altuntaş M, Agyekum EB, Zawbaa HM, Kamel S (2022) The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: a quantile regression evidence. Energy Rep 8:1979–1994
Bagliani M, Bravo G, Dalmazzone S (2008) A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecol Econ 65(3):650–661
Bekhet HA, Yasmin T, Al-Smadi RW (2017) Dynamic linkages among financial development, economic growth, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and gross fixed capital formation patterns in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Globalization 18(4):493–523
Bekun FV, Awosusi AA, Altuntaş M (2021) Coal energy consumption beat renewable energy consumption in South Africa: developing policy framework for sustainable development. Renewable Energy 175:1012–1024
Bello MO, Solarin SA, Yen YY (2018) The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. J Environ Manage 219:218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101
Borhan HB, Ahmed EM (2012) Simultaneous model of pollution and income in Malaysia. International Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(1):50–73
Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 76:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031
Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries, Energy & Environment, Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19834279
Economic Planning Unit (2021) Prime minister’s department,voluntary national review 2017. https://www.epu.gov.my/en/resources/publications?page=1
Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 55(2):251–276
GFN (2018) Global footprint network. Retrieved from http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?type=BCtot,EFCtot&cn=165
Godil DI, Sharif A, Rafique S, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–12
Granger CJW, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econom 2(2):111–120
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (2002) Economic Growth and the Environment. Q J Econ, CX, May, 353–77. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 141:105–129
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938
He K, Ramzan M, Awosusi AA, Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Altuntaş M (2021) Does globalization moderate the effect of economic complexity on CO2 emissions? Evidence from the top 10 energy transition economies. Front environ sci 555
Hussen AM (2004) Principles of Environmental Economics, 2nd edn. Routledge, London/New York
Iorember PT, Jelilov G, Usman O, Işık A, Celik B (2021) The influence of renewable energy use, human capital, and trade on environmental quality in South Africa: Multiple structural breaks cointegration approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):13162–13174
Kalmaz DB, Kirikkaleli D (2019) Modeling CO2 emissions in an emerging market: Empirical findings from ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(5):5210–5220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3920-z
Katircioglu S (2021) Estimating the role of urban development in environment quality: evidence from G7 countries. Energy & Environment https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X21997980
Katircioglu S, Katircioğlu S, Altinay M (2017) Interactions between Energy Consumption and Imports: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Comparative Asian Development 16(2):161–178
Katircioglu S, Katircioglu ST, Kilinc CC (2018) Investigating the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the globe. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(15):15029–15035
Khan MK, Abbas F, Godil DI, Sharif A, Ahmed Z, Anser MK (2021a) Moving towards sustainability: How do natural resources, financial development, and economic growth interact with the ecological footprint in Malaysia? A dynamic ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:55579–55591
Khan I, Hou F, Zakari A, Tawiah VK (2021b) The dynamic links among energy transitions, energy consumption, and sustainable economic growth: A novel framework for IEAcountries. Energy 222:19935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.1199350360-5442/
Kihombo S, Ahmed Z, Chen S, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 1–11
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Khan Z, Ali S (2021) Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:14009–14017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7
Kirikkaleli DTS, Khan Z, Ali S (2021) Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):14009–14017
Koksal C, Isik M, Katircioglu S (2020) the role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:13457–13466
Kripfganz S, Schneider DC (2018) ARDL: Estimating autoregressive distributed lag and equilibrium correction models. In proceedings of the 2018 London Stata Conference
Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 87(6):1858–1864
Liu H, Kim H (2018) Ecological footprint, foreign direct investment, and gross domestic production: evidence of Belt & Road Initiative countries. Sustain 2018(10):3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103527
Liu H, Kim H, Liang S, Kwon O (2018) Export diversification and ecological footprint: a comparative study on EKC theory among Korea, Japan, and China. Sustainability 10:3657–3669
Majeed MT, Tauqir A, Mazhar M, Samreen I (2021) Asymmetric effects of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: new evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32945–32961
Mata MN, Ahmed Z, Awosusi AA, Coelho MF, Altuntaş M, Martins JM, Martins JN, Onifade ST (2022) How do renewable energy, economic growth and natural resources rent affect environmental sustainability in a globalized economy? Evidence from Colombia Based on the Gradual Shift Causality Approach. Front Energy Res 9:739721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.73972
Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Environmental degradation and output volatility: A global perspective. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 13(1):180–208. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196193
Miao Y, Razzaq A, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA (2022) Do renewable energy consumption and financial globalisation contribute to ecological sustainability in newly industrialized countries?. Renewable Energy
Narayan PK, Smyth R (2008) Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics 30(5):2331–2341
Panait M, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Rjoub H, Popescu C (2021) Asymmetric impact of international trade on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT Nations. Energies 14(20):6581
Pata UK, Yilanci V (2020) Financial development, globalization and ecological footprint in G7: further evidence from threshold cointegration and fractional frequency causality tests. Environ Ecol Stat 27:803–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00467-z
Petinrin JO, Shaaban M (2015) Renewable energy for continuous energy sustainability in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:967–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.146
Rafique MZ, Nadeem AM, Xia W, Ikram M, Shoaib HM, Shahzad U (2021) Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator. Environment Development and Sustainability 1–18
Rahman ZU, Ahmad M (2019) Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO2 (a) symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: an empirical analysis through NARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(8):8111–8124
Ramzan M, Iqbal HA, Awosusi AA, Akinsola GD (2021) The environmental sustainability effects of financial development and urbanization in Latin American countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:33387–33398
Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy 60:892–905
Saud S, Chena C, Haseeba A, Sumayyaca (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518–119532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Shrinkhal R (2019) Economics, technology, and environmental protection: a critical analysis of phytomanagement. In Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813912-7.00022-3
Suki NM, Suki NM, Afshan S, Sharif A, Meo SM (2022) The paradigms of technological innovation and renewables as a panacea for sustainable development: a pathway of going green. Renewable Energy 181:1431–1439
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
World Bank (2021) World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/
Xu D, Salem S, Awosusi AA, Abdurakhmanova G, Altuntaş M, Oluwajana D, Kirikkaleli D, Ojekemi O (2022) Load capacity factor and financial globalization in Brazil: the role of renewable energy and urbanization. Front Environ Sci 9:823185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.823185
Yuping L, Ramzan M, Xincheng L, Murshed M, Awosusi AA, BAH SI, Adebayo TS (2021) Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: the roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization. Energy Rep 7:4747–4760
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428
Zhang L, Li Z, Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Adeshola I, Akinsola GD (2021) Modeling CO2 emissions in Malaysia: an application of Maki cointegration and wavelet coherence tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(20):26030–26044
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beton Kalmaz, D., Awosusi, A.A. Investigation of the driving factors of ecological footprint in Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 56814–56827 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19797-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19797-5