[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A GIS-based method for the reconstruction of the late eighteenth century forest vegetation in the Prignitz region (NE Germany)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our goal was to reconstruct the late eighteenth century forest vegetation of the Prignitz region (NE Germany) at a scale of 1:50,000. We also wanted to relate the historical forest vegetation to the actual and potential natural vegetation. For these purposes, we selected 15 woody species and transferred relevant data found in historical records from various sources together with the recent localities of (very) old individuals belonging to these woody species into ArcView GIS. Following multi-step data processing including the generation of a point density layer using a moving window with kernel estimation and derivation of vegetation units applying Boolean algebra rules together with information on site conditions, we derived 17 forest communities corresponding to the potential natural vegetation. We were able to reconstruct the historical forest vegetation for 90% of the forest area ca. 1780. Only two of the 17 forest communities covered large parts of the forested area. The oak forest with Agrostis capillaris covered about 44% of the total forest area, and alder forests on fenland made up about 37%. Oak-hornbeam forests with Stellaria holostea comprised slightly less than 6% of the forest area, while all other forest communities comprised less than 1%. The historical forest vegetation is more similar to the potential forest vegetation and quite different from the actual forest vegetation because coniferous tree species currently cover approximately two-thirds of the actual forest area. The most beneficial result of this study is the map of high-resolution historical vegetation units that may serve as the basis for various further studies, e.g., modelling long-term changes in biodiversity at the landscape scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andree K (1956) Die Entwicklung des geographischen Milieus und der Wirtschaft des Menschen im Einzugsgebiet der Dosse zwischen Wittstock und Teetz. Märkische Heimat 1(5):34–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Batek MJ, Rebertus AJ, Schroeder WA, Haithcoat TL, Compas E, Guyette RP (1999) Reconstruction of early nineteenth-century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozarks. J Biogeogr 26:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker L (1995) Satellite remote sensing atlas of Europe. Justus Perthes, Gotha, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinlich B, Hill B, Köstermeyer H, Beck L, van Rhemen K (2001) Schweinefreilandhaltung in der Landschaftspflege - ein Überblick zum aktuellen Kenntnisstand. Egge-Weser 14:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn U, Gollub G, Hettwer C, Neuhäuslová Z, Schlüter H, Weber H (2003) Map of the natural vegetation of Europe. Scale 1: 2 500 000. Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH, Münster-Hiltrup, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J, Schulte LA, Burrows SN, Sickley TA, Mladenhoff DJ (2004) Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (U.S.A.) using historical landscape reconstructions. Restor Ecol 12(1):124–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratring FWA (1804) Statistisch-topographische Beschreibung der gesamten Mark Brandenburg. Bd. 1–3. Reprint: Büsch O, Heinrich G (eds) (1968) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany

  • Brown DG (1998) Mapping historical forest types in Baraga County Michigan, USA as fuzzy sets. Plant Ecol 134(1):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogbill CV, Burk J, Motzkin G (2002) The forests of presettlement New England, USA: spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys. J Biogeogr 29:1279–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2001) The occurrence of plant biodiversity in a hemiboreal landscape: the effects of habitat and history. Ecography 24:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driescher E (1986) Historische Schwankungen des Wasserstandes von Seen im Tiefland der DDR. Geographische Berichte 120(3):159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt RW, Foster DR, Motzkin G, Hall B (2003) Conservation of changing landscapes: vegetation and land use history of Cape Cod National Seashore. Ecol Appl 13(1):68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders L (1997) Historisches Ortslexikon für Brandenburg. Teil 1. Prignitz, 2nd edn. Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, Weimar, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ (1997) The use of the land survey record to reconstruct pre-European vegetation patterns in the Darling Downs, Queensland, Australia. J Biogeogr 24:827–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B, Motzkin G, Foster DR, Syfert M, Burk J (2002) Three hundred years of forest and land-use change in Massachusetts, USA. J Biogeogr 29:1319–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdtle W, von Oheimb G, Westphal C (2005) Relationships between the vegetation and soil conditions in beech and beech-oak forests of northern Germany. Plant Ecol 177:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He HS, Mladenhoff DJ, Sickley TA, Guntenspregen GG (2000) GIS interpolations of witness tree records (1839–1866) for northern Wisconsin at multiple scales. J Biogeogr 27:1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietel E, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2004) Analysing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany. Landscape Ecol 19:473–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilf RB, Röhrig F (eds) (1938) Wald und Weidwerk in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Athenion, Potsdam, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Jones EW (1978) Vegetation changes resulting from afforestation of rough grazings in Caeo Forest, South Wales. J Ecol 66:433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G, Pommer U (2005) Potentielle Natürliche Vegetation von Brandenburg und Berlin mit Karte im Maßstab 1:200 000. Eberswalder Forstliche Schriftenreihe XXIV:1–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut für Forsteinrichtung und Standortserkundung (IFS) (ed) (1960) Ergebnisse der Standortserkundung im Staatlichen Forstwirtschaftsbetrieb Perleberg, Band 1 + 2:1–506

  • Institut für Forsteinrichtung und Standortserkundung (IFS) (ed) (1961) Ergebnisse der Standortserkundung im Staatlichen Forstwirtschaftsbetrieb Kyritz; Band 1–3:1–464

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch H, Schairer E, von Gaisberg E (1939) Die Buche der Ostalb. Mitteilungen der württembergischen forstlichen Versuchsanstalt 1939:1–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausch HD (1956) Flurnamen als Quellen zur Forstgeschichte, dargestellt am Beispiel Brandenburgs. Märkische Heimat 1(5):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbiegel D, Schwinge W (1991) Witterung-Klima. Informationen, Leistungsangebote, Normalwerte, Schwellenwerte, Häufigkeiten und Karten. Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Brandenburg und Berlin. Self-publisher, Potsdam, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesamt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Brandenburg (LGRB) (2001) Bodenübersichtskarte des Landes Brandenburg (BÜK 300). Self-publisher, Potsdam, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner Ch (1999) Einige kritische Anmerkungen zur Konstruktion der potentiellen natürlichen Vegetation. Berichte der Norddeutschen Naturschutzakademie 2/99:88–93

  • Manies KL, Mladenhoff DJ (2000) Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. public land survey records. Landscape Ecol 15(8):741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci DJ (2000) Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc Urban Plan 49:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes W (1929) Urgeschichte des Kreises Ostprignitz. Curt Kabitzsch, Leipzig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzkin G, Foster DR, Allen A, Harrod J, Boone R (1996) Controlling site to evaluate history: vegetation patterns of a New England sand plain. Ecol Monogr 66:345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller W (1941) Vom Wald unserer Prignitz. Prignitzer Heimatjahrbuch 1941:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JC (1997) Presettlement vegetation patterns along the 5th Principal Meridian, Missouri Territory, 1815. Am Midl Nat 137(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parchmann W (1921) Mecklenburgische Bestandesverhältnisse und Forstwirtschaft in früheren Jahrhunderten. Carl Hinstorffs Hofbuchdruckerei, Rostock, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarge H (1966) Waldgesellschaften der Prignitz. Archiv für Forstwesen 15(5/6):475–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Polthier W (1933) Geschichte der Stadt Wittstock. Safari-Verlag in Kommission, Berlin, pp 1–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Scamoni A (1955) Teeröfen als Nachweis eines ursprünglichen Vorkommens der Kiefer. Archiv für Forstwesen 4(2/3):170–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfe W (1972) Abriß der Geschichte der Kartographie Brandenburgs von 1771 bis 1821. Veröffentlichungen der Historischen Kommission zu Berlin 35:1–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt HHF (1991) Die Prignitz. Ein Haus- und Lesebuch. Hinstorff, Rostock, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze J (1956) Die Prignitz Aus der Geschichte einer märkischen Landschaft. Böhlau, Köln, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Stackebrandt W, Ehmke G, Manhenke V (eds) (1997) Atlas zur Geologie von Brandenburg. Self-publisher, Landesamt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Brandenburg, Kleinmachnow:1–80

  • von Oeynhausen U (1905) Glashütten in Mecklenburg. Jahrbücher des Vereins für mecklenburgische Geschichte und Altertumskunde 70:267–312

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wilamowitz-Moellendorf Graf W (1911) Gadower Fideikommißforst. Bericht über die 37. Versammlung des Märkischen Forstvereins am 28., 29. und 30. Mai 1911 in Perleberg. Buchdruckerei Robert Müller, Potsdam:4–12

  • Vowinkel K (1998) Die Waldweide im Oberharz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Bereich von St. Andreasberg. Unser Harz 46:146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M (2004) Auswirkungen des Landschaftswandels auf die Verbreitungsmuster von Waldpflanzen. Dissertationes Botanicae 392:1–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M, Groß J (2004) The Schmettau-Schulenburgsche map—a legend for the State of Brandenburg (eastern Germany) with critical comments (in German with English summary). Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 175:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M, Sommer M, Schmidt R (2010) Forest cover changes in the Prignitz region (NE Germany) between 1790 and 1960 in relation to soils and other driving forces. Landscape Ecol 25:299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ute Jahn, Sigrid Ehlert and Joachim Kiesel for their friendly and extensive technical assistance. The research was supported through basic funding of the research institution by the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV, Bonn, Germany) and by the Ministry for Rural Development, Environment and Consumer Protection of Brandenburg (MLUV, Potsdam, Germany). We thank the American Journal Experts service for polishing our English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Wulf.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wulf, M., Rujner, H. A GIS-based method for the reconstruction of the late eighteenth century forest vegetation in the Prignitz region (NE Germany). Landscape Ecol 26, 153–168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9555-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9555-1

Keywords