[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposition for adjustable robust linear optimization subject to uncertainty polytope

  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present in this paper a general decomposition framework to solve exactly adjustable robust linear optimization problems subject to polytope uncertainty. Our approach is based on replacing the polytope by the set of its extreme points and generating the extreme points on the fly within row generation or column-and-row generation algorithms. The novelty of our approach lies in formulating the separation problem as a feasibility problem instead of a max–min problem as done in recent works. Applying the Farkas lemma, we can reformulate the separation problem as a bilinear program, which is then linearized to obtained a mixed-integer linear programming formulation. We compare the two algorithms on a robust telecommunications network design under demand uncertainty and budgeted uncertainty polytope. Our results show that the relative performance of the algorithms depend on whether the budget is integer or fractional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audet C, Hansen P, Jaumard B, Savard G (1997) Links between linear bilevel and mixed 0–1 programming problems. J Optim Theory Appl 93:273–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res 23(4):769–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2002) Robust optimization methodology and applications. Math Program 92:453–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Goryashko A, Guslitzer E, Nemirovski A (2004) Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Math Program 99(2):351–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Caramanis C (2010) Finite adaptability in multistage linear optimization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 55(12):2751–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Dunning I (2014) Multistage robust mixed integer optimization with adaptive partitions. Under review

  • Bertsimas D, Georghiou A (2015) Design of near optimal decision rules in multistage adaptive mixed-integer optimization. Oper Res 63(3):610–627

  • Bertsimas D, Goyal V (2012) On the power and limitations of affine policies in two-stage adaptive optimization. Math Program 134(2):491–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52:35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Goyal V, Sun XA (2011a) A geometric characterization of the power of finite adaptability in multistage stochastic and adaptive optimization. Math Oper Res 36(1):24–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Iancu D, Parrilo P (2011b) A hierarchy of near-optimal policies for multistage adaptive optimization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(12):2809–2824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Litvinov E, Sun XA, Zhao J, Zheng T (2013) Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(1):52–63

  • Bienstock D, Özbay N (2008) Computing robust basestock levels. Discret Optim 5(2):389–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billionnet A, Costa M-C, Poirion P-L (2014) 2-stage robust MILP with continuous recourse variables. Discrete Appl Math 170:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zhang Y (2009) Uncertain linear programs: extended affinely adjustable robust counterparts. Oper Res 57(6):1469–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Sim M, Sun P, Zhang J (2008) A linear decision-based approximation approach to stochastic programming. Oper Res 56(2):344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan ED, Moré JJ (2002) Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math Program 91(2):201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H (1998) Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J Optim 9(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrel V, Lacroix M, Murat C, Remli N (2014) Robust location transportation problems under uncertain demands. Discrete Appl Math 164(1):100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh J, Sim M (2010) Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Oper Res 58(4-Part-1):902–917

  • Iancu D, Sharma M, Sviridenko M (2013) Supermodularity and affine policies in dynamic robust optimization. Oper Res 61(4):941–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM-ILOG (2015) IBM-ILOG Cplex

  • Kouvelis P, Yu G (1997) Robust discrete optimization and its application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui T (1996) Np-hardness of linear multiplicative programming and related problems. J Global Optim 9(2):113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattia S (2013) The robust network loading problem with dynamic routing. Comp Opt Appl 54(3):619–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattia S (2014) Private communication

  • Orlowski S, Pióro M, Tomaszewski A, Wessäly R (2010) SNDlib 1.0-survivable network design library. Networks 55(3):276–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Poss M (2014) A comparison of routing sets for robust network design. Optim Let 8(5):1619–1635

  • Poss M, Raack C (2013) Affine recourse for the robust network design problem: between static and dynamic routing. Networks 61(2):180–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postek K, Den Hertog D (2014) Multi-stage adjustable robust mixed-integer optimization via iterative splitting of the uncertainty set. CentER Discussion Paper Series

  • Ryoo HS, Sahinidis NV (2003) Global optimization of multiplicative programs. J Global Optim 26(4):387–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng B, Zhao L (2013) Solving two-stage robust optimization problems by a constraint-and-column generation method. Oper Res Let 41(5):457461

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sara Mattia for fruitful discussions on the topic of this paper. We also thank the editors and the referees for useful remarks and suggestions that helped in improving the presentation and the content of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Poss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayoub, J., Poss, M. Decomposition for adjustable robust linear optimization subject to uncertainty polytope. Comput Manag Sci 13, 219–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-016-0249-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-016-0249-2

Keywords

Navigation