Abstract
Climate change will alter forest ecosystems and their provisioning of services. Forests in the Carpathian Mountains store high amounts of carbon and provide livelihoods to local people; however, no study has yet assessed their future long-term dynamics under climate change. Therefore, we selected a representative area of 1340 km2 to investigate the effects of changing climate and disturbance regimes on (i) the spatial dynamics of the dominant tree species and forest types and (ii) the trajectories of the associated aboveground live carbon (ALC). We simulated 500 years of change under four Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios, incorporating wind and bark beetle disturbances using the LANDIS-II forest change model. Our simulations revealed a lagged adaptation of the forest landscape to climate change. While Picea abies dominance declined in all scenarios, Carpinus betulus expanded at low elevations and Acer pseudoplatanus at mid-elevations. We also found a slow but continuous expansion of Quercus petraea and Q. robur at low elevations and of Fagus sylvatica at mid and high elevations. This change in species composition was accompanied by a significant reduction of ALC: on average over the simulation period, unmitigated climate change reduced ALC between − 2.1% (RCP2.6) and − 14.0% (RCP8.5), while disturbances caused an additional reduction of ALC between − 4.5% (RCP2.6) and − 6.6% (RCP8.5). Therefore, foresighted management strategies are needed to facilitate vegetation adaptation to climate change, with the goal of stabilizing carbon storage and maintaining economic value of future Carpathian forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alder JR, Hostetler SW (2013) CMIP5 global climate change viewer. US Geological Survey. http://regclim.coas.oregonstate.edu/gccv/index.html. Accessed 8 July 2016
Altenkirch W, Majunke C, Ohnesorge B (2002) Waldschutz auf ökologischer Grundlage. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Bastian O, Steinhardt U (2002) Development and perspectives of landscape ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1237-8
Boden S, Kahle H-P, von Wilpert K, Spiecker H (2014) Resilience of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) growth to changing climatic conditions in Southwest Germany. Forest Ecol Manag 315:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.015
Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320(5882):1444–1449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155121
Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNnulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Hanson PJ, Irland LC, Lugo AE, Peterson CJ, Simberloff D, Swanson FJ, Stocks BJ, Wotton MB (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances: climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. Bioscience 51(9):723–734. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2
Didion M, Kupferschmid AD, Lexer MJ, Rammer W, Seidl R, Bugmann H (2009) Potentials and limitations of using large-scale forest inventory data for evaluating forest succession models. Ecol Model 220(2):133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.09.021
Erb K-H (2004) Land use related changes in aboveground carbon stocks of Austria’s terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystems 7(5):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0234-4
Ge Z-M, Kellomäki S, Peltola H, Zhou X, Väisänen H, Strandman H (2013) Impacts of climate change on primary production and carbon sequestration of boreal Norway spruce forests: Finland as a model. Clim Chang 118(2):259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0607-1
Gratzer G, Keeton WS (2017) Mountain forests and sustainable development: the potential for achieving the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda. Mt Res Dev 37(3):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00093.1
Griffiths P, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Radeloff VC, Abrudan IV, Lieskovsky J, Munteanu C, Ostapowicz K, Hostert P (2014) Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sens Environ 151:72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022
Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas M-J, Nabuurs G-J, Zimmermann NE (2013) Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nature Clim Change 3(3):203–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1687
Hickler T, Vohland K, Feehan J, Miller PA, Smith B, Costa L, Giesecke T, Fronzek S, Carter TR, Cramer W, Kühn I, Sykes MT (2012) Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(1):50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
Hlásny T, Barcza Z, Barka I, Merganičová K, Sedmák R, Kern A, Pajtík J, Balázs B, Fabrika M, Churkina G (2014) Future carbon cycle in mountain spruce forests of Central Europe: modelling framework and ecological inferences. Forest Ecol Manag 328:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.038
Hlásny T, Barka I, Kulla L, Bucha T, Sedmák R, Trombik J (2017) Sustainable forest management in a mountain region in the Central Western Carpathians, northeastern Slovakia: the role of climate change. Reg Environ Chang 17(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0894-y
Hlásny T, Trombik J, Dobor L, Barcza Z, Barka I (2016) Future climate of the Carpathians: climate change hot-spots and implications for ecosystems. Reg Environ Chang 16(5):1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0890-2
Hobi ML, Commarmot B, Bugmann H (2015) Pattern and process in the largest primeval beech forest of Europe (Ukrainian Carpathians). J Veg Sci 26(2):323–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12234
Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed 12 September 2009
Kautz M, Dworschak K, Gruppe A, Schopf R (2011) Quantifying spatio-temporal dispersion of bark beetle infestations in epidemic and non-epidemic conditions. Forest Ecol Manag 262(4):598–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.023
Kautz M, Meddens AJH, Hall RJ, Arneth A (2017) Biotic disturbances in Northern Hemisphere forests—a synthesis of recent data, uncertainties and implications for forest monitoring and modelling. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26(5):533–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12558
Keeling HC, Phillips OL (2007) The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16(5):618–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00314.x
Keeton WS, Franklin JF, Mote PW (2007) Climate variability, climate change, and western wildfire with implications for the suburban-wildland interface. In: Troy A, Kennedy R (eds) Living on the edge: economic, institutional and management perspectives on wildfire hazard in the urban interface. Elsevier, New York, pp 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3740(06)06013-5
Keeton WS, Chernyavskyy M, Gratzer G, Main-Knorn M, Shpylchak M, Bihun Y (2010) Structural characteristics and aboveground biomass of old-growth spruce–fir stands in the eastern Carpathian mountains, Ukraine. Plant Biosyst 144(1):148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500903560512
Keeton WS, Angelstam PK, Bihun Y, Chernyavdkyy M, Crow SM, Deyneka A, Elbakidze M, Farley J, Kovalyshyn V, Kruhlov I, Mahura B, Myklush S, Nunery JS, Soloviy I, Zahvoyska L (2013) Sustainable forest management alternatives for the Carpathian Mountains with a focus on Ukraine. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyżga B (eds) The Carpathians: integrating nature and society towards sustainability. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_24
Kerr G, Stokes V, Peace A, Jinks R (2015) Effects of provenance on the survival, growth and stem form of European silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) in Britain. Eur J For Res 134(2):349–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0856-9
Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecol Manag 95(3):209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1
Liu Z, Wimberly MC (2016) Direct and indirect effects of climate change on projected future fire regimes in the western United States. Sci Total Environ 542(Pt A):65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.093
Loudermilk EL, Scheller RM, Weisberg PJ, Yang J, Dilts TE, Karam SL, Skinner C (2013) Carbon dynamics in the future forest: the importance of long-term successional legacy and climate–fire interactions. Glob Change Biol 19:3502–3515. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12310
Maroschek M, Rammer W, Lexer MJ (2015) Using a novel assessment framework to evaluate protective functions and timber production in Austrian mountain forests under climate change. Reg Environ Chang 15(8):1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0691-z
Mikoláš M, Tejkal M, Kuemmerle T, Griffiths P, Svoboda M, Hlásny T, Leitão PJ, Morrissey RC (2017) Forest management impacts on capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) habitat distribution and connectivity in the Carpathians. Landsc Ecol 32(1):163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0433-3
Mezei P, Grodzki W, Blaženec M, Jakuš R (2014) Factors influencing the wind–bark beetles’ disturbance system in the course of an Ips typographus outbreak in the Tatra Mountains. Forest Ecol Manag 312:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.020
Moss R, Edmonds J, Hibbard K, Manning M, Rose S, Vuuren van D, Carter T, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl G, Mitchell J, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith S, Stouffer R, Thomson A, Weyant J, Wilbanks T (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823
Meier ES, Lischke H, Schmatz DR, Zimmermann NE (2012) Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(2):164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00669.x
Mladenoff DJ, He HS (1999) Design, behavior and applications of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. In: Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–162
Mráz P, Ronikier M (2016) Biogeography of the Carpathians: evolutionary and spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol J Linn Soc 119(3):528–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12918
Naudts K, Chen Y, MJ MG, Ryder J, Valade A, Otto J, Luyssaert S (2016) Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science 351(6273):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7270
Netherer S, Matthews B, Katzensteiner K, Blackwell E, Henschke P, Hietz P, Pennerstorfer J, Rosner S, Kikuta S, Schume H, Schopf A (2015) Do water-limiting conditions predispose Norway spruce to bark beetle attack? New Phytol 205(3):1128–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13166
Neumann M, Moreno A, Mues V, Härkönen S, Mura M, Bouriaud O, Lang M, Achten WMJ, Thivolle-Cazat A, Bronisz K, Merganič J, Decuyper M, Alberdi I, Astrup R, Mohren F, Hasenauer H (2016) Comparison of carbon estimation methods for European forests. Forest Ecol Manag 361:397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.016
Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006) Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr 76(4):521–547. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0.CO;2
Pasztor F, Matulla C, Rammer W, Lexer MJ (2014) Drivers of the bark beetle disturbance regime in Alpine forests in Austria. Forest Ecol Manag 318:349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.044
Peichl M, Arain MA (2006) Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forests. Agric For Meteorol 140(1-4):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.004
Petritan AM, Nuske RS, Petritan IC, Tudose NC (2013) Gap disturbance patterns in an old-growth sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.)–European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest remnant in the Carpathian Mountains, Romania. Forest Ecol Manag 308:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.045
Prots B, Kagalo O (eds) (2012) Kataloh typiv oselyshch Ukrainskykh Karpat ta Zakarpatskoyi nyzovyny. Merkator, Lviv (In Ukrainian)
R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://R-project.org. Accessed 7 November 2017
Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2004) A forest growth and biomass module for a landscape simulation model, LANDIS: design, validation, and application. Ecol Model 180(1):211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.022
Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2008) Simulated effects of climate change, fragmentation, and inter-specific competition on tree species migration in northern Wisconsin, USA. Clim Res 36:191–202. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00745
Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol Model 201(3-4):409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.009
Schütt P, Schuck J, Stimm B (2007) Lexikon der Baum- und Straucharten. Nikol, Hamburg
Schwaab J, Bavay M, Davin E, Hagedorn F, Hüsler F, Lehning M, Schneebeli M, Thürig E, Bebi P (2015) Carbon storage versus albedo change: radiative forcing of forest expansion in temperate mountainous regions of Switzerland. Biogeosciences 12(2):467–487. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-467-2015
Shvidenko A, Buksha I, Krakovska S, Lakyda P (2017) Vulnerability of Ukrainian forests to climate change. Sustainability 9(7):1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071152
Seidl R, Schelhaas M-J, Lexer MJ (2011) Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Glob Change Biology 17(9):2842–2852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02452.x
Seidl R, Schelhaas M-J, Rammer W, Verkerk PJ (2014) Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nat Clim Chang 4(9):806–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2318
Seidl R, Rammer W (2017) Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes. Landsc Ecol 32(7):1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0396-4
Sturtevant BR, Gustafson EJ, Li W, He HS (2004) Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm. Ecol Model 180(1):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.021
Svoboda M, Janda P, Bače R, Fraver S, Nagel TA, Rejzek J, Mikoláš M, Douda J, Boublík K, Šamonil P, Čada V, Trotsiuk V, Teodosiu M, Bouriaud O, Biriş AI, Sýkora O, Uzel P, Zelenka J, Sedlák V, Lehejček J (2014) Landscape-level variability in historical disturbance in primary Picea abies mountain forests of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania. J Veg Sci 25(2):386–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12109
Thom D, Seidl R, Steyrer G, Krehan H, Formayer H (2013) Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in Central European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecol Manag 307:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.017
Thom D, Rammer W, Seidl R (2017a) Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions. Glob Change Biol 23(1):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13506
Thom D, Rammer W, Seidl R (2017b) The impact of future forest dynamics on climate: interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes. Ecol Monogr 87(4):665–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1272
Trotsiuk V, Hobi ML, Commarmot B (2012) Age structure and disturbance dynamics of the relic virgin beech forest Uholka (Ukrainian Carpathians). Forest Ecol Manag 265:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.042
Ukrderzhlisproekt (2014) Ukrainske derzhavne proektne lisovporiadne vyrobnyche obyednannia VO “Ukrderzhlisproekt” (In Ukrainian). http://webulr.lisproekt.gov.ua. Accessed 14 June 2014
Vittoz P, Engler R (2007) Seed dispersal distances: a typology based on dispersal modes and plant traits. Bot Helv 117(2):109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-007-0797-8
Acknowledgments
This paper is part of a larger project initiated by Garry Sotnik to introduce LANDIS-II to the Ukrainian Carpathians for the study of human adaptation to climate change. We are grateful to Garry Sotnik for organizing the team and raising funding for the Ukrainian team members. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful remarks, which led to the significant improvement of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Wolfgang Cramer.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 1371 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kruhlov, I., Thom, D., Chaskovskyy, O. et al. Future forest landscapes of the Carpathians: vegetation and carbon dynamics under climate change. Reg Environ Change 18, 1555–1567 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1296-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1296-8