[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

New sports facilities do not drive migration between US cities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Migrants play a vital role in economic development, and city amenities play an important role in attracting migrants. This paper explores the role of one such amenity—major league sports stadiums—plays in intra-U.S. migration decisions. We use Internal Revenue Service tax-filing data and stadium construction data for major sports stadiums between 1991 and 2014 to create an unbalanced panel of migration flows between 439,386 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) pairs. Analyzing migration patterns over various time windows following the construction of new sports facilities, we find little evidence that new sports facility construction or the aggregate expenditures on new sports stadiums draw migrants between U.S. MSAs. We find weak evidence that suggests stadium construction acts as a deterrent to migration. Our primary conclusion is that spending on stadiums is not only ineffective in attracting migrants, but the opportunity cost associated with stadium construction likely reduces the ability of MSAs to attract migrants through the provision of other amenities or public goods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The literature on new sports facilities and residential property markets is large. Keeler et al. (2021) contain a recent summary. Propheter (2019) develops evidence of impacts on commercial property values.

  2. See Santos-Silva and Tenreyro (2011), Nejad and Young (2016), Arif (2020), and Arif et al. (2020) for a thorough discussion of PPML in the context of migration gravity models.

References

  • Albouy D, Cho H, Shappo M (2021) Immigration and the pursuit of amenities. J Reg Sci 61(1):5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif I (2020) The determinants of international migration: Unbundling the role of political, economic, and social institutions. World Econ 43:1699–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif I (2022) Educational attainment, corruption, and migration: an empirical analysis from a gravity model. Econ Model 110:105802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif I, Hoffer A, Stansel D, Lacombe D (2020) Economic freedom and migration: a metro area-level analysis. South Econ J 87(1):170–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backman M, Nilsson P (2018) The role of cultural heritage in attracting skilled individuals. J Cult Econ 42(1):111–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudasse T, Bazillier R (2014) Gender inequality and emigration: push factor or selection process? Int Econ 139:19–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broxterman D, Coulson E, Ihlanfeldt K, Letdin M, Zabel J (2019) Endogenous amenities and cities. J Reg Sci 59(3):365–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beine M, Parsons C (2015) Climatic factors as determinants of international migration. Scand J Econ 117(2):723–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belot M, Ederveen S (2012) Cultural barriers in migration between OECD countries. J Popul Econ 25(3):1077–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belot MV, Hatton TJ (2012) Immigrant selection in the OECD. Scand J Econ 114(4):1105–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoli S, Fernández-Huertas Moraga J (2013) Multilateral resistance to migration. J Dev Econ 102:79–100

  • Borjas GJ (1995) The economic benefits from immigration. J Econ Perspect 9(2):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlino GA, Saiz A (2019) Beautiful city: leisure amenities and urban growth. J Reg Sci 59(3):369–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates D, Humphreys BR (2005) Novelty effects of new facilities on attendance at professional sporting events. Contemp Econ Policy 23(3):436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates D, Humphreys BR (2008) Do economists reach a conclusion on subsidies for sports franchises, stadiums, and mega-events. Econ J Watch 5(3):294–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens MA (2014) Does development reduce migration. In: International handbook on migration and economic development, pp 152–185

  • Dao TH, Docquier F, Parsons C, Peri G (2018) Migration and development: dissecting the anatomy of the mobility transition. J Dev Econ 132:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier F, Peri G, Ruyssen I (2014) The cross-country determinants of potential and actual migration. Int Migr Rev 48:S37–S99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier F, Tansel A, Turati R (2017) Do emigrants self-select along cultural traits? Evidence from the MENA countries. SSRN (June)

  • Dreher A, Krieger T, Meierrieks D (2011) Hit and (they will) run: the impact of terrorism on migration. Econ Lett 113(1):42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drukker AJ, Gayer T, Gold AK (2020) Tax-exempt municipal bonds and the financing of professional sports stadiums. Natl Tax J 73(1):157–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falco C, Rotondi V (2016) The less extreme, the more you leave: radical Islam and willingness to migrate. World Dev 88:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM (2001) City growth and the 2000 census: which places grew, and why. Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Herrera E (2013) Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empir Econ 44(3):1087–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock D, Jacobi T, Sag M (2013) League structure & stadium rent seeking-the role of antitrust revisited. Fla l Rev 65:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiwatari M (2016) Social networks and migration decisions: the influence of peer effects in rural households in Central Asia. J Comp Econ 44(4):1115–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson I (2002) Sabotage versus public choice: sports as a case study for interest group theory. J Econ Issues 36(4):1079–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BR (2019) Should the construction of new professional sports facilities be subsidized. J Policy Anal Manage 38(1):264–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BR, Zhou Li (2015) Sports facilities, agglomeration, and public subsidies. Reg Sci Urban Econ 54:60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivlevs A, King RM (2017) Does emigration reduce corruption? Public Choice 171(34):389–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalich VZ (1998) A public choice perspective on the subsidization of private industry: a case study of three cities and three stadiums. J Urban Aff 20(2):199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler ZT, Stephens HM, Humphreys BR (2021) The amenity value of sports facilities: evidence from the Staples Center in Los Angeles. J Sports Econ (in press)

  • Krieger T, Renner L, Ruhose J (2018) Long-term relatedness between countries and international migrant selection. J Int Econ 113:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayda AM (2010) International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. J Popul Econ 23(4):1249–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Rapoport H (2010) Self-selection patterns in Mexico-U.S. migration: the role of migration networks. Rev Econ Stat 92(4):811–821

  • Mitchell MD (2019) Uncontestable favoritism. Public Choice 181(1):167–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejad M, Young AT (2016) Want freedom, will travel: emigrant self-selection according to institutional quality. Eur J Polit Econ 45:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlowski J, Wicker P (2019) Monetary valuation of non-market goods and services: a review of conceptual approaches and empirical applications in sports. Eur Sport Manag Q 19(4):456–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega F, Peri G (2013) The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration. Migration Studies 1(1):47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papapanagos H, Sanfey P (2001) Intention to emigrate in transition countries: the case of Albania. J Popul Econ 14(3):491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik JB, Estefania LP, Benjamin P (2021) Simpler evidence on immigration and institutions: an assessment. Econ J Watch 18(1) (2021)

  • Poprawe M (2015) On the relationship between corruption and migration: empirical evidence from a gravity model of migration. Public Choice 163(3–4):337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutvaara P, Steinhardt MF (2018) Bitterness in life and attitudes towards immigration. Eur J Polit Econ

  • Propheter G (2019) Estimating the effect of sports facilities on local area commercial rents: evidence from Brooklyn’s Barclays Center. J Sports Econ 20(1):91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport J (2007) Moving to nice weather. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(3):375–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Silva J, Tenreyro S (2011) Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson-PML estimator. Econ Lett 112(2):220–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansel D (2019) Economic freedom in U.S. metropolitan areas. J Reg Anal Policy 49(1):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • White R (2013) Is cultural distance a determinant of international migration flows? evidence from Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands. Econ Bull 33(3):2156–2168

    Google Scholar 

  • White R, Buehler D (2018) A closer look at the determinants of international migration: decomposing cultural distance. Appl Econ 50(33):3575–3595

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imran Arif.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: New stadium and arena construction

City

Venue

Sport

Opening Year

Cost (Nominal $)

Atlanta, GA

Turner Field

Baseball

1997

$209 million

Atlanta, GA

State Farm Arena

Basketball/Hockey

1999

$213.5 million

Baltimore, MD

Camden Yards

Baseball

1992

$106.5 million

Baltimore, MD

M&T Bank Stadium

Football

1998

$223 million

Boston, MA

TD Garden

Basketball/Hockey

1995

$160 million

Boston, MA

Gillette Stadium

Football

2002

$325 million

Buffalo, NY

KeyBank Center

Hockey

1996

$127.5 million

Charlotte, NC

Bank of America Stadium

Football

1996

$248 million

Charlotte, NC

Spectrum Center

Basketball

2005

$260 million

Chicago, IL

Guaranteed Rate Field

Baseball

1991

$150 million

Chicago, IL

United Center

Basketball/Hockey

1994

$175 million

Cincinnati, OH

Paul Brown Stadium

Football

2000

$445 million

Cincinnati, OH

Great American Ballpark

Baseball

2003

$290 million

Cleveland, OH

Progressive Field

Baseball

1994

$175 million

Cleveland, OH

Quicken Loans Arena

Basketball

1994

$100 million

Cleveland, OH

FirstEnergy Stadium

Football

1999

$283 million

Columbus, OH

Nationwide Arena

Hockey

2000

$175 million

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

Globe Life Park (Defunct)

Baseball

1994

$191 million

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

American Airlines Arena

Basketball/Hockey

2001

$420 million

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

AT&T Stadium

Football

2009

$1,300 million

Denver, CO

Coors Field

Baseball

1995

$300 million

Denver, CO

Pepsi Center

Basketball/Hockey

1999

$187 million

Denver, CO

Empower Field at Mile High

Football

2001

$400.9 million

Detroit, MI

Comerica Park

Baseball

2000

$300 million

Detroit, MI

Ford Field

Football

2002

$500 million

Houston, TX

Minute Maid Park

Baseball

2000

$250 million

Houston, TX

NRG Stadium

Football

2002

$352 million

Houston, TX

Toyota Center

Basketball

2003

$235 million

Indianapolis, IN

Bankers Life Fieldhouse

Basketball

1999

$183 million

Indianapolis, IN

Lucas Oil Stadium

Football

2008

$720 million

Jacksonville, FL

TIAA Bank Field

Football

1995

$121 million

Los Angeles-Anaheim, CA

Honda Center

Hockey

1993

$123 million

Los Angeles-Anaheim, CA

Staples Center

Basketball/Hockey

1999

$375 million

Louisville, KY

KFC YUM! Center

College Basketball (Downtown, professional scale)

2010

$238 million

Memphis, TN

The Memphis Pyramid

Basketball

1991

$65 million

Memphis, TN

Fedex Forum

Basketball

2004

$250 million

Miami, FL

American Airlines Arena

Basketball

2000

$213 million

Miami, FL

loanDepot Park

Baseball

2012

$634 million

Milwaukee, WI

American Family Field

Baseball

2001

$400 million

Minneapolis, MN

Target Center

Basketball/Hockey

1990

$104 million

Minneapolis, MN

Target Field

Baseball

2010

$555 million

Nashville, TN

Nissan Stadium

Football

1996

$264 million

Nashville, TN

Bridgestone Arena

Hockey

1999

$144 million

New Orleans, LA

Smoothie King Center

Basketball/Hockey

2001

$114 million

New York-Newark, NY-NJ

Prudential Center

Hockey

2007

$375 million

New York, NY

Citi Field

Baseball

2009

$830.6 million

New York, NY

Yankee Stadium

Baseball

2009

$1,500 million

New York, NY

Metlife Stadium

Football

2010

$1,600 million

New York, NY

Barclays Center

Basketball

2012

$1,000 million

Oklahoma City, OK

Chesapeake Energy Arena

Basketball

2002

$89.2 million

Omaha, NE

CHI Health Center Omaha

College Basketball (Downtown, professional scale)

2003

$291 million

Orlando, FL

Amway Center

Basketball

2010

$480 million

Philadelphia, PA

Wells Fargo Center

Basketball

1996

$210 million

Philadelphia, PA

Lincoln Financial Field

Football

2003

$512 million

Philadelphia, PA

Citizens Bank Park

Baseball

2004

$458 million

Phoenix, AZ

Talking Stick Resort Arena

Basketball/Hockey

1992

$96 million

Phoenix, AZ

Chase Field

Baseball

1998

$354 million

Phoenix, AZ

State Farm Stadium

Football

2006

$455 million

Pittsburgh, PA

PNC Park

Baseball

2001

$273.5 million

Pittsburgh, PA

Heinz Field

Football

2001

$263 million

Pittsburgh, PA

PPG Paints Arena

Hockey

2004

$319.7 million

Portland, OR

Moda Center

Basketball

1995

$262 million

Raleigh, NC

PNC Arena

Hockey

1999

$158 million

St. Louis, MO

Enterprise Center

Hockey

1994

$170 million

St. Louis, MO

The Dome at America’s Center

Football

1995

$280 million

St. Louis, MO

Busch Stadium

Baseball

2006

$365 million

Salt Lake City, UT

Vivint Arena

Basketball

1991

$94 million

San Antonio, TX

Alamodome

Basketball/Football

1993

$186 million

San Antonio, TX

AT&T Center

Basketball

2002

$186 million

San Diego, CA

Petco Park

Baseball

2004

$453 million

San Francisco, CA

Oracle Park

Baseball

2000

$357 million

San Francisco, CA

Levi’s Stadium

Football

2014

$1,300 million

San Jose, CA

SAP Center

Hockey

1993

$162.5 million

Seattle, WA

T-Mobile Park

Baseball

1999

$517 million

Seattle, WA

Lumen Field

Football

2002

$430 million

Tampa, FL

Amalie Arena

Hockey

1996

$139 million

Tampa, FL

Raymond James Stadium

Football

1998

$168.5 million

Washington D.C

Capital One Arena

Basketball/Hockey

1997

$175 million

Washington D.C

Fedex Field

Football

1997

$250.5 million

Washington D.C

Nationals Park

Baseball

2008

$693 million

Appendix B: Alternative model specifications and robustness analysis

In Tables B1 to B3, we include measures for the share of 18 + population w/ bachelors degree and the unemployment rate at both the origin and destination MSA. Table B1 shows the results for 4-Year Migration Following New Stadium Construction. Table B2 shows the results for 2-Year Migration Following New Stadium Construction. And Table B3 shows the results for 4-Year Migration and Stadium Construction Costs.

Table B1 OLS results for 4-year migration following new stadium construction with additional control variables
Table B2 OLS results for 2-year migration following new stadium construction with additional control variables
Table B3 OLS results for 4-year migration and stadium construction costs with additional control variables

In Table B4, we include a measure of institutions in our estimation model. We quantify institutional quality using Stansel’s (2019) Economic Freedom Index (EFI) for U.S. MSAs. The MSA EFI is published for 5-year periods and the aggregate index contains three sub-indices: Government Spending, Taxation, and Labor Market Freedoms. We measure differences in EFI across MSAs using gaps, defined by ratios of indexes. For example, the economic freedom gap is defined as,

$${\text{Economic}}\,{\text{freedom}}\,{\text{gap}}_{ij,t} = \left( {\frac{{{\text{Economic}}\,{\text{freedom}}_{j,t} }}{{{\text{Economic}}\,{\text{freedom}}_{i,t} }}} \right)$$

for \({\text{MSA}}_{i}\) to \({\text{MSA}}_{j}\) at time t. A gap value of one means that the quality of institutions in MSAi is the same as in MSAj. Gap values greater than one reflect higher quality local institutions in the origin MSA. We focus on new stadium cost as the explanatory variable of interest and construct a similar gap measure based on inflation adjusted new stadium costs for MSA pairs averaged over matching 5-year periods.

Table B4 OLS results for 4-year migration with stadium construction costs and economic freedom

Table B4 presents the results of fixed effects OLS regression, controlling for economic freedom as a measure of institutional quality. Institutional quality does impact migration; however, these results once again fail to reject the null hypothesis that stadium construction influences migration. The confidence intervals around the construction expenditure variable are tightly bound to zero. Our point effects for economic freedom and income are in-line with the initial findings from Arif et al. (2020).

Tables B5 and B6 present the results of models in which we change the migration window from two or four years post-construction to the same year the stadium was built (Table B5) and two years before the stadium was completed (Table B6). Similar to our previous findings, stadium construction has no significant relationship with net migration. In the same year (Table B5) that the stadium opens, we observe a small increase in migratory inflows, but those are matched by an increase in migratory outflows.

Table B5 OLS results for same-year migration following new stadium construction
Table B6 OLS results for 2-year migration before new stadium construction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arif, I., Hoffer, A., Humphreys, B. et al. New sports facilities do not drive migration between US cities. Econ Gov 23, 195–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00271-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00271-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation