Abstract
The study extends and tests the issue contingent four-component model of ethical decision-making to include moral obligation. A web-based questionnaire was used to gauge the influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment and moral intent. Perceived importance of an ethical issue was found to be a predictor of moral judgment but not of moral intent as predicted. Moral obligation is suggested to be a process that occurs after a moral judgment is made and explained a significant portion of the variance in moral intent.
References
Audi, Robert (ed.): 1995, Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
Barnett T. 2001 Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, 1038–1057
Barron F. 1953 An Ego-Strength Scale Which Predicts Response to Psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology 17, 327–333
Beck L., Azjen I. 1991 Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality 25, 285–301
Bratton, V.: 2004, Affective Morality: The Role of Emotions in the Ethical Decision-Making Process. Published Dissertation at Florida State University
Chin W. W. 1998 Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly 22, vii–xvi
Chin W. W., Newsted P. R. 1999 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis With Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares. In: R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 307–341
Collins D. 2000 The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1.500 Articles Published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 26, 1–73
Davis M. A., Johnson N. B., Ohmer D. G. 1998 Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision-Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 373–389
Greenberg J., Eskew D. E. 1993 The Role of Role Playing in Organizational Research. Journal of Management 19, 221–241
Haines, R. and L. N. K. Leonard: 2007, ‹Situational Influences on Ethical Decision-Making in an IT Context’, Information and Management 44, 313–320
Hawkins, D. I., R. J. Best and K. A. Coney: 2001, Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy, 8e. (New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill)
Jones T. M. 1991 Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Acad Manag Rev 16, 366–395
Leonard L. N. K., Cronan T. P., Kreie J. 2004 What are Influences of Ethical Behavior Intentions – Planned Behavior, Reasoned Action, Perceived Importance, or Individual Characteristics? Information & Management 42, 143–158
Reidenbach R. E., Robin, D. P. 1990 Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653
Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P., Dawson L. 1991 An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19, 83–92
Rest J. R. 1979 Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Rest J. R. 1986 Moral Development. New York: Prager
Robin D. P., Reidenbach R. E., Forrest P. J. 1996 The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-making of Ad Managers. Journal of Business Research 35, 17–28
Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Kraft K. L. 1996 Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Research 36, 245–255
Street M. D., Douglas S. C., Geiger S. W., Martinko M. J. 2001 The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision-Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86, 256–277
Street M. D., Street V. L. 2006 The Effects of Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 64, 343–356
Valentine S., Silver L. 2001 Assessing the Dimensionality of the Singhapakdi, Vitell, and Kraft Measure of Moral Intensity. Psychological Reports 88, 291–294
Vitell, S. J. and S. D. Hunt: 1990, ‹The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Partial Test of the Model’, in J.␣N. Sheth (ed.), Research in Marketing, Vol. 10 (JAI␣Press, Greenwich, Conn.), pp. 237–265
Zaichkowsky J. L. 1985 Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12, 341–352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Russell Haines is an Assistant Professor of Information Technology at Old Dominion University. He received his B.S. and Master of Accountancy from Brigham Young University and his Ph.D. from The University of Houston. His research interests are in laboratory experiments, ethical decision- making, supply chain decision-making, and computer- mediated communication.
Marc D. Street is an Assistant Professor of Management at Salisbury University in Salisbury, Maryland. He received his B.A. from the University of Maryland, College Park (1983); his MBA from the University of Baltimore (1993); and his Ph.D. from the Florida State University (1998). His primary research interests are in the areas of decision-making and business ethics. Dr. Street’s research has been published in journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Business Ethics, and the Journal of World Business, among others.
Douglas Haines is Associate Professor of Marketing and Department Chair of the Department of Business in the College of Business and Economics at the University of Idaho. Before acquiring his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon, he worked for 15 years in various positions at the H.J. Heinz company including
Vice President of the Weight Watchers Foods Division of Heinz USA. His research interests include decision making, particularly in the marketing channel context, inter firm relationships, and the development of the market for biodiesel and other alternative energy sources.
Below is the link to the Supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haines, R., Street, M.D. & Haines, D. The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent. J Bus Ethics 81, 387–399 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9502-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9502-5