[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Joint admission control, cell association, power allocation and throughput maximization in decoupled 5G heterogeneous networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Downlink (DL)-uplink (UL) coupled cell association scheme was adopted in 3rd generation (3G) homogeneous network and 4th generation (4G) heterogeneous network (HetNet). In the coupled cell association scheme, a user is associated to single base station (BS) in DL & UL based on the strongest received signal power (SRSP) in DL from a macro base station (MBS) and multiple small base stations (SBS) in HetNet. This is a sub-optimal solution for cell association as most of the users are associated to a MBS due to dominant transmit power and brings challenges like multiple interference issues and imbalanced user traffic load which leads to a degraded throughput in HetNet. In this paper, we investigate downlink uplink decoupled cell association scheme to address these issues and formulate a sum-rate maximization problem in terms of admission control, cell association and power allocation for MBS only, coupled and decoupled HetNet. The formulated optimization problem falls into class of a mixed integer non linear programming (MINLP) problem which is NP-hard and requires exhaustive search to find the optimal solution. However, computational complexity of the exhaustive search increases exponentially with the increase in number of users. Therefore, an outer approximation algorithm (OAA) is proposed as a solution to find near optimal solution with less computation complexity. Extensive simulations work has been done to evaluate the decoupled cell association scheme in HetNet vs the coupled cell association scheme in traditional MBS only and HetNet. Results show the effectiveness of decoupled cell association scheme in terms of KPIs, such as throughput, addressing user traffic load imbalances and number of users attached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Networking Index, C. V. (2017). Forecast and methodology, 2017–2022, white paper. In San Jose, CA, USA, (vol. 1).

  2. Hwang, I., Song, B., & Soliman, S. S. (2013). A holistic view on hyper-dense heterogeneous and small cell networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6), 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, B., Zhu, Q., & Zhu, H. (2017). Delay-aware lte wlan aggregation for 5g unlicensed spectrum usage. In 2017 IEEE 85th vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–7).

  4. Cui, Q., Gu, Y., Ni, W., & Liu, R. P. (2017). Effective capacity of licensed-assisted access in unlicensed spectrum for 5G: From theory to application. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(8), 1754–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damnjanovic, A., Montojo, J., Wei, Y., Ji, T., Luo, T., Vajapeyam, M., et al. (2011). A survey on 3G pp heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 18(3), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Y., Sheng, M., Sun, Y., & Shi, Y. (2016). Joint optimization of bs operation, user association, subcarrier assignment, and power allocation for energy-efficient hetnets. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(12), 3339–3353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, Y., Jiang, T., Luo, K., & Mao, S. (2017). Green heterogeneous cloud radio access networks: Potential techniques, performance trade-offs, and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(11), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh, A., Mangalvedhe, N., Ratasuk, R., Mondal, B., Cudak, M., Visotsky, E., et al. (2012). Heterogeneous cellular networks: From theory to practice. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(6), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhuang, B., Guo, D., & Honig, M. L. (2016). Energy-efficient cell activation, user association, and spectrum allocation in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(4), 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, C., Li, J., & Guizani, M. (2016). Cooperation for spectral and energy efficiency in ultra-dense small cell networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S., & Skold, J. (2013). 4G: LTE/LTE-advanced for mobile broadband. London: Academic press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, H., Huang,A., Xie, L. (2015). Best-fit cell attachment for decoupling dl/ul to promote traffic offloading in hetnets. In 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 3466–3471).

  13. Park, T., Abuzainab, N., & Saad, W. (2016). Learning how to communicate in the internet of things: Finite resources and heterogeneity. IEEE Access, 4, 7063–7073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elshaer, H., Boccardi, F., Dohler, M., & Irmer, R. (2014). Downlink and uplink decoupling: A disruptive architectural design for 5G networks. In IEEE global communications conference (pp. 1798–1803).

  15. Elshaer, H., Boccardi, F., Dohler,M., & Irmerr, R. (2015). Load and backhaul aware decoupled downlink/uplink access in 5G systems. In 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 5380–5385). IEEE.

  16. Sekander, S., Tabassum, H., & Hossain, E. (2015). Matching with externalities for decoupled uplink-downlink user association in full-duplex small cell networks. In 2015 IEEE international WIE conference on electrical and computer engineering (WIECON-ECE) (pp. 411–414).

  17. Muhammad, F., Abbas, Z. H., Abbas, G., & Jiao, L. (2016). Decoupled downlink-uplink coverage analysis with interference management for enriched heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Access, 4, 6250–6260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ali, M., Rabbani, Q., Naeem, M., Qaisar, S., & Qamar, F. (2017). Joint user association, power allocation, and throughput maximization in 5G h-cran networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(10), 9254–9262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sial, M. N., & Ahmed, J. (2018). Analysis of k-tier 5G heterogeneous cellular network with dual-connectivity and uplink-downlink decoupled access. Telecommunication Systems, 67(4), 669–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Celik, A., Radaydeh, R. M., Al-Qahtani, F. S., & Alouini, M. (2017). Joint interference management and resource allocation for device-to-device (d2d) communications underlying downlink/uplink decoupled (dude) heterogeneous networks. In 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–6).

  21. Arif, M., Wyne, S., & Ahmed, J. (2019). Performance analysis of downlink and uplink decoupled access in clustered heterogeneous cellular networks. Telecommunication Systems, 5, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, R., Liu, X., Luo, K., Jiang, T., & Jin, S. (2018). Decoupled access in hetnets with backhaul constrained small base stations. In IEEE access (Vol. 6, pp. 27 028–27 038).

  23. Bacha, M., Wu, Y., & Clerckx, B. (2017). Downlink and uplink decoupling in two-tier heterogeneous networks with multi- antenna base stations. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(5), 2760–2775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali, S., Aslam, M. I., & Ahmed, I. (2019). Uplink coverage probability and spectral efficiency for downlink uplink decoupled dense heterogeneous cellular network using multi-slope path loss model. In Telecommunication systems (pp. 1–12).

  25. Muhammad, F., Haroon, M. S., Abbas, Z. H., Abbas, G., & Kim, S. (2019). Uplink interference management for hetnets stressed by clustered wide-band jammers. In IEEE access (Vol. 7, pp. 182 679–182 690).

  26. Chen, M., Saad, W., & Yin, C. (2017). Echo state networks for self-organizing resource allocation in lte-u with uplink-downlink decoupling. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shi, M., Yang, K., Xing, C., & Fan, R. (2018). Decoupled heterogeneous networks with millimeter wave small cells. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(9), 5871–5884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jia, X., Fan, Q., Xu, W., & Yang, L. (2019). Cross-tier dual-connectivity designs of three-tier hetnets with decoupled uplink/downlink and global coverage performance evaluation. In IEEE access (Vol. 7, pp. 16 816–16 836).

  29. Elshaer, H., Vlachos, C., Friderikos, V., & Dohler, M. (2016).Interference-aware decoupled cell association in device-to-device based 5g networks. In 2016 IEEE 83rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–5).

  30. Zheng, J., Li, J., Wang, N., & Yang, X. (2017). Joint load balancing of downlink and uplink for eicic in heterogeneous network. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(7), 6388–6398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan, H. Z., Ali, M., Naeem, M., Rashid, I., & Imran, M. (xxxx). Resource allocation in 5G heterogeneous networks with downlink-uplink decoupled access. In Transactions on emerging telecommunications technologies (p. e3831).

  32. Goldsmith, A. (2005). Wireless communications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanif, M. F., & Smith, P. J. (2010). On the statistics of cognitive radio capacity in shadowing and fast fading environments. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(2), 844–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Duran, M. A., & Grossmann, I. E. (1986). An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs. Mathematical Programming, 36(3), 307–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fletcher, R., & Leyffer, S. (1994). Solving mixed integer nonlinear programs by outer approximation. Mathematical Programming, 66(1–3), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Floudas, C. A., & Pardalos, P. M. (2001). Encyclopedia of optimization (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Floudas, C. A. (1995). Nonlinear and mixed-integer optimization: Fundamentals and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Land, A. H., & Doig, A. G. (1960). An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. In Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (pp. 497–520).

  40. Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (2012). Matrix computations (Vol. 3). London: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bonami, P. (2019)“Basic open-source nonlinear mixed integer programming,” http://www.coin-or.org/Bonmin/, accessed Sep 15 .

  42. Bonami, P., Belotti, P., Forrest, J., Ladanyi, L., & Laird, C. (2019). Basic open-source nonlinear mixed integer programming.

  43. MATLAB, (2018). 9.7.0.1190202 (R2019b). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Humayun Zubair Khan, Mudassar Ali, Imran Rashid, Adil Masood Siddiqui & Muhammad Imran

  2. University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47050, Pakistan

    Mudassar Ali

  3. COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt, 47040, Pakistan

    Muhammad Naeem

  4. Instituto de Telecomunicações Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal

    Shahid Mumtaz

  5. Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28015, Madrid, Spain

    Shahid Mumtaz

Authors
  1. Humayun Zubair Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mudassar Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Naeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Imran Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adil Masood Siddiqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Imran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shahid Mumtaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humayun Zubair Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Part of this work is accepted in IEEE WCNC-2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, H.Z., Ali, M., Naeem, M. et al. Joint admission control, cell association, power allocation and throughput maximization in decoupled 5G heterogeneous networks. Telecommun Syst 76, 115–128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00707-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-020-00707-4

Keywords