[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Is public awareness and perceived threat of climate change associated with governmental mitigation targets?

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social scientists and science communicators are concerned about the apparent discrepancy between the scientific consensus on climate change (Anderegg et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12107–12109, 2010; Doran and Zimmerman EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 90:22–3, 2009) and the general public’s views (Knight Environ Sociol 2:101–113, 2016; Lee et al. Nat Clim Chang 5:1014–1020, 2015). It is reasoned that increased public awareness and perceived threat of climate change may pressure governments to enact policy to counteract climate change (e.g. setting stringent carbon emissions targets). Despite a logical link between public awareness and government-set emissions targets, this relationship remains untested. We examined the relationship between public awareness about and perceived threat of climate change and governmental emissions targets across 71 countries and 1 region. We found a positive association between the proportions of a country’s population that are aware of climate change and the unconditional emissions reduction targets set by that country in the Paris Agreement (Rogelj et al. Nature 534:631–639, 2016). However, the proportion of people in a country who perceive climate change as a personal threat was not associated with higher emissions reduction targets. Our results suggest that public awareness may be an important part of garnering the public support required for policies designed to mitigate climate change to succeed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Results were virtually identical when the purchasing power parity of GDP per capita was used instead of the GDP per capita in $USD, and, if anything, were slightly stronger.

References

  • Anderegg WR, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12107–12109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA, Jackman RW (1990) Regression diagnostics: an expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In: Fox J, Long JS (eds) Modern methods of data analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Chang 114:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD, Wesberg S (1982) Residuals and influence in regression. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS One 10:e0118489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Dan A, Shwom R (2007) Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol 72:185–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran PT, Zimmerman MK (2009) Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 90:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond A, Palmer MA, Sauer JD (2016) Enhancing endorsement of scientific inquiry increases support for pro-environment policies. Royal Soc Open Sci 3:160360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 36:326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen A, Vogl D (2013) Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: a comparative analysis of 33 countries. Glob Environ Chang 23:1001–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66:290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilens M, Page BI (2014) Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspect Polit 12:564–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC, Keim BD (2009) Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int J Climatol 29:2348–2352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison K (2012) A tale of two taxes: the fate of environmental tax reform in Canada. Rev Policy Res 29:383–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Braman D (2006) Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review 24:149–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D et al (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight KW (2016) Public awareness and perception of climate change: a quantitative cross-national study. Environm Sociol 2:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Chang 5:1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S (2011) Popular consensus: climate change is set to continue. Psychol Sci 22:460–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S (2013a) The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat Clim Chang 3:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac GE (2013b) NASA faked the moon landing—therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychol Sci 24:622–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning C, Mangas H, Amel E, Tang H, Humes L, Foo R, Sidlova V, Cargos K (2018) Psychological distance and response to human versus non-human victims of climate change. In: Filho WL, Marans RW, Callewaert J (eds) Handbook of sustainability and social science research 2018. Springer, Cham, pp 143–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob Environ Chang 21:1163–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Chai HY, Newell BR (2015) Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: an integrative review. J Environ Psychol 44:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont TL, Evans L, Sibley CG, Ries J, Cunningham A (2014) Proximity to coast is linked to climate change belief. PLoS One 9:e103180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers TA, Maibach E, Peters E, Leiserowitz A (2015) Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: the results of two experiments. PLoS One 10:e0120985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Yarnal B, Wiefek N (2002) Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Soc Sci Q 83:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page BI, Shapiro RY (1983) Effects of public opinion on policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 77:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga W, Spence A, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Pidgeon NF (2011) Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob Environ Chang 21:1015–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe BG, Borick CP (2012) Carbon taxation and policy labeling: experience from American states and Canadian provinces. Review of Policy Research 29:358–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj J, Den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H et al (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature 534:631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature climate change 1(1):46

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32:957–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2012) Psychology: fear and hope in climate messages. Nat Clim Chang 2:572–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhay E, Druckman JN, Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Tarantola T, Silva CL et al (2015) Geoengineering and climate change polarization: testing a two-channel model of science communication. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658:192–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum MB, Hepler J, Zimmerman RS, Saul L, Jacobs S, Wilson K et al (2015) Appealing to fear: a meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychol Bull 141:1178–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117:440e463

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2009) Appendix I—quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020 Available from: http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/items/5264.php

  • Wheeler D (2011) Quantifying vulnerability to climate change: implications for adaptation assistance. GDC Working Paper 240

  • Witte K, Allen M (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 27:591–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsko C, Ariceaga H, Seiden J (2016) Red, white, and blue enough to be green: effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 65:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?view=chart

  • World Bank (2016) Worldwide governance indicators. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#doc

  • Wu CFJ (1986) Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. Ann Stat 14:1261–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Massey University, Manawatu, Palmerston North, 4424, New Zealand

    Aaron Drummond & Lauren C. Hall

  2. Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

    James D. Sauer & Matthew A. Palmer

Authors
  1. Aaron Drummond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren C. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James D. Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew A. Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Drummond.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drummond, A., Hall, L.C., Sauer, J.D. et al. Is public awareness and perceived threat of climate change associated with governmental mitigation targets?. Climatic Change 149, 159–171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2230-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2230-2