Abstract
A network analysis (NA) of keyword co-occurrences for a broad collection of Data envelopment analysis (DEA) papers in the period 2008–2017 is carried out. The raw keywords have been cleaned up and standardized to consolidate and increase the consistency of the keywords. The resulting network has been characterized using network-level as well as node-level NA measures. Although the size of the network steadily increases with time, the average path length does not, showing its small world character. The disassortativity of the network indicates that the keywords used in a given paper generally include one or more common, frequently-used terms plus other less common terms that refer to the specific context of the research. The evolving nature of the keyword network is highlighted with some DEA keywords staying at the top of the ranking during the whole period and other emerging topics significantly increasing their strength during this period. The community structure of the network, which reflects the field’s knowledge structure, is also presented. The identified communities generally include specific DEA methodology terms, linked with corresponding application areas as well as with some geographical references. Also, the ego-network of some sample keywords is shown, and some research gaps in DEA are identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10(P10008).
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Cho, J. (2014). Intellectual structure of the institutional repository field: A co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 40(3), 386–397.
Choi, J., Yi, S., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information & Management, 48(8), 371–381.
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70, 066111.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer.
Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research (p. 1695). Volumen Complex Systems: InterJournal.
da Fontoura Costa, L., Oliveira, O. N., Jr., Travieso, G., Rodrigues, F. A., Ribeiro Villas Boas, P., et al. (2011). Analyzing and modeling real-world phenomena with complex networks: A survey of applications. Advances in Physics, 60, 329–412.
de la Hoz-Correa, A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Bakucz, M. (2018). Past themes and future trends in medical tourism research: A co-word analysis. Tourism Management, 65, 200–211.
Delecroix, B., & Epstein, R. (2004). Co-word analysis for the non-scientific information example of Reuters Business Briefings. Data Science Journal, 3(15), 80–87.
Dotsika, F., & Watkins, A. (2017). Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 114–127.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151–157.
Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8.
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2015). Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometric and co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1167–1182.
Gillespie, C. S. (2015). Fitting heavy tailed distributions: The powerlaw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(2), 1–16.
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821–7826.
Godwin, A. (2016). Visualizing systematic literature reviews to identify new areas of research. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE frontiers in education conference (pp. 1–8) https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757690
Ho, M. H.-C., & Liu, J. S. (2013). The motivations for knowledge transfer across borders: The diffusion of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. Scientometrics, 94(1), 397–421.
Huang, M., Wang, Z., & Chen, T. (2019). Analysis on the theory and practice of industrial symbiosis based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 956–967.
Khan, G. F., & Wood, J. (2015). Information technology management domain: Emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 959–972.
Lampe, H. W., & Hilgers, D. (2015). Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, 240, 1–21.
Lee, T. S., Lee, Y. S., Lee, J., & Chang, B. C. (2018). Analysis of the intellectual structure of human space exploration research using a bibliometric approach: Focus on human related factors. Acta Astronautica, 143, 169–182.
Liang, Y., & Chen, J. (2011). Group network centrality analysis of blogs in politics. Communication in Information Science and Management Engineering, 1(3), 32–35.
Liu, P., Chen, B. L., Liu, K., & Xie, H. (2016a). Magnetic nanoparticles research: A scientometric analysis of development trends and research fronts. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1591–1602.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016b). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33–45.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013a). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41, 3–15.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013b). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41, 893–902.
Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C. S., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks: II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64, 016132.
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243–252.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Chaim: Springer.
Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the Last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394.
Wood, J., & Khan, G. F. (2015). International trade negotiation analysis: Network and semantic knowledge infrastructure. Scientometrics, 105(1), 537–556.
Xu, X., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Zhao, X., Xu, Z., & Zhou, H. (2016). A bibliographic analysis and collaboration patterns of IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems between 2000 and 2015. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(8), 2238–2247.
Yan, B. N., Lee, T. S., & Lee, T. P. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1285–1300.
Yu, D., Wang, W., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., & Liu, R. (2017). Hybrid self-optimized clustering model based on citation links and textual features to detect research topics. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0187164.
Zhao, W., Mao, J., & Lu, K. (2018). Ranking themes on co-word networks: Exploring the relationships among different metrics. Information Processing and Management, 54(2), 203–218.
Zhu, J. (2002). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out with the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Grant DPI2017-85343-P. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lozano, S., Calzada-Infante, L., Adenso-Díaz, B. et al. Complex network analysis of keywords co-occurrence in the recent efficiency analysis literature. Scientometrics 120, 609–629 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03132-w
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03132-w