[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical likelihood inference for general transformation models with right censored data

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we consider empirical likelihood inference for general transformation models with right censored data. The models are a class of flexible semiparametric survival models and include many popular survival models as their special cases. Based on the marginal likelihood function, we define an empirical likelihood ratio statistic. Under some regularity conditions, we show that the empirical likelihood ratio statistic asymptotically follows a standard chi-squared distribution. Through some simulation studies and a real data application, we show that our proposed procedure can work fairly well even for relatively small sample size and high censoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bickel, P.: Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., Wei, L., Ying, Z.: Analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika 82(4), 835–845 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D., Cuzick, J.: Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 148(2), 82–117 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowska, D., Doksum, K.: Partial likelihood in transformation models with censoring data. Scand. J. Stat. 15(1), 1–23 (1988)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, L., Meeker, W.: Assessing influence in regression analysis with censored data. Biometrics 48(2), 507–528 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, J., Ying, Z., Wei, L.: On the linear transformation model for censored data. Biometrika 85(4), 980–986 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, M., Sun, L., Zuo, G.: A baseline-free procedure for transformation models under interval censorship. Lifetime Data Anal. 11(4), 437–488 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • He, B.: Application of the empirical likelihood method in proportional hazards model. Ph.D. Thesis of University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida (2006)

  • Li, J., Gu, M.: Adaptive lasso for general transformation models with right censored data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 2583–2597 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Li, R., Zhou, M.: Empirical likelihood in survival analysis. In: Fan, J., Li, G. (eds.) Contemporary Multivariate Analysis and Design of Experiments, pp. 337–350. World Scientific, Singapore (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Liang, Y.: Empirical likelihood inference for linear transformation models. J. Multivar. Anal. 97(7), 1586–1599 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., Halpern, J.: Regression with censored data. Biometrika 69(3), 521–531 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A.: Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for single functional. Biometrika 75(2), 237–249 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A.: Empirical likelihood ratio confidence region. Ann. Stat. 18(1), 90–120 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, G., Jing, B.: Empirical likelihood for cox regression model under random censorship. Commun. Stat., Simul. Comput. 30(1), 79–90 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.: General transformation model with censoring, time-varying covariates and covariates with measurement errors. Ph.D. Thesis of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (2008)

  • Ying, Z., Jung, S., Wei, L.: Median regression analysis with censored data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90(429), 178–184 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, W., Sun, Y., Zheng, M.: Empirical likelihood method for linear transformation models. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 63(2), 331–346 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y.: Empirical likelihood for linear transformation models with interval-censored failure time data. J. Multivar. Anal. 116, 398–409 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, M., Yu, W.: Empirical likelihood method for the multivariate accelerated failure time models. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 141(2), 972–983 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M.: Empirical likelihood analysis of the rank estimator for the censored accelerated failure time model. Biometrika 92(2), 492–498 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., Kim, M., Bathke, A.: Empirical likelihood analysis for the heteroscedastic accelerated failure time model. Stat. Sin. 22(1), 295–316 (2012)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the AE and two reviewers for their very insightful and detailed comments which lead to improvements of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heng Lian.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 242 kB)

Appendix

Appendix

In this paper, we assume that the cumulative density function of failure time T, F 0(t)=1−S 0(t), is continuous and F 0(t)=0 for t<0. The following regularity conditions will be used in the proofs of Theorems 1–2.

(A0) \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{k_{n}}{n}=c>0\). Censoring time C and failure time T are conditionally independent given Z. Moreover, P(T<C)>0 and P(|TS|<ε)>0 for any fixed S>0 and any small ε>0.

(A1) Suppose that βΘ, a compact subset of the Euclidean space R p and the true value β 0 is an interior point of Θ. The covariate vector Z is assumed to be bounded, that is, there exists a constant M 1>0 such that P(∥Z∥≤M 1)=1. For all u∈(0,1), ∥v∥≤M 1 and wΘ,

$$\begin{aligned} &\phi_3(u,v,w)=\frac{\partial\phi(u,v,w)}{\partial w},\\ &\phi _{33}(u,v,w)= \frac{\partial^2\phi(u,v,w)}{\partial w\partial w'} \end{aligned}$$

exist and are continuous with respect to wΘ. The condition also holds with ϕ(u,v,w) replaced by Φ(u,v,w). We use ∥⋅∥ for both the Euclidean norm of a vector and the operator norm of a matrix.

(A2) For any v satisfying ∥v∥≤M 1, there are functions F 1(u,v) and F 2(u,v), integrable with respect to u over (0,1) such that

$$\begin{aligned} &\bigl\Vert \phi_3(u,v,w)\bigr\Vert <F_1(u,v),\qquad \bigl\Vert \phi_{33}(u,v,w)\bigr\Vert <F_2(u,v),\\ &\quad\text{for all}\ w\in\varTheta. \end{aligned}$$

This condition also holds when ϕ(u,v,w) is replaced by Φ(u,v,w).

(A3) Denote \(\varPsi(u,v,w)=\frac{\varPhi_{3}(u,v,w)}{\varPhi(u,v,w)}\), \(\varPhi_{3}(u,v,w)= \frac{\partial\varPhi(u,v,w)}{\partial w}\), U=F 0(T). For any \(\boldsymbol {\beta}\in\mathcal{O}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}\), an neighborhood of β 0 in Θ, E\(_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}[\psi (1-U,Z,\boldsymbol {\beta})]\), E\(_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}[\psi^{2}(1-U,Z,\boldsymbol {\beta})]\) and E\(_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}[-\frac{\partial\psi(1-U,Z,\boldsymbol {\beta})}{\partial \boldsymbol {\beta}'}]\) exist. These expectations also exist with ψ(u,v,w) replaced by Ψ(u,v,w) and the matrix

$$\begin{aligned} V(\boldsymbol {\beta})&=\operatorname{Var}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_0}\bigl[\psi \bigl(1-F_0(Y),Z,\boldsymbol {\beta}\bigr)\delta \\ &\quad {}+\varPsi \bigl(1-F_0(Y),Z, \boldsymbol {\beta}\bigr) (1-\delta)\bigr] \end{aligned}$$
(14)

is positive definite at β=β 0. The subscript β 0 means that the expectation or variance is evaluated at the true parameter value.

(A4) \(\text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}[\varPsi^{2}(1-F_{0}(C),Z,\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0})]\) exists and there exists a constant M 2>0 such that

$$\begin{aligned} &\max \bigl\{\text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_0}\bigl[\psi^2(1-U,Z,\boldsymbol {\beta}_0)\bigr],\text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_0} \bigl[\varPsi^2(1-U,Z, \boldsymbol {\beta}_0) \bigr],\\ &\quad \text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta} _0}\bigl[\varPsi^2 \bigl(1-F_0(C),Z,\boldsymbol {\beta}_0\bigr)\bigr] \bigr \}<M_2. \end{aligned}$$

(A5) The function ψ(u,v,w) is continuous for u∈(0,1) and satisfies the Lipschitz condition with respect to u in any closed subset of (0,1). More specifically, for any [L,R]⊂(0,1), there exists a constant M 3(L,R), dependent on [L,R], such that for all u 1,u 2∈[L,R], |v|≤M 1 and \(w\in\mathcal{O}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_{0}}\),

$$\bigl|\psi(u_1,v,w)-\psi(u_2,v,w)\bigr|\leq M_3|u_1-u_2|. $$

This condition also holds when ψ(u,v,w) is replaced by Ψ(u,v,w).

(A6) The function \(\frac{\partial\psi(u,v,w)}{\partial w'}\) satisfies the Lipschitz condition with respect to u as in condition (A5) and this condition holds when ψ(u,v,w) is replaced by Ψ(u,v,w).

(A7) For any fixed discretization of failure time support (0,∞) (the discretization technique can be found in Sect. 2.3 of Wu (2008)) and later in the proof of this paper, and the number of discretization points m is fixed), there exists N such that when n>N,

$$ \text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_0} \biggl[-\frac{\partial}{\partial \boldsymbol {\beta}'}S_n( \boldsymbol {\beta}) \biggr]\geq\text{E}_{\boldsymbol {\beta}_0} \biggl[-\frac{\partial}{\partial \boldsymbol {\beta}'}S_{n,m}( \boldsymbol {\beta}) \biggr] $$
(15)

where S n,m (β) is a discretized version of S n (β) given the fixed discretization.

Conditions (A1) and (A3) are smoothness conditions for model (1) while (A2) implies that the order for differentiation and integration can be changed. (A0) and (A4)–(A7) are used to prove the asymptotic normality of the score function S n (β 0). The boundedness of covariates in condition (A2) is often used to simplify the proof. The inequality (15) is general true, otherwise, use of discretized data is better than use of original data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Huang, Z. & Lian, H. Empirical likelihood inference for general transformation models with right censored data. Stat Comput 24, 985–995 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9415-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9415-3

Keywords

Navigation