A new robust forward BSS adaptive algorithm based on automatic voice activity detector for speech quality enhancement

• Albouy, B., & Deville, Y. (2003). Alternative structures and power spectrum criteria for blind segmentation and separation of convolutive speech mixtures. In 4th international symposium on independent component analysis and blind signal separation (ICA) (pp. 361–366), Nara.

• Al-Kindi, M. J., & Dunlop, J. (1989). Improved adaptive noise cancellation in the presence of signal leakage on the noise reference channel. Signal Process, 17(3), 241–250.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Araki, S., Makino, S., Aichner, R., Nishikawa, T., & Saruwatari, H. (2003) Subband based blind source separation with appropriate processing for each frequency band. In 4th international symposium on independent component analysis and blind signal separation (pp. 499–504). IEEE ICA 2003, Nara.

• Bendoumia, R., & Djendi, M. (2014). Variable step-sizes new efficient two-channel backward algorithm for speech intelligibility enhancement: A subband approach. Applied Acoustics, 76, 209–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bouquin-Jeannès, R. L., Azirani, A. A., & Faucon, G. (1997). Enhancement of speech degraded by coherent and incoherent noise using a cross-spectral estimator. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 5, 484–487.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Charkani, N. H. (1996). Auto-adaptive separation of convolutive mixtures, applications to hand-free telephony in cars, Ph.D. dissertation (in French), National Pollytechnique of Grenoble, France.

• Chien, J. T., Lai, P. Y. (2005) Car speech enhancement using a microphone array. International Journal of Speech Technology, 8(1), 79–91.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Combescure, P. (1981). 20 listes de dix phrases phonétiquement équilibrées. Revue d’Acoustique, 56, 34–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Darazirar, I., & Djendi, M. (2015). A two-sensor Gauss-Seidel fast affine projection algorithm for speech enhancement and acoustic noise reduction. Applied Acoustics, 96, 39–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deller, J., Proakis, J., & Hansen, J. (1993). Discrete time processing of speech signals. New York: MacMillan Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Djendi, M. (2010) Advanced techniques for two-microphone noise reduction in mobile communications (Ph.D. dissertation (in French), University of Rennes 1, France, no. 19012010).

• Djendi, M., & Bendoumia, R. (2013). A new adaptive filtering subband algorithm for two channel acoustic noise reduction and speech enhancement. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 39(8), 2531–2550.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Djendi, M., & Bendoumia, R. (2014). A new efficient two-channel backward algorithm for speech intelligibility enhancement: A subband approach. Applied Acoustics, 76, 209–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Djendi, M., Gilloire, A., & Scalart, P. (2006) Noise cancellation using two closely spaced microphones: Experimental study with a specific model and two adaptive algorithms. In 2006 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. ICASSP 2006 Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 744–747).

• Djendi, M., Scalart, P., & Gilloire, A. (2013). Analysis of two-sensors forward BSS structure with post-filters in the presence of coherent and incoherent noise. Speech Communication, 55(10), 975–987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Djendi, M., Scalart, P., & Gilloire, A. (2013). Analysis of two-sensors forward BSS structurewith post-filters in the presence of coherent and incoherent noise. Speech Communications, 55(10), 975–987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Djendi, M., & Zoulikha, M. (2014). New automatic forward and backward blind sources separation algorithms for noise reduction and speech enhancement. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40, 2072–2088.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duong, Q. K., Ngoc, C., Park, S.-H., & Nam (2008). Application of block on-line blind source separation to acoustic echo cancellation. The Journal of Acoustical Society of Corea, 27(1E), 3 pp. 17–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Erik Visser, M., Otsuka, T.-W., & Lee (2003). A spatio-temporal speech enhancement scheme for robust speech recognition in noisy environments. Speech Communications, 41, 393–407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haykin, S. (2002). Adaptive filter theory (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2007). Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Communications, 49, 588–601.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2008). Evaluation of objective quality measures for speechenhancement. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 16(1), 229–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ikeda, S., & Sugiyama, A. (1999). An adaptive noise canceller with low signal-distorsion in the presence of crosstalk. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals, E82-A, 1517–1525.

  Google Scholar 

• ITU (2001) Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), and Objective Method for End-to-End Speech Quality Assessment of Narrowband Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs. ITU-T Recommendation.

• ITU-T (1996). Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T) Recommendation.

  Google Scholar 

• Kazuhiro, K. (2012) Subjective quality measurement of speech its evaluation, estimation applications (1st ed.). Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Kocinski, J. (2008). Speech intelligibility improvement using convolutive blind source separation assisted by denoising algorithms. Speech Commununications, 50(1), 29–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kocinski, J., & Sek, A. P. (2005). Speech intelligibility in various spatial configurations of background noise. Archives of Acoustics, 30(2), 173–191.

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, K. A., & Gan, W. S. (2004) Improving convergence of the NLMS algorithm using constrained subband updates. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 11(9), 736–739.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lepauloux, L., Sound recording distant by system multi-sensors. Application tospoken communication in noisy environment (Ph.D. dissertation (in French), University of Rennes 1, France, no. 4156).

• Ma, J., Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2009). Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibilityin noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3387–3405.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marwa, A., Abd El-Fattah, M. A., Dessouky, M. I., Abbas, A. M., Diab, S. M., El-Rabaie, E. M., et al. (2014). Speech enhancement with an adaptive Wiener filter. International Journal of Speech Technology, 17(1), 53–64.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayyas, K. (2004). Fast implementation of a subband adaptive algorithm for acoustic echo cancellation. Journal of Electrical Engineering-Bratislava, 55(5–6), 113–121.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, J., & Simmer, K. U. Multi-channel speech enhancement in a car environment using Wiener filtering and spectral subtraction. In 1997 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (Vol. 2, pp. 1167–1170).

• Navarro, L. (2007). Représentation tridimensionnelle de la phase dans un plan temps fréquence-Contribution à l’analyse des signaux quasi-stationnaires (Ph.D. dissertation (in French), University of Saint-Étienne, France, no. 461 IVS).

• Parra, L., & Spence, C. (2000). Convolutive blind separation of nonstationary sources. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(3), 320–327.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kunche, P., Sasi Bhushan Rao, G., Reddy, K. V. V. S, & Uma Maheswari R. (2015) A new approach to dual channel speech enhancement based on hybrid PSOGSA. International Journal of Speech Technology, 18(1), 45–56.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rabiner, L., & Juang, B.-H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Sayed, A. H. (2003). Fundamentals of adaptive filtering. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Scalart, P., & Lepauloux L. (2010) On the convergence behavior of recursive adaptive noise cancellation structure in the presence of crosstalk. In Conference of sensor signal processing for defence (SSPD 2010) (pp. 1–4).

• Scalart, P., & Filho, J. (1996) Speech enhancement based on a priori signal to noise estimation. In 1996 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (pp. 629–32).

• Selvi, R. S., & Suresh, G. R. (2016). Hybridization of spectral filtering with particle swarm optimization for speech signal enhancement. International Journal of Speech Technology, 19(1), 19–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sullivan, T. M. (1996). Multi-microphone correlation-based processing for robust automatic speech recognition (Dissertation, Ph. D., Carnegie Mellon University). http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~robust.

• Trawicki Marek, B., & Johnson Michael, T. (2012). Distributed multichannel speech enhancement with minimum mean-square error short-time spectral amplitude, log-spectral amplitude, and spectral phase estimation. Signal Processing, 92, 345–356.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tsujikawa, M., & Iso K.-I. (2004). Hands-free speech recognition using blind source separation post-processed by two-stage spectral subtraction. In INTERSPEECH 2004 - ICSLP, 8th international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 2073–2076), Jeju Island, Korea

• Van Gerven, S.,& Van Compernolle, D. (1992) Feedforward and feedback in symmetric adaptive noise canceller: stability analysis in a simplified case. In Eusipco 92, European signal processing conference (pp. 1081–1084). Brussels.

• Van Gerven, S., & Van Compernolle, D. (1995). Signal separation by symmetric adaptive decorrelation: Stability, convergence, and uniqueness. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 74(3), 1602–1612.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references