[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Historical Land-cover Conversion (1665–1820) in the Choptank Watershed, Eastern United States

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land-cover changes in the Choptank basin were estimated for 1665–1820 by using historical socioeconomic data and crop-rotation models. Socioeconomic data (human population, output per laborer, and crop yields) were obtained from the literature, whereas crop-rotation models, based on historical records, represented how agriculture was practiced. Model parameters and output were validated with export records, census data, and other historical records, and model errors were estimated to be approximately 5%. This approach indicated a sigmoidal pattern for conversion of primary forest to agricultural land by 1800. The initial time period, 1665–1720, was characterized by low-intensity tobacco and corn cultivation. Due to long fallows, the models indicated that there was little land in crops (approximately 5% of the region), but larger areas of secondary forest occurred on former cropland (approximately 15%). Although primary forest decreased, the initial result in the first 55 years was a low net rate of deforestation and occupation by low-intensity farms. However, after 1720, cropland expanded rapidly due to the use of wheat as a cash crop. From 1720 to 1775, primary and secondary forest rapidly disappeared, increasing agricultural land to 60% of the region. By 1800, approximately 80% was estimated to be converted to agriculture, and little primary forest remained. After 1800, the land needed for crops decreased due to improved management practices and crop yields, and some secondary forest on formerly cleared agricultural sites may have reappeared. We estimate that less than 150 years of European colonization resulted in virtually complete agriculturalization of a primarily forested landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Farmer. 1819–34. Weekly publication edited by J. J. Skinner. Baltimore (MD).

  2. Benitez, JA (2002) “Historical land cover changes (1665–2000) and impact on N and P export from the Choptank watershed.” PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland

  3. GS Brush (1984) ArticleTitleStratigraphic evidence of eutrophication in an estuary. Water Resour Res 20 531–41 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXkslynuro%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. GS Brush (1986) ArticleTitleGeology and paleoecology of Chesapeake Bay: a long-term monitoring tool for management. J Wash Acad Sci 76 146–460 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL28XmtVyis7s%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. GS Brush (1989) ArticleTitleRates and patterns of estuarine sediment accumulation. Limnol Oceanogr 34 1235–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. GS Brush (1997) History and impact of human activities on the Chesapeake Bay. RD Simpson NL Christensen Jr (Eds) Ecosystem function and human activities. Chapman and Hall New York 125–45

    Google Scholar 

  7. GS Brush FW Davis (1984) ArticleTitleStratigraphic evidence of human disturbance in an estuary. Quat Res (NY) 22 21–108

    Google Scholar 

  8. GS Brush C Lenk J Smith (1980) ArticleTitleThe natural forest of Maryland: an explanation of the vegetation map of Maryland. Ecol Monogr 50 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  9. LG Carr RR Menard LS Walsh (1991) Robert Cole’s world: agricultural society in early Maryland. University of Carolina Press Chapel Hill 362

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clements, PGE (1974) “From tobacco to grain: economic development on Marylands eastern shore”, 1660–1750. PhD Dissertation, University of Wisconsin. 188 p

  11. PGE Clements (1980) The Atlantic economy and colonial Maryland’s Eastern Shore: from tobacco to grain. Cornell University Press Ithaca 249

    Google Scholar 

  12. SR Cooper (1995) ArticleTitleChesapeake Bay watershed historical land use: impact on water quality diatom communities. Ecol Appl 5 703–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. SR Cooper GS Brush (1991) ArticleTitleLong-term history of Chesapeake Bay anoxia. Science 254 992–6 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK38Xms1KntA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. PH Cootner (1963) ArticleTitleThe role of the railroads in the United States economic growth. J Econ Hist 23 477–521

    Google Scholar 

  15. AO Craven (1965) ArticleTitleSoil exhaustion as a factor in the agricultural history of Virginia and Maryland 1606–1860. Univ Ill Stud Soc Sci 13 9–179

    Google Scholar 

  16. WS Currie KJ Nadelhoffer (2002) ArticleTitleThe imprint of land-use history: patterns of carbon and nitrogen in downed woody debris at the Harvard Forest. Ecosystems 5 446–60 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10021-002-1153-x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xnt1Wnt7o%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F Emory (1950) Queen Anne’s County, Maryland: its early history and development. Maryland Historical Society Baltimore 629

    Google Scholar 

  18. TR Fisher K-Y Lee H Berndt JA Benitez MN Mayers (1998) ArticleTitleHydrology and chemistry of the Choptank River basin in the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Water Air Soil Pollut 105 387–97 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005001525063 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXltlamsLg%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DR Foster (1992) ArticleTitleLand-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80 753–71

    Google Scholar 

  20. DR Foster G Motzkin B Slater (1998) ArticleTitleLand use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in Central New England. Ecosystems 1 96–119 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DR Foster T Zebryk . Schoonmaker A Lezberg (1992) ArticleTitlePost-settlement history of human land-use and vegetation dynamics of a Tsuga canadensis (hemlock) woodlot in central New England. J Ecol 80 773–86

    Google Scholar 

  22. JL Fuller DR Foster JS McLachlan N Drake (1998) ArticleTitleImpact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1 76–95 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. CP Gould (1913) The land system in Maryland, 1720–1765. Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore (MD) 106

    Google Scholar 

  24. LC Gray (1958) History of agriculture in the Southern United States to 1860, volumes 1 and 2. Publication no. 40. Carnegie Institution of Washington Washington (DC) 1086

    Google Scholar 

  25. LC Green RR Menard (1989) ArticleTitleLand, labor, and economies of scale in early Maryland: some limits to growth in the Chesapeake system of husbandry. J Econ Hist 49 407–8

    Google Scholar 

  26. D Grigg (1987) The industrial revolution and land transformation. M Wolman F Fournieer (Eds) Land transformation in agriculture. John Wiley and Sons New York 79–109 (SCOPE 32.)

    Google Scholar 

  27. LB Guo RM Gifford (2002) ArticleTitleSoil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biol 8 345–58 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. RM Harper (1918) ArticleTitleChanges in the forest area of New England in three centuries. J For 16 442–52

    Google Scholar 

  29. M Hu (1910) ArticleTitleThe use and abuse of the forest by the Virginia Indians. William Mary College Q Hist Mag 19 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  30. [ICPSR] Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1992. Historical, demographic, economic, and social data: the United States, 1790–1970 [computer file]. Ann Arbor (MI): Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

  31. Karinen, AE (1958) Numerical and distributional aspects of Maryland population 1631–1840. Dissertation, University of Maryland, 222 p

  32. A Kulikoff (1979) ArticleTitleThe economic growth of the eighteenth-century Chesapeake colonies. J Econ Hist 39 275–88

    Google Scholar 

  33. TP Martin (1935) ArticleTitleCotton and wheat in Anglo-American trade and politics, 1846–1852. J South Hist 1 293–319

    Google Scholar 

  34. GR Matlack (1997) ArticleTitleFour centuries of forest clearance and regeneration in the hinterland of a large city. J Biogeogr 24 281–95 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00108.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. JJ McCusker RR Menard (1991) The economy of British America (1607–1789). University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill 513

    Google Scholar 

  36. HM Miller (1986) ArticleTitleTransforming a “splendid and delightsome land”: colonist and ecological change in the Chesapeake 1607–1820. J Wash Acad Sci 76 173–87

    Google Scholar 

  37. G Motzkin WA Patterson III DR Foster (1999) ArticleTitleA historical perspective on pitch pine–scrub oak communities in the Connecticut Valley of Massachusetts. Ecosystems 2 255–73 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100219900073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. EM Noble (1920) History of the Caroline County, Maryland, from its beginning. JW Stowell Federalsburg (MD) 348

    Google Scholar 

  39. MM Norton TR Fisher (2000) ArticleTitleThe effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecol Engineer 14 337–62 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00060-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. EC Papenfuse Jr (1972) ArticleTitlePlanter behavior and economic opportunity in a staple economy. Agric Hist 46 297–312

    Google Scholar 

  41. JB Pascarella TA Mitchell MI Serrano JK Zimmerman (2000) ArticleTitleLand-use history and forest regeneration in the Cayey Mountains, Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 3 217–28 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s100210000021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. DO Percy (1997) Ax or plow? Significant colonial landscape alteration rates in the Maryland and Virginia tidewater. H Wheatley (Eds) Agriculture resource exploitation and environmental change: an expanding world—the European impact on the world history 1450–1800. Variorum Brookfield (VT) 160–68

    Google Scholar 

  43. CC Petit E Lambin (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term land-cover changes in the Belgian Ardennes (1775–1929): model-based reconstruction vs. historical maps. Global Change Biol 8 616–30 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00500.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. N Ramankutty JA Foley (1999) ArticleTitleEstimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands from 1850 to 1992. Global Ecol Biogeogr 8 381–96 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00141.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. WD Rasmussen (1975) Agriculture in the United States: a documentary history, volume 1. Random House New York 912

    Google Scholar 

  46. HC Rountree TE Davidson (1997) Eastern Shore Indians of Maryland and Virginia. University Press of Virginia Charlottesville 329

    Google Scholar 

  47. EWB Russell RB Davis RS Anderson TE Rhodes DS Anderson (1993) ArticleTitleRecent centuries of vegetation change in the glaciated north-eastern United States. J Ecol 81 647–64

    Google Scholar 

  48. JB Russo (1992) ArticleTitleA model planter: Edward Lloyd IV of Maryland, 1770–1796. William Mary Q 49 62–88

    Google Scholar 

  49. DW Schneider (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of European settlement and land use on regional patterns of similarity among Chesapeake forest. Bull Torrey Bot Club 123 223–39

    Google Scholar 

  50. GT Sharer (1976) ArticleTitleFlour milling in the growth of Baltimore, 1750–1830. Md Hist Mag 71 322–33

    Google Scholar 

  51. WL Silver R Ostertag AE Lugo (2000) ArticleTitleThe potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restor Ecol 8 394–418 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. IG Simmons (1987) Transformation of the land in pre-industrial time. M Wolman F Fournieer (Eds) Land transformation in agriculture. John Wiley and Sons . 45–77 (SCOPE 32.)

    Google Scholar 

  53. BE Smith PL Marks S Gardescu (1993) ArticleTitleTwo hundred years of forest cover changes in Tompkins County, New York. Bull Torrey Bot Club 120 229–47

    Google Scholar 

  54. N Stephenne EF Lambin (2001) ArticleTitleA dynamic simulation model of land-use changes in Sudano-shelian countries of Africa (SALU). Agric Ecosyst Environ 85 145–61 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00181-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. OC Stewart (1956) Fire as the first great force employed by man. W Thomas (Eds) Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. University of Chicago Press Chicago 115–33

    Google Scholar 

  56. GA Stiverson (1977) Poverty in a land of plenty: tenancy in eighteenth-century Maryland. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore (MD) 187

    Google Scholar 

  57. The Agricultural Museum (1810–12). Weekly publication edited by David Wiley [microfilm]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  58. O Tilghman (1915) History of Talbot County, Maryland, 1661–1861. Williams and Wilkins Baltimore (MD)

    Google Scholar 

  59. LS Walsh (1989) ArticleTitlePlantation management in the Chesapeake, 1620–1820. J Econ Hist 49 393–406

    Google Scholar 

  60. M Williams (1989) Americans and their forests: a historical geography. Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wiser, VD (1963) The movement for agricultural improvement in Maryland, 1785–1865. PhD Dissertation, Department of History, University of Maryland

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was primarily supported by NASA’s Land-Cover and Land-Use Change Program (LCLUC) through grants NAG5-6249 and carbon-0000-0075 to T.R.F., with supplementary support to J.A.B. from Horn Point Laboratory Graduate Research Funds. J.A.B. was supported by the Fulbright Foundation, the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) in Mexico, and the Autonomous University of Campeche (UAC), Mexico. We thank Robert Gardner, David Correll, Keith Eshleman, Richard Weismiller, and Phillip Townsend as PhD committee members for J.A.B., and Kent Mountford for a review of a previous version of this article. The comments of Dr. D. Foster and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved our article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science (UMCES), Cambridge, Maryland 21613, USA

    Jorge A. Benitez & Thomas R. Fisher

  2. Center for Ecology Fisheries and Oceanography of the Gulf of Mexico (EPOMEX), Autonomous University of Campeche (UAC), 24000 Campeche, Mexico

    Jorge A. Benitez

Authors
  1. Jorge A. Benitez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas R. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge A. Benitez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benitez, J., Fisher, T. Historical Land-cover Conversion (1665–1820) in the Choptank Watershed, Eastern United States . Ecosystems 7, 219–232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0228-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0228-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation