Abstract
One of the older questions in the debate about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is whether it is worthwhile for organizations to pay attention to societal demands. This debate was emotionally, normatively, and ideologically loaded. Up to the present, this question has been an important trigger for empirical research in CSR. However, the answer to the question has apparently not been found yet, at least that is what many researchers state. This apparent ambivalence in CSR consequences invites a literature study that can clarify the debate and allow for the drawing of conclusions. The results of the literature study performed here reveal that there is indeed clear empirical evidence for a positive correlation between corporate social and financial performance. Voices that state the opposite refer to out-dated material. Since the beginnings of the CSR debate, societies have changed. We can therefore clearly state that, for the present Western society, “Good Ethics is Good Business.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allouche, J., Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57(1), 8–41
Arlow, P., Ackelsberg, R., (1991). A Small Firm Planning Survey: Business Goals, Social Responsibility, and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review 22(2), 161–172
Balabanis, G., Philips, H.C., Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: are they linked? European Business Review, 98(1), 25–42
Barnett, M.L., Salomon, R.M. (2006). Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1156
Blacconiere, W.G., Patten, D.M. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (3), 357–377
Boyle, E.J., Higgins, M.M., Rhee, S.G. (1997). Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defence contractors: theory and evidence. Critical perspectives on accounting, 8(6), 541–561
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116
Brown, B. (1998). Do Stock Market Investors Reward Companies with Reputations for Social Performance?. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(3), 271–280
Carrol, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505
Carter, C. R., R. J. Auskalnis and C. L. Ketchum: 1999, `Purchasing from Minority Business Enterprises: Key Success Factors', Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(1), 28–32
Carter, C.R., Kale, R., Grimm, C.M. (2000). Environmental Purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research, 36(1), 219–228
Chand, M. (2006). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance: Industry Type as a Boundary Condition. The Business Review 5(1), 240–245
Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49
Davidson III, W.N., Worrell, D.L. (1990). A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21(3), 7–19
De Bakker, F.G.A., Groenewegen, P., den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliomatric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317
Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(3), 22–29
Dowell, G. Hart, S., Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environment standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074
Flew, A. (1973). Must Morality Pay or What Socrates Should Have Said to Thrasymachus. In C. L. Carter (Ed.), Skepticism and Moral Principles (pp. 21–47). Evanston: New University Press.,
Frederick, W.C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–164
Freedman, M., Stagliano, A.J. (1991). Differences in social-cost disclosures: A market test of investor reactions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4(1), 68–83
Freeman, R. E.: 1994, `The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409–421
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times, 13 September 1970, pp. 122–126
Frooman, J. (1997). Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth. Business and Society, 36(3), 221–249
Garriga, E. and D. Melé: 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71
Gauthier, C. (2005). Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 199–206
Goll, I., Rasheed, A.A., (2004). The Moderating Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 41–54
Gössling, T. (2003). The price of morality. An analysis of personality, moral behaviour, and social rules in economic terms. Journal of business ethics, 45(1–2), 121–131
Gössling, T., Vocht, C. (2007). Social Role Conceptions and CSR Policy Success. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 363–372
Graves, S.B., Waddock, S.A. (1999). A look at the Financial-Social Performance Nexus when Quality of Management is Held Constant. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12(1), 87–99
Griffin, J.J. (2000). Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century. Business and Society, 39(4), 479–491
Griffin, J.J., Mahon, J.F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5–31
Guerard, J.B.Jr. (1997). Is there a cost to being socially responsible in investing? Journal of Investing, 6(2), 11–18
Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman: 1993, ‹Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysts Journal 49, 62–66
Hart, S.L., Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An emperical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37
He, Y., Tian, Z., Chen, Y. (2007). Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 151–169
Herremans, I.M., Akathaporn, P., McInnes, M. (1993). An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Economic Performance. Accounting, Organazations and Society, 18(7/8), 587–604
Holme, L., Watts, R. (1999). Making Good Business Sense., Geneva: The World Council for Sustainable Development
Hueting, R. (1990). The Brundtland report: A matter of conflicting goals. Ecological Economics, 2(2), 109–117
Judge, W.Q., Jr., Douglas, T.J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An emperical assesment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241–262
Klassen, R.D., McLaughlin, C.P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214
Kumar, R., W. B. Lamb and R. E. Wokutch: 2002, ‹The End of South African Sanctions, Institutional Ownership, and the Stock Price Performance of Boycotted Firms’, Business and Society 41(2), 133–165
Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 1–18
Margolis, J.D., Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305
Maron, I.Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 191–200
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609
Meznar, M.B., Nigh, D., and Kwok, C.C. (1994). Effect of announcements of withdrawal from South Africa on stockholder wealth. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1633–1648
Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Moore, G.M. (2001). Corporate Social Performance: An investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 299–315
Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441
Pava, M.L., Krausz, J., (1996). The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357
Peinado-Vara, E. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21(1), 61–69
Preston, L.E., O’Bannon, D.P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, 36(4), 419–429
Roman, R.M., Hayibor, S., Agle, R.B. (1999). The Relation Between Social and Financial Performance: Repainting a Portrait. Business and Society, 38(1), 109–125
Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M., Janney, J.J., Paul, K. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156
Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559
Schnietz, K.E., Epstein, M.J. (2005). Exploring Financial Value of a reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–345
Schubert, A., Lang, I. (2005). The Literature Aftermath Of The Brundtland Report ‹Our Common Future’. A Scientometric Study Based On Citations In Science And Social Science Journals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 1–8
Seifert, B., Morris, S.A., Bartkus, B.R. (2003). Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211
Seifert, B., Morris, S.A., Bartkus, B.R. (2004). Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161
Stanwick, P.A., Stanwick, S.D. (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Emperical Examination. Journal or Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204
Stormer, F. (2003). Making the shift: Moving from “Ethics Pays” to an Inter-System Model of Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 279–289
Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610
The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, The Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
Velde, van de, E., Vermeir, W., Corten, F., (2005). Finance and Accounting: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129–137
Vogel, D. (2005). The Market for Virtue The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC
Waddock, S.A. (2004). Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 1–15
Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319
Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718
Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, `Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance', International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229–267
Wu, C.F. (2002). The Relationship of Ethical Decision-Making to Business Ethics and Performance in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 163–176
Wu, M.: 2006, ‹Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of American Academy of Business 8(1), 163–171
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Laura P. Hartman and an anonymous reviewer for their stimulating comments on former versions of this article. Further thanks go to Martyna Janowicz and Luc van Baest for their comments throughout the research project and to the students of Masters Circle on Corporate Social Responsibility at Tilburg University 2006/2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Both authors contributed equally to this research. The authors' names appear in alphabetical order.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Beurden, P., Gössling, T. The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. J Bus Ethics 82, 407–424 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x