[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Farmers’ perception of sustainable agriculture and its determinants: a case study in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to assess in quantitative terms farmers’ perceptions of sustainable agriculture and to determine how those are influenced by different socio-economic characteristics and information-seeking behavior of the farmers. The study was conducted in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey and comprised a stratified sample of 208 farmers from four districts of the province. The farmers rated each of the 21 selected sustainable agricultural practices for importance on a 5-point scale, and the total of these ratings formed the sustainable agriculture perception index. The index score was calculated for each farmer and was treated as the dependent variable in the stepwise regression analysis procedure. The independent variables were such socio-economic characteristics as the farming system, the total and irrigated area of the farm, membership of a cooperative society and participation in village administration, and age, education, and income of the farmer; components of information-seeking behavior included use of the mass media (newspapers, radio, and television), use of the Internet, travel, and participation in farming events. The results of the study showed that the higher the socio-economic status (more frequent contact with extension services, higher education, ownership of land, etc.) and the greater the access to information, the greater the perceived importance of sustainable agricultural practices. It is concluded that if policy-makers and extension organizations concentrate on these factors, they are more likely to succeed in making farmers more favorably disposed toward sustainable agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktas, Y. (2001). Tarimsal yayım surecinde tarımsal ilac saticilarinin yeri ve onemi. The place and importance of pest sellers in Agricultural Extension Process. GAP II. Tarim Kongresi, 1, 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annual Report, I.I.T.A. (1997). Farmers’ perceptions of soil degradation. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Lambourn UK. http://www.iita.org/info/ar97/26-27.htm.

  • Bahcesel.Com. (2008). Toprak kirlenmesi: sebepleri, sonuçları - Causes and results of soil pollution. http://www.bahcesel.com/.

  • Benbrook, C. M. (1991). Introduction (in Banr’s sustainable agriculture research and education in the field: A proceedings) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Bhutto, A. W., & Bazmi, A. A. (2007). Sustainable agriculture and eradication of poverty in Pakistan. Natural Resources Forum, 31, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boz, I., & Akbay, C. (2005). Factors influencing the adoption of maize in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey. Agricultural Economics, 33, 431–440. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0864.2005.00305.x.

  • Boz, I., Akbay, C., Jordan, G. N. M., & Kamalak, A. (2005). Measuring livestock farmers’ effect on sustainable agricultural and rural development. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 17(8). http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/8/boz17088.htm.

  • Carolan, M. S. (2005). Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology, 70, 387–413. doi:10.1526/0036011054831233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). (2008). The world fact book. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html.

  • Drost, D. (1998). Targeting extension efforts for the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Extension (36)5. http://www.joe.org/search.html].

  • Drost, D., Gilbert, L., & Hales, K. (1997). Utah’s vegetable growers: Assessing sustainable agriculture. HortTechnology, 7(4), 445–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duzguneş, O. & Eliçin, A. (1986). Hayvan yetiştirme ilkeleri. Ankara Universitesi Yayınları: 978, Ders Kitabı: 288.

  • Flora, C. B. (1992). Building sustainable agriculture: A new application of farming system research and extension. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2, 37–49. doi:10.1300/J064v02n03_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A. A., Kelly, D. E., Syers, J. K., & Coughlan, K. J. (1996). Measuring sustainability of agricultural systems at the farm level: Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Special Publication, 49, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. (1995). The concepts of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. J. (1996). Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems, 50, 117–143. doi:10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C. E. (1991). The US Department of Agriculture commitment to sustainable agriculture (in Banr’s sustainable agriculture research and education in the field: A proceedings) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Inan, I. H. (2006). Agricultural economics and agribusiness. Tekirdag Turkey: Trakya University Faculty of Agriculture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, B. H., Guiking, F. C. T., Van der Eijk, D., Smaling, E. M. A., Wolf, J., & Van Reuler, H. (1990). A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QEFTS). Geoterma, 46, 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. N. M., Alderson, M., Hall, N. W., & Boz, I. (2002). Kahramanmaraş’ta fiğ üretiminin sürdürülebilir tarım potansiyeline katkıları. Türkiye V. Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi 18–20 Eylül, Erzurum. s.130–137.

  • Lee, D. R. (2005). Agricultural sustainability and technology adoption: Issues and policies for developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87, 1325–1333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00826.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MARA (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs). (2007). Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs’ web site: http://www.tarim.gov.tr/arayuz/10/menu.asp.

  • Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MEF). (2007). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry’s Website. http://www.cevreorman.gov.tr/.

  • Mulder, I. (2000). Soil fertility: QUEFTS and farmers’ perceptions. Working Paper. International Institute for Environment and Development, London and Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam.

  • Ozturk, D. (1999). The characteristics of goat farming system in Kahramanmaraş. North Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on goats held at tours France 15–20 May, pp. 360–361.

  • Peel, M. D. (1998). Crop rotations for increased productivity. North Dakota State University NDSU Extension Service. http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/plantsci/crops/eb48-1.htm.

  • Pugliese, P. (2001). Organic farming and sustainable rural development: A multifaceted and promising convergence. Sociologia Ruralis, 41, 112–130. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, S. (2003). Environmental impacts of modern agricultural technology diffusion in Bangladesh: An analysis of farmers’ perceptions and their determinants. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 183–191. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00066-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. P., & Hall, A. J. (2003). Importance of crop-livestock system in India and farmers’ perceptions of fodder quality in coarse cereals. Field Crops Research, 84, 189–198. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00150-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Turkey Official Journal. (1998). Aniz Yakilmasinin Önlenmesi Hakkinda Teblig No: 1998/26. http://www.ankara-tarim.gov.tr/bk/mevzuat/mevzuat3.htm.

  • Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., & Burton, M. (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecological Economics, 39, 463–478. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S., McDonald, G. T., & Thwaites, R. N. (2000). TIM: Assessing the sustainability of agricultural land management. Journal of Environmental Management, 60, 267–288. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS.11.5. (2002). SPSS-Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Version 11.5. SPSS Inc.

  • Suzer, S. (2002). Aniz yangınları. Cine Tarım Dergisi sayı: 41. http://www.cine-tarim.com.tr/dergi/arsiv41/index.htm.

  • Tanrıvermiş, H. (2003). Agricultural land use change and sustainable use of land resources in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 54, 553–564. doi:10.1006/jare.2002.1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. E. (1995). Scientific farm animal production. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D., Mohamed, Z., Shamsudin, M., Mohayidin, M., & Chiew, E. (1993). Creating a farmer sustainability index: A Malaysian case study. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 8, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Civil Code (2005). Turk Medeni Kanunu. Maddeler: 640–682. 3. Kitap 2. Kısım 3. Bölüm: Miras Hukuku- Mirasın Geçmesi –Mirasın Paylaşılması. http://www.belgenet.com/yasa/medenikanun/640-682.html.

  • Turkish Statistical Association (TSA). (2007). Agricultural Statistics. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do.

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, T. (2001). Elementary sampling methods (Turkish translation) Literatür Yayıncılık, Dağıtım, Pazarlama, Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti. İstanbul. pp. 170–174.

  • Yurdakul, O., Smith, D., Koç, A., Fuller, F., Sengül, H., Akdemir, Ş. et al. (1999). Livestock supply and feed demand in Turkey. An evaluation of the current situation and alternative policy scenarios. Agricultural Economics Research Institute Publication # 17, ISBN 975-407-035-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Füsun Tatlıdil.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Füsun Tatlıdil, F., Boz, İ. & Tatlidil, H. Farmers’ perception of sustainable agriculture and its determinants: a case study in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey. Environ Dev Sustain 11, 1091–1106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9168-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9168-x

Keywords

Navigation