How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study

• Bana e Costa CA, Vansnick J-C (2001) A fundamental criticism to Saaty’s use of the eigenvalue procedure to derive priorities. Working Paper LSEOR 01.42. Retrieved December 2006 from http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/operationalResearch/research/workingPapers.htm

• Barzilai J (1997) Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. J Operat Res Soc (JORS) 48(12):1226–32

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barzilai J (1998) On the decomposition of the value function. Operat Res Lett 22(4–5):159–170

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barzilai J (2001a) Notes on the analytic hierarchy process. In: Proceedings of the NSF Design and Manufacturing Research Conference, pp 1–6

• Barzilai J (2001b) Basic principles of measurement. In: Proceedings of the IEEE inter-national conference on syst man cybern pp 395–400

• Barzilai J (2002) Notes on measurement and decision theory. In: Proceedings of the NSF design and manufacturing research conference, pp 1–11

• Barzilai J, Golany B (1990) Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices: the additive case. Operat Rese Lett 9:407–10

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barzilai J, Cook WD, Golany B (1987) Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operat Res Lett 6(1):131–134

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berekoven L, Eckert W, Ellenrieder P (2001) Marktforschung. Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung, 9. Auflage, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

• Blankmeyer E (1987) Approaches to consistency adjustments. J Optim Theory Appl 45:479–488

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brugha C (2000) Relative measurement and the power function. Eur J Operat Res 121(3):627–640

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Budescu DV, Zwick R, Rapoport A (1986) A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Appl Psychol Meas 10(1):69–78

  Google Scholar 

• Chu ATW, Kalabra RE, Spingarn KA (1979) A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J Optim Theory Appl 27:531–538

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cogger KO, Yu PL (1985) Eigenweight vectors and least distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios. J Optim Theory Appl 46:483–491

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cook WD, Kress M (1988) Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: an axiomatic approach. Eur J Operat Res 37:355–62

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crawford G, Williams C (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. J Math Psychol 29:387–405

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Golany B, Kress M (1993) A multicriteria evaluation of the methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. Eur J Operat Res 69:210–202

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (1989) The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  Google Scholar 

• Ishizaka A (2004) The advantages of clusters in AHP. In: The 15th Mini-Euro conference, MUDSM

• Ishizaka A, Lusti M (2003) An intelligent tutorial system for AHP. In: The šorić K, Hunjak T, Scitovski R (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on operational research KOI 2002, pp 215–223

• Ishizaka A, Lusti M (2004) An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices. Int Trans Operat Res 11(1):97–105

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jensen RE (1984) An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 28(3):317–332

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson CR, Beine WB, Wang TY (1979) Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure. J Math Psychol 18:61–64

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harker PT, Vargas L (1987) The theory of ratio scale estimation: saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 33(11):1383–1403

  Google Scholar 

• Lusti M (2002) Data warehousing und data mining, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  Google Scholar 

• Saaty ThL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saaty ThL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. Mac Gray-Hill, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Saaty ThL (2001a) Decision-making with the AHP: why is the Principal Eigenvector necessary? In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process (ISAHP 2001), pp 383–396

• Saaty ThL (2001b) The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. In: Köksalan M et al. (eds) Multiple criteria decision making in the new millennium. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference, MCDM. Lect. Notes Econ. Math. Syst. vol 507, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 15–37

• Saaty ThL (2003) Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary?. Eur J Operat Res 145:85–91

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saaty ThL, Vargas LG (1984a) Inconsistency and rank preservation. J Math Psychol 28:205–214

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saaty Th.L., Vargas L.G. (1984b) Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Math Model 5:309–324

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (1997), On the Measurement of Preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6:309–319

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shim JP (1989) Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Econ Plan Sci 23:161–167

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Takeda E, Cooger KO, Yu PL (1987) Estimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: a comparative study. Eur J Operat Res 29:360–369

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Triantaphyllou E, Pardalos PM, Mann SH (1990) A minimization approach to membership evaluation in fuzzy sets and error analysis. J Optim Theory Appl 66(2):275–287

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur J Operat Res 48(1):2–8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zahedi F (1986) The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications. Interface 16:96–108

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references