[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Fast 6D object pose refinement in depth images

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovering 6D object pose has gained much focus, because of its application in robotic intelligent manipulation to name but a few. This paper presents an approach for 6D object pose refinement from noisy depth images obtained from a consumer depth sensor. Compared to the state of the art aimed at the same goal, the proposed method has high precision, high robustness to partial occlusions and noise, low computation cost and fast convergence. This is achieved by using an iterative scheme that only employs Random Forest to minimize a cost function of object pose which can quantify the misalignment between the ground truth and the estimated one. The random forest in our algorithm is learnt only using synthetic depth images rendered from 3D model of the object. Several experimental results show the superior performance of the proposed approach compared to ICP-based algorithm and optimization-based algorithm, which are generally used for 6D pose refinement in depth images. Moreover, the iterative process of our algorithm can be much faster than the state of the art by only using one CPU core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Collet A, Martinez M, Srinivasa SS (2011) The MOPED framework: object recognition and pose estimation for manipulation. Int J Robot Res 30(10):1284–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Savarese S, and Fei-Fei L (2007) 3D generic object categorization, localization and pose estimation. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8

  3. Besl PJ, Mckay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M (2001) Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on 3D digital imaging and modeling, pp 145–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher R. (2001) Projective ICP and stabilizing architectural augmented reality overlays. In: International symposium on virtual and augmented architecture, pp. 69–80

  6. Zabulis X, Lourakis M, and Koutlemanis P. (2015) 3D object pose refinement in range images. In: International conference on computer vision systems, pp. 263–274

  7. Zabulis X, Lourakis M, Koutlemanis P (2016) Correspondence-free pose estimation for 3D objects from noisy depth data. Vis Comput:1–19

  8. Tan D J, Ilic S (2014) Multi-forest tracker: a chameleon in tracking. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1202–1209

  9. Tan D J, Tombari F, Ilic S, et al. (2015) A versatile learning-based 3D temporal tracker: scalable, robust, online. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 693–701

  10. Frome A, Huber D, Kolluri R, et al. (2004) Recognizing objects in range data using regional point descriptors. In: European conference on computer vision, pp. 224–237

  11. Zaharescu A, Boyer E, Varanasi K, et al. (2009) Surface feature detection and description with applications to mesh matching. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 373–380

  12. Rusu R B, Blodow N, Beetz M (2009) Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3212–3217

  13. Rusu R B, Bradski G, Thibaux R, et al. (2010) Fast 3d recognition and pose using the viewpoint feature histogram. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2155–2162

  14. Bronstein M M, Kokkinos I (2010) Scale-invariant heat kernel signatures for non-rigid shape recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition pp. 1704–1711

  15. Drost B, Ulrich M, Navab N, et al. (2010) Model globally, match locally: efficient and robust 3D object recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 998–1005

  16. Hinterstoisser S, Lepetit V, Rajkumar N, et al. (2016) Going further with point pair features. In: European conference on computer vision, pp. 834–848

  17. Darom T, Keller Y (2012) Scale-invariant features for 3-D mesh models. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(5):2758–2769

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi C, Christensen H I (2012) 3D pose estimation of daily objects using an RGB-D camera. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3342–3349

  19. Hinterstoisser S, Lepetit V, Ilic S, et al. (2012) Model based training, detection and pose estimation of texture-less 3d objects in heavily cluttered scenes. In: Asian conference on computer vision, pp. 548–562

  20. Hinterstoisser S, Cagniart C, Ilic S et al (2012) Gradient response maps for real-time detection of textureless objects. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(5):876–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rios-Cabrera R, Tuytelaars T. (2014) Discriminatively trained templates for 3D object detection: a real time scalable approach. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2048–2055

  22. Kehl W, Tombari F, Navab N, et al. (2016) Hashmod: a hashing method for scalable 3D object detection. In: British machine vision conference, pp. 1–12

  23. Cai H, Werner T, Matas J (2013) Fast detection of multiple Textureless 3-D objects. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Systems, pp. 103–112

  24. Hodan T, Zabulis X, Lourakis M, et al. (2015) Detection and fine 3D pose estimation of texture-less objects in RGB-D images. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4421–4428

  25. Zhang H, Cao Q (2017) Texture-less object detection and 6D pose estimation in RGB-D images. Robot Auton Syst 95:64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradski G, Bradski G, Xu B X, et al. (2010) Depth-encoded hough voting for joint object detection and shape recovery. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 658–671

  27. Brachmann E, Krull A, Michel F, et al. (2014) Learning 6D object pose estimation using 3D object coordinates. In: European conference on computer vision, pp. 536–551

  28. Krull A, Brachmann E, Michel F, et al. (2015) Learning analysis-by-synthesis for 6D pose estimation in RGB-D images. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 954–962

  29. Wohlhart P, Lepetit V (2015) Learning descriptors for object recognition and 3D pose estimation. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3109–3118

  30. Doumanoglou A, Kouskouridas R, Malassiotis S, et al. (2016) Recovering 6D object pose and predicting next-best-view in the crowd. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3583–3592

  31. Kehl W, Milletari F, Tombari F, et al. (2016) Deep learning of local RGB-D patches for 3D object detection and 6D pose estimation. In: European conference on computer vision, pp. 205–220

  32. Zhang H, Cao Q (2017) Combined holistic and local patches for recovering 6D object pose. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pp. 2219–2227

  33. Kehl W, Manhardt F, Tombari F, et al. (2017) SSD-6D: making RGB-based 3D detection and 6D pose estimation great again. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1530–1538

  34. Michel F, Kirillov A, Brachmann E, et al. (2016) Global hypothesis generation for 6D object pose estimation. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 115–124

  35. Porzi L, Penate-Sanchez A, Ricci E, et al. (2017) Depth-aware convolutional neural networks for accurate 3D pose estimation in RGB-D images. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5777–5783

  36. Jafari OH, Mustikovela SK, Pertsch K, et al. (2017) The Best of BothWorlds: Learning Geometry-based 6D Object Pose Estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.01924

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61673261).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Lab of Mechanical Systems and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Haoruo Zhang & Qixin Cao

Authors
  1. Haoruo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qixin Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haoruo Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Cao, Q. Fast 6D object pose refinement in depth images. Appl Intell 49, 2287–2300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1376-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1376-y

Keywords