Factors, issues and interdependencies in the incorporation of a Web 2.0 based learning environment in higher education

• Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Bailey, M., Ifenthaler, D., Gosper, M., Kretzschmar, M., & Ware, C. (2015). The changing importance of factors influencing students’ choice of study mode. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9253-9.

• Bartholomew D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J. A. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

• Blackwelder, W. C. (2004). Current issues in clinical equivalence trials. Journal of Dental Research, 83(Special Issue C), C113–C115.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Breen, R., Lindsay, R., Jenkins, A., & Smith, P. (2001). The role of information and communication technologies in a university learning environment. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070123233.

• Carter, L., & Salyers, V. (2015). A model for meaningful e-learning at Canadian universities. In J. Keengwee (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational technology integration and active learning (pp. 78–114). Hershey: IGI Global.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Chimos Κ., Karvounidis T., Douligeris C., Bersimis S., and Bassios M. (2013). Unisuite: An innovative integrated suite for delivering synchronous and asynchronous online education, IEEE EDUCON 2013 Conference, March 11-13, 2013, Berlin, Germany, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530136.

• Christensen, E. (2007). Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. Journal of Hepatology, 46, 947–995.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clayson, D. E., Frost, T. F., & Sheffet, M. J. (2006). Grades and the student evaluation of instruction: A test of the reciprocity effect. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(1), 52–65 Retrieved from: http://amle.aom.org/content/5/1/52.abstract.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x.

• Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028.

• Dyson, M. C., & Campello, S. B. (2003). Evaluating virtual learning environments: What are we measuring? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1(1), 1–20 http://www.ejel.org.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris, A. L. & Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual worled technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137–143.

• Hung, M.-L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students' Perceptions of instructors' roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers and Education, 81, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Islam, A. K. M. N. (2012). The role of perceived system quality as the educators’ motivation to continue E-learning system use. AIS Transaction of Human-computer Interaction, 4(1), 25–44 Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/thci/vol4/iss1/2/.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Karvounidis, T., Chimos, Κ., Bersimis, S., & Douligeris, C. (2015). I-SERF - an integrated self-evaluated and regulated framework for deploying web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(5), 319–333.

  Google Scholar 

• Landow, L. (2000). Current issues in clinical trial design: Superiority versus equivalency studies. Anesthesiology, 92, 1814–1820.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lazzari, M. (2009). Creative use of podcasting in higher education and its effect on competitive agency. Computers and Education, 52(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lesaffre, E. (2008). Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 66(2), 150–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2007). Using web 2.0 for learning in the community. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.06.003.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Montgomery, D. C. (1996). Introduction to statistical quality control (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, L. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher.

  Google Scholar 

• Păuleţ-Crăiniceanu, L. (2014). Integrating the web 2.0 Technologies in Romanian Public Universities. Towards a blended learning model that addresses troubled student-faculty interaction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.618.

• Rabah, J. (2015). Benefits and constraints of technology integration in Quebec English schools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 24–31.

  Google Scholar 

• Streiner, D. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Swan, K., Day, S. L., Bogle, L. R., & Matthews, D. B. (2013). A collaborative, design-based approach to improving an online program. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.006.

• Tang, T. L.-P., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Students’ perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.007.

• Ullrich, C., Shen, R., & Gillet, D. (2010). Not yet ready for everyone: An experience report about a personal learning environment for language learning. In X. Luo, M. Spaniol, L. Wang, Q. Li, W. Nejdl, &W. Zhang (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning – ICWL 2010. ICWL 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 6483. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_28.

• Venkatesh, V., Rabah, J., Fusaro, M., Couture, A., Varela, W. and Alexander, K. (2016). Factors Impacting University Instructors’ and Students’ Perceptions of Course Effectiveness and Technology Integration in the Age of Web 2.0, doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1037358ar.

• Youssef, A. B. and Dahmani, M. (2008). The impact of ICT on student performance in higher education: Direct effects, Indirect Effects and Organisational Change. http://www.uoc.edu/rusc/5/1/dt/eng/benyoussef_dahmani.pdf.

Download references