[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The diagnostic value of monoclonal gastric cancer 7 antigen: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the clinical characteristic and the diagnostic role of MG7-Ag in detecting gastric cancer (GC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant manuscripts aiming at the application of serum MG7-Ag level in GC diagnosis were searched in PubMed, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wan Fang Data independently, which were published between January 1, 1980 and February 28, 2013. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR+), negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR−), diagnostic odds ratio, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were used to evaluate the value of serum MG7-Ag in diagnosis of GC by using the Meta-DiSc and STATA 11.0 statistical software. 410 manuscripts were retrieved, and 7 manuscripts of high quality including 652 patients were of high quality in this meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DLR+, DLR−, and AUC were 0.73 (95 % CI 0.63–0.82), 0.91 (95 % CI 0.84–0.94), 8.59 (95 % CI 5.62–13.11), 0.29 (95 % CI 0.21–0.42), and 0.92 (95 % CI 0.89–0.94), respectively. MG7-Ag is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of GC. However, more studies are needed to confirm the standard criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miki K (2006) Gastric cancer screening using the serum pepsinogen test method. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 9:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S et al (2013) Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009. Chin J Cancer Res 25:10

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi Y, Hu W, Yin F et al (2004) Regulation of drug sensitivity of gastric cancer cells by human calcyclin-binding protein (CacyBP). Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 7:160–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu WK, Lee CW, Cho CH et al (2010) MicroRNA dysregulation in gastric cancer: a new player enters the game. Oncogene 29:5761–5771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG et al (2006) A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2257–2261

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JH, Son SY, Lee CM, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2013) Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. Surgical endoscopy

  7. Liu D, Zhang L, Shen Z, et al. (2013) Increased levels of SLP-2 correlate with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association

  8. Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Yokoyama S et al (1998) Postoperative chemotherapy may improve prognosis in unresectable gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 26:269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H et al (2003) Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, Fluorouracil, and Cytosine arabinoside followed by oral Fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206–1. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21:2282–2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong SH, Bae K, Ha CY et al (2013) Effectiveness of endoscopic clipping and computed tomography gastroscopy for the preoperative localization of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 84:80–87

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tajiri H, Doi T, Endo H et al (2002) Routine endoscopy using a magnifying endoscope for gastric cancer diagnosis. Endoscopy 34:772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J et al (2003) The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 6:142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin B, Wang X, Jin Y et al (2009) Detection of serum gastric cancer-associated MG7-Ag from gastric cancer patients using a sensitive and convenient ELISA method. Cancer Invest 27:227–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren J, Chen Z, Juan SJ, Yong XY, Pan BR, Fan DM (2000) Detection of circulating gastric carcinoma-associated antigen MG7-Ag in human sera using an established single determinant immuno-polymerase chain reaction technique. Cancer 88:280–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang X, Tie J, Xie Y, Li Q, Zhao Q, Fan D (2010) Detection of gastric carcinoma-associated antigen MG7-Ag in human sera using surface plasmon resonance sensor. Cancer epidemiol 34:648–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walter S (2002) Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med 21:1237–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:31

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J (1999) Serum MG7-Ag and TAG-72 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. ShenZhen Medical Journal 12

  20. Li XH, Song BH, Li CL, Hu JL (1996) The diagnostic significance of serum tumor markers MG7-Ag in the gastric cancer. Journal Of The Fourth Military medical university: 75–7

  21. Wang YL, Yao XH, Lou GC. Clinical significance of determination of five tumor markers in the peripheral blood of patients with gastric cancer. Journal Of HangZhou Normal University 2006:242-4 + 7

  22. Jin GY, Meng C, Jiang JT, Deng H. The diagnostic value of serum MG7-Ag, CA19-9 and IAP joint detection of gastric cancer. Journal of SuZhou Medical University 2001:72-3

  23. Wang MS. Combined detection of serum OPN, MG7-Ag, TPS diagnostic value of gastric cancer. Shandong Medical Journal 2011;51

  24. Zhang L, Ren J, Pan K et al (2010) Detection of gastric carcinoma-associated MG7-Ag by serum immuno-PCR assay in a high-risk Chinese population, with implication for screening. Int J 1) 126:469–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DerSimonian R, Kacker R (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemporary clinical trials 28:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Group UCSW (2013) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2009 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute

  27. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians

  28. Maruyama K, Okabayashi K, Kinoshita T (1987) Progress in gastric cancer surgery in Japan and its limits of radicality. World J Surg 11:418–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pyrhönen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M (1995) Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 71:587

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pectasides D, Mylonakis A, Kostopoulou M et al (1997) CEA, CA 19–9, and CA-50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 20:348–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wobbes T, Thomas C, Segers M, Nagengast F (2006) Evaluation of seven tumor markers (CA 50, CA 19–9, CA 19–9 TruQuant, CA 72–4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer 69:2036–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. AS R, Korsten M (2007) Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing. Advances in medical sciences 52

  34. Jones CM, Athanasiou T (2005) Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg 79:16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J (2004) Rectal Cancer: local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging—A Meta-Analysis1. Radiology 232:773–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Manran Liu for the scientific design.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Laboratory Medicine, Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medical Diagnostics Designated by Chinese Ministry of Education, Chong Qing Medical University, #1 Yi-Xue-Yuan Rd., Yu-zhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Zongyue Zeng, Sheng Fu, Ping Hu, Liuyang Zhao, Hailong Zhang, Xi Tang & Zhaofang Zeng

  2. Department of Pathogenic Biology, Chong Qing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Xiaorong Yang

Authors
  1. Zongyue Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheng Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ping Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liuyang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hailong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xi Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaorong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhaofang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaofang Zeng.

Additional information

Zongyue Zeng and Sheng Fu contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, Z., Fu, S., Hu, P. et al. The diagnostic value of monoclonal gastric cancer 7 antigen: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med 14, 337–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-013-0246-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-013-0246-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation