Abstract
Rapid tissue donation (RTD) is an advancing oncology research procedure for collecting tumors, metastases, and unaffected tissue 2–6 h after death. Researchers can better determine rates of progression, response to treatment, and polymorphic differences among patients. Cancer patients may inquire about posthumous body donation for research to offer a personal contribution to research; however, there are barriers to recruiting for an RTD program. Physicians must reassure the patient that their treatment options and quality of care will not be compromised due to participating in RTD. In this commentary we discuss how theories of altruism may explain cancer patients’ desire to participate in an RTD program, the ethical concerns of health care professionals and patients and the use of altruism as a recruitment strategy. We offer recommendations for examining the cultural and ethical climate of the institution prior to initiating such a program such as examining the relationship of healthcare professionals and patients, identifying ethical concerns, and examining ways to promote acceptance and buy-in across professionals, patients, and families.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
American Medical Association. 2001. Declaration of professional responsibility: medicine’s social contract with humanity. Accessed 10 March 2012 at: http://www.ama-assn.org/go/declaration.
Andanda, P.A. 2008. Law, ethics and medicine: Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 34(3): 171–179.
Australian Law Reform Commission. 2003. Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia (ALRC96). Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
Amir, M., and E. Haskell. 1997. Organ donation: who is not willing to commit? Psychological factors influencing the individual’s decision to commit to organ donation after death. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4(3): 215–229.
Back, A.L., J.P. Young, E. McCown, et al. 2008. Abandonment at the end of life from patient, caregiver, nurse, and physician perspectives: Loss of continuity and lack of closure. Archives of Internal Medicine 169(5): 474–479.
Barr, M. 2006. ‘I’m not really read up on genetics’: Biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties 1(2): 251–262.
Batson, C.D. 1991. The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Batson, C.D., and N.Y. Ahmad. 2009. Empathy-induced altruism: A threat to the collective good. In Altruism and prosocial behavior in groups (advances in GROUP processes, volume 26), ed. S.R. Thye, and E.J. Lawler, 1–23. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Boyette, A. C., Schabath, M. B., Quinn, G. P. 2012. Physicians knowledge and attitudes towards rapid autopsy. Unpublished thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Buell, J.F., J. Trofe, G. Sethuraman, et al. 2003. Donors with central nervous system malignancies: Are they truly safe? Transplantation 76(2): 340–343.
Cahill, K.C., and R.R. Ettar. 2008. Student attitudes to whole body donation are influenced by dissection. Anatomical Sciences Education 1(5): 212–216.
Caporael, L.R. 2001. Evolutionary psychology: toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science. Annual Review of Psychology 52(1): 607–628.
Chochinov, H.M., T. Hack, S. McClement, L. Kristjanson, and M. Harlos. 2002. Dignity in the terminally ill: An empirical model. Social Science in Medicine 54(3): 433–443.
Dugosh, K.L., D.S. Festinger, J.R. Croft, and D.B. Marlowe. 2010. Measuring coercion to participate in research within a doubly vulnerable population: Initial development of the coercion assessment scale. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5(1): 93–102.
Erikson, E. 1959. Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues 1: 18–164.
Exley, M., N. White, and J.H. Martin. 2002. Why families say no to organ donation. Critical Care Nurse 22(6): 44–51.
Ghorpade, A., L. Bruch, Y. Persidsky, et al. 2005. Development of a rapid autopsy program for studies of brain immunity. Journal of Neuroimmunology 163(1–2): 135–144.
Greenberg v Miami Children’s Hosp. Research Institute, Inc., 2003. 264 F Supp 2d 1064 (SD Fla 2003).
Gupta, A.K. 2004. WIPO-UNEP Study on the role of intellectual property rights in the sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. Geneva: WIPO Press.
Gunderman, R.B. 2008. Giving ourselves: The ethics of anatomical donation. Sciences Education 1: 5.
Hansson, M.G., J. Dillner, C.R. Bartram, J.A. Carlson, and G. Helgesson. 2006. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncology 7(3): 266–269.
Healy, K. 2006. Last best gifts: Altruism and the market for human blood and organs. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hinton, J. 1999. The progress of awareness and acceptance of dying assessed in cancer patients and their caring relatives. Palliative Medicine 13(1): 19–35.
Hofmann, B. 2009. Broadening consent—and diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics 35(2): 125–129.
Kamal, I.S., D.R. Forsyth, and J.R. Jones. 1997. Does it matter who requests necropsies? Prospective study of clinical audit on rate of requests. British Medical Journal 314(7096): 1729.
Kauffman, H.M., M.A. McBride, W.S. Cherikh, et al. 2002. Transplant tumor registry: Donor related malignancies. Transplantation 74(3): 358–362.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. 2008. Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree. Liaison Committee on Medical Education; Washington, DC. Accessed 7 March 2012 from http://www.lcme.org/functions2008jun.pdf.
Lidz, C.W., P.S. Appelbaum, T. Grisso, and M. Renaud. 2004. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Social Science in Medicine 58(9): 1689–1697.
Lindell, K.O., J.A. Erlen, and N. Kaminski. 2006. Lessons from our patients: Development of a warm autopsy program. PLoS Medicine 3(7): e234.
Loughrey, M., W. McCluggage, and P. Toner. 2000. The declining autopsy rate and clinicians’ attitudes. The Ulster Medical Journal 69(2): 83.
Mascia, L., D. Pasero, A.S. Slutsky, et al. 2010. Effect of a lung protective strategy for organ donors on eligibility and availability of lungs for transplantation. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association 304(23): 2620–2627.
McCullough, M.E., M.B. Kimeldorf, and A.D. Cohen. 2008. An adaptation for altruism: The social causes social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17(4): 281–285.
McIntyre J., Pratt C., Antonia T., Gonzalez L., Haura E., Quinn G. P. 2012. Stakeholder perceptions of thoracic rapid tissue donation: An exploratory study. Social Science & Medicine (under review).
McMillan, R. 1995. Responsibility to or for in the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Medical Ethics 21(2): 112–115.
McPhee, S.J., K. Bottles, B. Lo, G. Saika, and D. Crommie. 1986. To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. The American Journal of Medicine 80(4): 665–671.
Meslin, E. 2010. The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking. Public Health Genomics 13(4): 207–214.
Moore v Regents of the University of California. 1990. 793 P2d 479 (Cal 1990).
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. 2006. Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, 2006. Chicago: National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
National Health and Medical Research Council. 1999. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
Ngata, P. 2005. Death, dying, and grief: A maori perspective. In Death and bereavement around the world, vol. 30, ed. J.D. Morgan, and P. Laungani. New York, NY: Baywood.
Organización Nacional de Trasplantes. 2010. The Committee of Experts on the Organisational Aspects of Co-operation in Organ Transplantation. International Figures on Donation and Transplantation. Retrieved 17 March 2012 from http://www.ont.es/publicaciones/Documents/Newsletter2010.pdf.
Pentz, R.D., C.B. Cohen, M. Wicclair, et al. 2005. Ethics guidelines for research with the recently dead. Nature Medicine 11(11): 1145–1149.
Roberts, L.W., K.B. Nolte, T.D. Warner, et al. 2000. Perceptions of the ethical acceptability of using medical examiner autopsies for research and education. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 124(10): 1485–1495.
Roberts, L.W. 2002. Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism. American Journal of Psychiatry 159(5): 705–712.
Rosenblum, A. M., Horvat, L. D., Siminoff, L. A. et al. 2012. The authority of next-of-kin in explicit and presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation: an analysis of 54 nations. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation. Published online 11 Nov 2012 (e-pub ahead of print).
Rubin, M.A., M. Putzi, N. Mucci, et al. 2000. Rapid (“warm”) autopsy study for procurement of metastatic prostate cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 6(3): 1038–1045.
Sanner, M. 1994. Attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. A model for understanding reactions to medical procedures after death. Social Science and Medicine 38(8): 1141–1152.
Sanner, M. 2006. People’s attitudes and reactions to organ donation. Mortality 11(2): 133–150.
Schwartz, C., I. Lennes, B. Hammes, et al. 2003. Honing an advance care planning intervention using qualitative analysis: The living well interview. Journal of Palliative Medicine 6(4): 593–603.
Sharp, L.A. 1995. Organ transplantation as a transformative experience: anthropological insights into the restructuring of the self. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9(3): 357–389.
Shaw, R. 2010. Perceptions of the gift relationship in organ and tissue donation: Views of intensivists and donor and recipient coordinators. Social Science and Medicine 70(4): 609–615.
Shaw, R. 2008. Rethinking reproductive gifts as body projects. Sociology 42(1): 11–28.
Siminoff, L.A., R.M. Arnold, A.L. Caplan, B.A. Virnig, and D.L. Seltzer. 1995. Public policy governing organ and tissue procurement in the United States: Results from the national organ and tissue procurement study. Annals of Internal Medicine 123(1): 10–17.
Siminoff, L.A., and K. Chillag. 1999. The fallacy of the “gift of life”. The Hastings Center Report 29(6): 34–41.
Snowdon, C., D.R. Elbourne, and J. Garcia. 2004. Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: Attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition 89(3): F204–F207.
Sque, M., S. Payne, and C.J. Macleod. 2007. Gift of life or sacrifice: key discourses for understanding decision-making by families of organ donors. In Organ and tissue donation: An evidence base for practice, ed. M. Sque, and S. Payne, 40–58. Maidenhead, NY: McGraw Hill and Open University Press.
Teno, J.M., B.R. Clarridge, V. Casey, et al. 2004. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA 291(1): 88–93.
Titmuss, R.M. 1970. The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. London, United Kingdom: London School of Economics Books.
Trivers, R.L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1): 35–57.
Ussher, J., L. Kirsten, P. Butow, and M. Sandoval. 2006. What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Social Science and Medicine 62(10): 2565–2576.
Valencia Declaration. 2002. http://globalization.icaap.org/content/v2.2/declare.html.
Ziebland, S., A. Chapple, C. Dumelow, et al. 2004. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: A Qualitative study. British Medical Journal 328(7439): 564.
Zodrow, J.J. 2003. The commodification of human body parts: regulating the tissue bank industry. Southwest University Law Review 32(3): 407–449.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinn, G.P., Murphy, D., Pratt, C. et al. Altruism in terminal cancer patients and rapid tissue donation program: does the theory apply?. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 857–864 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9480-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9480-6